Photo via Reason

How Trump's Undermining of the Constitution Helped Cause a "Blue Tsunami"

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Somin, I. (2026, November 5). How Trump's Undermining of the Constitution Helped Cause a "Blue Tsunami". Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/11/05/how-trumps-undermining-of-the-constitution-ended-up-undermining-the-gop/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Reason · collected 2026-11-05 · by Ilya Somin

Quick Summary

Tuesday's election resulted in significant losses for Trump and the Republican Party as they lost control of both houses of Congress, often referred to as a "Blue Tsunami." Factors contributing to this defeat include unconstitutional actions regarding tariffs, the War in Iran, and immigration policies. Specifically, Trump’s imposition of high tariffs through various executive orders has raised consumer prices by approximately $700 billion over ten years, leading many voters to view these measures negatively due to economic impacts. Additionally, the ongoing Iran conflict without congressional authorization further angered voters; exit polls indicated that 74% of those surveyed cited the war as a crucial or important factor in their voting decisions and disapproved of Trump’s handling of it.
Written by AI on 2026-11-05, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In the 2026 U.S. midterm elections held on November 3, Democrats won control of both the House and Senate, marking a significant shift after years of Republican dominance. Despite President Donald Trump's unpopularity, Republicans had hoped to maintain their majority in Congress. However, factors such as Trump’s unconstitutional actions, notably his unilateral declaration of war against Iran, contributed to voter backlash. The election saw Democrats winning in traditionally red states like Texas and South Carolina, leading many analysts to describe it as a "Blue Tsunami." Post-election, there was internal blame-sharing within the Trump administration, with some insiders suggesting that certain cabinet members might face consequences for their roles during the midterm defeats.

Written for “Midterm Elections Results” on 2026-11-05, grounded in this article and the 754 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly left (beta estimate) Confidence high 2 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning: leans strongly left for article 131888 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-11-05

Story

📰 Midterm Elections Results
Politics · 755 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 8% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 6 of 36 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Free Press
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 0 of 23 claims Outlet record 97/100
CBC News
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 60/100
Blue wave Same event
Dawn
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 16 claims Outlet record 72/100
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 2 of 22 claims Outlet record 61/100
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 9 of 48 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles refer to different time frames of analysis post-midterm elections; Article A discusses potential outcomes and interpretations before the results, while Article B analyzes causes after the results are known.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 0 of 39 claims Outlet record 66/100
Persuasion
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 0 of 23 claims
Global News
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 3 of 50 claims Outlet record 63/100
The Hindu
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 0 of 6 claims Outlet record 77/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
52
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
4 of 52 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
755
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-05 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1161 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ilya Somin
31 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 In each case, he illegally tried to transform relatively narrow delegations to the executive into a blank check to impose tariffs at will.
🔮 I address a variety of counterarguments, including claims that voting for a lesser evil makes you morally complicit in that candidate's wrongdoing, arguments that it's better to cast a "protest vote" for a candidate that has no chance of winning, arguments based on the very low probability that your vote will be decisive, and more.
🔮 If Section 338 is still valid and does grant the kind of nearly unlimited authority Trump claims, that would violate the constitutional "nondelegation" doctrine, which restricts delegation of legislative power to the executive…
🔮 Today, in United States v. Alaska, federal district Judge Sharon Gleason ruled against the Trump administration's lawsuit seeking to block certification of Alaska Senate election results on the grounds that doing so might be necessary to prevent "voter confusion" caused by the presence of two candidates with very similar names on the ballot.
🔮 In the original series, the Klingons and Romulans are mostly depicted as evil and irreconcilable enemies of the Federation, in TNG the Klingons have become allies and there is hope that there will be peace with the Romulans, as well.
2026-10-31 · assertive framing · Sir Patrick Stewart, RIP
🔮 But I have a few additions and caveats that I will append after quoting a few key passages from Dan's post.
2026-10-30 · assertive framing · A Libertarian Perspective on the 2026 Election
🔮 I would add, as I did in this article, that invocations of emergency powers should be subject to nondeferential judicial review, to ensure that they are used only in the event of genuine emergencies, not bogus ones.
2026-10-30 · assertive framing · New Brennan Center Report on Curbing Executive Power
🔮 Some of those who vote for the "wrong" Dan Sullivan might rank the "right" one second.
🔮 It also adopts a properly restrictive definition of "rebellion" (which is one of the conditions that might justify federalization of the National Guard).
🔮 Today, the Trump Justice Department filed a federal lawsuit seeking to block Alaska Senate election results on the grounds they might be influenced by voter "confusion" between incumbent Republican Senator Dan S. Sullivan and a separate Republican candidate with a very similar name (Dan L. Sullivan).
Also by Ilya Somin
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 31 articles by Ilya Somin →

Topics

Congress Constitution GOP Republican the War in Iran

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 6× GOP ORG · 3× Americans NORP · 2× Congress ORG · 2× Canada GPE · 1× Iran GPE · 1× Republican NORP · 1× Ted Cruz PERSON · 1× Texas GPE · 1× the Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

The requirement of congressional authorization for the initiation of war is there to ensure that no one person can take the country to war on his own, and that any major military actions have broad public support, which can be essential to ensuring that we have the will and commitment needed to achieve victory against difficult opponents.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-05
🔮 In each case, he illegally tried to transform relatively narrow delegations to the executive into a blank check to impose tariffs at will.

Claims (52 extracted, 4 hedged)

On Tuesday, Trump and the Republican suffered a massive electoral defeat, losing control of both houses of Congress. asserted
Trump → suffer → Congress
Many have called it a "Blue Tsunami". asserted
Many → call → it
The defeat was caused by multiple factors. asserted
defeat → cause → factors
But Trump's unconstitutional actions on tariffs, the War in Iran, and immigration played a major role. asserted
actions → play → role
Violations of the Constitution don't always result in political setbacks for the perpetrators. asserted
Violations → result → perpetrators
But in this case they did "bigly." asserted
they → do → case
As Texas GOP Senator Ted Cruz put it, "Tariffs have made everything too expensive, and the Iran war has dragged on too long." This connection is perhaps most obvious in the case of tariffs. asserted
connection → put → tariffs
Since returning to power in January 2025, Trump has engaged in a series of massive tariff power grabs, repeatedly attempting to usurp congressional authority in this field, and use it to impose the highest tariff schedule since the Great Depression. asserted
Trump → return → Depression
He started with the IEEPA tariffs. asserted
He → start → tariffs
When the Supreme Court invalidated them, he tried again with Section 122 and Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, and the Section 338 tariffs against Canada. asserted
he → invalidate → Canada
In each case, he illegally tried to transform relatively narrow delegations to the executive into a blank check to impose tariffs at will. asserted
he → try → will
The net effect of these actions has been to raise prices for consumers, reduce economic growth, and impose some $700 billion in new taxes on Americans over a 10-year period (unless courts end up striking down the new tariffs, too). asserted
courts → raise → tariffs
The tariffs also failed to produce the promised increase manufacturing employment. asserted
tariffs → fail → employment
And most voters have come to realize that tariffs increase prices, and damage the economy. asserted
tariffs → come → economy
Exit polls reveal that 66% of voters believe Trump's tariffs have hurt the national economy (compared to only 21% who believe they helped), and a similar percentage (64%) believe they hurt the economy in their area (only 14% believe they helped it). asserted
they → reveal → it
Numerous other polls show widespread opposition to the tariffs, as well (e.g. here and here). asserted
polls → show → tariffs
They became a major issue in the elections, linked to the broader issues of price increases and "affordability." asserted
They → become → increases
Polls, pundits, and even Donald Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance all agree the Iran War was a major factor in GOP losses. asserted
War → agree → losses
The military stalemate combined with resulting energy price increases have enraged voters. asserted
stalemate → combine → voters
Exit polls showed that 74% of voters said the war was a "crucial" or "important" factor in their decisions, and the vast majority of them disapproved of Trump's conduct of it. asserted
majority → show → it
And, as I have argued from the beginning, that war is unconstitutional because it was never authorized by Congress. asserted
it → argue → Congress
As I warned at the start of the conflict, the failure to build up the public supported needed to secure congressional authorization greatly reduced the odds of success: asserted
failure → warn → success
The requirement of congressional authorization for the initiation of war is there to ensure that no one person can take the country to war on his own, and that any major military actions have broad public support, which can be essential to ensuring that we have the will and commitment needed to achieve victory against difficult opponents. asserted
we → ensure → opponents
Trump's failure to seek and secure that kind of broad public support has ensured that only about 27 percent of Americans approve of this military action, compared to 43 percent who disapprove, according to a Reuters poll. uncertain
who → seek → poll
Other surveys show similar results. asserted
surveys → show → results
This is a historically low level of public support at the start of a major military action and bodes ill for U.S. staying power if we suffer reverses or a prolonged conflict results. asserted
conflict → bode → reverses
I think that prediction has (so far at least) been vindicated by events. asserted
prediction → think → events
But, here too, various unconstitutional actions have damaged the GOP's political standing and hurt the party in the election. asserted
actions → damage → election
Trump's cruel mass deportation policies have made ICE by far the most the most unpopular federal agency (surpassing even the IRS) and alienated Hispanic voters in Texas and elsewhere; this was a key factor in the Republicans' defeat in that state. asserted
this → make → state
GOP immigration policies led many Hispanics who backed Trump and the GOP in 2024 to turn against them in 2026. asserted
who → lead → 2026
In part because of indefensible double standards in relevant Supreme Court precedent, courts permit a wide range of harsh and cruel conduct in immigration policy, that would be invalidated in any other context. asserted
that → permit → context
But many of Trump's policies went beyond even these overly permissive bounds. asserted
many → go → bounds
As a result, the administration has lost many thousands of immigration detention and deportation cases, including many on constitutional grounds, and many before GOP-appointed judges. asserted
administration → lose → judges
Trump's immigration crackdown has violated the Constitution in various other ways, as well, as in the case of his use of an absurdly broad definition of "invasion" in order to justify detaining and deporting even legal migrants without due process. asserted
crackdown → violate → process
In all three of these cases, voter backlash arose primarily because of the awful - and highly visible - practical consequences, rather than because of the constitutional issues themselves. asserted
backlash → arise → issues
Most voters care far more about military failure, rising prices, and visible cruelty of these policies than about their legality. asserted
voters → care → legality
Nonetheless, it is still true that unconstitutional conduct played a major role in causing the tsunami that swept away many GOP officeholders. asserted
that → play → officeholders
It would be a mistake to assume that unconstitutional policies always lead to electoral punishment, or even usually do so. asserted
policies → assume → punishment
In many cases, voters are unaware of illegality or don't give it much weight if they do find out. asserted
they → give → weight
Previous presidents have often avoided significant political backlash for violating the Constitution. asserted
presidents → avoid → Constitution
…and 12 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support