AI crisis heightens the stakes of Xi’s visit to Washington
-
asserted
crisis → heighten → Washington
Click here to listen to this article -
- China’s spy chief warned that runaway AI capabilities could threaten Communist Party control.
-
uncertain
capabilities → click → control
President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed to begin talks on artificial intelligence safety during Trump’s visit to Beijing in the spring.
asserted
Trump → agree → spring
A growing sense of urgency over the risks posed by artificial intelligence is adding pressure on the Trump administration to secure a diplomatic breakthrough with China when President Xi Jinping travels to the White House for a state visit next week.
asserted
Jinping → grow → visit
Expectations for a deal that establishes guardrails on AI are low on both sides, which continue to drive a headlong race toward potentially unfathomable intelligence capabilities.
asserted
which → establish → capabilities
Ahead of the meeting, rhetoric from Washington and Beijing has underscored only deepening acrimony and distrust over their rush to dominate the technological frontier.
asserted
rhetoric → underscore → frontier
But an article published this week by Beijing’s spy chief, warning that runaway AI capabilities could threaten Communist Party control, caught the attention of the Trump administration.
uncertain
capabilities → publish → administration
One U.S. official told The Times that the blunt assessment accurately reflects private thinking inside Xi’s government about the growing risks.
asserted
assessment → tell → risks
Still, within President Trump’s team, divisions persist over whether to negotiate with China at all.
asserted
divisions → persist → China
Top U.S. officials doubt whether any agreement could be credibly enforced or verified.
uncertain
agreement → doubt → ?
Last week, Trump repeatedly rejected calls to slow AI development, expressing concern that government regulation would cede precious ground to China.
asserted
regulation → reject → China
And a high-profile U.S. debate over AI safety, kicked off last week by a warning from an AI researcher, prompted a defensive response from Beijing, where a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson accused Washington of “fearmongering, confrontation and vicious competition.”
asserted
spokesperson → kick → fearmongering
The U.S. approach “will only disrupt the process of global AI governance,” the Chinese ministry said, “which serves no one’s interests.”
asserted
which → disrupt → interests
The rapid development of artificial intelligence has sparked renewed debate about its risks, with both the United States and China expressing concerns.
asserted
States → spark → concerns
Some American AI companies — led by Anthropic and OpenAI, the most advanced in the field thus far — are beginning to use their most sophisticated models to train the next generation, in a process known as recursive self-improvement.
asserted
companies → lead → improvement
Researchers and industry experts believe the first company to master it could set off an exponential cycle of progress, pulling so far ahead that competitors can no longer catch up.
uncertain
competitors → believe → progress
But those same companies also fear what they are creating: machines capable of continuously improving their own intelligence, pushing AI development beyond human control.
asserted
they → fear → control
“The point of recursive self-improvement is the most likely candidate for the point of no return,” said Connor Leahy, U.S. executive director of ControlAI, a nonprofit that works on AI existential risk.
asserted
that → say → risk
The group has advised Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act.
asserted
group → advise → Act
Slow progress with China
Elements of the Trump administration have been spooked by frontier models, reversing course over the summer to support a loose federal framework governing the release of the country’s most advanced AI systems.
asserted
Elements → spook → systems
China already has a similar process in place.
asserted
China → have → place
Trump and Xi agreed to begin talks on AI safety during the U.S. president’s visit to Beijing this spring, suggesting a strategic alignment could emerge to address the threat.
uncertain
alignment → agree → threat
But progress has been slow, with Trump accusing China of fueling domestic opposition in the United States to the data centers powering AI development.
asserted
Trump → accuse → development
The White House is considering whether to host a meeting with AI executives on the sidelines of its summit with Xi next week — but the Chinese would not be invited, an official said.
asserted
official → consider → Xi
“The two sides were supposed to have at least one dialogue meeting before next week’s summit.
asserted
sides → suppose → summit
This now appears entirely unlikely, and it’s not clear how much AI safety will feature in the meeting between the two leaders,” said Scott Kennedy, a senior advisor on Chinese business and economics at the Center for Strategic & International Studies.
asserted
Kennedy → appear → Studies
“This stalemate in setting the agenda is creating a vacuum of leadership on one of these most consequential issues.
asserted
stalemate → set → issues
The result may mean few if any guardrails on AI and the global competition,” Kennedy added.
uncertain
Kennedy → mean → AI
“Although not great for much of the world, that outcome likely suits both Trump and Xi just fine.”
asserted
outcome → suit → Trump
Publicly, China has presented a different vision than private U.S. companies for AI development, emphasizing the integration of AI across its economy over frontier research.
asserted
China → present → research
That has allowed Chinese diplomats to argue that the United States, not China, is driving the most dangerous advances in AI.
asserted
States → allow → AI
But U.S. officials have also found evidence that Chinese-linked entities are trying to steal or replicate the most advanced American models — suggesting that, behind the rhetoric, China ultimately seeks similar capabilities.
asserted
China → find → capabilities
“While it’s undoubtedly true that the CCP wouldn’t take kindly to an uncontrollable AI undermining its rule, it would be a huge leap to conclude that Beijing would think of this as an international issue requiring a negotiated solution, particularly from a perceived position of disadvantage,” said Daniel Remler, a senior fellow with the Technology and National Security Program at the Center for a New American Security.
asserted
Remler → ’ → Security
“The Trump administration seems ready to engage, but rightfully cautious.”
asserted
administration → seem → ?
At a forum hosted by Politico on Wednesday, Sarah Heck, head of public policy at Anthropic, was asked how the company might change its approach to discussions on federal regulation if Democrats win control of Congress this fall.
uncertain
Democrats → host → Congress
She pivoted to a broader concern, that U.S. attempts to address AI safety will be futile if China wins the race.
asserted
China → pivot → race
“There’s something that’s really important that everybody hears from Anthropic, and I think the president has said this many, many times: The United States needs to stay in the lead on AI,” Heck said.
asserted
Heck → ’ → AI
“You cannot do safety from second place.
asserted
You → do → place
You just can’t do it.”
asserted
You → do → it
A major capability leap in January
Chatbots such as ChatGPT learn to answer questions or write poetry from analyzing patterns in vast amounts of data.
asserted
Chatbots → learn → data
…and 33 more, not listed.
The Aporia
