Photo via Fox News

There is a way to fix Social Security. And the solution might surprise you

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

Jenkin, T. (2026, September 18). There is a way to fix Social Security. And the solution might surprise you. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/way-fix-social-security-solution-might-surprise-you

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-09-18 · by Ted Jenkin

Quick Summary

The article discusses potential solutions to address future funding shortages of Social Security rather than its current solvency crisis. It proposes raising the taxable wage cap to $400,000, incrementally increasing the payroll tax rate from 6.2% to 7.2%, and gradually raising the full retirement age to 70 for individuals born after 1990. These measures aim to bolster Social Security's financial stability without drastic immediate changes.
Written by AI on 2026-09-18, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Social Security's financial challenges have been a recurring concern, but the system is not set to run out of funds completely; rather, it will face difficulties in generating enough revenue to cover all scheduled benefits. One proposed solution to stabilize Social Security involves raising the taxable wage cap from $184,500 to $400,000 for both employees and employers who currently pay a combined 6.2% tax on earnings below the current cap. This adjustment would expose additional wages above $184,500 up to $400,000 to Social Security taxes, helping address the fund's long-term solvency issues as high-income earners currently contribute less proportionally than lower and middle-income workers.

Written for “Social Security Reform Proposal” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Social Security Reform Proposal
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 2% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Independent
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 2 of 24 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Social Security reform and public opinion, without describing the same specific incident or occurrence.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
57
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
2%
1 of 57 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
68/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-18 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 6569 article(s) · 13 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 13 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ted Jenkin
7 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 So yes, your parents may have had a 14% mortgage.
🔮 And it may offer some of the worst bets in America.
🔮 Even if its trust fund reserves are depleted, millions of workers will still be paying Social Security taxes every payday.
🔮 Here are five more ways successful Americans could increasingly find themselves paying even more.
🔮 Cato estimates those proposals could cost somewhere between $71 trillion and $212 trillion over the next decade.
🔮 We have promised ourselves a government we aren't currently willing to pay for.
🔮 At 35 years old, you might have a mortgage, two kids, a six-figure salary and an MBA degree hanging on the wall.
Also by Ted Jenkin
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 7 articles by Ted Jenkin →

Topics

Americans Congress Medicare Social Security Washington

Subjects

Social Security ORG · 17× Americans NORP · 2× Democrats NORP · 2× Congress ORG · 1× Medicare ORG · 1× Republicans NORP · 1× Washington GPE · 1×

Narrative

1. Raise the Social Security wage cap to $400,000 In 2026, employees pay 6.2% into Social Security, and employers contribute another 6.2%, but the tax stops once wages reach $184,500.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-18
🔮 Even if its trust fund reserves are depleted, millions of workers will still be paying Social Security taxes every payday.

Claims (57 extracted, 1 hedged)

Every few months, another headline tells Americans that Social Security is going broke. asserted
Security → tell → Americans
Social Security isn't going to wake up one morning with zero dollars coming through the door. asserted
dollars → go → door
Even if its trust fund reserves are depleted, millions of workers will still be paying Social Security taxes every payday. asserted
millions → deplete → taxes
The problem is that those taxes eventually won't generate enough money to pay 100% of scheduled benefits. asserted
taxes → generate → benefits
So, let's stop pretending Social Security can't be fixed. asserted
Security → let → ?
You're just probably not going to like the fix. asserted
You → go → fix
Here are three changes Washington should seriously consider. asserted
Washington → consider → ?
1. Raise the Social Security wage cap to $400,000 In 2026, employees pay 6.2% into Social Security, and employers contribute another 6.2%, but the tax stops once wages reach $184,500. asserted
wages → raise → 184,500
Someone making $100,000 pays Social Security tax on every dollar. asserted
Someone → make → dollar
Someone making $1 million doesn't. asserted
Someone → make → million
That's going to become increasingly difficult politically and mathematically to defend. asserted
That → go → ?
For somebody earning $400,000, that would expose another $215,500 of wages to Social Security taxes. asserted
that → earn → taxes
It also doesn’t make Social Security an infinite tax like Medicare. asserted
Security → make → Medicare
At today's 12.4% combined employee-employer rate, that's potentially another $26,722 annually flowing into the system from that worker and employer combined. asserted
that → combine → worker
Depending on exactly how Congress structured the change, we're potentially talking about well over $1 trillion of additional revenue over a decade. asserted
we → depend → decade
Higher earners won't like it. asserted
earners → like → it
I wouldn't like paying it either. asserted
I → like → it
But Social Security needs revenue. asserted
Security → need → revenue
It’s called a compromise. asserted
It → call → ?
Take the 6.2% tax to 7.2%, one-tenth at a time Here's the second part politicians really won't want to advertise. asserted
politicians → take → time
Everyone needs some skin in the game. asserted
Everyone → need → game
Employers would see a corresponding gradual increase. asserted
Employers → see → increase
For someone earning $75,000, the first increase amounts to about $75 for the entire year. asserted
increase → earn → year
Ten years later, the employee would be paying an additional $750 annually at today's income. asserted
employee → pay → income
Higher earners won't like it. asserted
earners → like → it
I wouldn't like paying it either. asserted
I → like → it
But Social Security needs revenue. asserted
Security → need → revenue
It’s called a compromise. asserted
It → call → ?
Nobody enjoys paying more taxes. asserted
Nobody → enjoy → taxes
But slowly adjusting the rate over a decade gives workers and businesses time to adapt. asserted
adjusting → adjust → time
If you were born after 1990, 70 becomes the new 67 asserted
70 → bear → 1990
Now comes the third rail. asserted
rail → come → ?
Today's full retirement age is 67 for people born in 1960 or later. asserted
age → bear → 1960
Don't change the deal for someone who's 62 and has spent their entire working life planning around 67. asserted
who → change → 67
If you were born after 1990, gradually move full retirement age to 70. asserted
you → bear → 70
Someone born in 1991 turns 35 this year. asserted
Someone → bear → 1991
They have decades to plan for the change. asserted
They → have → change
People are living longer than generations before them. asserted
People → live → them
If we're going to make Social Security financially sustainable for another generation, the retirement-age math eventually has to reflect longevity. asserted
math → go → longevity
In the end, nobody gets a free lunch Here's the political problem. asserted
problem → get → lunch
…and 17 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support