Photo via CBS News

Will AI Harm Humans? Poll finds Americans want to slow development but not stop

Read the original at CBS News ↗
Cite

Salvanto, A., Pinto, J. D., & Backus, F. (2026, September 18). Will AI Harm Humans? Poll finds Americans want to slow development but not stop. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/will-a-i-harm-humans-opinion-poll/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

CBS News · collected 2026-09-18 · by Anthony Salvanto, Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus

Quick Summary

A CBS News/YouGov poll conducted between September 16-18, 2026, found that while Americans acknowledge the potential benefits of AI in areas like medical breakthroughs and efficiency at work, they are predominantly pessimistic about its broader impact due to concerns over job displacement and autonomous harm. The survey indicates a preference for slowing down AI development rather than halting it entirely, emphasizing a shared responsibility between companies and government in managing risks while ensuring competitiveness with nations like China.
Written by AI on 2026-09-18, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

A recent CBS News poll reveals most Americans are concerned about the potential harms from AI, yet they do not want to halt its development entirely. The survey finds that a majority worries about AI models acting independently to harm people or being used by humans for harmful purposes. Despite these concerns, respondents believe that developing AI is necessary for the U.S. to stay competitive with countries like China, and it could lead to significant medical and scientific advancements. However, Americans also think both companies and the government should play a role in managing AI risks. The poll indicates that people are skeptical about tech companies regulating themselves responsibly, leading to increased support for government-imposed restrictions on AI development.

Written for “AI Development Concerns Poll” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Development Concerns Poll
Technology · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
Reason
Hedges 1 of 17 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles discuss related topics concerning AI but describe different discussions or polls, not the same specific incident.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 3 of 26 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of public opinion towards AI, with Article A focusing on President Trump's handling of AI and Article B focusing on Americans' concerns about the development and regulation of AI.”
The Dispatch
Hedges 5 of 32 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI concerns; Article A focuses on an Anthropic researcher's resignation over AI safety, while Article B reports on a poll about American public opinion on AI development and regulation.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles describe different perspectives on AI development, with Article A focusing on political and business leaders' views during a panel discussion, while Article B reports on public opinion from a poll conducted later.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 6 of 17 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss related concerns about AI but describe different aspects and perspectives, not the same specific incident.”
BBC News
Hedges 6 of 33 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI concerns and opinions; Article A reports on a poll about public sentiment while Article B focuses on reactions from AI workers in major firms.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 2 of 14 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss similar themes but describe different specific events or perspectives on AI development and regulation, not the same incident.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 3 of 71 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI without referencing the same specific incident or time.”
The Straits Times
Hedges 2 of 13 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different perspectives on AI risks but describe separate events with distinct sources and dates.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
23
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
2 of 23 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
66/100
CBS News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-18 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

CBS News · 4465 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Anthony Salvanto
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 If more Republicans decide to vote, it could certainly change.
🔮 Collins is drawing enough voters and enough of Maine's Democrats, while she is bolstered by those who say they're voting more on state matters than national ones, to keep the race at a tie. And she has an edge on who would bring back more federal funds to Maine.
🔮 In this case, they might perceive action as being in US interests - or, it's that Republicans are listening to administration's around the situation.
🔮 Mr. Trump is so much on voters' minds that if this view holds at these levels through Election Day, it would surpass This is also an election set against a wide backdrop of uncertainty on many fronts: The economy, inflation, conflict overseas, and even AI's impact.
🔮 Like any powerful new technology, Americans understand that AI could be used for good or bad.
Also by Anthony Salvanto
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
Jennifer De Pinto
4 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Collins is drawing enough voters and enough of Maine's Democrats, while she is bolstered by those who say they're voting more on state matters than national ones, to keep the race at a tie. And she has an edge on who would bring back more federal funds to Maine.
🔮 Mr. Trump is so much on voters' minds that if this view holds at these levels through Election Day, it would surpass This is also an election set against a wide backdrop of uncertainty on many fronts: The economy, inflation, conflict overseas, and even AI's impact.
🔮 Those who would favor a new data center in their area overwhelmingly think they are necessary for the U.S. to compete with other countries.
🔮 Like any powerful new technology, Americans understand that AI could be used for good or bad.
Also by Jennifer De Pinto
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
Fred Backus
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 If more Republicans decide to vote, it could certainly change.
🔮 Collins is drawing enough voters and enough of Maine's Democrats, while she is bolstered by those who say they're voting more on state matters than national ones, to keep the race at a tie. And she has an edge on who would bring back more federal funds to Maine.
🔮 Of those who think abortion should be legal in all or most cases, most would nevertheless set restrictions on when during a pregnancy an abortion should take place.
🔮 Mr. Trump is so much on voters' minds that if this view holds at these levels through Election Day, it would surpass This is also an election set against a wide backdrop of uncertainty on many fronts: The economy, inflation, conflict overseas, and even AI's impact.
🔮 Like any powerful new technology, Americans understand that AI could be used for good or bad.
Also by Fred Backus
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Americans CBS News China U.S. YouGov

Subjects

Americans NORP · 3× U.S. GPE · 3× CBS News ORG · 1× China GPE · 1× Current Population Survey ORG · 1× U.S. Census ORG · 1× YouGov ORG · 1×

Narrative

One difference between the more optimistic and pessimistic people has to do with perceived economic impact: Those who think AI is poised to take jobs are more pessimistic on other aspects about it.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-18
🔮 Like any powerful new technology, Americans understand that AI could be used for good or bad.

Claims (23 extracted, 2 hedged)

Like any powerful new technology, Americans understand that AI could be used for good or bad. uncertain
AI → understand → good
There is optimism on some fronts — but pessimism outweighs it today. asserted
pessimism → be → it
Most Americans do worry AI models will act on their own to harm people, and even more that models will be used by people to harm others. asserted
models → worry → others
Yet Americans do not want to stop AI altogether, because most do think the U.S. needs to develop AI to be competitive, and must do so faster than China. asserted
U.S. → want → China
They also think that it can lead to medical and scientific breakthroughs. asserted
it → think → breakthroughs
So it's a matter of containing and managing it. asserted
it → contain → it
But who should do this? asserted
who → do → this
People tend not to think AI companies will manage it responsibly by themselves, which leads to a wider call for government restrictions. asserted
which → tend → restrictions
One difference between the more optimistic and pessimistic people has to do with perceived economic impact: Those who think AI is poised to take jobs are more pessimistic on other aspects about it. asserted
AI → have → it
Views don't closely follow age or partisanship. asserted
Views → follow → age
But the U.S. needs it to compete. asserted
U.S. → need → it
Companies and the government share responsibility. asserted
Companies → share → responsibility
And more see a government role to restrict, not promote, AI development. asserted
more → see → development
However, there's at least some optimism about AI making helpful discoveries in medical treatments and making tasks easier. asserted
tasks → be → treatments
That, combined with the perceived need to compete, means very few think AI should be stopped completely. asserted
AI → combine → need
Rather, they say, slow down. asserted
they → say → ?
There continues to be wide concern AI will take jobs. asserted
AI → continue → jobs
This has been a long-standing concern in previous polling. asserted
This → stand → polling
This concern is especially pronounced among people who think the government should restrict AI use, rather than promote it. asserted
government → pronounce → it
At the same time, more workers think it will make their jobs easier to do than harder, even if they tend to think it will reduce, rather than increase the number of jobs overall. asserted
it → think → jobs
And so on balance, it's seen as creating more problems than it solves. asserted
it → see → problems
This CBS News/YouGov survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 2,051 U.S. adults interviewed between September 16-18, 2026. asserted
survey → conduct → September
The sample was weighted to be representative of adults nationwide according to gender, age, race, and education, based on the U.S. Census American Community Survey and Current Population Survey, as well as 2024 presidential vote. uncertain
sample → weight → Survey
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support