Photo via New York Post

There’s a prudent path forward for AI — and pols need to push it over politics

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Hammer, J. (2026, September 19). There’s a prudent path forward for AI — and pols need to push it over politics. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/09/18/opinion/theres-a-prudent-path-forward-for-ai-and-pols-need-to-push-it-over-politics/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-09-19 · by Josh Hammer

Quick Summary

Politico reports on how political figures are using fears about artificial intelligence (AI) to gain support in upcoming midterm elections, despite recent polls indicating that many Americans view AI negatively and see it as potentially harmful. A new Politico poll reveals that 63% of Americans believe AI could destroy humanity, up from a more balanced opinion last December. Politicians like Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon are joining forces at anti-AI events, while former President Barack Obama encourages Democrats to emphasize AI regulation during campaigns. The article argues against pandering to these fears and instead advocates for demonstrating leadership in the face of such moral panics.
Written by AI on 2026-09-19, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

A recent Politico poll shows that 63% of Americans believe AI has the potential to "destroy humanity," with majorities from both Democrats and Republicans echoing this fear. This stark change in public opinion occurred within a year, as a December 2025 Navigator Research poll found Americans equally split on their views toward AI data centers. The shift is partly attributed to statements by industry leaders like Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, who warned of the dangers of unregulated AI development, and calls for an industry slowdown from figures such as Elon Musk.

Written for “AI Policy Debate” on 2026-10-30, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Policy Debate
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 15% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 10 of 37 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI regulation and public perception without describing the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Reason
Hedges 1 of 17 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles discuss related topics around AI risks and regulation but describe different discussions and contexts, not the same specific incident.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 2 of 44 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI policy among Democrats and public opinion, rather than describing the same specific incident.”
NBC News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 41 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI policy responses and public sentiment towards AI, without clearly describing the same specific incident.”
AI loses a Dallas debate Different event
Semafor
Hedges 1 of 19 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different events: one reports on a debate about immigration and AI, while the other discusses public opinion polls regarding AI's potential risks.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 6 of 33 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A discusses specific organizations backed by Anthropic allies, while Article B comments on public sentiment and political strategies regarding AI.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 5 of 52 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss different uses of AI and do not describe the same specific incident or outcome.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss AI as an election issue but describe different aspects: one focuses on public opinion polls, while the other discusses political strategists' reactions.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss similar topics related to political discussions on AI but describe different aspects and times, not the same specific incident.”
BBC News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 53 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the AI regulation debate, with Article A focusing on President Trump's response and opposition from Congress and AI sector leaders, while Article B addresses public sentiment and political maneuvering around AI ahead of midterm elections.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
39
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
15%
6 of 39 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-19 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 15208 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Josh Hammer
6 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Given the stark dichotomy of the moment, let’s fervently hope that will be more than enough to prevail in the elections this Tuesday.
🔮 On Sunday’s edition of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” host Kristen Welker asked Democratic Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed if he would “set the record straight” on his alleged ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.
🔮 The anti-Israel press may have downplayed the harrowing affair as a “pilot altercation,” but the fact is a Muslim pilot tried to crash a plane full of Jews.
🔮 The deal was widely ridiculed: Critics called it “Seward’s Folly,” after secretary of state and lead negotiator William Seward.
🔮 A new poll from Politico has the grisly details: 63% of Americans think AI has the potential to “destroy humanity.” A majority of both Democrats and Republicans now think AI could herald the apocalypse. That’s quite a sea change in less than a year: In December 2025, a poll from Navigator Research found Americans split roughly equally among those favoring data centers, opposing data centers or ambivalent.
Also by Josh Hammer
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 6 articles by Josh Hammer →

Topics

Americans DMV Democrats Politico Republicans

Subjects

Americans NORP · 3× Democrats NORP · 2× Politico ORG · 2× Anthropic ORG · 1× DMV ORG · 1× Dario Amodei PERSON · 1× Navigator Research ORG · 1× OpenAI ORG · 1× Republicans NORP · 1× Sam Altman PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Days before the new Politico poll, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei stressed the same existential stakes, arguing AI industry titans “owe it to humanity to try” to slow down the Frankenstein’s monster they’ve unleashed on the masses.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-19
🔮 A new poll from Politico has the grisly details: 63% of Americans think AI has the potential to “destroy humanity.” A majority of both Democrats and Republicans now think AI could herald the apocalypse. That’s quite a sea change in less than a year: In December 2025, a poll from Navigator Research found Americans split roughly equally among those favoring data centers, opposing data centers or ambivalent.

Claims (39 extracted, 6 hedged)

The time-tested solution? Find a scapegoat, go negative and blame the other side. asserted
solution → test → side
This year the weaponized bogeyman is artificial intelligence. asserted
bogeyman → weaponize → ?
Many Americans are falling for the anti-AI information operation. asserted
Americans → fall → operation
A new poll from Politico has the grisly details: 63% of Americans think AI has the potential to “destroy humanity.” A majority of both Democrats and Republicans now think AI could herald the apocalypse. That’s quite a sea change in less than a year: In December 2025, a poll from Navigator Research found Americans split roughly equally among those favoring data centers, opposing data centers or ambivalent. uncertain
Americans → have → centers
It’s not hard to figure out what happened. asserted
what → ’ → ?
Days before the new Politico poll, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei stressed the same existential stakes, arguing AI industry titans “owe it to humanity to try” to slow down the Frankenstein’s monster they’ve unleashed on the masses. asserted
they → stress → masses
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has a “sociopathic lack of concern” for humanity, according to a loose-lipped company board member. uncertain
Altman → have → member
Elon Musk is calling for an industry slowdown, too. asserted
Musk → call → slowdown
AI industry leaders seem to have settled on a message: Our product is going to kill your job, and it might end all of humanity, but trust us and do what we say anyway. uncertain
we → seem → what
It’s not often that you see industry leaders fan the flames of a moral panic ignited by their own product. asserted
leaders → ’ → product
Harvard Business School should offer a case study on how not to market and sell one’s wares, starring Amodei and Altman. asserted
School → offer → Amodei
Unsurprisingly, given the polling, prominent figures across the political spectrum have found common cause on AI regulation. asserted
figures → give → regulation
This week, Soviet Union-honeymooning communist Bernie Sanders and MAGA maestro Steve Bannon spoke at the same anti-AI confab in Washington, DC. asserted
Sanders → honeymoon → Washington
That’s why Barack Obama wants Democrats to emphasize AI regulation on the campaign trail. asserted
Democrats → ’ → trail
Data centers could cost Republican John Husted his reelection to the Senate in Ohio. uncertain
centers → cost → Ohio
And they could harm Democrat Cait Conley in her run against Mike Lawler in New York’s swingy 17th Congressional District. uncertain
they → harm → District
But here’s the thing: Many moral panics aren’t based in reality. asserted
panics → ’ → reality
The Salem witch trials weren’t based in sound reason — nor, in more recent memory, were the lockdowns, school closures and mask mandates of COVID-19. asserted
lockdowns → base → COVID-19
For that matter, what is the current AI doomsaying if not a form of digital COVID? asserted
doomsaying → doomsaye → COVID
The way out of a baseless moral panic is not to pander to the mob. asserted
way → pander → mob
It is to demonstrate leadership. asserted
It → demonstrate → leadership
That’s why we remember Abraham Lincoln and his appeals to natural rights — and not Stephen Douglas, who pleaded for might-makes-right “popular sovereignty.” uncertain
might → ’ → sovereignty
Trump is making a similar case today. asserted
Trump → make → case
This week, he dismissed the AI moral panic as a “hoax.” asserted
he → dismiss → hoax
That’s leadership. asserted
That → ’ → ?
As the 18th-century conservative British statesman Edmund Burke once said, “Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he betrays, instead of serving you, if he sacrifices it to your opinion.” asserted
he → say → opinion
Majority sentiment certainly matters, and a dose of populism isn’t just healthy — it’s vital. asserted
it → matter → populism
A society where the elites are wildly out of touch with the commoners is not a society built to last. asserted
elites → build → commoners
After all, eugenics, forced sterilizations and anti-miscegenation laws were all once broadly popular. asserted
eugenics → force → ?
None of this is to say there aren’t valid concerns with AI. asserted
None → say → AI
AI models should not tell a troubled teen girl how to harm herself; the algorithms must not help a man rob the local bank. But the data-center backlash is silly and misplaced. asserted
backlash → tell → bank
Taken to its logical conclusion, shutting down all data centers would end the internet itself. asserted
shutting → take → internet
Prudence is a long-forgotten word in the Western political lexicon. asserted
Prudence → forget → lexicon
Aristotle referred to it as the queen of the virtues and the essence of statesmanship; Lincoln exhibited it in spades. asserted
Lincoln → refer → spades
It’s what we desperately need, amidst our crippling AI civil war. asserted
we → ’ → war
And a full, industry-wide innovation shutdown would be nothing short of suicidal. In the short term, the AI doomsayers are likely to prevail. asserted
doomsayers → prevail → term
Trump’s robustly pro-AI stance won’t help Republicans this November. asserted
stance → help → Republicans
But history books aren’t written on the outcome of a single election. asserted
books → write → election
We forget that at our own peril. asserted
We → forget → peril
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support