Photo via New York Post

How taxpayers were taken for a ride on the train to nowhere

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

CA Post Editorial Board. (2026, September 20). How taxpayers were taken for a ride on the train to nowhere. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/09/19/opinion/it-should-be-the-end-of-the-line-for-california-high-speed-rail/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-09-20 · by CA Post Editorial Board

Quick Summary

The California High Speed Rail Authority has come under scrutiny for allowing consultants to collect over $680,000 in questionable travel reimbursements, including first-class airfare and luxury transportation services like private jets and Uber Black rides. This comes as the project faces a projected budget shortfall by 2027, with an estimated total cost of $231 billion compared to initial promises of $45 billion. Critics argue that funding should be halted given the lack of tangible progress and overuse of taxpayer money.
Written by AI on 2026-09-20, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The California High-Speed Rail project, intended to connect Los Angeles and San Francisco, is under scrutiny for significant mismanagement and misuse of public funds. An Inspector General's report revealed that four consulting firms received over $2 million in travel-related reimbursements between June 2024 and April 2026, with nearly half a million dollars spent on questionable expenses like tiki bars, cigar lounges, nightclubs, and escape rooms. Additionally, the project faces mounting delays and financial troubles; its budget is projected to run dry by 2027. The Inspector General found that $81,000 was not compliant with state travel rules, while another $543,400 did not meet contractual requirements, highlighting systemic issues within the rail authority's governance structure. This scandal has intensified public frustration and calls for the project to be halted due to ongoing mismanagement and waste of taxpayer money.

Written for “California High Speed Rail Scandal” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 California High Speed Rail Scandal
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
Hedges 2 of 23 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss similar issues with misuse of funds in the California High-Speed Rail project but describe different aspects and timeframes, suggesting they are not reporting on the exact same incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
19
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
2 of 19 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-20 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 15868 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

CA Post Editorial Board
70 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 This year, it might be tempting to think that your vote matters even less.
🔮 Good: Admitting the need for change — obvious though it may be — is the first step toward a safer, stronger, more livable LA.
🔮 It might just work, because Becerra may think he has an excuse to continue funding it, under new leadership.
🔮 Even former Obama administration staffers were appalled that he might move ahead to the general election.
🔮 But socialist City Councilwoman Nithya Raman is an extremist who will make things even worse.
🔮 Dolores Huerta, who died Wednesday at the age of 96, will always be remembered as a towering figure in the history of the American labor movement.
🔮 Instead, it will only link a couple of towns in the Central Valley, at a cost of over $200 billion, by 2032 at the earliest.
🔮 And if the 20,000 number — which Essayli called “the floor” — turns out to be to accurate, that would be an even more explosive revelation about how far our elections have fallen.
🔮 And parents, and not schools, may be left to grapple with years of fallout from a kid’s “exploration” of gender dysphoria.
🔮 The socialist city councilwoman, who’s running to “fail up” to the mayor’s office, has proposed a new plan that has the potential to incur new, hampering costs on a city already suffering from a $1 billion budget deficit.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Also by CA Post Editorial Board
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 70 articles by CA Post Editorial Board →

Topics

Black California The California Post App Uber the California Post

Subjects

California GPE · 2× Bakersfield GPE · 1× California State Auditor ORG · 1× Gavin Newsom PERSON · 1× Merced GPE · 1× San Francisco GPE · 1× Steve Hilton PERSON · 1× Uber ORG · 1× the California High Speed Rail Authority ORG · 1× the California Post ORG · 1×

Narrative

As the California Post recently reported: Per the project’s own inspector general, high-speed rail consultants collected more than $680,000 in dubious travel reimbursements — including for first-class plane tickets, international jaunts and rides to places like gyms, tiki rooms and nightclubs.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-20
🔮 While the authority has failed to curb consultants gone wild, the project’s budget is untenable: High-speed rail is projected to run dry of cash in 2027, the audit found.
2026-09-20 · New York Post
How taxpayers were taken for a ride on the train to nowhere · assertive framing

Claims (19 extracted, 2 hedged)

But in this case, we mean the evident bilking of taxpayers. asserted
we → mean → taxpayers
As the California Post recently reported: Per the project’s own inspector general, high-speed rail consultants collected more than $680,000 in dubious travel reimbursements — including for first-class plane tickets, international jaunts and rides to places like gyms, tiki rooms and nightclubs. asserted
consultants → report → gyms
Taxpayers even covered bills for a flight via private aircraft, Uber Black luxury service, and rides from clubs at 2:30 a.m. asserted
Taxpayers → cover → a.m.
That’s galling — and yet another reason to bring the troubled project to a halt. asserted
That → ’ → halt
Download The California Post App, follow us on social, and subscribe to our newsletters California’s high-speed rail experiment, dubbed “the train to nowhere” for its uselessness, has failed. asserted
experiment → download → uselessness
Among the lowlights: a “shadow government” of consultants that effectively ran the troubled project and approved their own work — detailed in a blistering 2018 California State Auditor report. asserted
that → run → report
Now, the California High Speed Rail Authority admits, again, that it lets consultants run the asylum. asserted
consultants → admit → asylum
While the authority has failed to curb consultants gone wild, the project’s budget is untenable: High-speed rail is projected to run dry of cash in 2027, the audit found. asserted
audit → fail → 2027
Who can justify pouring more tax money into this mess? asserted
Who → justify → mess
At least one candidate for governor gets it: Steve Hilton, on the ballot Nov. 3, has pledged to halt taxpayer funding for the project on day one if elected. asserted
Hilton → get → day
State and federal taxpayers already have lavished up to $15 billion, combined, on the debacle — with no tracks, no trains and no rail travel to show for it. asserted
taxpayers → lavish → it
Compare that to what state voters were promised in 2008: a bullet train that would whisk riders from San Francisco to LA in two hours and 40 minutes, to be built for no more than $45 billion and completed by 2020. asserted
that → compare → 2020
To call that a joke is too charitable. asserted
call → call → that
Seven years ago, Gov. Gavin Newsom all but vowed to scrap it, only to backtrack and settle for (dreams of) abbreviated rail from Merced to Bakersfield. asserted
Newsom → vow → Bakersfield
He went on to install cronies at the rail authority in May of this year. uncertain
He → go → year
This is the same Newsom who in 2014 said the project fudged numbers to keep tax money rolling in: The then-lieutenant gov called ridership projections “wildly overstated” and revenue figures “manipulated.” asserted
figures → say → projections
Is it any wonder the project’s a laughingstock? asserted
project → ’ → ?
Yet despite all the failure, all the shrunken ambition and all the ridicule — Newsom & Co. won’t consign the mess to the scrap heap. asserted
Newsom → consign → heap
The only thing slower than the project itself might be Sacramento’s will to course-correct. uncertain
thing → correct → project
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support