In win for Trump, Supreme Court backs restrictions on mail-in ballots

The Trump Administration's Efforts to Restrict Mail-In Voting

President Donald Trump's executive order, issued on March 31, aimed to create a federal list of eligible voters and restrict mail-in voting by requiring states to use specific envelopes and barcodes. The US Postal Service (USPS) was instructed to deliver ballots only to those on the approved list.

However, this move was blocked by two court orders in Massachusetts, issued by Judge Indira Talwani on June 25 and August 11. These injunctions prevented the USPS from implementing the new rule before the midterm elections in November.

In response, the Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court, which initially decided to allow the restriction of mail-in voting to proceed while the case was ongoing. This decision was seen as a preliminary victory for President Trump.

However, the Supreme Court's unsigned opinion did not declare the executive order lawful, and Democratic-led states argued that permitting the administration to push ahead with changes would contribute to pre-election chaos.

In response, California Governor Gavin Newsom announced that his state would sue again to block federal changes to mail voting. The California legislature also proposed two new laws that would make it a crime to interfere with the delivery of mail ballots, punishable by up to four years in prison.

The USPS has submitted a motion to dissolve one of the court injunctions blocking the implementation of the Trump administration's plan, and published new guidelines that could take effect if legal barriers are removed.