Photo via Fox News

Mail-voting crackdown moves ahead as Trump court win opens door to federal action

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

Creitz, C. (2026, August 28). Mail-voting crackdown moves ahead as Trump court win opens door to federal action. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mail-voting-crackdown-moves-ahead-trump-court-win-opens-door-federal-action

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-08-28 · by Charles Creitz

Quick Summary

A former White House deputy counsel, Gene Hamilton, is saying that following a Supreme Court ruling, federal agencies can now move forward with parts of President Trump's election-integrity order, which includes new ballot-mail standards and efforts involving state citizenship lists. The court's majority rejected a challenge from opposing states who claimed harm could come from the order. Hamilton notes that the states must show a concrete or imminent injury to challenge executive action in this area, rather than relying on predictions of future harm. The next phase of Trump's effort to change mail-in-voting is expected to be implemented soon, with USPS having already finalized its ballot-mail rule requiring standardized envelopes and tracking barcodes.
Written by AI on 2026-08-28, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The Trump Administration's Efforts to Restrict Mail-In Voting

President Donald Trump's executive order, issued on March 31, aimed to create a federal list of eligible voters and restrict mail-in voting by requiring states to use specific envelopes and barcodes. The US Postal Service (USPS) was instructed to deliver ballots only to those on the approved list.

However, this move was blocked by two court orders in Massachusetts, issued by Judge Indira Talwani on June 25 and August 11. These injunctions prevented the USPS from implementing the new rule before the midterm elections in November.

In response, the Trump administration appealed to the Supreme Court, which initially decided to allow the restriction of mail-in voting to proceed while the case was ongoing. This decision was seen as a preliminary victory for President Trump.

However, the Supreme Court's unsigned opinion did not declare the executive order lawful, and Democratic-led states argued that permitting the administration to push ahead with changes would contribute to pre-election chaos.

In response, California Governor Gavin Newsom announced that his state would sue again to block federal changes to mail voting. The California legislature also proposed two new laws that would make it a crime to interfere with the delivery of mail ballots, punishable by up to four years in prison.

The USPS has submitted a motion to dissolve one of the court injunctions blocking the implementation of the Trump administration's plan, and published new guidelines that could take effect if legal barriers are removed.

Written for “Trump's Mail Voting Restrictions” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 15 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump's Mail Voting Restrictions
Politics · 16 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
NBC News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 26 claims Outlet record 60/100
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 4 of 54 claims Outlet record 95/100
The Independent
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 2 of 18 claims Outlet record 59/100
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 23 of 175 claims Outlet record 66/100
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 7 of 39 claims Outlet record 96/100
The Guardian
Hedges 19 of 150 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A reports on California planning to sue the Trump administration again, while Article B reports on the Supreme Court's ruling allowing federal action and the potential for new lawsuits”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 2 of 23 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A reports on a federal judge halting Trump's executive order, while Article B reports on the Supreme Court ruling in favor of Trump's effort to change mail-in-voting system, indicating two different legal developments”
UPI
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 1 of 16 claims Outlet record 56/100
“Article A discusses a Supreme Court ruling, while Article B mentions a federal court judge blocking Trump administration restrictions, indicating two different legal actions”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
32
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
4 of 32 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
69/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
16
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-08-28 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 6063 article(s) · 11 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 11 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Charles Creitz
37 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 "This would have never happened if we didn't have ranked-choice voting," Dunleavy told Fox News Digital.
🔮 "While some may try to write this off as just how politics works now, ballot-stacking should have no place in our electoral process," Murkowski said.
🔮 "DOJ's election monitors will be engaging in the same routine monitoring we've done for decades."
🔮 "Defendants’ argument that [Constitution] Article II bars Congress from regulating the removal of AUSAs (assistant U.S. attorneys) flies in the face of nearly two centuries of Supreme Court precedent," Judge Jesse Furman wrote, adding that accepting the administration's argument would "unsettle the very equilibrium established by this nation's constitutional system." A DOJ spokesperson told Fox News Digital the department disagreed with the decision and will appeal it in "due course."
🔮 Schiff drew a comparison to Trump's efforts to challenge the 2020 presidential election, arguing that senior Justice Department officials at the time, including Attorney General William Barr refused to support efforts to overturn the results — while accusing current DOJ leadership of being willing to go further. "This time, with [Attorney General Todd] Blanche, they are all in on this disgraceful campaign," Schiff said, predicting the case in the Last Frontier has "no chance of succeeding."
🔮 The federal raid on Rep. Ilhan Omar’s Washington, D.C., home prompted warnings Wednesday from a conservative watchdog leader that more revelations could be coming, as the Minnesota Democrat faces separate investigations involving her immigration records and financial disclosures.
🔮 Second Amendment advocates argue additional gun restrictions would not have stopped the killer and could make it harder for armed civilians like Giamanco to intervene.
🔮 The heated exchange prompted moderators to call for decorum and warn that microphones could be shut off if the candidates continued interrupting one another.
🔮 Jones' announcement did not identify specific Trump administration actions, but the president signed a March 2025 order seeking stricter proof-of-citizenship requirements for voter registration and changes to mail-ballot rules and backed the SAVE Act to mandate voter ID. "At a time when the Trump administration has sought to push the federal government further into the administration of state elections, we will work closely with the Department of Elections and the Federal Accountability Unit to protect Virginia’s authority, the integrity of our elections, and every eligible voter’s right to be heard," said Ajay Saini, the OAG official Jones named to lead the division.
🔮 He suggested Sheinbaum's demand for evidence of the Coast Guard shooting could reflect pressure within her own political coalition to justify working with the Trump administration.
Also by Charles Creitz
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 37 articles by Charles Creitz →

Topics

DHS DOJ Fox News Digital USPS the Supreme Court

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 7× Hamilton PERSON · 6× USPS ORG · 5× DOJ ORG · 3× Fox News Digital ORG · 3× the Supreme Court ORG · 3× American NORP · 2× DHS ORG · 2× White House ORG · 2× the White House ORG · 2×

Narrative

"[The] SCOTUS decision does not deal with the substance of Trump’s unconstitutional Executive Order and does not mean his illegal attempt to restrict mail-in voting will go forward." On Wednesday, Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes responded to the ruling, declaring, "Over my dead body is that rule going to go into effect.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-28
🔮 Former White House deputy counsel Gene Hamilton said federal agencies such as the Postal Service can now move forward with parts of Trump’s election-integrity order, including new ballot-mail standards and efforts involving state citizenship lists, as opposing states wait to see which concrete federal actions could form the basis of new lawsuits.

Claims (32 extracted, 4 hedged)

The next phase of President Donald Trump’s effort to change America’s mail-in-voting system is taking shape after the Supreme Court issued a largely favorable ruling for the White House in a challenge to Trump's mail-in ballot restrictions. asserted
Court → change → restrictions
Former White House deputy counsel Gene Hamilton said federal agencies such as the Postal Service can now move forward with parts of Trump’s election-integrity order, including new ballot-mail standards and efforts involving state citizenship lists, as opposing states wait to see which concrete federal actions could form the basis of new lawsuits. uncertain
actions → say → lawsuits
"It’s really interesting what the court did [and] it’s actually exactly what you would expect the court to do," Hamilton told Fox News Digital. asserted
Hamilton → ’ → Digital
Hamilton said that when Trump directed USPS, DHS and DOJ to prepare for the new protocols, several states immediately claimed harm, but the court’s majority rejected their challenge. asserted
majority → say → challenge
Originally, a Boston federal judge agreed with them, but the Supreme Court effectively said "you can’t enjoin [the feds] from thinking" — in Hamilton’s words — because no action had taken place yet. asserted
action → agree → place
"It reminds the American people … just because something might happen in the future [it] doesn't mean that you're actually harmed today, and that's really the crux of what the court did." uncertain
court → remind → what
Hamilton quipped that if the states challenging the order were proven right — and the possibility of future harm were enough to obtain a legal stay — his organization would "have a field day across the country" trying to head off new policies he and his clients oppose. asserted
he → quip → policies
In that regard, he added that the district judge ultimately overruled by the Supreme Court made an "egregious" misread of Article III powers and essentially said states can dictate which cases the attorney general and DOJ try to prosecute. asserted
general → add → cases
He emphasized that the legal landscape could change quickly once Trump’s actions get underway, but said states challenging executive action must show a concrete or sufficiently imminent injury rather than rely on predictions about what agencies might eventually do. uncertain
agencies → emphasize → what
Besides USPS, Trump’s order directs DHS to compile and provide states with lists of adult U.S. citizens, while DOJ was told to prioritize investigations and potential prosecutions involving ballots issued to ineligible voters. asserted
DOJ → direct → voters
"Let’s see what the departments and agencies actually do. asserted
departments → see → what
Well, let's see what they say they're going to do," Hamilton told Fox News Digital, as new concrete federal rules will come next. asserted
rules → see → Digital
The clock is ticking to implement the plan and respond to further legal challenges as states distribute mail ballots progressively earlier than in past decades. asserted
states → tick → decades
USPS first proposed its ballot-mail rule in June and has since finalized it, requiring standardized ballot envelopes and unique tracking barcodes while directing states to use a federal portal to identify voters receiving mailed federal ballots. asserted
USPS → propose → ballots
States that fail to comply could see outbound federal ballot mail refused or returned. uncertain
mail → fail → ?
But the agency signaled at the time that it won’t implement the rule for the midterms unless the litigation is resolved. asserted
litigation → signal → midterms
A separate injunction obtained in litigation by the League of Women Voters currently blocks USPS from implementing the rule. asserted
injunction → obtain → rule
"Why wouldn't you take steps like getting a list of eligible voters, like asking the USPS to use standard mail security measures that they use for other things," Hamilton commented. asserted
Hamilton → take → things
Asked which provisions of Trump’s order the administration plans to implement following the ruling, when those actions would begin and how states would be directed to comply, the White House did not provide specifics. asserted
House → ask → specifics
"These are commonsense measures that protect the security of mail-in ballots and ensure only Americans are electing American leaders. asserted
Americans → protect → leaders
This administration will continue to lawfully enact the agenda President Trump was elected on — which includes the safety and security of our elections," White House spokeswoman Lauren Bis told Fox News Digital. asserted
Bis → continue → Digital
California Attorney General Rob Bonta — who led the plaintiffs from 23 states along with Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro — criticized the Supreme Court for letting Trump "try to make it harder for Americans to vote. asserted
Americans → lead → Court
" Shapiro was listed separately because Pennsylvania Republican Attorney General David Sunday had not signed the state onto the suit. asserted
Sunday → list → suit
"Not so fast," the potential 2028 presidential candidate said in a statement. asserted
candidate → say → statement
"Donald Trump does not run elections here in Pennsylvania — or in any state." asserted
Trump → run → state
"[The] SCOTUS decision does not deal with the substance of Trump’s unconstitutional Executive Order and does not mean his illegal attempt to restrict mail-in voting will go forward." On Wednesday, Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes responded to the ruling, declaring, "Over my dead body is that rule going to go into effect. asserted
rule → deal → effect
We are going to fight this tooth and nail in the courts." asserted
We → go → courts
Bonta pledged to continue the fight and noted that Obama-appointed Judge Indira Talwani of Boston had originally sided with the plaintiffs. asserted
Talwani → pledge → plaintiffs
Hamilton predicted such disputes would produce another round of litigation as agencies make their next moves. asserted
agencies → predict → moves
"We have to get through the arbitrage of lower court proceedings, and I'm sure there's going to be a lot more fighting to come," he said. asserted
he → have → proceedings
Shapiro echoed the plaintiffs’ opposition to the ruling, tweeting: "We’ll see the Trump Administration in court." asserted
We → echo → court
Fox News Digital's Hannah Brennan and Melissa Chrise contributed to this report. asserted
Brennan → contribute → report
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support