Photo via Semafor

‘This pushes the boundaries’: White House helped Pentagon explain the legality of its stock deals

Read the original at Semafor ↗
Cite

Mueller, E. (2026, September 21). ‘This pushes the boundaries’: White House helped Pentagon explain the legality of its stock deals. Semafor. https://www.semafor.com/article/09/21/2026/this-pushes-the-boundaries-white-house-helped-pentagon-explain-the-legality-of-its-stock-deals

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Semafor · collected 2026-09-21 · by Eleanor Mueller

Quick Summary

Before announcing its first equity stake in a company, the Pentagon sought legal guidance from the White House's Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on whether such investments violated laws. In June 2025, OMB General Counsel Mark Paoletta issued an opinion arguing that the multibillion-dollar deal with rare earth firm MP Materials was exempt from the Antideficiency Act due to national security concerns under the Defense Production Act and constitutional authority. This legal justification has raised skepticism among former Pentagon officials who view it as stretching existing laws too far, while lawmakers are pushing for clearer legislative guidance on such investments.
Written by AI on 2026-09-21, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In June 2025, one month before announcing its first equity stake in MP Materials, a rare earth firm, the Pentagon's top lawyer sought guidance from the White House about the legality of the deal. The Office of Management and Budget General Counsel Mark Paoletta provided a legal opinion stating that the agreement was exempt from laws barring executive branch spending without congressional approval because it was "necessary to avoid an imminent threat to human life and government property." This justification relied on authorities granted by the Defense Production Act and annual defense legislation from 2017, as well as Article II of the Constitution. The opinion highlights the Trump administration's strategy for controversial deployments of taxpayer money in private sector investments.

Written for “Pentagon Stock Deals Controversy” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Pentagon Stock Deals Controversy
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 8% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
ABC News (US)
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of government actions and legal questions regarding financial dealings but do not describe the same specific incident.”
The Guardian
Hedges 6 of 50 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses Trump family members and allies profiting from AI-related defense contracts, while Article B describes the White House's legal justification for a Pentagon deal with MP Materials.”
The Independent
Hedges 0 of 13 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different financial activities related to Trump's investments, with Article A focusing on a legal opinion from the White House regarding Pentagon stock deals and Article B detailing Trump's personal transactions in SpaceX stock.”
NBC News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 34 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different actions by the Trump administration: one involves legal justification for a Pentagon stock deal, and the other concerns lawmakers' criticism of a plan to cut $810 million in federal funds using pocket rescissions.”
ABC News (US)
Hedges 2 of 13 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different actions taken by the White House regarding Pentagon stock deals and rescinding funds, not the same specific incident.”
The Straits Times
Hedges 0 of 10 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different actions by the Trump administration: one involves seeking legal justification for Pentagon stock deals, while the other describes an attempt to withhold Congress-approved funds.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
51
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
4 of 51 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
59/100
Semafor's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-21 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Semafor · 1440 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Eleanor Mueller
34 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The bill, which will touch on “worker protections and privacy and data protections” as well as “ideas around economic impacts,” will be the union federation’s “highest priority,” Shuler added.
2026-10-29 · assertive framing · AFL-CIO drafting ‘gold-standard’ AI legislation
🔮 Schultz’s hiring comes as Kalshi users forecast a 91% chance that Democrats win a majority in the House and a 65% chance of a Democratic Senate majority.
2026-10-28 · assertive framing · Kalshi hires Obama adviser
🔮 The Federal Reserve voted to leave interest rates unchanged today as officials seek more information to decide whether additional hikes would be necessary to tame inflation.
2026-10-28 · assertive framing · Fed holds rates steady despite dissents
🔮 The cryptocurrency industry’s leading network of super PACs is yet again spending huge sums against Sherrod Brown in Ohio, despite doubts that the investment will pay off.
2026-10-28 · assertive framing · Crypto industry attempts a risky 2024 reboot in Ohio
🔮 The Federal Reserve is widely expected to leave interest rates unchanged Wednesday before raising them again in December.
2026-10-26 · assertive framing · Federal Reserve expected to tap brakes on rate hikes
🔮 The administration may be negotiating even more stakes under the radar, since SEC filings for unrelated deals mention the possibility of warrants.
🔮 “I would imagine that the next year, the year after, we will be tackling the ownership structure,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Tuesday, calling it “unclear” for now how “a change in the arrangement of the shareholder structure” would benefit homeowners.
2026-10-20 · assertive framing · Trump administration punts on releasing Fannie, Freddie
🔮 The Trump administration’s recent changes to Trump Accounts could come under fire from the next Congress if Democrats win a majority.
2026-10-07 · mixed framing · Trump Account changes could take heat next year
🔮 “You might say, ‘Please, please, sir, it’s going down too fast.’”
2026-10-06 · assertive framing · Trump expands access to tax-exempt diesel
🔮 The letter provides a useful road map for how Democrats would scrutinize the agency if they win a majority of either chamber this fall.
2026-10-05 · assertive framing · Democrats demand testimony from housing director
Also by Eleanor Mueller
Kalshi hires Obama adviser
2026-10-28 · Semafor
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 34 articles by Eleanor Mueller →

Topics

Congress MP Materials OSC Pentagon Semafor

Subjects

Pentagon ORG · 11× OSC ORG · 7× Congress ORG · 4× Semafor ORG · 4× MP Materials ORG · 3× Paoletta PERSON · 2× the White House ORG · 2× The Scoop PERSON · 1× Trump PERSON · 1× White House ORG · 1×

Narrative

A multibillion-dollar agreement with rare earth firm MP Materials is exempt from the law that bars the executive branch from spending taxpayer money without Congress, Office of Management and Budget General Counsel Mark Paoletta argued in June 2025, because it was “necessary to avoid an imminent threat to human life and government property.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-21
🔮 One month before the Pentagon announced its first equity stake in a company, its top lawyer asked the White House to explain why the deal wouldn’t break the law.

Claims (51 extracted, 4 hedged)

One month before the Pentagon announced its first equity stake in a company, its top lawyer asked the White House to explain why the deal wouldn’t break the law. asserted
deal → announce → law
The White House budget office responded with a previously unreported legal opinion, reviewed by Semafor, that provides a crucial look at how the Trump administration justified one of its most controversial deployments of taxpayer money in the private sector. asserted
administration → respond → sector
A multibillion-dollar agreement with rare earth firm MP Materials is exempt from the law that bars the executive branch from spending taxpayer money without Congress, Office of Management and Budget General Counsel Mark Paoletta argued in June 2025, because it was “necessary to avoid an imminent threat to human life and government property.” asserted
it → bar → life
The Pentagon would be relying on authorities provided by the Defense Production Act and annual defense legislation from 2017, Paoletta continued, as well as Article II of the Constitution. asserted
Paoletta → rely → Constitution
The deal would be the latest in a “venerable tradition of presidential obligations in advance of appropriation,” he concluded, stretching back to 1792. asserted
he → conclude → 1792
While the Pentagon went on to strike more deals for equity in companies — including its most recent agreement with Venezuelan oil company North American Blue Energy Partners — former Pentagon officials told Semafor they were skeptical of Paoletta’s reasoning. asserted
they → go → reasoning
For the moment, the Defense Department’s investments are operating in a legal morass that lawmakers in both parties see as unsustainable. asserted
lawmakers → operate → parties
The Senate Armed Services Committee wants Congress to pass its already-advancing plan to give the Pentagon’s Office of Strategic Capital explicit legal authority for its equity stakes, a spokesperson for Chair Roger Wicker, R-Miss., told Semafor. asserted
spokesperson → want → Semafor
OSC, which was created to issue loans, has been involved in a majority of the equity agreements. asserted
which → create → agreements
Wicker “believes that an appropriately scoped equity investment authority is important for continued positive work in restoring a free market for critical minerals,” the spokesperson added. asserted
spokesperson → believe → minerals
“But he also believes the department must regularize the process surrounding equity-based deals and increase its transparency with the Congress to render this approach sustainable over the long term.” asserted
approach → believe → term
One former Pentagon official said that the law barring taxpayer expenditures without Congress, known as the Antideficiency Act, was “one of the hurdles we thought was going to be insurmountable” for the MP Materials deal. asserted
we → say → deal
Another former OSC official said they were “surprised that the current team has discovered the authority to do this under the Defense Production Act,” adding that “laws can be elastic, but elasticity snaps at some point.” “I think this pushes the boundaries,” the official continued. asserted
official → say → boundaries
OSC’s role in the MP Materials deal was limited to a $150 million loan under its statute, a Pentagon spokesperson told Semafor, while the Pentagon’s Acquisitions and Sustainment Unit made the $400 million equity investment using authorities granted by the Defense Production Act. asserted
Unit → limit → Act
Both agreements were authorized by law, the spokesperson said, ading that the latter has already netted more than $465 million. asserted
latter → authorize → million
But those comments are at odds with what a US official told reporters earlier this month in announcing the Venezuela oil deal — that the Trump administration wielded legal authority “granted to the OSC when it was created.” asserted
it → tell → OSC
The US official added that OSC “has taken several similar positions in other companies.” asserted
OSC → add → companies
Press releases and SEC filings for other deals also seem to blur the line. asserted
releases → seem → line
The Senate Armed Services panel has requested briefings from the OSC on the Pentagon’s legal authority to take equity, people familiar with the talks said. asserted
people → request → talks
A spokesperson for the Pentagon said it subsequently responded in depth to questions that arose in the briefing on the MP Materials deal. asserted
that → say → deal
The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the conflicting explanations given for OSC’s role in the Pentagon’s equity deals. asserted
House → respond → deals
The Pentagon has negotiated equity or some equivalent, like warrants, in at least 10 companies since Cerberus cofounder Steve Feinberg was confirmed as deputy defense secretary last year. asserted
Feinberg → negotiate → secretary
At least seven of those agreements involved the OSC, which is helmed by Cerberus alumnus David Lorch. asserted
which → involve → Lorch
Behind the scenes, former Pentagon officials described a rush to strike the deals that raised concerns about due diligence, which were heightened when a deal with rare earths startup Reelement faltered. asserted
deal → describe → Reelement
Feinberg negotiated the MP Materials equity stake without the OSC, the officials said, and involved it only after reaching a handshake agreement. asserted
officials → negotiate → agreement
The Pentagon spokesperson pushed back on that characterization, questioning how OSC could have played a role if that were the case. uncertain
that → push → role
Yet subsequent agreements have followed a similar pattern, the officials said, with Feinberg’s private-sector hires at OSC and the newer Economic Defense Unit sidelining career officials in order to ink deals as quickly as possible. asserted
hires → follow → deals
The unit is helmed by a third Cerberus alumnus, George Kollitides. asserted
unit → helm → alumnus
Subsequent agreements have followed a similar pattern, the officials said, with Feinberg’s private-sector hires at OSC and the newer Economic Defense Unit sidelining career officials in order to ink deals as quickly as possible. asserted
hires → follow → deals
The unit is helmed by a third Cerberus alumnus, George Kollitides. asserted
unit → helm → alumnus
Other questions that swirled around the deals, according to the officials: whether all firms were getting a fair shot at a deal, since Feinberg’s team prefers to rely on its own connections rather than a formal application, and whether OSC had the bandwidth to oversee agreements after they were signed. uncertain
they → swirl → agreements
“For months and months, I and several other people would raise it repeatedly,” one of the officials said of the MP Materials deal. asserted
one → raise → deal
“It was always: ‘This is going to be handled; don’t worry about it.’ asserted
This → go → it
” The clock could be ticking: Trump’s Defense Production Act authority is slated to lapse at the end of the month. uncertain
authority → tick → month
If lawmakers don’t extend it, the cornerstone of the Pentagon’s legal argument will evaporate. asserted
cornerstone → extend → argument
In Paoletta’s memo, he argues the MP Materials deal is “essential to the exercise of [the president’s] constitutional authorities and is supported by several congressional enactments.” asserted
deal → argue → enactments
The Defense Production Act “authorizes the president to ‘make provision … for the encouragement of exploration, development, and mining of critical and strategic materials and other materials,’” Paoletta wrote, noting that “our adversary China” has created a need for the US to mine its own rare earth minerals. asserted
US → authorize → minerals
Annual defense legislation for 2017, he wrote, gives the Pentagon grounds for equity deals by allowing “the Secretary of Defense broad authority to, among other things, ‘use contracts, grants, or other transaction authorities to support development, prototyping, and manufacturing capabilities.’” asserted
he → write → capabilities
Paoletta also invoked Article II of the Constitution, likening the MP Materials agreement to deals like former President Thomas Jefferson’s purchase of the Louisiana territory. asserted
Paoletta → invoke → territory
Free-market Republicans see it differently. asserted
Republicans → see → it
…and 11 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support