Photo via ABC News (US)

White House orders over $800M in funds rescinded

Read the original at ABC News (US) ↗
Cite

Kerr, N. (2026, September 26). White House orders over $800M in funds rescinded. ABC News (US). https://abcnews.com/Politics/white-house-orders-800m-funds-rescinded-collins-calls/story?id=136772703

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

ABC News (US) · collected 2026-09-26 · by Nicholas Kerr

Quick Summary

The White House has ordered over $800 million in congressionally appropriated funds to be rescinded across various government programs, a move criticized by Senator Susan Collins as an unlawful violation of the Impoundment Control Act. President Trump invoked authority under this act for what is known as a "pocket rescission," affecting agencies such as Health and Human Services, Education, Housing and Urban Development, and Justice. Collins argues that OMB intentionally withheld these funds without warning to execute the cancellation, undermining Congress's constitutional power over government funding.
Written by AI on 2026-09-26, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

President Trump ordered the cancellation of $810 million in congressionally approved funding on Friday, marking the second use of a "pocket rescission" in 49 years. This controversial move zeroes out funds for illegal immigrants and race-focused programs across seven federal departments, including HHS, Education, and Homeland Security. Key cuts include $10 million from minority business grants, $10 million for legal services aiding illegal immigrants, and $70 million allocated to "woke" international education initiatives. Critics argue the move undermines Congress's constitutional authority over spending; Republican Senator Susan Collins called it an "illegal action."

Written for “Trump Pocket Rescission Spending” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 13 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Pocket Rescission Spending
Politics · 14 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 15% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Straits Times
Hedges 0 of 10 claims Outlet record 66/100
Fox News
Hedges 1 of 19 claims Outlet record 69/100
The Straits Times
Hedges 0 of 9 claims Outlet record 66/100
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 22 claims Outlet record 96/100
“Article A describes a federal judge's ruling against the Trump administration's termination of clean energy grants, while Article B discusses the White House rescinding funds across various programs under legal authority.”
Semafor
Hedges 4 of 51 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different actions taken by the White House regarding Pentagon stock deals and rescinding funds, not the same specific incident.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 5 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
Toronto Star
Hedges 0 of 23 claims Outlet record 64/100
CBC News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 18 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Guardian
Hedges 0 of 22 claims Outlet record 66/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 21 claims Outlet record 70/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
13
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
15%
2 of 13 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
70/100
ABC News (US)'s corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
14
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-26 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

ABC News (US) · 1270 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Nicholas Kerr
12 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 A House Democrat is asking congressional appropriators for guardrails that would prevent President Donald Trump from exploiting a loophole in federal law to buy the East Potomac Golf Course that he's been pushing to renovate with taxpyer funds.
🔮 Trump suggests Iran could 'take out' Los Angeles and San Diego Gov. Gavin Newsom called the president’s remarks "deranged and dangerous."
🔮 Trump says his super PAC will pay for controversial promotional ad campaign The ads that mirrored campaign spots were paid for with government funds.
🔮 Critics say the ads could violate federal propaganda law.
🔮 The project will be built by Mesabi Metallics in Iowa.
🔮 It does not get to decide which programs are worth funding," she said, adding that she will "work with my colleagues to address these illegal actions."
2026-09-26 · assertive framing · White House orders over $800M in funds rescinded
🔮 The remarks came ahead of a meeting set to occur later on Tuesday between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly.
🔮 Trump says he will form new 'AI Force' but continues to call AI fears a 'hoax'
🔮 Wray resigned as director before Trump was inaugurated for his second term because he feared that Trump firing him could cause turmoil within the department.
🔮 Energy Secretary says 'there may not be' a nuclear agreement with Iran President Trump said last week he "could not care less" if Iran struck a deal. Energy Secretary Chris Wright said Sunday that a nuclear agreement with Iran, long sought by President Donald Trump, may not come to fruition after months of war with the country. "
Also by Nicholas Kerr
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 12 articles by Nicholas Kerr →

Topics

Congress OMB The White House White House the Impoundment Control Act

Subjects

Congress ORG · 4× Collins PERSON · 3× The White House ORG · 3× OMB ORG · 2× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× GOP ORG · 1× The Supreme Court ORG · 1× Trump PERSON · 1× White House ORG · 1× the Government Accountability Office ORG · 1×

Narrative

Collins said that Congress received the $810 million package of rescissions fromthe White House's Office of Management and Budget with no warning and alleged that "OMB intentionally withheld these funds for months to execute this unlawful cancellation of appropriations that were approved on a bipartisan basis and signed into law." "OMB is an agency of the executive branch.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-26
🔮 It does not get to decide which programs are worth funding," she said, adding that she will "work with my colleagues to address these illegal actions."
2026-09-26 · ABC News (US)
White House orders over $800M in funds rescinded · assertive framing

Claims (13 extracted, 2 hedged)

White House orders over $800M in funds rescinded; Collins calls it 'clear violation' of law The move has already drawn criticism from at least one GOP senator. The White House announced Friday evening that it was rescinding over $800 million in congressionally appropriated funds across a range of government programs. asserted
it → rescind → programs
In a statement, the White House said President Donald Trump was invoking authority under the Impoundment Control Act to deploy a "pocket rescission" of funds, a legally questionable maneuver Trump also used in 2025 to claw back billions in appropriated funds for foreign aid programs. asserted
Trump → say → programs
The Supreme Court effectively allowed that rescission to proceed -- staying a lower court order last September requiring those funds to be obligated -- but noted that the "order should not be read as a final determination on the merits" of the rescission. asserted
order → allow → rescission
Pocket rescissions occur when the president requests Congress to cancel funds as the end of the fiscal year approaches, according to the Government Accountability Office. uncertain
end → occur → Office
While Congress needs to approve rescissions, it only has 45 days to respond, and "when not enough time is given to consider this request or for funds to be used before they expire, the president is bypassing congressional authority over government funding," the GAO notes. asserted
GAO → need → funding
According to the release from the White House, the new rescissions target programs across a variety of federal agencies, including the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Education, the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Justice. uncertain
rescissions → accord → Justice
Among them are $567 million in funds to HHS which the administration alleges went to "pro-illegal immigration programs and Non-Governmental Organizations that provided services to refugees, asylees, and other non-citizens and put unaccompanied children in harm's way. asserted
that → allege → way
The administration also lists programs under the DHS which it claimed "laundered taxpayer dollars" to provide "welfare" to undocumented immigrants. asserted
it → list → immigrants
Maine Republican Sen. Susan Collins -- who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee -- blasted the move in a statement on social media on Friday, calling it an attempt to "undermine Congress's Constitutional power of the purse" and a violation of the law. " asserted
who → chair → law
The independent Government Accountability Office has concluded that pocket rescissions are unlawful and not permitted by the Impoundment Control Act," Collins wrote. asserted
Collins → conclude → Act
"Any effort to rescind appropriated funds without congressional approval is a clear violation of the law." asserted
effort → rescind → law
Collins said that Congress received the $810 million package of rescissions fromthe White House's Office of Management and Budget with no warning and alleged that "OMB intentionally withheld these funds for months to execute this unlawful cancellation of appropriations that were approved on a bipartisan basis and signed into law." "OMB is an agency of the executive branch. asserted
OMB → say → branch
It does not get to decide which programs are worth funding," she said, adding that she will "work with my colleagues to address these illegal actions." asserted
she → get → actions
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support