Photo via Silver Bulletin

Do I really buy that Texas could turn blue?

Read the original at Silver Bulletin ↗
Cite

Silver, N. (2026, August 26). Do I really buy that Texas could turn blue? Silver Bulletin. https://www.natesilver.net/p/do-i-really-buy-that-texas-could

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Silver Bulletin · collected 2026-08-26 · by Nate Silver commentary

Quick Summary

The article's author discusses the possibility of Texas turning blue, arguing that while Democrats have a history of winning presidential elections in the state, they have not done so since 1964. The Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Texas, James Talarico, is using language suggesting he can "take back" the state from Republicans and corporate interests. However, the author notes that this is a tricky task, as Democrats have been absent from the state's politics for decades. Despite Talarico having raised almost $69 million, the author questions whether his message will resonate with voters in Texas.
Written by AI on 2026-08-26, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

A podcast hosted by Nate Silver and his former colleagues Galen Druke and Clare Malone is set to debut in September, called "Still Counting" and produced by Crooked Media. In related news, Silver notes that he's a high-propensity consumer of political ads on YouTube, particularly those featuring James Talarico, the Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Texas. Silver mentions that Talarico has run several ads complaining about low fundraising numbers, but as of June, Talarico had already raised almost $69 million to fund his campaign.

Written for “Texas Election Projections” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Texas Election Projections
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
23
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
4%
1 of 23 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
expected in commentary, which argues a position · beta estimate
Publisher signals
not measured
these signals count newsroom corrections; Commentary has none to count
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-08-26 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Silver Bulletin · 56 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Nate Silver
38 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 I figured the post would start by talking about some of Sunday morning’s more interesting polls.
2026-11-01 · assertive framing · Could Haley Stevens cost Democrats the Senate?
🔮 Our customers tended to scroll through the simulations until they’d encounter one of the weirder maps, and then they’d sometimes use that as a way to express doubt about the forecast.
2026-11-01 · assertive framing · 13 maps for the morning after the midterms
🔮 I think you’d agree that it would be pretty weird for a fox to be friends with a dolphin?
2026-10-31 · assertive framing · SBSQ #32: SuperMegaJumboDeluxe Edition
🔮 We’ll try to space things out, but it’s possible that dishes will pile up and there will be some dry spells, or that you’ll get more than one newsletter or more than one FLIPR update in a day.
2026-10-30 · assertive framing · The cognitive dissonance election
🔮 For example, if Democrats have a good night next Tuesday and Peggy Flanagan easily wins in Minnesota, our newsletter from earlier this month that seriously contemplated Michele Tafoya’s chances might be one of those.
🔮 But I’m feeling a little meta-d out this weekend — maybe it was seeing You Can See Everything on Friday.1
2026-10-25 · assertive framing · Let’s talk shop about every Senate race
🔮 Strategic Vision “polls” exhibited statistical patterns — namely, being far more likely to contain some trailing digits (such as 5, 7, 8 and 9) than others, including on obscure questions they probably thought would never be scrutinized — that were canonical signs of forged election results in authoritarian regimes.
2026-10-22 · assertive framing · Fake polls are a real problem
🔮 But leave that philosophical question aside for now — because after a long week of travel,1 I could use a simpler Model Talk.
2026-10-17 · assertive framing · The good, bad and ugly outcomes in the Senate
🔮 Below, you’ll find our forecast for each 2026 Senate race, along with how our numbers have changed over time and which states are likeliest to decide control of the chamber.
2026-10-15 · assertive framing · FLIPR 2026 Senate forecast
🔮 Although our critics might disagree, we seek to avoid false equivocation at Silver Bulletin.
2026-10-09 · assertive framing · Could Minnesota spoil the blue wave?
Also by Nate Silver
13 maps for the morning after the midterms
2026-11-01 · Silver Bulletin
SBSQ #32: SuperMegaJumboDeluxe Edition
2026-10-31 · Silver Bulletin
The cognitive dissonance election
2026-10-30 · Silver Bulletin
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 38 articles by Nate Silver →

Topics

Browns Democrats FiveThirtyEight NFL Texas

Subjects

Texas GPE · 12× Democrats NORP · 4× Talarico PERSON · 4× Democratic NORP · 3× Browns ORG · 2× NFL ORG · 2× Richard Nixon PERSON · 2× U.S. Senate ORG · 2× FiveThirtyEight ORG · 1× Galen Druke PERSON · 1×

Narrative

From 1952 through 1980, Texas was perhaps the preeminent swing state; it was vital to JFK’s win over Richard Nixon in 1960, for instance, a year when Kennedy’s selection of Lyndon B. Johnson as his running mate was the exception to the rule that vice presidential picks don’t matter much.6
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-26
🔮 The podcast, produced by Crooked Media, will officially debut in September.
2026-08-26 · Silver Bulletin
Do I really buy that Texas could turn blue? · assertive framing

Claims (23 extracted, 1 hedged)

New podcast, “Still Counting”, coming soon! asserted
podcast → come → ?
Hey readers, some big news: I’m launching a podcast, “Still Counting”, with my former FiveThirtyEight colleagues Galen Druke and Clare Malone. asserted
I → launch → colleagues
The podcast, produced by Crooked Media, will officially debut in September. asserted
podcast → produce → September
Look for a more official announcement post about this later, but we’ve been holding off on saying anything about this publicly, so I wanted to share. asserted
I → look → this
I don’t donate to political campaigns.1 asserted
I → donate → campaigns.1
But the algorithms correctly determine that I’m a high-propensity political news consumer, and so I still get served my share of campaign ads when staying up late watching hockey fight videos or whatever. asserted
I → determine → videos
In these ads, Talarico frequently complains that he’s fallen short of his fundraising goals — buddy, could you spare 5 bucks? — a bit implausibly given that he’d already raised almost $69 million4 as of the last FEC fundraising deadline in June. uncertain
he → complain → June
As a grammar pedant, though, I’ve been struck by the language that Talarico has frequently used in these ads as well as elsewhere in his campaign rhetoric5: he’s going to take Texas back. asserted
he → strike → Texas
But this is a bit like the Cleveland Browns claiming that they’ve finally found the formula to return the franchise back to its former glory. asserted
they → claim → glory
Almost nobody remembers their former glory because the Browns’ last NFL title came in 1964, two seasons before the first Super Bowl. asserted
title → remember → Bowl
That year, 1964, was also the last time Democrats won the presidential race decisively in Texas — with native-son LBJ prevailing by 27 points — though Hubert H. Humphrey and Jimmy Carter would later sneak out narrow wins in 1968 and 1976. asserted
Humphrey → win → 1968
Like the Browns, though — one of the most dominant franchises of the pre-Super Bowl NFL — Democrats in Texas did once have a glorious history. asserted
Democrats → have → history
Between 1924 and 1948, Democrats won presidential elections in Texas by an average of 51 points, failing only in 1928 as part of Al Smith’s landslide defeat to Herbert Hoover, though FDR more than made up for it by winning by 77 points in 1932. asserted
FDR → win → 1932
From 1952 through 1980, Texas was perhaps the preeminent swing state; it was vital to JFK’s win over Richard Nixon in 1960, for instance, a year when Kennedy’s selection of Lyndon B. Johnson as his running mate was the exception to the rule that vice presidential picks don’t matter much.6 asserted
picks → matter → rule
In all but one year during that period, Texas’s margin was within 5 points of the national popular vote, making it a strong candidate for being the tipping-point state when combined with its hefty electoral vote total. asserted
it → make → total
The exception came in 1972, and it was telling: Richard Nixon won by 33 points against George McGovern, considerably larger than his gargantuan 23-point national margin. asserted
Nixon → come → margin
Democrats also haven’t won a gubernatorial race in Texas since 1990 (Ann Richards, of course) or a U.S. Senate race there since 1988 (Lloyd Bentsen, who also doubled as Michael Dukakis’s running mate). asserted
who → win → mate
So it’s understandable that people are skeptical Talarico can bring the state back to the D column this year. asserted
Talarico → ’ → column
Why our model nevertheless says Talarico has a pretty good shot asserted
Talarico → say → shot
Depending on the day, our midterms model, FLIPR, characterizes the Texas Senate race this year either as “toss-up” or as “leans Democratic”. asserted
model → depend → Democratic
We employ these buckets because some of our readers seem more comfortable with them than with percentages, but they are defined mathematically. asserted
they → employ → percentages
We describe a race as a “toss-up” when neither party has greater than a 60 percent chance of winning. asserted
party → describe → chance
Texas has been teetering right around that threshold, with Talarico bouncing around within the 59 to 61 percent range since model launch. asserted
Talarico → teeter → launch
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support