Claims extracted
13
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
15%
2 of 13 hedged
("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
not measured
these signals count newsroom corrections;
Commentary has none to count
Outlets on this story
1
Other
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Post about anything you want, ask random questions, whatever.
asserted
you → post → questions
ACX has an unofficial subreddit, Discord, and bulletin board, and in-person meetups around the world.
asserted
ACX → have → world
Most content is free, some is subscriber only; you can subscribe here.
asserted
you → subscribe → ?
1: Josh Morrison, who wrote the guest post about how AI Superforecasting Will Transform The FDA, will be doing a panel on the subject with former FDA employee Adam Kroetsch in SF on October 1.
asserted
Superforecasting → write → October
3: An ACX grantee asked me if I could sign ACX Grants up for various clouds’ free compute programs, and this snowballed into a discussion with some AI safety charities that also wanted this.
uncertain
that → ask → this
The answer currently seems to be no for the clouds I looked at, but I’m still excited about helping exciting philanthropically-minded startups and nonprofits get compute.
asserted
startups → seem → compute
Please let me know if you represent a compute provider or compute-rich organization who would be interested in lending some to needy startups/nonprofits in exchange for effusive thanks and free advertisements on ACX.
4:
asserted
who → let → 4
Thanks to people who chimed in with concerns about the most recent book review finalist, This Is Going To Hurt, being partially AI-written.
asserted
This → chime → concerns
In the comments of the contest rules, I said that “You may use AI for research and to help you with small writing tasks, but the large majority must be written by you.”
uncertain
majority → say → you
This was in the comments and not the formal rules, but I think there’s a general understanding that using AI in what is at least partly a writing contest is against the spirit of the exercise.
asserted
what → think → exercise
On the other hand, this was a joint entry by two contributors, and one of them didn’t use AI.
asserted
one → use → AI
My splitting-the-difference decision is that I won’t disqualify this entry, I’ll let its many detractors vote against it organically at the final vote, and the various finalist perks (free subscription, right to pitch me pieces, prize money if it wins) will go only to the contributor who didn’t use AI.
asserted
who → split → AI
Next contest, I’ll try to have a firmer policy, something like “any entry with a greater than 5% AI-written Pangram score is disqualified, and everyone in a joint entry is responsible for making sure their co-contributor doesn’t bring them over this limit”.
asserted
bring → try → limit
The Aporia
