Photo via Daily Mail

DANIEL HANNAN: Britain's only being targeted for slavery reparations because we're seen as a soft touch. Time to fight back!

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Cite

Hannan, D. (2026, September 22). DANIEL HANNAN: Britain's only being targeted for slavery reparations because we're seen as a soft touch. Time to fight back! Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/debate/article-16149613/DANIEL-HANNAN-Britains-targeted-slavery-reparations-seen-soft-touch-Time-fight-back.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Daily Mail · collected 2026-09-22 · by Daniel Hannan analysis

Quick Summary

Daniel Hannan argues in the Daily Mail that countries seeking reparations from Britain for historical slavery are acting aggressively and ungratefully. He suggests retaliatory measures such as canceling aid programs and denying visas if these nations continue their campaigns against Britain, both legally and diplomatically. Hannan emphasizes Britain's role in abolishing slavery globally and its significant efforts to end the slave trade throughout the 19th century, arguing that any claims for reparations are unfounded given historical context and actions taken by Britain.
Written by AI on 2026-09-22, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Daniel Hannan argues that Britain is being unfairly targeted for slavery reparations by Caribbean states like Barbados and African nations such as Ghana because they see it as an easy target. He suggests these countries are not just making claims but launching a hostile campaign against the UK. In response, Hannan proposes retaliatory measures such as canceling aid programs in Barbados if it pursues Britain for reparations through international courts or denying visas to citizens of Ghana if it leads anti-British campaigns at the UN. He asserts that Britain took decisive actions against slavery earlier than other nations by banning the trade in 1807 and abolishing it completely in 1833, spending £20 million (a significant sum at the time) to buy and free every slave under British dominion. Hannan argues that these reparations demands are an act of bellicosity rather than a just claim for historical grievances.

Written for “Slavery Reparations Debate UK” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Slavery Reparations Debate UK
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 2% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 6 of 21 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A reports on Caribbean nations planning to sue Britain for slavery reparations and bringing it up at the Commonwealth summit, while Article B is a commentary responding to the threat of reparations lawsuits.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
62
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
2%
1 of 62 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
69/100
Daily Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-22 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Daily Mail · 8805 article(s) · 22 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 22 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Daniel Hannan
4 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The old boy could be wheeled out to smile and read a few stumbling lines while the decisions were apparently made by his wife, his staff and a coterie of senior Democrats.
🔮 The two things are correlated, in the sense that getting rid of all the fiddly little exemptions allows you to lower the rates, rather as collapsing all the holes in a Swiss cheese would lower its height.
🔮 A vote to join the European Economic Community in 1972 would have gone against membership; the vote to stay in three years later went in favour.
🔮 What might today's Ghanaians argue in their defence?
Also by Daniel Hannan
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

African Barbados Britain Caribbean Daily Mail

Subjects

Britain GPE · 5× African NORP · 2× Ghana GPE · 2× Barbados GPE · 1× Caribbean NORP · 1× Charles PERSON · 1× Daily Mail ORG · 1× Jamaica GPE · 1× Napoleon PERSON · 1× Third Worldist NORP · 1×

Narrative

Grievance Towards the end of the 18th century, following campaigns by religious groups, notably Anglicans and Quakers, Britain began to see slavery as morally abhorrent, banning the trade in 1807 and slavery itself in 1833, raising the then colossal sum of £20 million through taxation and government borrowing to buy and free every slave in its dominions.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-22
🔮 What might today's Ghanaians argue in their defence?

Claims (62 extracted, 1 hedged)

- See more Daily Mail on Google - save us as a Preferred Source This has gone far enough. asserted
This → see → Source
The countries coming after us for slavery reparations, mainly Caribbean states but also some in Africa, are not just rude and ungrateful. asserted
countries → come → Africa
They are launching a hostile campaign against us, and we should respond accordingly. asserted
we → launch → us
If Barbados pursues us through the courts for trillions of pounds, we should cancel our aid programmes there. asserted
we → pursue → programmes
If Ghana wants to lead a Third Worldist posse against us in the UN, we should deny all visa applications from that country. asserted
we → want → country
We have a range of sanctions to deploy against unfriendly countries, ranging from targeted embargoes to travel bans. asserted
We → have → bans
We should recognise that we are dealing with hostile states. asserted
we → recognise → states
To target Britain, which did more than any other nation on the planet to stamp out what had previously been a universal institution, is not just bad manners. asserted
what → target → planet
Britain was not just early in declaring slavery illegal. asserted
slavery → declare → ?
It then did something unique, pouring its blood and treasure into a campaign to extirpate the foul institution everywhere. asserted
It → do → institution
Even when we were engaged in a life-and-death struggle with Napoleon, we were still diverting warships to hunt down the slavers. asserted
we → engage → slavers
Yes, Britain had been a major player in the slave trade in the 18th century – a time when it was regarded almost everywhere as permanent and inevitable. asserted
it → regard → century
In the 19th century, though, it broke with other countries. asserted
it → break → countries
Driven partly by religious conviction, partly by Enlightenment individualism and partly by capitalism, which made forced labour economically obsolete, it banned slavery in its colonies and began a global campaign against the traffic. That campaign was resisted by many African kings, who saw slavery as both naturally ordained and economically essential. asserted
who → drive → ordained
It was their hostility that drove abolitionists and evangelicals to demand the establishment of African colonies. asserted
that → drive → colonies
Jamaica's culture minister, led a delegation to Britain to petition King Charles for slavery reparations earlier this month Wokesters tend to talk of 'colonialism and slavery' as if they were the same phenomenon. asserted
they → lead → colonialism
They rarely admit the extent to which the first was intended to stamp out the second. asserted
first → admit → second
Following abolition, Britain attempted to make restitution in a meaningful way, spending an astonishing 1.8 per cent annually of GDP between 1808 and 1867 on hunting down the slavers, the most expensive moral foreign policy in history. asserted
Britain → follow → history
If there were a case for reparations in principle (which there is not), that sum alone – not counting the billions given since in aid – covers any debt many times over. asserted
sum → be → debt
But such is the moral fervour of the reparationists that few want to tell them when they are talking rot. asserted
they → want → rot
The trouble is our diplomats and officials – and also, often, our MPs and ministers – keep indulging these grifters. asserted
trouble → keep → grifters
That is the sole reason why they keep targeting us. asserted
they → keep → us
No one asks for reparations from, say, China (which did not abolish slavery until 1910) or Ethiopia (1942) or Saudi Arabia (1962). asserted
which → ask → 1910
You know why? asserted
You → know → ?
Because they don't encourage the shake-down artists. asserted
they → encourage → artists
Suppose we were to send a bill to, say, Ghana on grounds we had expended a great deal of blood and treasure defeating its slavers. asserted
we → suppose → slavers
What might today's Ghanaians argue in their defence? uncertain
Ghanaians → argue → defence
First, they would point out that retroactive law is wrong. asserted
law → point → ?
We don't generally punish things that were legal at the time, and with good reason. asserted
that → punish → reason
It would open the door to chaos. asserted
It → open → chaos
Second, they would argue that slavery was not the only evil in history, and again they would have a point. asserted
they → argue → point
Can we confidently say slavery was worse than, say, the Cambodian killing fields, the Holodomor (the man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine), the Mongol conquests or the sack of Carthage? asserted
slavery → say → Carthage
And even if slavery were in a different moral category from other past atrocities, why should transatlantic slavery be treated as different from the forms of slavery that existed everywhere else? asserted
that → treat → slavery
King Charles is expected to attend the upcoming Commonwealth heads of government meeting in Antigua Vendetta I do mean everywhere. asserted
I → expect → Antigua
Every society, from the Mayans to the Maori, enslaved people. asserted
society → enslave → people
Britain is unusual only in having eliminated the practice. asserted
Britain → eliminate → practice
Some 17 million Africans were sold as slaves in the Islamic world, for example, many of them castrated to serve as eunuchs. asserted
many → sell → eunuchs
Britain's only involvement with that trade was to halt it. asserted
involvement → halt → it
Yet we see the heirs to that trade, Arab states, cheerfully voting in the UN to demand reparations from Britain. asserted
heirs → see → Britain
Even if none of these considerations applied, there would still be something peculiarly abhorrent about resuscitating the notion of ancestral guilt. asserted
none → apply → guilt
…and 22 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support