Photo via New York Post

Panic drove NYC and LA to ban school AI — and that’s a big mistake

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Weber, J. (2026, September 22). Panic drove NYC and LA to ban school AI — and that’s a big mistake. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/09/21/opinion/panic-drove-nyc-la-to-ban-school-ai-and-thats-a-big-mistake/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-09-22 · by Jennifer Weber

Quick Summary

New York City and Los Angeles have banned the use of artificial intelligence tools like chatbots in public schools for nearly a million students combined. Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Chancellor Kamar Samuels in New York decided to ban generative AI from kindergarten through eighth grade, while Los Angeles followed suit with an indefinite ban covering all grades. The article argues that these bans are misguided as they either hinder students' ability to learn about the benefits of AI or prevent them from understanding its risks, ultimately leaving them ill-prepared for a future where AI is increasingly prevalent.
Written by AI on 2026-09-22, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

New York City and Los Angeles have banned the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in their public school systems, affecting more than 600,000 students in New York alone. Mayor Zohran Mamdani criticized President Donald Trump's dismissive stance on AI concerns as "very flip," while also pushing for an all-member hearing to address potential dangers posed by advanced technologies like those developed by Anthropic and OpenAI. Skeptics argue that these bans are overly cautious, pointing out the self-interest of tech companies in calling for slower development of AI. Meanwhile, a Politico poll revealed that nearly half of Americans want to pause the development of sophisticated AI systems. Despite this debate, both cities have opted for stringent measures against AI in education, setting an extreme precedent that some see as counterproductive.

Written for “School AI Bans Controversy” on 2026-11-05, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 School AI Bans Controversy
Education · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
TIME
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 8 of 53 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A discusses the ban on AI in schools by New York and Los Angeles, while Article B is about how parents discuss AI with their children.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 3 of 16 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses NYC's blanket ban on school AI, while Article B describes specific regulatory bills introduced by the City Council aimed at AI companies.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
35
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
4 of 35 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Education
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-22 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 17168 article(s) · 36 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 36 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jennifer Weber
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 When the heads of Anthropic and OpenAI urged AI companies to slow development down, President Donald Trump dubbed their alarm bell a “sick conspiracy” — and skeptics saw self-interest behind both warnings. Mayor Zohran Mamdani faulted Trump for what he called a “very flip response” to AI companies’ talk of “the end of humanity,” and the New York City Council has called for an all-member hearing to question AI companies about the dangers.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

America Americans Anthropic Los Angeles New York

Subjects

Mamdani PERSON · 3× Americans NORP · 2× Los Angeles GPE · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× America GPE · 1× Anthropic ORG · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× New York GPE · 1× Zohran Mamdani PERSON · 1× the New York City Council ORG · 1×

Narrative

When the heads of Anthropic and OpenAI urged AI companies to slow development down, President Donald Trump dubbed their alarm bell a “sick conspiracy” — and skeptics saw self-interest behind both warnings. Mayor Zohran Mamdani faulted Trump for what he called a “very flip response” to AI companies’ talk of “the end of humanity,” and the New York City Council has called for an all-member hearing to question AI companies about the dangers.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-22
🔮 When the heads of Anthropic and OpenAI urged AI companies to slow development down, President Donald Trump dubbed their alarm bell a “sick conspiracy” — and skeptics saw self-interest behind both warnings. Mayor Zohran Mamdani faulted Trump for what he called a “very flip response” to AI companies’ talk of “the end of humanity,” and the New York City Council has called for an all-member hearing to question AI companies about the dangers.
2026-09-22 · New York Post
Panic drove NYC and LA to ban school AI — and that’s a big mistake · assertive framing

Claims (35 extracted, 4 hedged)

There are two ways for America’s schools to get artificial intelligence wrong. asserted
intelligence → be → ?
One is to hand a child a chatbot and let it do all the thinking — and the other is to ban AI and pretend it doesn’t exist. asserted
it → hand → AI
New York and Los Angeles have both chosen the second option. asserted
York → choose → option
That means they’re setting their students up to get the first. asserted
they → mean → first
Americans are split when it comes to AI, as evidenced by the debate that raged last week. asserted
that → split → debate
When the heads of Anthropic and OpenAI urged AI companies to slow development down, President Donald Trump dubbed their alarm bell a “sick conspiracy” — and skeptics saw self-interest behind both warnings. Mayor Zohran Mamdani faulted Trump for what he called a “very flip response” to AI companies’ talk of “the end of humanity,” and the New York City Council has called for an all-member hearing to question AI companies about the dangers. asserted
Council → urge → dangers
The nation is somewhere in between: A Politico poll this month found that 48% want to pause the development of advanced AI. asserted
% → find → AI
Yet on Sept. 2, Mamdani and Chancellor Kamar Samuels chose to go to extremes, banning generative AI in NYC public schools for every student from 2-K through grade 8 — about 600,000 kids. asserted
Mamdani → choose → grade
Later that same day, Los Angeles blocked AI on school devices in every grade — banning it indefinitely for more than 378,000 students. asserted
Angeles → block → students
These school systems are behaving as if a kindergartener’s educational needs are the same as a 13-year-old’s, or a 17-year-old’s. asserted
needs → behave → old
But their bans fail no matter who is right about AI. asserted
who → fail → AI
If Trump is right and AI is the engine of the future economy, our students must learn how to use it. asserted
students → learn → it
If Mamdani is right and AI is dangerous, students must learn how it works, so they can understand its flaws and pitfalls. asserted
they → learn → flaws
Either way the answer is to teach — and a ban teaches nothing. asserted
ban → teach → nothing
Mamdani calls his policy a moratorium. asserted
Mamdani → call → policy
But a moratorium only works if the world outside is also pausing, and right now it isn’t. asserted
it → work → ?
More than half of US teens already use chatbots for schoolwork, according to Pew, and one in 10 students say a chatbot does most of it. uncertain
chatbot → use → it
So students with AI access at home will learn through trial and error, not through careful instruction. asserted
students → learn → instruction
And the rules don’t bind private schools, charter schools or tutors, nor do they touch what happens at home or across the rest of the country. asserted
what → bind → country
That means students without access will fall behind. asserted
students → mean → access
Consequently, New York’s and LA’s moratoriums aren’t taking AI away from kids — just stripping them of the opportunity to learn from teachers how to ask AI good questions, evaluate its information, and gauge the trustworthiness of its assertions. asserted
moratoriums → take → assertions
This isn’t to say students at every level should have access to AI in school. asserted
students → say → school
For the youngest students, through second grade, the ban is correct: They must learn to read first. asserted
They → learn → grade
However, beginning in third grade students should be taught to read what AI produces, spot weak claims, and distinguish fact from opinion. uncertain
AI → begin → opinion
Too many students today can’t do that. When Stanford researchers tested 3,446 high school students in 2019, two-thirds of them could not tell a news story from an ad, even when the ad was labeled. uncertain
ad → test → ad
Early research shows that this kind of work can improve critical-thinking skills. asserted
kind → show → skills
By middle school, a student needs to be able to trace an AI’s claim back to a real source and spot a citation that doesn’t exist — a skill that takes years to teach. Yet the nation’s two largest school districts have no plan to change their teaching to include what students should learn about AI at different grade levels, or when. uncertain
students → need → levels
That’s outright negligence. asserted
That → ’ → ?
As I’ve argued in a Manhattan Institute brief, students need a real AI-literacy curriculum, one that teaches them to judge what AI produces so it never does the thinking for them. asserted
it → argue → them
Regarding AI as a tool, rather than a threat to learning, is key: More than a third of entry-level jobs already require AI literacy. asserted
third → regard → literacy
That’s also what a cautious public is asking for. asserted
public → ’ → what
Americans are not telling schools to hand children over to a chatbot — but neither are they telling schools to pretend AI doesn’t exist. asserted
AI → tell → schools
A curriculum that keeps AI out of the earliest grades, puts the teacher in charge in third grade and builds real skills by middle school respects that caution and still prepares students to succeed. asserted
students → keep → caution
Students are already using AI, whether the two largest school districts like it or not. asserted
districts → use → it
We can teach them how to use it well — or leave a million kids to just figure it out on their own. asserted
We → teach → own
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support