Photo via TIME

What We Tell Our Kids About AI

Read the original at TIME ↗
Cite

Karnal, A., & Kreiter, B. (2026, September 22). What We Tell Our Kids About AI. TIME. https://time.com/article/2026/09/22/what-we-tell-our-kids-about-ai/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

TIME · collected 2026-09-22 · by Alex Karnal, Brian Kreiter

Quick Summary

The article discusses how parents should talk to their children about artificial intelligence (AI) and its potential impacts on society and job markets. It highlights that while there are genuine concerns about AI's risks and dangers, it is also transforming fields like drug development by accelerating the discovery process and improving prediction capabilities in human biology. The authors advocate for a balanced approach of "pragmatic optimism," emphasizing the need to focus on the positive advancements brought by AI alongside addressing its challenges.
Written by AI on 2026-09-22, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Between them, Alex Karnal and Brian Kreiter have six children ranging from ages 8 to 12 who haven't yet encountered concerns about artificial intelligence (AI) potentially ruining their futures. The authors acknowledge that these worries are valid; they mention warnings by AI system developers about the technology's potential dangers beyond current understanding, predictions of job losses due to automation, and debates over truth, power, safety, and institutional governance capabilities.

However, Karnal and Kreiter argue against becoming overly focused on worst-case scenarios and losing sight of AI's existing benefits. They cite an example where five scientists used an AI-driven system to develop a new medicine with potential cancer-treating capabilities in primates within less than six months—an impressive feat highlighting the technology’s current positive impacts. While they acknowledge that the risks are real and require urgent action, they advocate for maintaining a balanced approach that includes pragmatic optimism alongside caution.

Written for “AI And Parenting Advice” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI And Parenting Advice
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 15% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Toronto Star
Hedges 0 of 28 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss AI education but describe different contexts and focuses: one is a detailed account of curriculum development at Toronto French School, while the other is more broadly about how parents talk to their children about AI.”
CBC News
Hedges 4 of 40 claims Outlet record 74/100
“Article A reports on a specific AI integration event in a New Brunswick school, while Article B discusses general parental approaches and concerns about AI education.”
BBC News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 1 of 16 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI in relation to education and children, without reporting on the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Fox News
Hedges 7 of 24 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI's impact and future prospects, not a single specific incident.”
New York Post
Hedges 4 of 35 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses the ban on AI in schools by New York and Los Angeles, while Article B is about how parents discuss AI with their children.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
53
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
15%
8 of 53 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
59/100
TIME's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-22 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

TIME · 782 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Alex Karnal
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 They will learn that some of the people building the most powerful AI systems have warned that the technology could become dangerous in ways we cannot yet control.
2026-09-22 · assertive framing · What We Tell Our Kids About AI
The only article under this byline in the corpus.
Brian Kreiter
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 They will learn that some of the people building the most powerful AI systems have warned that the technology could become dangerous in ways we cannot yet control.
2026-09-22 · assertive framing · What We Tell Our Kids About AI
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

No topics tagged.

Subjects

Merck ORG · 1× Moderna ORG · 1×

Narrative

Nearby, another group of only five scientists used an AI-driven experimental system to move from an idea for a challenging new medicine to demonstrating what we believe are unique cancer-treating capabilities in a primate in less than six months.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-22
🔮 They will learn that some of the people building the most powerful AI systems have warned that the technology could become dangerous in ways we cannot yet control.
2026-09-22 · TIME
What We Tell Our Kids About AI · assertive framing

Claims (53 extracted, 8 hedged)

Between us, we have six children. asserted
we → have → children
None of them has a phone yet, and none has asked us whether artificial intelligence is going to ruin their lives. asserted
intelligence → have → lives
They will learn that some of the people building the most powerful AI systems have warned that the technology could become dangerous in ways we cannot yet control. uncertain
we → learn → ways
They will hear predictions that many of the jobs they might want in the future may disappear. uncertain
they → hear → future
They will encounter arguments about truth, power, safety, and whether our institutions can possibly keep pace with machines advancing faster than our ability to govern them. uncertain
institutions → encounter → them
We will not be able to tell them that any of it is nonsense. asserted
any → tell → it
We don’t think it is. asserted
it → think → ?
But another danger looms over this moment. asserted
danger → loom → moment
As the conversation around AI grows darker, we risk becoming so consumed by what might go wrong that we stop paying attention to what is beginning to go right. uncertain
what → grow → attention
The risks are real and demand immediate action. asserted
risks → demand → action
It is an argument for something we think is becoming equally necessary: pragmatic optimism. asserted
we → think → something
We work in one of the most failure-prone fields there is, trying to understand disease and determine which medicines might work in human beings. uncertain
medicines → work → beings
From where we sit, on the front lines of investing in and creating medicines, we are beginning to see AI change what is possible. asserted
what → sit → medicines
Historically, roughly nine out of 10 therapies entering human testing fail. asserted
therapies → enter → testing
A successful medicine can take a decade or more and billions of dollars to develop. asserted
medicine → take → dollars
But of course, those statistics obscure the real cost. asserted
statistics → obscure → cost
A failed or missing medicine is a patient still waiting. asserted
medicine → miss → ?
For most of modern drug development, scientists have started with a hypothesis about biology, searched for a molecule that might affect it, tested that molecule and, overwhelmingly, discovered along the way that they were wrong. uncertain
they → start → way
AI is beginning to change that story. asserted
AI → begin → story
We have had the wonder of watching this shift in human insight and discovery direction being force-multiplied by AI up close. asserted
shift → have → AI
We recently watched a team of researchers use AI to design antibodies from scratch against some of the hardest targets in medicine, unlocking approaches that have stymied some of the most sophisticated groups in pharma. asserted
that → watch → pharma
Nearby, another group of only five scientists used an AI-driven experimental system to move from an idea for a challenging new medicine to demonstrating what we believe are unique cancer-treating capabilities in a primate in less than six months. asserted
we → use → months
Programs with these ambitions would conventionally require teams of specialists working for years. asserted
Programs → require → years
What is changing is not simply the tools available to help us make predictions about human biology. asserted
changing → change → biology
It is the speed of the discovery process itself: propose an idea, build it, test it in the physical world, learn from what happened, and begin again. asserted
what → propose → world
The scientific method itself is beginning to accelerate, and the number of scientific inquiries, opportunities to advance health per dollar spent, is beginning to scale. asserted
number → begin → dollar
Last month, Merck and Moderna reported that a personalized cancer vaccine for melanoma significantly delayed the disease from spreading. asserted
vaccine → report → disease
What we find particularly exciting is how this growing clinical evidence, combined with AI tools and automated labs, can open the field to more competitors. asserted
evidence → find → competitors
The evidence reduces uncertainty about the approach, while these tools can lower the cost and time required to pursue it. asserted
tools → reduce → it
Together, they can bring more teams and more capital into our fight against cancer and expand the number of promising ideas that will be tested at an unprecedented rate. asserted
that → bring → rate
Anyone claiming that AI has solved drug discovery is selling something. asserted
AI → claim → something
Not one has been approved. asserted
one → approve → ?
Biology has humbled generations of brilliant scientists, and AI will not repeal biology. asserted
AI → humble → biology
Drugs will fail. asserted
Drugs → fail → ?
Patients will respond in ways nobody predicted. asserted
nobody → respond → ways
But we see green shoots and a remarkable new calibration of direction, not a destination. asserted
we → see → direction
Direction is the whole game in fighting disease and improving human health. asserted
Direction → fight → health
AI is beginning to give us better ways of finding it. asserted
AI → begin → it
Not the belief that the dangers surrounding AI are exaggerated, or that medicine is about to become easy. asserted
medicine → surround → AI
We believe neither. asserted
We → believe → neither
…and 13 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support