Photo via UPI

Appeals court brings back Republican-backed Missouri voting map

Read the original at UPI ↗
Cite

Keppeler, J. (2026, September 22). Appeals court brings back Republican-backed Missouri voting map. UPI. https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2026/09/21/appeals-court-missouri-should-use-new-voting-map/4081790035793/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

UPI · collected 2026-09-22 · by Jill Keppeler

Quick Summary

A federal appeals court ruled on September 21st that Missouri must use a Republican-backed congressional voting map for November's midterm elections, despite previous rulings against it. The decision upholds U.S. District Judge Stephen Clark’s ruling and reverses the state supreme court’s earlier block of the new map, which alters the 5th Congressional District to favor Republicans. This comes after the U.S. Supreme Court twice declined to allow the use of this map ahead of November's election.
Written by AI on 2026-09-22, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

A federal appeals court in Missouri ordered on September 18 that the state must use newly drawn Republican-backed congressional districts for November’s midterm elections, despite previous rulings by both the U.S. Supreme Court and the Missouri Supreme Court blocking their implementation. The new map, favored by former President Donald Trump, aims to benefit Republicans by altering district boundaries and splitting existing ones. This decision follows a long-standing legal battle over redistricting in Missouri, which has seen multiple conflicting court orders affecting voter registration and ballots already printed using the old 2022 map. As a result, the case is likely headed back to the U.S. Supreme Court for a final ruling before November's elections.

Written for “Missouri Redistricting Saga” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 26 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Missouri Redistricting Saga
Politics · 27 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 8% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Fox News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 3 of 23 claims Outlet record 69/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 16 claims Outlet record 70/100
NBC News
Hedges 0 of 14 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Guardian
⚖️ Centre further left than this Hedges 0 of 9 claims Outlet record 66/100
Toronto Star
Hedges 5 of 44 claims Outlet record 64/100
Fox News
Hedges 4 of 38 claims Outlet record 69/100
NBC News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 2 of 26 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different court rulings on the use of a Republican-backed voting map in Missouri; Article A refers to an appeals court ruling to use the new map, while Article B describes the Supreme Court rejecting this push for the third time.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 0 of 25 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different rulings by different courts at distinct times: one from an appeals court allowing a new map and another from the Supreme Court blocking that map.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 13 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different rulings by different courts (8th Circuit Court of Appeals and Supreme Court) regarding Missouri's congressional voting map at distinct points in time.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
13
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
1 of 13 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
56/100
UPI's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
27
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-22 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

UPI · 58 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jill Keppeler
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 This meant the state would use voting maps with the congressional districts it used in 2022 and 2024.
🔮 The new rules would give the U.S. Postal Service unprecedented power to withhold mail-in ballots.
Also by Jill Keppeler
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Democrat Missouri Republican Republicans the U.S. Supreme Court

Subjects

the U.S. Supreme Court ORG · 4× Missouri GPE · 3× Republicans NORP · 3× Democrat NORP · 2× Republican NORP · 2× Denny Hoskins PERSON · 1× Hoskins PERSON · 1× Stephen Clark PERSON · 1× The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ORG · 1× U.S. GPE · 1×

Narrative

The state used the map in primary elections earlier this year, before the state's high court ruled unanimously a few weeks ago to block the map and say that a referendum on redistricting should instead be on the November ballot.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-22
🔮 This meant the state would use voting maps with the congressional districts it used in 2022 and 2024.

Claims (13 extracted, 1 hedged)

A federal appeals court ruled Monday that Missouri must use a new, Republican-friendly congressional voting map in November's midterm elections, although the U.S. Supreme Court has twice declined to allow it. asserted
Court → rule → it
The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the new map, first approved last year, should be used for the upcoming election, which is less than two months away. asserted
which → say → election
The state used the map in primary elections earlier this year, before the state's high court ruled unanimously a few weeks ago to block the map and say that a referendum on redistricting should instead be on the November ballot. asserted
referendum → use → ballot
This meant the state would use voting maps with the congressional districts it used in 2022 and 2024. asserted
it → mean → 2022
Several days later, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to grant an emergency appeal by Missouri Republicans asking to use the newer map. asserted
Court → decline → map
But the story continued: Not long after that ruling, U.S. District Judge Stephen Clark ruled that the state could use the map, and Missouri Secretary of State Denny Hoskins told local elected officials that he'd follow the federal judge's ruling instead. The state supreme court then summoned Hoskins to explain why it shouldn't fine him in contempt, and the U.S. Supreme Court again ruled against the use of the 2025 map, setting up the referendum again. The decision Monday, which upholds Clark's decision, has no immediate effect. uncertain
which → continue → effect
The appeals court put its ruling on hold for a week, allowing challengers time to involve the U.S. Supreme Court yet again. asserted
court → put → Court
Local elections officials have already sent absentee ballots to citizens overseas and military voters. asserted
officials → send → citizens
State law requires absentee ballots to be available to other voters by Tuesday. asserted
law → require → Tuesday
The 2025 map, which is backed by President Donald Trump, changed the 5th Congressional District in the state, a district now held by Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, a Democrat. asserted
which → back → Cleaver
It broke up the Kansas City base of the district and extended it into more Republican-leaning areas, giving Republicans a chance to take the district, which is one of the only Democrat-held districts in the state. asserted
which → break → state
A redistricting push backed by Trump started after a U.S. Supreme Court decision in April that gutted a part of the landmark federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 that helped protect minority voting power. asserted
that → back → power
Many states, especially in the southern United States, have since redrawn their voting maps to favor Republicans. asserted
states → redrawn → Republicans
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support