Photo via NBC News

Appeals court seeks to revive GOP congressional map in Missouri

Read the original at NBC News ↗
Cite

Hurley, L. (2026, September 21). Appeals court seeks to revive GOP congressional map in Missouri. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2026-election/appeals-court-seeks-revive-gop-congressional-map-missouri-rcna599108

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

NBC News · collected 2026-09-21 · by Lawrence Hurley

Quick Summary

On Monday, a federal appeals court in Missouri ruled that Republicans can use their newly drawn congressional map for November’s election, despite previous rejections by the Supreme Court. The ruling was made by three Republican-appointed judges and supports the use of the 2025 map over the previously used 2022 one. However, the decision is on hold for a week to allow opponents time to challenge it further at the Supreme Court level.
Written by AI on 2026-09-22, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

A federal appeals court in Missouri ordered on September 18 that the state must use newly drawn Republican-backed congressional districts for November’s midterm elections, despite previous rulings by both the U.S. Supreme Court and the Missouri Supreme Court blocking their implementation. The new map, favored by former President Donald Trump, aims to benefit Republicans by altering district boundaries and splitting existing ones. This decision follows a long-standing legal battle over redistricting in Missouri, which has seen multiple conflicting court orders affecting voter registration and ballots already printed using the old 2022 map. As a result, the case is likely headed back to the U.S. Supreme Court for a final ruling before November's elections.

Written for “Missouri Redistricting Saga” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 26 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Missouri Redistricting Saga
Politics · 27 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 16 claims Outlet record 70/100
Fox News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 3 of 23 claims Outlet record 69/100
The Guardian
⚖️ Centre Hedges 0 of 9 claims Outlet record 66/100
UPI
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 13 claims Outlet record 56/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 13 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different rulings by different courts at distinct times and with opposing outcomes regarding Missouri's congressional map.”
Toronto Star
Hedges 5 of 44 claims Outlet record 64/100
Fox News
Hedges 4 of 38 claims Outlet record 69/100
Fox News
Hedges 1 of 6 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles describe different rulings by different courts on the use of a new congressional map in Missouri, not the same specific incident.”
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different rulings at distinct times by different courts (federal appeals court vs. Supreme Court) regarding Missouri's congressional map.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
14
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 14 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
60/100
NBC News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
27
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-22 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

NBC News · 1987 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Lawrence Hurley
8 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The ballot in New Hampshire includes a closely watched Senate race that could play a key role in deciding control of the chamber.
🔮 The court order included no explanation, saying only that two conservative justices, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, would have granted it.
🔮 The justices will hear arguments and issue a ruling later in the court term, which runs until June.
🔮 Although the case concerns a specific lawsuit the city and county of Boulder, Colorado, brought against Exxon Mobil and Suncor Energy, the ultimate decision could have broad ramifications for more than two dozen similar lawsuits around the country.
🔮 President Donald Trump’s harsh criticisms may still be ringing in the ears of Supreme Court justices when they return to the bench for a new nine-month term next week.
2026-10-02 · assertive framing · Trump clashes ahead as new Supreme Court term begins
🔮 The Supreme Court said Thursday it will consider whether immigrants subject to deportation can be held in detention indefinitely while their cases are adjudicated.
🔮 will vote before this order seeks to take effect.
🔮 “This Administration will continue to lawfully enact the agenda President Trump was elected on — which includes the safety and security of our elections,” White House spokesperson Lauren Bis said in a statement.
Also by Lawrence Hurley
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 8 articles by Lawrence Hurley →

Topics

Constitution Democratic GOP Missouri Republicans

Subjects

Missouri GPE · 4× Republicans NORP · 3× Democratic NORP · 2× GOP ORG · 2× Republican NORP · 2× the Missouri Supreme Court ORG · 2× 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ORG · 1× House ORG · 1× St. Louis GPE · 1× the Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

The St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered that the new map drawn last year should be used this fall, even though the Supreme Court has already twice rejected Republicans on the issue in recent weeks and had apparently put the issue to bed. “This Court holds that Missouri’s current plan to use the 2022 map in the November 2026 general election violates the Constitution.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-22
🔮 will vote before this order seeks to take effect.
2026-09-22 · NBC News
Appeals court seeks to revive GOP congressional map in Missouri · assertive framing

Claims (14 extracted, 0 hedged)

A federal appeals court on Monday introduced a new wrinkle into the convoluted fight over whether Republicans can use a new congressional map in November’s election, as the GOP tries to eliminate one of the state’s two Democratic House districts. asserted
GOP → introduce → districts
The St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered that the new map drawn last year should be used this fall, even though the Supreme Court has already twice rejected Republicans on the issue in recent weeks and had apparently put the issue to bed. “This Court holds that Missouri’s current plan to use the 2022 map in the November 2026 general election violates the Constitution. asserted
plan → base → Constitution
Only use of the 2025 map complies with the Constitution and federal law,” the appeals court said in an unsigned ruling. asserted
court → comply → ruling
The decision has no immediate effect and faces long odds to be implemented ahead of the election based on the Supreme Court’s previous action. asserted
decision → have → action
The three-judge appeals court panel was comprised of Republican-appointed judges, including two picked by President Donald Trump. asserted
panel → comprise → Trump
The appeals court put its ruling on hold for a week, giving the challengers time to seek Supreme Court intervention again. “Ballots have been printed, and Missourians have already voted. asserted
Missourians → put → intervention
will vote before this order seeks to take effect. asserted
order → vote → effect
Officials should stop wasting taxpayers’ money on pointless legal action and instead focus on administering our elections,” Richard von Glahn, the executive director of People Not Politicians, the group challenging the map, said in a statement. asserted
Glahn → stop → statement
Monday’s decision upheld a decision by Missouri-based U.S. District Judge Stephen Clark, who had that the new map must be used, notwithstanding the Missouri Supreme Court having previously reached the opposite conclusion. asserted
Court → uphold → conclusion
The U.S. Supreme Court put Clark’s ruling on hold on Sept. 10 in a decision that seemed to end the dispute, with the state set to use the previous map from 2022, which includes six seats held by Republicans and two held by Democrats. asserted
which → put → Democrats
Missouri was one of several states where the Legislature drew a new map last year, seeking to draw out Democratic Rep. Emanuel Cleaver and create a 7-1 GOP map. asserted
Legislature → draw → map
Missouri Secretary of State Denny Hoskins, a Republican, had after a significant delay ordered election officials to use the 2022 map. asserted
Hoskins → order → map
That followed an unusual proceeding in which the Missouri Supreme Court held him in contempt for failing to comply with its ruling that said the 2025 map had to be put on hold under state law while a voter referendum takes place. asserted
referendum → follow → place
The legal fight began when opponents of the new map gathered sufficient signatures to put the new map before voters in November as a ballot referendum. But Hoskins delayed a decision about whether to include the measure on the ballot, waiting until the last minute before rejecting the plan, arguing that redistricting plans are not subject to voters’ approval. asserted
plans → begin → approval
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support