Photo via Toronto Star

Whatever good is in Mark Carney's Building Canada Strong Act is poisoned by the toxic rest

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Cite

Raj, A. (2026, September 22). Whatever good is in Mark Carney's Building Canada Strong Act is poisoned by the toxic rest. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/althia-raj-whatever-good-is-in-carney-s-building-canada-strong-act-is-poisoned-by-the-toxic-rest/article_8fb6db96-c943-4461-87bc-a31107be6ce2.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Toronto Star · collected 2026-09-22 · by Althia Raj

Quick Summary

Prime Minister Mark Carney is internationally praised for his diplomatic efforts and leadership in global issues such as climate change and human rights. However, domestically, criticism arises over the Building Canada Strong Act, a 243-page omnibus bill that accelerates project reviews and permits to one year while allowing government discretion on which laws apply to specific projects deemed regions of national interest. The bill was presented with limited time for journalists to review it, raising concerns about transparency and accountability in its drafting and implementation.
Written by AI on 2026-09-22, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Prime Minister Mark Carney's Building Canada Strong Act is facing criticism for including provisions that could undermine environmental protections and democratic processes, despite his international praise for promoting multilateralism and addressing climate change. At home, Carney enjoys significant support from Canadians who back his agenda on defence spending and oil subsidies, with recent byelections seeing the Liberals win all three contested seats by more than 50% of the vote. However, concerns arise over specific bill provisions such as granting the Canada Energy Regulator (CER) powers to remove conditions on pipeline construction projects, which could bypass environmental laws. Conrad Black criticized Carney's speech at the European Parliament, arguing that it was misguided since the European Parliament lacks real power and its regulatory framework often conflicts with policies in Atlantic English-speaking countries like Canada and the United States.

Written for “Mark Carney's Policy Criticized” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Mark Carney's Policy Criticized
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 10% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Bulwark
Hedges 1 of 3 claims
“The articles discuss different aspects of Canada's relationship with Europe and the US under Prime Minister Mark Carney but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 5 of 32 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Mark Carney's political actions and image, one focusing on his alignment with corporate interests and the other on his international relations efforts.”
The Hindu
Hedges 1 of 12 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different events: one discusses Mark Carney's international diplomacy in general, while the other specifically covers a news conference where he talks about trade negotiations with India.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 34 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles describe different events: one about Carney's general international efforts and another about a specific event co-hosting an oceanographic research rally.”
The Globe and Mail
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 52/100
“The articles describe different events: one focuses on Carney's broader diplomatic efforts and values, while the other specifically mentions his pledge of $82 million at the UN General Assembly for ocean monitoring.”
National Post
Hedges 0 of 36 claims Outlet record 60/100
CBC News
Hedges 1 of 28 claims Outlet record 74/100
“The articles describe different speeches by Mark Carney and Anita Anand at separate occasions.”
National Post
Hedges 2 of 68 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Prime Minister Mark Carney's policies and actions without describing the same specific incident.”
National Post
Hedges 2 of 13 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A reports on the impending tabling of a major economic and labour bill by the Liberal government, while Article B discusses Prime Minister Carney's actions and policies both internationally and domestically but does not specifically address the same legislative event.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 1 of 25 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Mark Carney's legislative actions without clearly referring to the same specific incident or bill.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
29
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
10%
3 of 29 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
64/100
Toronto Star's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-22 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Star · 10784 article(s) · 28 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 28 correction(s)
2026-10-26
Correction
2026-10-24
Correction
2026-10-07
Correction
2026-09-24
Correction

Who wrote this

Althia Raj
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Gunn may believe that DRIPA and SOGI policies led British Columbia to turn blue and that the same strategy will pay off for Poilievre.
🔮 Monday, a trial begins in Vancouver whose outcome could significantly alter climate change policies across the country.
🔮 It’s legislation that Conservatives can only dream Canadians would have allowed them to table.
Also by Althia Raj
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Canada Canadians Liberals Partners for Multilateralism the Financial Times

Subjects

Canada GPE · 3× Canadians NORP · 3× Carney PERSON · 3× Liberals NORP · 3× Brazil GPE · 1× Kenya GPE · 1× Mark Carney PERSON · 1× Partners for Multilateralism ORG · 1× the European Council ORG · 1× the Financial Times ORG · 1×

Narrative

This is far from the only poison pill in C-39: the bill gives the CER — now the reviewer of major pipelines — the ability to remove conditions, to suspend a variety of laws from applying, including for example, now allowing a company to start constructing a pipeline without meeting the conditions set out in its certificate (those very conditions upon which the certificate was granted).
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-22
🔮 It’s legislation that Conservatives can only dream Canadians would have allowed them to table.

Claims (29 extracted, 3 hedged)

On the world stage, he dazzles. asserted
he → dazzle → stage
Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks eloquently about shared values of democracy, addressing climate change, fighting for human rights, and walks his talk of like-minded countries banding together to preserve the rules-based international order. asserted
countries → speak → order
Whether its penning an op-ed in the Financial Times to announce Partners for Multilateralism with the presidents of Brazil, Kenya and the European Council, or sounding the alarm at the World Economic Forum in Davos, or at the European Parliament in Strasburg, Carney has made Canadians proud. asserted
Canadians → pen → Strasburg
At home, he is praised for his stance against U.S. President Donald Trump’s threats. asserted
he → praise → threats
Because of the current political realities — and Carney’s capacity to lead — a significant majority back his agenda, recent byelections saw the Liberals win all three seats by more than 50 per cent of the vote. asserted
Liberals → lead → vote
But that agenda is increasingly different from the one the Liberals put forward in the last election: massive increases in defence spending, big subsidies to oil and gas, the abandonment of United Nations peacekeeping, net-zero climate goals that won’t be met, the selling off of Canada’s largest airports to private operators, and a loophole reform to Canada’s project approval process. asserted
that → put → process
It’s legislation that Conservatives can only dream Canadians would have allowed them to table. asserted
them → ’ → that
But Liberals who spent years saying their assessments wouldn’t result in lawsuits, and that science-based decision making that considered impacts on nature, climate, Indigenous Peoples, was required — now stand by watching it dismantled by one of their own. asserted
it → spend → own
Now, one can believe that it takes too long to get projects done in this country and reform is needed, and still conclude that what the prime minister proposes is a radical departure from what Canadians expect. asserted
Canadians → believe → what
Building Canada Strong Act is a 243-page omnibus bill that amends several pieces of legislation. asserted
that → build → legislation
It wasn’t given to journalists until 35 minutes into a 45-minute technical briefing. asserted
It → give → briefing
When ministers took the podium, reporters had no chance to thoughtfully review the bill. asserted
reporters → take → bill
This isn’t the way sweeping legislation should be explained. asserted
legislation → explain → ?
Setting that aside, what the bill does is vast in scope. asserted
does → set → scope
It doesn’t just speed up timelines for reviews and permitting to one year, it amends the “Building Canada Act,” the controversial bill C-5, to allow for “regions of national interests,” essentially gives the government another loophole by which to fast-track projects, where it can pick and choose what laws to apply. asserted
it → speed → laws
The new bill also gives a designated minister — for now, Internal Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc — the power to remove conditions from projects already approved. asserted
bill → give → projects
“One of the things that’s holding Roberts Bank Terminal Two back from construction, are some conditions that were imposed under the environmental assessment to prevent harm to Southern Resident Killer Whales,” said Anna Johnston, a staff lawyer at West Coast Environmental Law. asserted
Johnston → hold → Law
“The proponent had to come up with a plan for shipping at night so as to more minimally impede orcas when they’re hunting. asserted
they → have → orcas
“The minister now, in this bill, will have the power to just remove that condition of approval,” she said. asserted
she → have → approval
The bill mostly follows what was presented last May for public consultation. uncertain
what → follow → consultation
Cabinet will pre asserted
Cabinet → pre → ?
approve big pipeline projects before routing details or the Canada Energy Regulator’s review of environmental conditions and impacts on Indigenous Peoples is complete, for example. asserted
review → approve → example
But one thing the government backed away from — after receiving 26,000 emails — are changes to Species At Risk Act that would have allowed cabinet to approve projects that could lead to the extinction of species. uncertain
that → back → species
Unfortunately, the changes proposed Monday, and the change made in C-5 last year, allow the Carney government to do the same run around Canada’s environmental protections for species at risk, like the orcas, just without the public closely watching. asserted
public → propose → orcas
This is far from the only poison pill in C-39: the bill gives the CER — now the reviewer of major pipelines — the ability to remove conditions, to suspend a variety of laws from applying, including for example, now allowing a company to start constructing a pipeline without meeting the conditions set out in its certificate (those very conditions upon which the certificate was granted). asserted
certificate → give → which
The bill also amends the Canada Labour Code to expand on the labour minister to use section 107 — a power that the Liberals have used several times since 2024, including last summer under Carney, to shut down strikes and impose binding arbitration. asserted
Liberals → amend → arbitration
Labour groups had called on the Liberals to eliminate section 107 — arguing it was unconstitutional (four ongoing court cases may settle that). uncertain
cases → call → that
Instead, the Grits have codified it and offered conditions by which the minister’s power can be exercised. asserted
power → codify → which
The government frames this law as part of its “Canada Strong” plan — and frankly, some parts are good — but toxic with good is still bad. asserted
toxic → frame → good
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support