Photo via Toronto Star

Mark Carney's sweeping new bill gets one big thing right

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Cite

Radwanski, A. (2026, September 23). Mark Carney's sweeping new bill gets one big thing right. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/business/opinion/carney-s-sweeping-new-bill-gets-one-big-thing-right/article_e8dfc422-a7e2-496d-a1e1-ca610594432c.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Toronto Star · collected 2026-09-23 · by Adam Radwanski

Quick Summary

Mark Carney introduced the Building Canada Strong Act as part of his efforts to streamline federal approvals for major projects like mines and power stations in Canada. This new legislation aims to reduce the time it takes to approve such projects from about five years to one year, by conducting all reviews simultaneously rather than sequentially and granting approvals through a single ministerial decision instead of multiple cabinet approvals. While there is controversy around changes to labour law included in this bill, experts generally agree that Carney's approach addresses longstanding issues with Canada’s regulatory process for major infrastructure projects.
Written by AI on 2026-09-23, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Patty Hajdu, Canada’s Jobs Minister, stated that the federal government will not interfere with workers’ right to strike despite considering legal changes to improve labour relations. The minister emphasized that upcoming legislation aims to reduce the number of times the government has to intervene in strikes under Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code. This section allows Ottawa to refer disputes to the Canada Industrial Relations Board, a measure employers and unions have differing views on. While most employers advocate for greater federal power to intervene during labour disruptions that could harm national interests, unions argue against any measures that might compromise their right to strike. Hajdu added that government intervention is a last resort and encouraged parties to resolve issues themselves at the negotiating table. The proposed amendments include introducing a special mediator role who will document arguments in acrimonious negotiations and publish reports identifying sticking points.

Written for “Canada Labour Law Changes” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 23 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Canada Labour Law Changes
Politics · 24 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 4% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBC News
Hedges 13 of 60 claims Outlet record 74/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 1 of 29 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss related themes of regulatory reform but refer to different countries (USA vs. Canada) and distinct legislative contexts.”
National Post
Hedges 1 of 21 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Mark Carney's agenda but do not describe the same specific incident or event.”
National Post
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 52 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Mark Carney's government policies and do not refer to the same specific incident or time.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 5 of 32 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Mark Carney's involvement with Canadian business interests; one focuses on his interactions with corporate Canada, while the other mentions a bill aimed at improving economic competitiveness.”
National Post
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 35 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of economic competitiveness in Canada but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
National Post
Hedges 3 of 32 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of policies by Prime Minister Mark Carney but do not describe the same specific incident.”
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 6 of 27 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different topics related to government intervention in energy projects but describe distinct events without overlapping time, place, or outcome.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Centre further left than this Hedges 1 of 7 claims Outlet record 64/100
“While both articles discuss Mark Carney's new economic bill introduced in Parliament, Article A focuses on the introduction and potential implications for labour relations, whereas Article B discusses the broader context of streamlining project reviews.”
CBC News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 5 of 14 claims Outlet record 74/100
“The articles discuss different aspects related to climate legislation but do not describe the same specific incident or court ruling.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
25
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
4%
1 of 25 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
64/100
Toronto Star's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
24
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-23 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Star · 10939 article(s) · 28 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 28 correction(s)
2026-10-26
Correction
2026-10-24
Correction
2026-10-07
Correction
2026-09-24
Correction

Who wrote this

Adam Radwanski
6 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 You may have your own causes for alarm, at this week’s decision by the Bank of Canada to impose its first interest-rate increase in more than three years.
🔮 In fact, buried in the same announcement was a backtracking on Ottawa’s plans to toughen Canada’s rules on regulating vehicle emissions, which could further weaken the domestic EV market for the next few years.
🔮 The federal budget expected next month would be a good time for Mark Carney to start thinking small.
🔮 What could Canadians tangibly gain from our potential new partnership with the European Union?
🔮 And that’s long enough to scare off many would-be proponents from trying to get them built in the first place.
🔮 It doesn’t require a vivid imagination to foresee how much more poorly an event like this week’s, which may or may not become an annual thing, could play in future.
Also by Adam Radwanski
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 6 articles by Adam Radwanski →

Topics

Building Canada Strong Act Canada Ottawa the Building Canada Act the Major Projects Office

Subjects

Carney PERSON · 4× Canada GPE · 2× Ottawa ORG · 2× Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission ORG · 1× Crown ORG · 1× Mark Carney PERSON · 1× cabinet ORG · 1× the Canada Energy Regulator ORG · 1× the Impact Assessment Agency ORG · 1× the Major Projects Office ORG · 1×

Narrative

Another is to strengthen the ability of a single federal entity to oversee and serve as a single entry point for those processes, including by giving leadership of some of them to the Canada Energy Regulator or Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (whose specialized expertise are supposed to help speed things up) rather than just the Impact Assessment Agency.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-23
🔮 And that’s long enough to scare off many would-be proponents from trying to get them built in the first place.
2026-09-23 · Toronto Star
Mark Carney's sweeping new bill gets one big thing right · assertive framing

Claims (25 extracted, 1 hedged)

Beneath all the noise, around the sweeping legislation with which Mark Carney kicked off this fall’s parliamentary sitting, lies his second attempt at tearing down one of the biggest and most longstanding obstacles to Canada’s economic competitiveness and opportunity. asserted
attempt → kick → competitiveness
For what feels like forever, companies seeking to build new mines or power stations or pipelines or ports have complained about having to navigate a federal approvals process that can verge on Kafkaesque. asserted
that → feel → process
With 14 different federal departments or agencies holding permitting power, and at least a handful of them typically overlapping on any given proposal, major projects have tended to take about five years to get green-lit. asserted
projects → hold → years
And that’s long enough to scare off many would-be proponents from trying to get them built in the first place. asserted
them → ’ → place
Hot off last year’s election campaign, Carney hurriedly attempted a quick fix, via the Building Canada Act. asserted
Carney → attempt → Act
But it mostly just created a workaround that would allow select projects to bypass normal processes if they were deemed by Ottawa to be in the national interest — a designation nobody has proven eager to seek, partly for fear of court challenges. asserted
nobody → create → challenges
It also created yet another agency, the Major Projects Office, to help navigate pre-existing ones. asserted
It → create → ones
The do-over that he unveiled this week to kick off the fall parliamentary sitting is a much different story. asserted
he → unveil → sitting
There’s already lots of controversy around the new (and confusingly similarly named) Building Canada Strong Act, much of it around changes to labour law that the government chose to lump in with the regulatory ones. asserted
government → ’ → ones
Carney’s unrelenting inclination to impress everyone with the scope of his ambition, in this case with an omnibus bill touted as “the most consequential economic legislation” of this era, has its downsides. asserted
inclination → impress → downsides
But few people familiar with Ottawa’s byzantine inner workings would disagree with the permitting culture shift that he’s trying to engineer. asserted
he → disagree → that
And the way he’s mostly going about it looks a lot more promising than last time around. asserted
he → go → time
Instead of just cherry-picking a few well-lobbied pitches, the government is now promising to get all major projects approved (or rejected) within a year, through a complex set of proposed changes that largely boil down to a few fundamentals. asserted
that → pick → fundamentals
One is to conduct all reviews across those many departments (for instance involving impacts on waterways or wildlife) simultaneously, not sequentially as has tended to happen, and then have approvals granted in one fell swoop by the environment minister rather than scattershot by half of cabinet. asserted
approvals → conduct → cabinet
Another is to strengthen the ability of a single federal entity to oversee and serve as a single entry point for those processes, including by giving leadership of some of them to the Canada Energy Regulator or Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (whose specialized expertise are supposed to help speed things up) rather than just the Impact Assessment Agency. asserted
expertise → strengthen → things
And in a similar vein, Carney is proposing to create a single hub for most Crown-Indigenous consultations, which are currently as diffuse as other processes in a way that arguably serves neither side’s interests. asserted
that → propose → interests
None of this is foolproof, and there’s no guarantee it’ll get all decisions down to 12 months. asserted
it → ’ → months
But if it comes close to that, it’ll move Canada from the slower end of project approvals toward the front of the pack among comparable countries, including the United States. asserted
it → come → States
It’s also not exactly a dramatic rightward shift. asserted
It → ’ → ?
Quite a bit of it is stuff that the government was also toying with under Justin Trudeau, but never got around to. asserted
government → toy → Trudeau
All of which makes it a bit frustrating that Carney couldn’t resist the temptation to combine it with more contentious measures — even just on the project-permitting side, let alone the strange stew he cooked up by tossing in policies meant to reduce work-stopping labour disputes. asserted
he → make → disputes
If you’re worried about existing environmental protections or Indigenous engagement requirements being softened, for instance, there’s legitimate cause for concern in the bill’s proposal to create “regions of national interest” in which blanket permitting conditions could be set, reducing scrutiny of each individual project. uncertain
conditions → ’re → project
Likewise the prospect of ministerial approval in select cases for early work on projects to begin before approvals have been granted, since it’s not hard to imagine pressure on the government to not then stop that work in its tracks. asserted
it → begin → tracks
Those components of the purportedly generational piece of legislation are at once more marginal, in terms of how much they’ll come into play and the extent to which they’ll improve the investment climate, and riskier in terms of tipping the scales. asserted
they → come → scales
Better Carney had stuck to finally lighting a fire under the system to enforce existing protections as quickly and predictably as possible, which is what’s really going to get Canada built (stronger). asserted
Canada → stick → protections
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support