The Aporia
Tuck, S. (2026, September 23). Carney government’s retaliation may weaken the legal case against Trump’s tariffs, think tank argues. National Post. https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/carney-governments-retaliation-may-weaken-the-legal-case-against-trumps-tariffs
Tuck, Simon. “Carney government’s retaliation may weaken the legal case against Trump’s tariffs, think tank argues.” National Post, 23 Sept. 2026, https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/carney-governments-retaliation-may-weaken-the-legal-case-against-trumps-tariffs.
Tuck, Simon. “Carney government’s retaliation may weaken the legal case against Trump’s tariffs, think tank argues.” National Post, September 23, 2026. https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/carney-governments-retaliation-may-weaken-the-legal-case-against-trumps-tariffs.
Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.
The Montreal Economic Institute (MEI) released a report arguing that Carney's government's recent imposition of counter-tariffs on American imports may weaken Canada’s legal stance against Trump's tariffs, as the U.S. President's actions could be justified under the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, which allows for retaliatory measures if another country imposes discriminatory tariffs. Law professor Ilya Somin from George Mason University in Virginia notes that while there is political pressure to retaliate against Trump’s tariffs on Canada, such counter-tariffs are inherently discriminatory and could legally support the justification for Trump's actions, thereby undermining any legal challenges to them. The report suggests that while understanding the political motivations behind these retaliatory measures, they may come with significant legal risks.