Photo via National Post

Carney government’s retaliation may weaken the legal case against Trump’s tariffs, think tank argues

Read the original at National Post ↗
Cite

Tuck, S. (2026, September 23). Carney government’s retaliation may weaken the legal case against Trump’s tariffs, think tank argues. National Post. https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/carney-governments-retaliation-may-weaken-the-legal-case-against-trumps-tariffs

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

National Post · collected 2026-09-23 · by Simon Tuck

Quick Summary

A new report from the Montreal Economic Institute argues that the Carney government's recent retaliatory tariffs against the United States could undermine Canada's legal case against President Trump’s tariffs. The report, set for release on Wednesday, claims that by imposing discriminatory tariffs, Canada may be providing justification under U.S. law for Trump’s actions, potentially weakening its own position in court. Law professor Ilya Somin of George Mason University, one of the report authors, acknowledges the political motivation behind these counter-tariffs but warns they carry legal risks and could complicate efforts to challenge the tariffs legally.
Written by AI on 2026-09-23, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The Montreal Economic Institute (MEI) released a report arguing that Carney's government's recent imposition of counter-tariffs on American imports may weaken Canada’s legal stance against Trump's tariffs, as the U.S. President's actions could be justified under the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, which allows for retaliatory measures if another country imposes discriminatory tariffs. Law professor Ilya Somin from George Mason University in Virginia notes that while there is political pressure to retaliate against Trump’s tariffs on Canada, such counter-tariffs are inherently discriminatory and could legally support the justification for Trump's actions, thereby undermining any legal challenges to them. The report suggests that while understanding the political motivations behind these retaliatory measures, they may come with significant legal risks.

Written for “US Tariff Policy” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 US Tariff Policy
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 36% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Global News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 10 of 114 claims Outlet record 63/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the trade war between Canada and the US; one focuses on a Texas manufacturer's perspective, while the other discusses a think tank report on legal implications of counter-tariffs.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 45 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss related issues of trade disputes between Trump and Canada but describe different aspects of this broader topic.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 26 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Canada's response to U.S. tariffs, with Article A focusing on strategic retaliation lessons from China and Article B analyzing legal implications of direct discriminatory counter-tariffs.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 22 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different aspects and timing related to Trump's trade war with Canada, one focusing on a think tank report about counter-tariffs weakening legal case and another on the U.S. Trade Czar's comments about lack of urgency for a deal.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 14 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Canada-US tariff situation and do not describe the exact same incident or outcome.”
CBC News
Hedges 4 of 34 claims Outlet record 74/100
“The articles describe different aspects of ongoing trade tensions between Canada and the U.S., but do not clearly refer to the same specific incident or timing.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
14
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
36%
5 of 14 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
60/100
National Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-23 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

National Post · 1242 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Simon Tuck
10 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 OTTAWA — Tax reform designed to spur economic growth will be a key pillar in Prime Minister Mark Carney’s second budget, government sources say, signalling another policy shift in the governing Liberals from the Justin Trudeau era.
2026-10-29 · assertive framing · Carney budget to focus on taxes, shift from Trudeau era
🔮 The update also announced the new Council for 24 Sussex, a group of “distinguished” supporters of the project who will add their voices, expertise and access to networks, while helping raise awareness and encourage contributions.
🔮 That could include using sanctions to freeze and forfeit assets to compensate victims and their families.
🔮 The Carney government announced Tuesday that it will create a new Crown corporation for defence procurement, the latest new wing of the federal bureaucracy at a time of public service cuts.
🔮 A new report by Ottawa’s fiscal watchdog warns that the planned high-speed rail project from Toronto to Quebec city could cost as much as 25 per cent more than the Carney government’s highest estimates.
🔮 But as Meggs’ brief trek across the bridge suggests, the 15-acre park may now be overrun by swarms of government.
🔮 A new report by Ottawa’s fiscal watchdog raises questions about when the government will eliminate its operating deficit, despite Prime Minister Mark Carney saying last week that the government now expects to balance its operating budget a year earlier than the original goal.
🔮 — The Carney government’s latest round of counter-tariffs may weaken the legal case against the Trump tariffs, because they directly discriminate against American imports, a new think tank report says.
🔮 — Repeating his recent emphasis on saving Canadians’ money, Poilievre said the cuts would come largely from reducing the federal bureaucracy, foreign aid, corporate welfare, fake asylum claims and “boondoggles” like the government’s high-speed rail plan.
🔮 The domestic golf cart business has only a handful or so players, but small businesses that import and sell mobility scooters, power wheelchairs and other electric or battery-powered gadgets may also fall under the same automotive classification.
Also by Simon Tuck
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 10 articles by Simon Tuck →

Topics

American Canada Canadian MEI U.S.

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 8× MEI ORG · 5× Canada GPE · 4× Canadian NORP · 4× American NORP · 3× U.S. GPE · 3× Carney PERSON · 2× OTTAWA GPE · 2× Somin PERSON · 2× the Montreal Economic Institute ORG · 1×

Narrative

While Trump hasn’t directly invoked Smoot-Hawley to justify any of his various tariffs, that legislation from 96 years ago did establish a precedent of sorts in allowing a president to adjust tariff rates that had already been approved by Congress if discrimination were involved.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-23
🔮 — The Carney government’s latest round of counter-tariffs may weaken the legal case against the Trump tariffs, because they directly discriminate against American imports, a new think tank report says.

Claims (14 extracted, 5 hedged)

— The Carney government’s latest round of counter-tariffs may weaken the legal case against the Trump tariffs, because they directly discriminate against American imports, a new think tank report says. uncertain
report → weaken → imports
In a report to be released Wednesday, the Montreal Economic Institute (MEI), wrote that U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent tariffs against Canada may rest legally on 1930 legislation that is often blamed for almost immediately fuelling the Great Depression. uncertain
that → release → Depression
But that legislation, the Smoot-Hawley tariff, states that American tariffs are to be used to fight back against discriminatory tariffs from another country, perhaps such as those launched earlier this month by Canada. asserted
tariffs → state → Canada
Ilya Somin, a law professor at George Mason University in Arlington, Va. and one of the authors of the MEI report, said he understands the political pressure to fight back against the Trump tariffs against Canada, but that the counter-tariffs are not without risk. Counter-tariffs are by definition discriminatory, he said, which could legally justify Trump’s tariffs and therefore threaten the legal argument against them. “Ideally, they shouldn’t do this but i do recognize there are political advantages,” said Somin, who is also a senior fellow at the MEI uncertain
who → say → MEI
. U.S. opponents could certainly still win a legal argument against the Trump tariffs, Somin said, but it’s far from certain. uncertain
it → win → tariffs
“It is hard to predict how a court would handle this particular point,” the report concludes. asserted
report → predict → point
In July, Trump imposed 50 per cent tariffs on a range of Canadian imports and then expanded the list a month later. asserted
Trump → impose → list
Canada responded earlier this month with counter-tariffs at the same rate on a basket of American imports. asserted
Canada → respond → imports
While Trump hasn’t directly invoked Smoot-Hawley to justify any of his various tariffs, that legislation from 96 years ago did establish a precedent of sorts in allowing a president to adjust tariff rates that had already been approved by Congress if discrimination were involved. asserted
discrimination → invoke → Congress
The MEI report acknowledges that these latest rounds of Trump tariffs could be struck down in court despite the Canadian counter-tariffs because the 1930 legislation has since been supplanted by more recent legislation. uncertain
legislation → acknowledge → legislation
The document describes the Trump tariffs, which have caused harm to a number of Canadian businesses and sectors, as “harmful, illegal and indefensible.” asserted
which → describe → businesses
The MEI isn’t alone in questioning the Carney government’s counter-tariffs. asserted
MEI → question → tariffs
Economists have said that tariffs and counter-tariffs cost both sides because they raise prices and make both economies less efficient. asserted
economies → say → prices
Industry Minister Mélanie Joly has said Ottawa’s counter-tariffs will help Canadian negotiators in future talks with the U.S. National Post asserted
tariffs → say → U.S.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support