Photo via Toronto Star

Canadians feel powerless, but we are not. This is one way we can stand up for ourselves

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Cite

Appleton, B. (2026, September 24). Canadians feel powerless, but we are not. This is one way we can stand up for ourselves. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/canadians-feel-powerless-but-we-are-not-this-is-one-way-we-can-stand-up-for-ourselves/article_03913462-6294-4695-9a2c-c0003d33e2e0.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Toronto Star · collected 2026-09-24 · by Barry Appleton

Quick Summary

A Canadian author submits a friend-of-the-court brief to the United States Court of International Trade regarding Section 301 tariffs imposed on Canada and other economies. The article argues that while many Canadians believe these issues can only be addressed politically by negotiators, recent court decisions show that ordinary citizens and small businesses in America have successfully challenged such tariffs through legal means. It highlights that any Canadian could submit their own brief or comment in ongoing proceedings to address the legality of the tariffs and potentially influence how future trade disputes are handled under CUSMA (Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement) and other statutes.
Written by AI on 2026-09-24, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On September 30, three judges at the United States Court of International Trade will hear arguments about the legality of Section 301 tariffs imposed on 60 economies, including Canada. These tariffs are part of a dispute under a 96-year-old statute used against Canada for the first time. Canadians often feel powerless in addressing these issues, but recent cases show that small businesses and American states have successfully challenged such tariffs through U.S. courts. For example, in February, the Supreme Court ruled against presidential emergency powers being used to impose tariffs, and in May, another court halted a replacement surcharge. Interestingly, none of these challenges were initiated by foreign governments; they came from ordinary people filing friend-of-the-court briefs. This highlights that Canadians do have avenues for standing up against such policies without direct government intervention.

Written for “Canadians Feel Powerless” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Canadians Feel Powerless
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
46
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
4 of 46 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
64/100
Toronto Star's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-24 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Star · 11143 article(s) · 28 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 28 correction(s)
2026-10-26
Correction
2026-10-24
Correction
2026-10-07
Correction
2026-09-24
Correction

Who wrote this

Barry Appleton
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 But a red line has an object; it protects a decision Canada will not hand to anyone.
🔮 What the court does with it now is theirs alone, and I will not pretend to know what it will do.
🔮 On Sept. 30, three judges of the United States Court of International Trade will hear arguments on whether the Section 301 tariffs now applied to 60 economies, Canada among them, were lawfully imposed.
Also by Barry Appleton
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

American Canada Canadian Section 301 Washington

Subjects

American NORP · 10× Canada GPE · 9× Canadian NORP · 7× Washington GPE · 5× Canadians NORP · 2× Mexico GPE · 2× The U.S. International Trade Commission ORG · 1× the Court of International Trade ORG · 1× the Supreme Court of the United States ORG · 1× the United States Court of International Trade ORG · 1×

Narrative

The U.S. International Trade Commission takes comments until Nov. 8 on how it should define foreign discrimination under Section 338, the 96-year-old statute now used against Canada for the first time in its history.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-24
🔮 On Sept. 30, three judges of the United States Court of International Trade will hear arguments on whether the Section 301 tariffs now applied to 60 economies, Canada among them, were lawfully imposed.

Claims (46 extracted, 4 hedged)

On Sept. 30, three judges of the United States Court of International Trade will hear arguments on whether the Section 301 tariffs now applied to 60 economies, Canada among them, were lawfully imposed. asserted
tariffs → hear → them
It is the only one written by a Canadian. asserted
It → write → Canadian
Many Canadians believe these tariffs are a political problem with a political answer, and that only the people in the negotiating room can act. asserted
people → believe → room
The past year has disproved that twice. asserted
year → disprove → that
In February, the Supreme Court of the United States held that the emergency powers statute did not authorize the president’s tariffs. asserted
statute → hold → tariffs
In May, the Court of International Trade held the replacement surcharge unlawful. uncertain
surcharge → hold → Trade
No foreign government brought either case. asserted
government → bring → case
Small businesses and American states brought both. asserted
businesses → bring → both
American courts stopped American tariffs in months, at the request of ordinary people who simply filed. asserted
who → stop → people
There is no requirement to be a party to the case, and none to be American, only a working knowledge of the record. asserted
none → be → record
A court deciding whether an agency followed its own law is entitled to hear from people who actually know it. asserted
who → decide → it
Any Canadian could have filed one before mine. uncertain
Canadian → file → mine
Any Canadian still can, in the very next proceeding that opens after this one. asserted
that → open → one
My brief puts three things before the court. asserted
brief → put → court
The Trade Act requires Washington to promptly request formal dispute settlement under CUSMA once consultations with a treaty partner fail. asserted
consultations → require → partner
Washington opened consultations with Canada on March 12. asserted
Washington → open → March
The record does not show that dispute settlement was ever requested. asserted
settlement → show → ?
Section 301 also requires proof that Canada burdens American commerce. asserted
Canada → require → commerce
Canada is the second-largest export market in the world for American goods, behind only Mexico, so the claim needs a named displaced export. uncertain
claim → need → export
The report names none. asserted
report → name → none
And the report contradicts itself. asserted
report → contradict → itself
One passage says Washington does not find that Canada failed to impose a forced labour import ban. asserted
Canada → say → ban
The tariff notice says the opposite. asserted
notice → say → opposite
A separate release this month credits Canada with adopting the very ban it was just penalized for lacking. asserted
it → credit → ban
Washington is not the only government leaving the treaty machinery idle. asserted
Washington → leave → machinery
Since last March, Canada has asked for CUSMA consultations three times, on emergency duties, steel and aluminum, and automobiles. asserted
Canada → ask → duties
All three stopped at the first step. asserted
three → stop → step
No panel has ever been requested. asserted
panel → request → ?
Other doors stand open, and cost nothing to use. asserted
doors → stand → nothing
The U.S. International Trade Commission takes comments until Nov. 8 on how it should define foreign discrimination under Section 338, the 96-year-old statute now used against Canada for the first time in its history. asserted
it → take → history
The Trade Representative takes comments until Oct. 29 for its annual list of foreign trade barriers, where Canadian measures already appear. asserted
measures → take → barriers
A Canadian business may file. uncertain
business → file → ?
None of this has been debated here either. asserted
None → debate → this
The Commons rose in June and returned only this week, so every measure of the summer landed while Parliament was away. asserted
Parliament → rise → summer
Its trade committee’s last act before rising was to take testimony on how Canada enforces its own forced labour ban. asserted
Canada → rise → ban
That same testimony is now sitting before an American court, because I am the one who put it there. asserted
who → sit → it
For thirty years Canadian trade disputes were fought government to government, and another country’s courts read as somebody else’s business. asserted
courts → fight → business
That instinct no longer fits the tools now being used against us. asserted
instinct → fit → us
Domestic American statutes are challenged in domestic American courts. asserted
statutes → challenge → courts
Mexico sits down in Washington on the 28th to negotiate CUSMA, without Canada in the room. asserted
Mexico → sit → room
…and 6 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support