Photo via Toronto Star

Canadian workers are feeling the pain of the trade war. I went to New York to stand up for them

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Cite

Appleton, B. (2026, October 2). Canadian workers are feeling the pain of the trade war. I went to New York to stand up for them. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/canadian-workers-are-feeling-the-pain-of-the-trade-war-i-went-to-new-york-to-stand-up-for-them/article_a7b8cb0d-985a-49b5-99d8-dca64464d99b.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Toronto Star · collected 2026-10-02 · by Barry Appleton

Quick Summary

No summary of this article yet; the story summary below covers the event.

AI analysis

Story summary

Barry Appleton, a Canadian lawyer, personally traveled to New York to represent Canadian interests affected by the US-China trade war at the United States Court of International Trade on Wednesday afternoon. No official Canadian representatives were present during this crucial legal proceeding. Appleton testified and filed a brief supporting businesses and states challenging tariffs imposed by the United States. These tariffs are causing significant economic pain in Canada, such as dairy processors considering layoffs due to restricted US market access and manufacturers pricing products against international competitors benefiting from favorable trade deals. Canada lacks similar protections in its own trade agreements.

Written for “US Tariff Policy” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 US Tariff Policy
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Semafor
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A describes Canada's efforts to strengthen ties with other countries during a G20 meeting, while Article B focuses on the impact of the trade war on Canadian workers and industries.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 56 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Canada's economic situation and relationship with the United States, rather than a single specific incident.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 1 of 34 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different impacts of trade issues, with Article A focusing on dairy processors in Ontario affected by US import restrictions and Article B discussing job losses at Cleveland Cliffs' Stelco operations in Hamilton.”
CBC News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 21 of 58 claims Outlet record 74/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the trade war with distinct focuses and timings.”
Toronto Star
Hedges 1 of 39 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Canada-U.S. trade war, with Article A focusing on legal proceedings and their impact on workers, while Article B features Michael J. Fox's comments on the relationship between Canadians and Americans despite the trade tensions.”
Global News
Hedges 1 of 21 claims Outlet record 63/100
“Article A describes the legal proceedings and arguments happening within the U.S. Court of International Trade regarding Trump's forced labor tariffs, while Article B discusses broader impacts on Canadian workers from a trade war perspective.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 8 of 34 claims Outlet record 61/100
“While both articles reference Trump's trade tariffs and mention the Court of International Trade hearing on Wednesday, Article B focuses more on the impact of the tariffs rather than reporting on the specific court proceedings described in Article A.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 0 of 40 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A discusses Mark Carney's rebuke of Stelco after layoffs were announced, while Article B talks about the broader impacts of trade war on Canadian workers and does not refer to a specific event at Stelco.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
42
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
2 of 42 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
64/100
Toronto Star's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-02 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Star · 11255 article(s) · 28 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 28 correction(s)
2026-10-26
Correction
2026-10-24
Correction
2026-10-07
Correction
2026-09-24
Correction

Who wrote this

Barry Appleton
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 But a red line has an object; it protects a decision Canada will not hand to anyone.
🔮 What the court does with it now is theirs alone, and I will not pretend to know what it will do.
🔮 On Sept. 30, three judges of the United States Court of International Trade will hear arguments on whether the Section 301 tariffs now applied to 60 economies, Canada among them, were lawfully imposed.
Also by Barry Appleton
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

American Canada Canadian Canadians the United States Court of International Trade

Subjects

Canada GPE · 7× Canadian NORP · 3× Canadians NORP · 3× American NORP · 2× Germany GPE · 1× Japan GPE · 1× Manhattan GPE · 1× Ontario GPE · 1× the United States GPE · 1× the United States Court of International Trade ORG · 1×

Narrative

I testified before the American trade representative when this investigation opened and filed a brief in the case argued that day, in support of the businesses and states challenging these tariffs.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-02
🔮 What the court does with it now is theirs alone, and I will not pretend to know what it will do.

Claims (42 extracted, 2 hedged)

I left the United States Court of International Trade on Wednesday afternoon and stood on a Manhattan sidewalk, unable to move. asserted
I → leave → sidewalk
I have spent three weeks in this newspaper on the legal mechanics of this trade war — which statute, which clock started running. asserted
clock → spend → war
That was the right place to start. asserted
That → start → ?
It is not where this ends for the people living through it. asserted
this → end → it
Somewhere in Ontario, a dairy processor is deciding whether to keep a night shift running for a product that, as of this week, cannot enter the United States at all. asserted
that → decide → States
Somewhere in the Maritimes, a manufacturer is pricing its next shipment of steel against a competitor in Germany or Japan, whose government negotiated a tariff cap into its own trade deal. asserted
government → price → deal
Canada has no deal to write one into. asserted
Canada → have → one
That is why I paid my own way to New York, one Canadian lawyer, because nobody representing Canada had. asserted
nobody → pay → Canada
I want to be exact about what happened Wednesday, and what did not. asserted
what → want → ?
I testified before the American trade representative when this investigation opened and filed a brief in the case argued that day, in support of the businesses and states challenging these tariffs. asserted
investigation → testify → tariffs
The written argument needed making, and nobody else was making it. asserted
nobody → write → it
What the court does with it now is theirs alone, and I will not pretend to know what it will do. asserted
it → pretend → what
What I will say is this. asserted
say → say → What
The calendar is not built for a resolution, and ordinary Canadians are paying rent on that every day it drags on. asserted
it → build → that
Mexico’s own trade minister was in Milwaukee this same week, in the room with the Americans, writing the G20 rules for this kind of dispute. asserted
minister → write → dispute
Canada has not had one substantive round with Washington since August. asserted
Canada → have → August
That absence has a real cost, and it lands on people who never chose this fight. asserted
who → have → fight
The Bank of Canada estimates the economy is running about a point and a half below where it expected to be, and half of that growth gone for good, expansions quietly shelved because nobody could say when this ends. uncertain
this → estimate → growth
A tariff is a price a business can absorb. asserted
business → absorb → ?
What took effect this week on Canadian alcohol, dairy and motorcycles is not a price. asserted
took → take → alcohol
A producer cannot sell into that market at any price, any volume, for any reason. asserted
producer → sell → reason
There is a word for that, and it is not tariff. asserted
it → be → that
It’s a blockade, an economic one, until this year reserved for adversaries, not a treaty ally. asserted
It → ’ → adversaries
Nobody can tell a machinist in Windsor when this ends, or a steel worker near Hamilton. asserted
this → tell → Hamilton
They read the news the same way we all do: their own government has not sat down with the people who can change this. asserted
who → read → this
I do not know what trade judges will decide. asserted
judges → know → what
I know only what I saw leaving that building: American small business owners and state attorney general lawyers who came because the law let them, and no one from Canada beside them. asserted
law → know → them
Here is the part I think gets lost. asserted
I → think → ?
Canadians are not paying the costs of the trade war for nothing. asserted
Canadians → pay → nothing
Weeks ago, Ottawa was asked to hand over exclusive rights to Canadian critical minerals, and to accept limits on who Canada may trade with. uncertain
Canada → ask → who
Canada said no, or not yet. asserted
Canada → say → ?
A country that trades away the right to choose its partners has lost the thing worth protecting. asserted
that → trade → thing
Independence has never been free anywhere it meant anything. asserted
it → mean → anything
I still think it is worth paying. asserted
it → think → ?
Nobody has been honest about how dear that price has become. asserted
price → become → ?
I went because those workers cannot be there themselves. asserted
workers → go → ?
That is a plain description of an empty chair, and empty chairs have consequences for people who never chose to leave them empty. asserted
who → have → them
The tariffs are a night shift, a shelved expansion, a market that used to exist and does not anymore. asserted
that → shelve → ?
Somebody should be making that argument for the people carrying that weight. asserted
Somebody → make → weight
I did not argue for Canada in that courtroom. asserted
I → argue → courtroom
…and 2 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support