Photo via The Sydney Morning Herald

The US media boycott hit Trump right where it hurts. Now it’s Hanson’s turn

Read the original at The Sydney Morning Herald ↗
Cite

Aly, W. (2026, September 24). The US media boycott hit Trump right where it hurts. Now it’s Hanson’s turn. The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/the-us-media-boycott-hit-trump-right-where-it-hurts-now-it-s-hanson-s-turn-20260925-p60zyz.html?ref=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_source=rss_feed

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Sydney Morning Herald · collected 2026-09-24 · by Waleed Aly

Quick Summary

American media outlets typically divided by political affiliation are showing rare solidarity against President Donald Trump's recent actions, including his illegal decision to ban certain news organizations like MSNBC and CNN from White House press access. This boycott has affected Trump's visibility in the media during significant events such as UN addresses and meetings with foreign leaders, highlighting the impact on a president who relies heavily on television coverage. Previously, despite constant criticism of the media, Trump had not faced such unified opposition until this ban on specific outlets was announced.
Written by AI on 2026-09-24, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On September 18, 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump announced an immediate ban on several news outlets from entering the White House, including CNN, MS NOW (formerly MSNBC), and Politico. In a social media post on his platform Truth Social, Trump accused these outlets of reporting "fiction and lies" when covering the U.S. government. The decision sparked legal action with CNN, MS NOW, and Politico filing lawsuits arguing their First Amendment rights were violated. A federal court temporarily blocked the ban but it remains contentious, with the Justice Department petitioning for its reinstatement on October 3rd. This move escalates long-standing tensions between Trump and major media outlets, raising significant concerns over freedom of the press in the United States.

Written for “Trump Bans Media Outlets From White House” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 223 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Bans Media Outlets From White House
Politics · 224 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Free Press
Hedges 1 of 5 claims Outlet record 96/100
“The articles describe different stages of a broader conflict between President Trump and the media. Article A reports on the initial announcement of the ban, while Article B discusses the aftermath and reactions to the ban.”
BBC News
Hedges 2 of 34 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A reports on the immediate incident where journalists' press credentials were confiscated, while Article B discusses a broader solidarity among media outlets in response to Trump's actions.”
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 0 of 11 claims
“While both articles discuss media organizations being banned from covering the White House under President Trump's administration, they describe different aspects or stages of this broader policy.”
New York Post
Hedges 4 of 28 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different aspects of an ongoing conflict between President Trump and media outlets — Article A focuses on the launch of 'Trump TV', while Article B discusses the media's response to a boycott or ban.”
The Dispatch
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 61/100
“Article A discusses a boycott against Trump and Fox News standing in solidarity with MS NOW, while Article B mentions Trump banning CNN, MS Now, and Politico from the White House. These are different actions involving distinct sets of media organizations.”
The Hindu
Hedges 0 of 7 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A describes the immediate reaction on September 21st to Trump's ban from September 18th, while Article B discusses the broader solidarity and impact of the boycott days later.”
Reason
Hedges 2 of 15 claims Outlet record 67/100
“While both articles discuss President Trump's decision to ban CNN and other news organizations from the White House, they describe different aspects and contexts of this incident.”
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 14 claims
“The articles discuss related actions by President Trump towards different media outlets but do not describe the exact same incident.”
Reason
Hedges 4 of 27 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Article A discusses Trump's announcement to ban certain news outlets from the White House, while Article B focuses on media solidarity in response to the bans and mentions MS NOW specifically.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
54
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
5 of 54 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
61/100
The Sydney Morning Herald's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
224
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-24 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Sydney Morning Herald · 5731 article(s) · 15 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 15 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Waleed Aly
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Or we demand reduced government spending – though very rarely by specifying the cuts – which will almost certainly deny people cherished services.
🔮 Probably nowhere is that truer than in sport and the arts, which we will talk about at The Age’s Melbourne Assembly civic forum later this month.
🔮 If Labor suffers a shock catastrophe at the next federal election, there’s a good chance this will have been the inflection point.
🔮 It seems astonishing that anything quite so unified could grow from America’s famously polarised soil, but here we are, watching as such sworn enemies as Fox News and MS NOW stand in solidarity with each other, and against President Donald Trump’s latest attack on their craft.
🔮 You might see them in the manosphere, or the institutions teaching our kids gender fluidity.
Also by Waleed Aly
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

America CNN Fox News MS NOW White House

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 13× Fox News ORG · 3× MS NOW ORG · 3× ABC ORG · 2× America GPE · 2× CNN ORG · 2× White House ORG · 2× American NORP · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× MSNBC ORG · 1×

Narrative

Party director James Ashby said giving the ABC access would be like “going back to some domestic violence relationship” (Hanson’s views on such violence as a “two-way street” presumably don’t extend this far).
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-24
🔮 It seems astonishing that anything quite so unified could grow from America’s famously polarised soil, but here we are, watching as such sworn enemies as Fox News and MS NOW stand in solidarity with each other, and against President Donald Trump’s latest attack on their craft.
2026-09-24 · The Sydney Morning Herald
The US media boycott hit Trump right where it hurts. Now it’s Hanson’s turn · assertive framing

Claims (54 extracted, 5 hedged)

It seems astonishing that anything quite so unified could grow from America’s famously polarised soil, but here we are, watching as such sworn enemies as Fox News and MS NOW stand in solidarity with each other, and against President Donald Trump’s latest attack on their craft. uncertain
enemies → seem → craft
Each symbolises everything the other hates. asserted
other → symbolise → everything
And yet this week, that was forgotten when Trump declared he was banning MS NOW, alongside CNN and Politico, from the White House, and deactivated their correspondents’ press passes. asserted
he → forget → passes
Illegally so, it turned out, and a court has just ordered they be reinstated. asserted
they → turn → ?
But in the meantime, Fox – alongside ABC, CBS and NBC – had boycotted Trump’s press conferences. asserted
Fox → boycott → conferences
Suddenly, Trump found himself at risk of greatly reduced television coverage in a week of addressing the UN and hosting Xi Jinping. asserted
Trump → find → Jinping
Already, we’ve seen his team forced to capture their own footage of Trump arriving heroically to open the new White House helipad, the kind of thing that news cameras would have filmed. asserted
cameras → see → that
There he was, saying words no one could hear, exuding exactly no authority. uncertain
one → say → authority
That sort of thing is unimaginable for someone like Trump, who loves and dominates television more than any president ever has. asserted
president → love → television
He is famously fixed to Fox News. asserted
He → fix → News
He appoints its anchors to high office. asserted
He → appoint → office
In his first term, Trump staffers tried giving him briefings in the form of television packages because it was the best way to ensure he would pay attention. asserted
he → try → attention
He amassed some US$4.6 billion ($6.5 billion) worth of free television coverage in the 2016 election campaign alone, about twice that of Hillary Clinton. asserted
He → amass → Clinton
He has effectively lived with a television camera on him since. asserted
He → live → him
A boycott of this kind hits Trump somewhere near where it hurts. asserted
it → hit → Trump
I’ll admit to being surprised by these developments. asserted
I → admit → developments
After all, Trump has berated the media for his whole premiership without provoking any solidaristic response. asserted
Trump → berate → response
You’re familiar with the catchphrases: “the fake news media”, “the enemy of the people”, “corrupt” and “dishonest”. asserted
You → ’re → people
He has attacked individual journalists as “human scum” and “low-life reporters” and told one to be “quiet, piggy”. asserted
He → attack → one
He has even banned individual reporters from the Pentagon and White House, most notably CNN’s Jim Acosta in 2018. asserted
He → ban → 2018
The difference this time was that he just went ahead and banned whole outlets. asserted
he → go → outlets
That has two consequences. asserted
That → have → consequences
First, it ends up costing the other outlets much more money because they often share footage, which allows them to operate with fewer resources. asserted
them → end → resources
Cut two TV networks from the pool and you leave a big shortfall for the others to make up. asserted
others → cut → shortfall
But second, Trump did so explicitly because their “cumulative stories” led him to regard them as unfavourable. asserted
stories → do → them
And whatever you think of those outlets, or even of the media in general, that’s an enormous move. asserted
that → think → media
To effectively demand favourable coverage in exchange for access is to undo the very concept of accountability. asserted
demand → demand → accountability
Trump’s answer to this charge hits all the typically populist notes, but it also had a slip within it: “I don’t have to let them into my … into the people’s house.” asserted
I → hit → house
Trump seems to regard access as his to give personally. asserted
Trump → seem → his
Then he corrects, and asserts it on behalf of the people. asserted
he → correct → people
By now, some of this should sound familiar to the Australian ear. asserted
some → sound → ear
But she has taken the step of banning entire outlets from attending some of her press conferences. asserted
she → take → conferences
In this case, it’s the ABC (for whom I am a radio host) and The Guardian, and on the Victorian hustings, occasionally, The Age. asserted
I → ’ → hustings
“I answer to the people, not the media” declared Hanson in her National Press Club address in June. asserted
Hanson → answer → June
Party director James Ashby said giving the ABC access would be like “going back to some domestic violence relationship” (Hanson’s views on such violence as a “two-way street” presumably don’t extend this far). asserted
views → say → street
The ban is patchy and Barnaby Joyce certainly seems exempt from it. asserted
Joyce → seem → it
But One Nation has pulled candidates from ABC slots where they were regulars until they joined the party. asserted
they → pull → party
In short, Hanson has crossed a line the US media has decided not to accept. asserted
media → cross → line
Might Australian journalists do the same? uncertain
journalists → do → same
Could we see, for example, the Murdoch press – broadcast and print – stand on principle and say that if the ABC cannot attend a press conference, then they won’t either? uncertain
they → see → conference
…and 14 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support