Photo via Semafor

White House is isolated in brushing off AI safety

Read the original at Semafor ↗
Cite

Gold, A. (2026, September 25). White House is isolated in brushing off AI safety. Semafor. https://www.semafor.com/article/09/25/2026/white-house-is-isolated-in-brushing-off-ai-safety

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Semafor · collected 2026-09-25 · by Ashley Gold

Quick Summary

The White House is alone in its stance against international regulation of artificial intelligence (AI), emphasizing U.S. leadership in AI while rejecting global governance frameworks. During recent UN General Assembly meetings and discussions with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, President Trump’s team emphasized American dominance in AI technology and dismissed the need for government-set ground rules. This position contrasts sharply with calls from other nations, including China, and even some leading AI companies, which advocate for a coordinated approach to ensure responsible AI development.
Written by AI on 2026-09-25, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

At the UN General Assembly in New York City, the White House is facing isolation over its stance on artificial intelligence (AI) safety regulations. While US tech companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Hugging Face are participating in discussions about setting global AI standards to ensure safety, President Donald Trump's team insists that the development of AI should not be slowed by government intervention. In contrast, Chinese leader Xi Jinping supports a global governance framework for responsible AI development. The French official Jean-Noël Barrot emphasized at a UN National Security meeting that an international common framework is needed to manage risks associated with frontier AI models. However, without the backing of the US, any such agreement would be hard to implement, leaving other nations to develop nonbinding rules and best practices independently.

Written for “AI Safety Concerns Ignored” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Safety Concerns Ignored
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 25% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
BBC News
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 1 of 12 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles describe different aspects of discussions and stances on AI safety between US and China, not the same specific meeting or incident.”
Dawn
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 5 of 25 claims Outlet record 72/100
“The articles discuss different perspectives on AI policy and safety in China and the US but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 6 of 57 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different meetings and statements made by Trump administration regarding AI over distinct time periods.”
TIME
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 2 of 39 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI regulation and international perspectives rather than the same specific incident.”
South China Morning Post
Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 63/100
“The articles discuss different perspectives on AI development and its regulation but describe distinct events and positions taken by different leaders.”
Semafor
Hedges 2 of 6 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI oversight and regulation by different political figures at distinct times.”
Los Angeles Times
Hedges 7 of 44 claims Outlet record 95/100
“The articles describe different perspectives on the same summit but report distinct aspects and conclusions from the meeting.”
South China Morning Post
Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 63/100
“The articles discuss different gatherings and forums where AI safety is discussed, with Article A focusing on UN General Assembly meetings and Chinese leader Xi Jinping's visit to Washington, while Article B focuses on a Singapore forum.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 1 of 14 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different events: one about the White House's stance on AI safety, and another about a US court upholding the Pentagon's decision regarding Anthropic.”
CBS News
Hedges 1 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different aspects related to AI, with Article A focusing on the White House's stance at the UN General Assembly and meetings, while Article B discusses security incidents involving AI giants.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
20
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
25%
5 of 20 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
59/100
Semafor's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-25 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Semafor · 1423 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ashley Gold
25 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Both OpenAI and Anthropic will have “war rooms” dedicated to ensuring their platforms provide accurate information about the midterm elections, a first for both companies.
2026-11-02 · assertive framing · Election ‘war rooms’ enter the AI age
🔮 And the government will devote £10 million per year to research on how AI is shaping employment.
2026-10-28 · assertive framing · Britain’s AI testing agency outguns US
🔮 Could the Tesla-SpaceX merger that Elon Musk floated this week pose antitrust problems?
2026-10-23 · mixed framing · SpaceX-Tesla merger could face antitrust scrutiny
🔮 Anthropic’s lobbying form lists the Collaboration on Adversarial Threats and Security Risks Act, a bill that would allow labs to coordinate with each other on security risks, as a point of focus for the company on Capitol Hill.
🔮 New York City could be the first place in the country where consumers are protected from a “doom loop” of AI-powered customer service chatbots, per a rule proposed today by Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s administration.
🔮 “If [Clayton] can get agencies approaching AI from very different directions to keep sharing information, coordinating decisions and agreeing on responsibilities … his influence will last well beyond any one appointment,” the lobbyist said.
2026-10-19 · assertive framing · The national intelligence chief steering AI
🔮 “Throughout its work, the [task force] will engage with frontier model developers and other SI companies, consumer protection groups, and civil liberties advocates, industry stakeholders, and federal and state law enforcement agencies to inform and implement its efforts,” a White House official said in a statement.
2026-10-16 · assertive framing · White House’s AI task force gets to work
🔮 Frontier AI labs largely do this sort of disclosure and incident reporting already, and Trump’s task force has not laid out exactly what will count as an “incident” that must be reported going forward.
2026-10-13 · assertive framing · Trump AI directive sparks questions
🔮 The simple fact that there is an existing investigation will impact a company’s stock price and operations.”
2026-10-08 · assertive framing · FTC advancing on its AI safety probe
🔮 The Scoop A coalition of nearly 40 labor, progressive, faith, and AI safety groups is laying out demands for AI legislation in Congress, warning lawmakers that any bill that crosses their red lines will face “active, mobilized opposition,” according to a letter shared first with Semafor.
2026-10-07 · assertive framing · AI safety group lays out demands for candidates
Also by Ashley Gold
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 25 articles by Ashley Gold →

Topics

America Chinese New York City The White House the UN General Assembly

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 4× Anthropic ORG · 2× China GPE · 2× Chinese NORP · 2× OpenAI ORG · 2× White House ORG · 2× America GPE · 1× Ashley PERSON · 1× The White House ORG · 1× the UN General Assembly ORG · 1×

Narrative

Yet even AI CEOs are more aligned with the UN than with Trump. Companies are pushing for coordinated “AI pacing,” saying they support global efforts to coordinate on safety and affirming that they cannot set the standards for responsible AI use on their own. “The international community will need to establish a common framework to manage the risks associated with frontier AI models,” said Jean-Noël Barrot, the French official who chaired the UN National Security meeting on AI featuring the CEOs of OpenAI, Anthropic and Hugging Face.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-25
🔮 Without official support from the US, however, any such agreement will be difficult to execute.
2026-09-25 · Semafor
White House is isolated in brushing off AI safety · mixed framing

Claims (20 extracted, 5 hedged)

The White House and its allies are lonely in their insistence that AI development in America must accelerate without governments setting ground rules. asserted
governments → accelerate → rules
At the UN General Assembly in New York City, as well as in meetings with Chinese leader Xi Jinping in Washington this week, President Donald Trump’s team was clear: US companies are the leaders in AI; they plan to keep it that way; and they reject any international attempts to rein in the technology. asserted
they → plan → technology
Trump, with his call to leave AI “exactly where it is” contrasts with Xi, who said responsible AI development is necessary — as other Chinese officials said this week that they support a global governance framework. asserted
they → leave → framework
Without official support from the US, however, any such agreement will be difficult to execute. asserted
agreement → execute → US
White House science and tech adviser Michael Kratsios rejected global efforts in a UN address that he called an “intervention.” asserted
he → reject → that
As a result, nations may be left setting nonbinding rules and best practices without the buy-in of the biggest companies’ home country. uncertain
nations → leave → country
Meanwhile, frontier labs are pushing forward with their own self-regulatory schemes, which will ask them to agree on testing standards in a highly competitive environment. asserted
which → push → environment
Yet even AI CEOs are more aligned with the UN than with Trump. Companies are pushing for coordinated “AI pacing,” saying they support global efforts to coordinate on safety and affirming that they cannot set the standards for responsible AI use on their own. “The international community will need to establish a common framework to manage the risks associated with frontier AI models,” said Jean-Noël Barrot, the French official who chaired the UN National Security meeting on AI featuring the CEOs of OpenAI, Anthropic and Hugging Face. asserted
who → align → OpenAI
Polling shows Americans are largely skeptical of claims that the US must beat China at AI development, and that people are generally worried the technology is moving fast enough to pose a risk to their jobs and livelihood. uncertain
technology → show → jobs
Those surveys show worries about AI acceleration across party lines. asserted
surveys → show → lines
Trump’s AI isolation from the world, and much of the electorate, puts congressional Republicans in a strange position, too. asserted
isolation → put → position
They’re advocating for AI safety and slowdowns and sponsoring bipartisan legislation to regulate AI, while their party leader presses the gas. asserted
leader → advocate → gas
As Semafor first reported on Thursday, Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., has asked Secretary of State Marco Rubio to convene National Security Council meetings with cyber experts and AI developers about potential national security threats, including possible AI-enabled attacks on critical infrastructure. asserted
Young → report → infrastructure
“The United States should continue to lead the world in the development and deployment of artificial intelligence,” Young wrote to Rubio. asserted
Young → continue → Rubio
“Maintaining that leadership also requires ensuring that our government keeps pace with emerging capabilities and understands the risks they may present.” uncertain
they → maintain → risks
Room for Disagreement Trump’s allies often see ulterior motives behind much of the current advocacy for stricter AI safety rules. asserted
allies → see → rules
Some argue that companies as big as OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and Anthropic are seeking “regulatory capture” by trying to shape legislation that only their companies will have the means to comply with, therefore giving themselves a leg up. asserted
companies → argue → leg
Others decry “doomerism,” or the belief that AI could kill off humanity or eliminate jobs, as hysterical and speculative. uncertain
AI → decry → jobs
Criticizing the effective altruism community, which many AI safety groups have connections to, is another burgeoning White House tactic. asserted
groups → criticize → connections
But the core of the president’s message is simple: The US should do nothing that might give China, with its cheaper open-source models, an advantage in the AI race. uncertain
that → do → race
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support