In recent weeks, a fresh crop of people connected to the artificial intelligence industry have emerged to warn that AI is possibly going to kill us all, spreading the word with various degrees of credibility or self-interest.
uncertain
AI → connect → credibility
Anthropic chief and co-founder Dario Amodei has also called to slow down the development of AI technology, a recommendation that Sam Altman of OpenAI and even notorious good judgment-haver Elon Musk quickly cosigned.
asserted
Altman → call → OpenAI
Meanwhile, the Trump administration and the president himself have continued to insist that AI is essential for American technological advancement and military might.
uncertain
AI → continue → advancement
As a very strange public debate has ensued, it’s become clear that Trump, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and other people connected with the administration view AI as an essentially masculine tool: “dominant,” a word they keep using over and over, powerful, and able to be kept in check only by a strong ruler.
asserted
they → ensue → ruler
The Trump administration has become a place where very odd politics around both gender and “wokeness” are constantly on display.
asserted
politics → become → display
Trump issued a garbled executive order immediately upon retaking office that attempted to redefine “male” and “female.”
asserted
that → issue → male
Hegseth is obsessed with testosterone, announcing in July that military members will be screened for low T regardless of their gender.
asserted
members → obsess → gender
The intense focus on gender and wokeness has also been true of their approach to AI: last year, the administration promised that it would require AI companies with federal contracts to make sure their large language models match the administration’s views on things like climate change; transgender identity; and diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.
asserted
models → promise → change
(The administration characterized the mandate as a way to only purchase AI tools that “prioritize truthfulness and ideological neutrality.”
asserted
that → characterize → truthfulness
It’s now increasingly obvious that Trump and his administration view AI technology as something akin to a large, dangerous dog that only a masculine owner can control.
asserted
owner → ’ → that
Trump has repeatedly called warnings that AI could harm human beings “a hoax,” writing on TruthSocial that the “only control or ‘guardrails’ that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT, and the U.S.A. has that, in spades!”
“The people that say AI is going to destroy the World, and that Data Centers are bad for your neighborhood, are the same people that said, just a short time ago, that the World would be extinguished by ‘Climate Change,’” the president also posted, with his trademark random capitalization.
uncertain
president → call → capitalization
“That HOAX never worked out for them, and now they’re on to the next one.
asserted
they → work → one
Soon you’ll find out they’re working for people that do not have the best interests of the United States in mind!”
asserted
that → find → mind
More recently, Trump promised, also on TruthSocial, that he’d appoint an “AI czar,” writing, “Only High I.Q. individuals need apply!
asserted
individuals → promise → czar
And on X, he tried very hard to rebrand AI entirely, putting to his followers a poll about which more flattering term should be used instead.
asserted
term → try → poll
“A far more elegant and accurate description of this new phenomena would be Superior Intelligence (SI),” the president wrote, “or Extreme Intelligence (EI) or, Supreme Intelligence (SI).”
asserted
president → write → phenomena
The debate took a strange turn last week when The New York Post ran a story warning that some people calling for a slowdown of AI development, including Amodei, are connected with the “effective altruism” movement.
asserted
people → take → movement
Effective altruism is, simply put, a philosophy first put forward by the bioethicist Peter Singer, which purports to use calculation and hard evidence to maximize the impact of charitable donations, and figure out what charitable initiatives will do the most good mathematically.
asserted
initiatives → put → good
The idea is controversial for all kinds of reasons, and one of its most visible proponents has been imprisoned financial fraudster Sam-Bankman-Fried, which isn’t, itself, a great advertisement.
asserted
which → imprison → proponents
Some people have even likened EA to a cult, and one actual and extremely violent high-control group, the Zizians, had some effective altruist DNA.
asserted
group → liken → DNA
There’s also an offshoot best described as “effective altruism accelerationism,” promoted by several high-profile Silicon Valley figures, which holds that accelerating technological progress, including by developing AI faster, will promote human survival and consciousness on a galactic level, an idea that has several obvious, universe-sized holes.
asserted
that → ’ → holes
(Among them: AI data centers already clearly have disastrous environmental and health impacts, which is the opposite of promoting human survival.)
asserted
which → have → survival
Boiling all of that down to only what might interest or scare their readers, The Post positioned effective altruism as a frightening example of a wealthy “group of woke elitists” trying to engineer the world to their liking.
uncertain
Post → boil → liking
“It’s a group of globalists who believe in open borders, genderless pronoun and promote ‘Effective Altruism’ that believe all the world’s problems can be solved with technology,” the paper elaborated, adding that EA’s “obsessed adherents believe in funneling their wealth toward the goals they view as most important to humanity, including climate change and strict AI regulation.”
asserted
they → ’ → change
Right-wing commentators were quick to make the connection: that “woke,” feminine, or nonbinary people can’t be trusted in their warnings on AI.
asserted
people → make → AI
“There is no committee or regulatory body with a ‘they/them’ that will make any good decisions,” far-right activist Chris Rufo declared.
asserted
Rufo → be → decisions
“Social scientists call this the Iron Law of Genderfluidity, and it’s been replicated in a hundred peer-reviewed journals, so you know it’s true.”
asserted
it → call → journals
(He was attempting to make a joke; there is no such “law.”)
asserted
He → attempt → joke
The Post soon ran a second story about how another prominent AI critic, author and computer scientist Nate Soares, is romantic partners with Aella, a well-known pseudonymous sex writer who has an OnlyFans and goes to sex parties.
asserted
who → run → parties
Soares is the president of the Machine Intelligence Research Institute and the co-author of If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies.
asserted
Everyone → build → It
But the Post‘s story barely discussed his work; rather than cast doubt on any of Soares’ specific ideas about AI, it instead painted AI critics as sexually deviant—even if only by association—and thus untrustworthy.
asserted
it → discuss → association
Other outlets like Fox News and the Bari Weiss-run The Free Press have followed suit with their own stories about the dangers of the effective altruism movement’s views on AI.
asserted
outlets → run → AI
The Defense Department has also gotten involved.
asserted
Department → get → ?
The X account for the so-called Office of the Under Secretary of War for Research and Engineering, previously seen posting QAnon memes, has issued a series of posts attacking effective altruism.
asserted
account → call → altruism
Emil Michael, who was confirmed to that position in May 2025, is a former businessman who worked at Uber and, before that, Klout, a social media analytics company that assigned users a score assessing their online popularity and influence.
uncertain
that → confirm → popularity
“Americanism, not effective altruism,” one recent tweet from the account declared.
asserted
tweet → declare → account
“The United States will continue to be AI DOMINANT!”
asserted
States → continue → ?
“No dooming,” another declared.
asserted
another → declare → ?
Whoever wins AI, WINS!”
asserted
wins → win → AI
Michael has also appeared on Fox News to declare effective altruism’s advocacy against AI to be a plot against American interests.
asserted
advocacy → appear → interests
…and 17 more, not listed.
The Aporia
