Photo via BBC News

Man City and the 115 charges - key questions answered

Read the original at BBC News ↗
Cite

Johnson, D. (2026, September 25). Man City and the 115 charges - key questions answered. BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cx30540044q0o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

BBC News · collected 2026-09-25 · by Dale Johnson

Quick Summary

Manchester City faces a decision after being charged with 115 violations of Premier League financial rules over breaches from 2009 to 2018, including inaccurate financial reporting and player payment details. The club has maintained its innocence but will face consequences if found guilty on nearly all charges, potentially impacting their titles and Premier League status. City has indicated they would appeal any guilty verdict, as the case involves allegations of inflating sponsorship revenue and misreporting financial information to meet UEFA's Financial Fair Play rules and the Premier League’s Profit Sustainability Rules.
Written by AI on 2026-09-25, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Manchester City Found Guilty of 114 Out of 115 Charges by Premier League Commission

In a significant ruling, an independent commission found Manchester City guilty of 114 out of 115 charges brought against them by the Premier League. The accusations stem from a "disguised funding scheme" that allegedly inflated revenue by over £830 million between 2009 and 2018.

Reactions and Implications

Outlook

This ruling marks a pivotal moment in Premier League history, raising questions about financial transparency and regulation within the sport.

Written for “Manchester City Guilty Verdict Appeals” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 83 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Manchester City Guilty Verdict Appeals
Sports · 84 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Al Jazeera
Hedges 3 of 20 claims Outlet record 60/100
Al Jazeera
Hedges 0 of 10 claims Outlet record 60/100
Toronto Star
Hedges 2 of 29 claims Outlet record 64/100
Evening Standard
Hedges 0 of 24 claims Outlet record 65/100
BBC News
Hedges 20 of 73 claims Outlet record 69/100
Semafor
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 7 claims Outlet record 60/100
Evening Standard
Hedges 0 of 12 claims Outlet record 65/100
Evening Standard
Hedges 1 of 25 claims Outlet record 65/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
78
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
9 of 78 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
69/100
BBC News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
84
Sports
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-25 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

BBC News · 4716 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Dale Johnson
17 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 City have been found guilty of all charges related to breaches of the Premier League's financial rules between the 2009-10 and 2017-18 seasons, and creating "sham contracts" to inflate sponsorship deals by £830m. The club have said they are "innocent of the accusations made by the Premier League" and they have "irrefutable evidence" the ruling "contains clear material errors, of law, principle and fact, and is unsafe". In their appeal, City will argue the payments were made by the United Arab Emirates government as a shareholder of the sponsors, while there are inconsistencies in the Commission's judgement.
🔮 And every one could in some way claim to have been left financially out of pocket.
2026-10-13 · assertive framing · How much did Man City's rule breaking cost your team?
🔮 To the uninitiated it might seem logical that the Seagulls must have spent big, investing in players ready for the first team. Yet Brighton are, along with Everton, one of only two clubs to record a profit in transfer spending over the past five years.
🔮 - Published Senior figures within the English game are concerned that Manchester City could play in the Champions League next season even if they are relegated for breaching financial regulations.
🔮 It catalogues how the club's owners, Abu Dhabi United Group, knew from the 2009-10 season that there would be major overspends if the club was to reach the level they wanted to get to.
🔮 City fans, and the rest of football, are left to guess what the punishment might be.
🔮 And how long will it be before this saga does come to an end? What are the 115 charges? In February 2023, City were charged and referred to an independent commission over alleged breaches that were said to have taken place between 2009 and 2018.
2026-09-25 · assertive framing · Man City and the 115 charges - key questions answered
🔮 Traverso said that any "correction in transfer values" or "slowdown in buyer demand" could have serious implications for any club carrying debt.
🔮 - Published The first international break of the season is under way - and this one is longer than fans will have become accustomed to.
🔮 But plenty of others will be looking over their shoulders heading into the new, extended international break.
Also by Dale Johnson
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 17 articles by Dale Johnson →

Topics

Abu Dhabi BBC Sport City Premier League Uefa

Subjects

City ORG · 13× Premier League ORG · 5× Uefa ORG · 5× the Premier League ORG · 4× Der Spiegel ORG · 3× ADUG ORG · 2× Abu Dhabi GPE · 2× BBC Sport ORG · 2× Der Spiegel's ORG · 2× Manchester City ORG · 2×

Narrative

The charges - relating to Premier League financial rules - are: 54 x failure to provide accurate financial information from 2009-10 to 2017-18. 14 x failure to provide accurate details for player and manager payments from 2009-10 to 2017-18. 5 x failure to comply with Uefa's rules including financial fair play (FFP) 2013-14 to 2017-18. 7 x breaching Premier League profit and sustainability (PSR) rules from 2015-16 to 2017-18. 35 x failure to co-operate with Premier League investigations from December 2018 to Feb 2023.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-25
🔮 And how long will it be before this saga does come to an end? What are the 115 charges? In February 2023, City were charged and referred to an independent commission over alleged breaches that were said to have taken place between 2009 and 2018.
2026-09-25 · BBC News
Man City and the 115 charges - key questions answered · assertive framing

Claims (78 extracted, 9 hedged)

- Published It has taken more than two years, but a judgement finally appears to have been reached on the 115 charges levelled against Manchester City over breaches of Premier League financial rules. asserted
judgement → publish → rules
Following a four-year investigation, City were charged and the hearing finally got under way on 16 September 2024. asserted
hearing → follow → September
BBC Sport has now learned a decision has been made, after the Athletic reported City had been found guilty on all almost of the charges. asserted
City → learn → charges
But what does this mean for City's titles? asserted
this → mean → titles
And how long will it be before this saga does come to an end? What are the 115 charges? In February 2023, City were charged and referred to an independent commission over alleged breaches that were said to have taken place between 2009 and 2018. asserted
that → come → 2009
The charges - relating to Premier League financial rules - are: 54 x failure to provide accurate financial information from 2009-10 to 2017-18. 14 x failure to provide accurate details for player and manager payments from 2009-10 to 2017-18. 5 x failure to comply with Uefa's rules including financial fair play (FFP) 2013-14 to 2017-18. 7 x breaching Premier League profit and sustainability (PSR) rules from 2015-16 to 2017-18. 35 x failure to co-operate with Premier League investigations from December 2018 to Feb 2023. asserted
charges → relate → Feb
City have always denied wrongdoing and BBC Sport has been told they would appeal were they found guilty. asserted
they → deny → wrongdoing
But what does that actually mean? asserted
that → mean → what
German newspaper Der Spiegel published leaked documents, including emails purportedly sent between top City executives (some of whom remain at the City Football Group), across several seasons following the club's Abu Dhabi takeover in 2008. asserted
some → publish → 2008
It alleged these showed the club had inflated sponsorship revenue from state-owned airline Etihad and state-controlled telecoms firm Etisalat by disguising direct investment from their holding company (Sheik Mansour's Abu Dhabi United Group, or ADUG) as sponsorship income by channelling the funds through the companies' accounts. asserted
club → allege → accounts
This, it was alleged, was a means of meeting FFP rules introduced by Uefa in 2011 - and PSR brought in by the Premier League in 2012 - limiting clubs' permitted losses. asserted
it → allege → losses
There then followed further allegations of misreporting financial information centred on documents that claimed to show secret 'off-the-books' payments to then manager Roberto Mancini via consultancy fees from a club in Abu Dhabi. asserted
that → follow → Dhabi
It is also alleged the club gave players more money than was officially going through the accounts so recorded spending was less than it actually was. asserted
it → allege → accounts
City, who have always maintained ADUG is a private fund rather than an arm of the state, refused to comment on any of Der Spiegel's revelations, saying the leaked emails were obtained illegally, and they were an "attempt to damage the club's reputation". asserted
they → maintain → reputation
City - along with the companies involved - strongly denied breaking any financial rules. asserted
City → involve → rules
But that did not stop both Uefa and the Premier League launching investigations as a result. asserted
Uefa → stop → result
November 2018: Football Leaks allegations emerge with Der Spiegel publishing claims Manchester City breached financial fair play rules. uncertain
City → emerge → rules
March 2019: Uefa launches a formal investigation off the back of Der Spiegel's findings. asserted
Uefa → launch → findings
City criticise the investigation and launch an appeal process. asserted
City → criticise → process
November 2019: The Court of Arbitration for Sport (Cas) deems City's appeal inadmissible. asserted
appeal → deem → Sport
February 2020: Uefa announces a two-year ban for City from European competitions and a €30m fine. asserted
Uefa → announce → competitions
City's European ban is overturned after an appeal to Cas. asserted
ban → overturn → Cas
City lose a jurisdiction ruling that allows the media to report the Premier League is continuing to investigate the champions for alleged financial breaches. asserted
League → lose → breaches
Der Spiegel publishes a fresh report claiming the Premier League has been investigating the club for three years, providing detailed claims. uncertain
League → publish → claims
The Premier League charges City with 115 financial breaches. asserted
League → charge → breaches
City manager Pep Guardiola says the club expect to learn the verdict "within one month". asserted
club → say → month
Guardiola left the Etihad at the end of last season. asserted
Guardiola → leave → season
Reports emerge that a verdict has been reached, with sources telling the BBC that City have been found guilty of breaking the majority of the charges. What punishment could Man City face? uncertain
City → emerge → punishment
It was never expected the verdict would come complete with the sanctions. asserted
verdict → expect → sanctions
We now face a waiting game for even that verdict to officially be made public by the independent panel. asserted
verdict → face → panel
We don't know who was on the panel that heard and ruled on the case, and that will only come once a written judgment is released. asserted
judgment → know → case
Being removed from the Premier League would mean City lose their membership and are demoted to a lower division from the end of the season. asserted
City → remove → season
That could also happen through a points penalty so severe they would effectively be relegated. uncertain
they → happen → penalty
What has been said? asserted
What → say → ?
The Premier League declined to comment on the case when approached on Friday. asserted
League → decline → Friday
City issued a statement that showed frustration news of the verdict had leaked. asserted
news → issue → verdict
It read: "The Premier League process remains ongoing, with significant elements to be completed, and subject to strict confidentiality. " asserted
process → read → confidentiality
As such Manchester City FC's position remains consistent with the club's statement of February 2023. asserted
position → remain → February
"The club has diligently respected due process for eight years on the basis that the Premier League Board and Executive would behave as an independent, impartial and fair-minded regulator, free from partisan influence." Will there be an appeal? asserted
Board → respect → influence
How long would one take? asserted
one → take → ?
…and 38 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support