Photo via Fox News

Supreme Court blocks Missouri from using new congressional map in 2026 election

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

Baehr, J., Bream, S., & Mears, B. (2026, September 25). Supreme Court blocks Missouri from using new congressional map in 2026 election. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-blocks-missouri-from-using-new-congressional-map-2026-election

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-09-25 · by Jasmine Baehr, Shannon Bream, Bill Mears

Quick Summary

The Supreme Court has halted Missouri from using its newly drawn 2025 congressional map and instead ordered the state to use the 2022 map for the 2026 election. The unsigned order, which garnered no dissents, instructs lower courts not to prohibit or require either map usage in the upcoming midterm elections, effectively resolving the dispute over Missouri’s congressional district boundaries.
Written by AI on 2026-09-25, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

A federal appeals court in Missouri ordered on September 18 that the state must use newly drawn Republican-backed congressional districts for November’s midterm elections, despite previous rulings by both the U.S. Supreme Court and the Missouri Supreme Court blocking their implementation. The new map, favored by former President Donald Trump, aims to benefit Republicans by altering district boundaries and splitting existing ones. This decision follows a long-standing legal battle over redistricting in Missouri, which has seen multiple conflicting court orders affecting voter registration and ballots already printed using the old 2022 map. As a result, the case is likely headed back to the U.S. Supreme Court for a final ruling before November's elections.

Written for “Missouri Redistricting Saga” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 26 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Missouri Redistricting Saga
Politics · 27 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 17% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBS News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 25 claims Outlet record 66/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 13 claims Outlet record 70/100
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 34 claims Outlet record 66/100
NPR
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 23 claims Outlet record 60/100
NBC News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 26 claims Outlet record 60/100
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 70/100
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 33 claims Outlet record 64/100
Los Angeles Times
Hedges 1 of 36 claims Outlet record 95/100
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 21 claims Outlet record 60/100
Fox News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 3 of 23 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles describe different rulings by different courts at different times, with Article A mentioning a federal appeals court decision and Article B referring to a Supreme Court order.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
6
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
17%
1 of 6 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
69/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
27
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-25 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 6252 article(s) · 11 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 11 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jasmine Baehr
32 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Trump announced Saturday that Audi would invest $4.2 billion in a new facility in the Macon area, with plans to manufacture approximately 200,000 vehicles annually.
🔮 "I will be loyal to the Constitution of the United States," El-Sayed said.
🔮 Miles argued that the line of questioning may illustrate a broader threat to religious freedom.
🔮 Castillo contends that she would not have purchased the meal, or would have examined it more closely, had she known about the alleged defect.
🔮 "So I'm going to sign this now, something that Joe Biden would be unable to do because he was unable to sign his signature," Trump said.
🔮 Rep. Delia Ramirez, D-Ill., formally introduced sweeping legislation to dismantle the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and eliminate Customs and Border Protection (CBP), advancing a radical proposal that would fundamentally overhaul federal immigration enforcement.
🔮 Bethea said the story may encourage listeners to examine unresolved trauma, mental health concerns and other personal struggles that he and Fr. Martins believe may contribute to spiritual vulnerability.
🔮 "Literally, President Trump could walk across the Cumberland River, and tomorrow the headline would say President Trump refuses to swim," the musician joked.
🔮 "[Blakeman will] save this state.
🔮 The Pentagon confirmed to Fox News Digital on Thursday that the firing squad execution of convicted Fort Hood terrorist Nidal Malik Hasan will be livestreamed, allowing the public to witness the military's first execution in more than six decades.
Also by Jasmine Baehr
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 32 articles by Jasmine Baehr →
Shannon Bream
4 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 It was unclear after the public session how the court might rule.
🔮 Chief Justice John Roberts, surrounded by his eight colleagues, will call the court into public session precisely at 10 a.m. EDT with a pair of scheduled oral arguments.
🔮 The Supreme Court on Friday ordered Missouri to use its 2022 congressional map in the 2026 election, blocking the state from using a newer map that could have benefited Republicans in the upcoming midterm elections.
🔮 It also argues that without a stay, the baby could be moved to California for hospice care while West remains unable to participate in decisions about the child's medical treatment.
Also by Shannon Bream
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
Bill Mears
4 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 It was unclear after the public session how the court might rule.
🔮 Chief Justice John Roberts, surrounded by his eight colleagues, will call the court into public session precisely at 10 a.m. EDT with a pair of scheduled oral arguments.
🔮 The Supreme Court on Friday ordered Missouri to use its 2022 congressional map in the 2026 election, blocking the state from using a newer map that could have benefited Republicans in the upcoming midterm elections.
🔮 It also argues that without a stay, the baby could be moved to California for hospice care while West remains unable to participate in decisions about the child's medical treatment.
Also by Bill Mears
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Court of Appeals Missouri Republicans The District Court The Supreme Court

Subjects

Missouri GPE · 7× Court of Appeals ORG · 2× The District Court ORG · 2× The Supreme Court ORG · 2× FOX NEWS APP ORG · 1× Republicans NORP · 1×

Narrative

"And the District Court and Court of Appeals should not order or otherwise require Missouri to use the 2025 map in the 2026 congressional election in Missouri." The ruling effectively ends the immediate legal wrangling over which congressional map Missouri will use for the 2026 election, leaving the older boundaries in place.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-25
🔮 The Supreme Court on Friday ordered Missouri to use its 2022 congressional map in the 2026 election, blocking the state from using a newer map that could have benefited Republicans in the upcoming midterm elections.

Claims (6 extracted, 1 hedged)

The Supreme Court on Friday ordered Missouri to use its 2022 congressional map in the 2026 election, blocking the state from using a newer map that could have benefited Republicans in the upcoming midterm elections. uncertain
that → order → elections
The unsigned order drew no noted dissents, with the justices making clear that lower courts should neither prohibit use of Missouri’s 2022 map nor require the state to use the 2025 map. asserted
prohibit → draw → map
"The District Court and Court of Appeals should not enjoin or otherwise prohibit the use of the 2022 map in the 2026 congressional election in Missouri," the order states. asserted
order → enjoin → Missouri
"And the District Court and Court of Appeals should not order or otherwise require Missouri to use the 2025 map in the 2026 congressional election in Missouri." The ruling effectively ends the immediate legal wrangling over which congressional map Missouri will use for the 2026 election, leaving the older boundaries in place. asserted
Missouri → order → place
The Supreme Court ordered Missouri to use its 2022 congressional map for the 2026 election rather than the state’s newer 2025 map. asserted
Court → order → map
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP This is a developing story; check back later for updates. asserted
This → click → updates
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support