Photo via Los Angeles Times

For third time, Supreme Court rejects Missouri's bid for another GOP-leaning House district

Read the original at Los Angeles Times ↗
Cite

Savage, D. G. (2026, September 25). For third time, Supreme Court rejects Missouri's bid for another GOP-leaning House district. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2026-09-25/for-third-time-supreme-court-rejects-missouris-bid-for-another-gop-leaning-house-district

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Los Angeles Times · collected 2026-09-25 · by David G. Savage

Quick Summary

The Supreme Court has rejected Missouri’s attempt to implement a new congressional district map that would favor Republicans for the third time this month. The court ruled to maintain the use of the 2022 election map, which gives Republicans an advantage in six out of eight districts. This decision comes after both state and federal courts had previously ruled in favor of adopting the new 2025 map, but concerns over electoral chaos near election time led the Supreme Court to uphold the existing map despite ongoing disputes from both sides regarding voting district changes.
Written by AI on 2026-09-25, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

A federal appeals court in Missouri ordered on September 18 that the state must use newly drawn Republican-backed congressional districts for November’s midterm elections, despite previous rulings by both the U.S. Supreme Court and the Missouri Supreme Court blocking their implementation. The new map, favored by former President Donald Trump, aims to benefit Republicans by altering district boundaries and splitting existing ones. This decision follows a long-standing legal battle over redistricting in Missouri, which has seen multiple conflicting court orders affecting voter registration and ballots already printed using the old 2022 map. As a result, the case is likely headed back to the U.S. Supreme Court for a final ruling before November's elections.

Written for “Missouri Redistricting Saga” on 2026-10-30, grounded in this article and the 26 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Missouri Redistricting Saga
Politics · 27 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
NBC News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 26 claims Outlet record 60/100
NPR
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 23 claims Outlet record 60/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 13 claims Outlet record 70/100
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 45 claims Outlet record 64/100
New York Post
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 34 claims Outlet record 66/100
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 64/100
Fox News
Hedges 1 of 6 claims Outlet record 70/100
Reason
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 3 of 13 claims Outlet record 67/100
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 21 claims Outlet record 95/100
CBS News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 25 claims Outlet record 66/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
36
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
1 of 36 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
95/100
Los Angeles Times's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
27
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-25 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Los Angeles Times · 252 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

David G. Savage
10 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 - Click here to listen to this article - - The Supreme Court gave political parties and their fundraising committees lower rates for broadcast campaign ads. - Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson voted to deny the administration’s appeal.
🔮 Supreme Court sounds wary of state-based climate change suits against oil producers - Click here to listen to this article - - Several justices suggested that local and state claims against oil companies may be blocked by the federal Clean Air Act. -
🔮 In its new term, the court will also hear major cases on immigration and guns.
🔮 “At this late date, ordering reversion to the 2025 map in the midst of an ongoing election would usher in electoral chaos,” the justices wrote.
🔮 - The decision will aid states that seek to scrub their voter rolls and remove those who are not citizens.
🔮 - Click here to listen to this article - - The administration could try to impose new regulations for the 2028 elections.
🔮 Acting on his own, Trump had the East Wing of the White House torn down in October and ordered work to start on a massive new building that would dwarf the old executive mansion and seat 1,000 guests for dinner.
🔮 At issue is whether the president acting on his own may build a huge new ballroom complex that is expected to dwarf the historic Executive Mansion.
🔮 By a 5-4 vote, the justices granted an emergency appeal from Trump and his lawyers on Monday, setting aside a judge’s order that would stop the construction.
🔮 California leaders immediately noted the limits of the high court ruling and said they would file a lawsuit to prevent Trump’s desired changes from taking effect. “The Supreme Court just let the Trump administration move ahead (for now) with its plan to disenfranchise voters across the country.
Also by David G. Savage
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 10 articles by David G. Savage →

Topics

GOP Missouri Republican Republicans the Supreme Court

Subjects

Republicans NORP · 6× the Supreme Court ORG · 6× GOP ORG · 4× Republican NORP · 4× Missouri GPE · 3× Democrat NORP · 2× Kansas City GPE · 2× Legislature ORG · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

“This Court has repeatedly cautioned that lower federal courts should not ‘alter the election rules of a state on the eve of an election.” Each side in this messy dispute accused the other of seeking to change the voting districts on the eve of the election. On Tuesday, the opponents of the newly drawn GOP-friendly map appealed to the Supreme Court for the third time.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-25
🔮 “At this late date, ordering reversion to the 2025 map in the midst of an ongoing election would usher in electoral chaos,” the justices wrote.

Claims (36 extracted, 1 hedged)

For third time, Supreme Court rejects Missouri’s bid for another GOP-leaning House district asserted
Court → reject → district
- Click here to listen to this article - - The Legislature’s goal was to flip one more seat in favor of Republicans. - asserted
goal → click → Republicans
A court of appeals ruled in favor of the GOP-friendly map after the Supreme Court had already blocked it. asserted
Court → rule → it
For the third time this month, the Supreme Court has rejected Missouri’s bid for one more Republican-leaning congressional district. asserted
Court → reject → district
With no dissents, the justices upheld a state court order requiring the use of a 2022 election map, which favors Republicans in six of the eight districts. asserted
which → uphold → districts
“At this late date, ordering reversion to the 2025 map in the midst of an ongoing election would usher in electoral chaos,” the justices wrote. asserted
justices → order → chaos
The GOP, with the backing of conservative federal judges, wanted to use a new 2025 election map that redrew the district in Kansas City that had elected a Black Democrat. asserted
that → want → Democrat
That would have given Republicans a 7-1 advantage, but the Supreme Court stood in the way. asserted
Court → give → way
A new report reveals that mid-decade redistricting for the U.S. House has changed congressional districts for one-tenth of Americans. asserted
redistricting → reveal → Americans
“As a matter of state law, the 2022 map — not the 2025 map — must be used in the 2026 congressional election,” the justices said in an unsigned opinion. asserted
justices → use → opinion
“This Court has repeatedly cautioned that lower federal courts should not ‘alter the election rules of a state on the eve of an election.” Each side in this messy dispute accused the other of seeking to change the voting districts on the eve of the election. On Tuesday, the opponents of the newly drawn GOP-friendly map appealed to the Supreme Court for the third time. asserted
opponents → caution → time
They said it is too late to switch the districts because ballots had gone out based on the existing map. asserted
ballots → say → map
They said the Republicans “demand a new map after votes have already been cast. asserted
votes → say → map
Ballots using the 2022 map have been printed and mailed, and absentee voting, both by mail and in-person, began today. asserted
voting → use → person
But the state’s Republican attorneys said the primary elections took place under the new 2025 map, and that argues for keeping those districts in place for the general election in November. asserted
that → say → November
Last September, the Missouri General Assembly, following President Trump’s lead, voted to redraw its eight congressional districts. asserted
Assembly → follow → districts
In recent years, the state had sent six Republicans and two Democrats to Congress. asserted
state → send → Congress
The Legislature’s goal was to flip one more seat in favor of Republicans. asserted
goal → flip → Republicans
The new map would do that by breaking up the Kansas City district that had elected Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, a Black Democrat, with a new district that favored a Republican. asserted
that → do → Republican
But a group called People Not Politicians and its executive director, Richard von Glahn, gathered more than 300,000 signatures for a referendum to challenge the new law before it took effect. asserted
it → call → effect
After waiting nine months to respond, Missouri Secretary of State Denny Hoskins, a Republican, denied the referendum in early August on the same day the primary elections got underway. asserted
elections → wait → day
Von Glahn and his group of voters sued and won a unanimous decision from the Missouri Supreme Court on Sept. 3. asserted
Glahn → sue → Sept.
Its judges said the state Constitution authorizes such a referendum and a new election map cannot take effect until the voters have spoken. asserted
voters → say → effect
Hoskins filed an emergency appeal at the Supreme Court and cited the “chaotic fallout” from the state court “irresponsible decision.” asserted
Hoskins → file → decision
Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, who oversees appeals from the 8th Circuit Court based in St. Louis, denied the appeal without comment on Sept. 8. asserted
who → oversee → Sept.
The Supreme Court’s decision marked a defining moment in a pitched legal battle that has lasted nearly a year and caused confusion for voters. asserted
that → mark → voters
But shortly after his decision was issued, U.S. District Judge Stephen R. Clark, a Trump appointee, issued a temporary restraining order that prohibited the state from using the any voting map other than the new one. asserted
that → issue → one
People not Politicians appealed that decision to the Supreme Court. asserted
People → appeal → Court
On Sept. 10, Kavanaugh and the full court granted the appeal and blocked the judge’s order from taking effect. asserted
Kavanaugh → grant → effect
The justices did not explain their reasoning, but the meaning of the order was clear. asserted
meaning → explain → order
The state Supreme Court ruling meant the new map could not be used for this year’s election. uncertain
map → mean → election
But that did not stop the 8th Circuit Court from ruling the state must use the new map. asserted
state → stop → map
Siding with several Republican candidates, a 2-1 majority said the use of 2022 map was unconstitutional because the primary elections were held under the new map. asserted
elections → side → map
Its decision ordered the elections to be held using the new map. asserted
elections → order → map
This was a surprising ruling, since the Supreme Court’s order on Sept. 10 barred judges in Missouri from intervening further in the dispute over the voting maps. asserted
order → bar → maps
But after a third trip to the court, the justices said the state must use the 2022 map. asserted
state → say → map
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support