Photo via Toronto Star

Premiers keeping cards close on constitutional changes pitched in Alberta referendum

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Cite

Farrell, J. (2026, September 27). Premiers keeping cards close on constitutional changes pitched in Alberta referendum. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/alberta/premiers-keeping-cards-close-on-constitutional-changes-pitched-in-alberta-referendum/article_2ad389bc-b625-5771-a1db-2feef8c24cea.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Toronto Star · collected 2026-09-27 · by Jack Farrell

Quick Summary

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith plans to hold a referendum on October 19 where Albertans will vote on four major constitutional reforms. These proposals include abolishing the Senate, allowing Alberta to appoint its own judges, opting out of federal programs without losing funding, and giving provincial laws precedence over federal ones in jurisdictional disputes. Smith’s government acknowledges that some changes would require national consensus under the 7/50 rule. When asked about their stance on these reforms, other Canadian premiers have generally declined to comment or stated they will wait for Alberta's referendum results before offering opinions.
Written by AI on 2026-09-27, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith is proposing four major constitutional reforms in a referendum set for October 19. These include abolishing the Senate, allowing Alberta to appoint its own judges, opting out of federal programs without losing funding, and giving provincial laws precedence over federal laws in disputes. However, Smith’s counterparts across Canada are remaining silent on their stance towards these changes. A professor at Mount Royal University suggests that due to the lack of attention given by Smith and the significant work required to implement such reforms, no concrete actions will likely follow after the referendum. Notably, abolishing the Senate would require unanimous support from all provinces and territories as well as the Senate itself, making it highly unlikely to succeed.

Written for “Alberta Constitutional Changes Refere…” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Alberta Constitutional Changes Refere…
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Global News
Hedges 5 of 43 claims Outlet record 63/100
CBC News
Hedges 5 of 46 claims Outlet record 74/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the upcoming referendum in Alberta: one focuses on other premiers' stances on constitutional changes, while the other reports on a poll about Albertans' views on immigration and undecided voters.”
Toronto Star
Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles describe different events: one is about premiers' stances on constitutional changes in Alberta, while the other is an energy and economic discussion hosted by Enserva with Premier Smith and Doug Ford.”
Global News
Hedges 6 of 36 claims Outlet record 63/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Canadian unity and constitutional changes in Alberta, but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 6 of 35 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A discusses voter behavior and concerns leading up to the referendum, while Article B focuses on other premiers' responses to Premier Smith's proposals for constitutional changes.”
Toronto Star
Hedges 2 of 35 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A discusses Premier Smith's constitutional changes referendum, while Article B covers Doug Ford's visit to Calgary to urge Albertans to remain in Canada.”
Toronto Star
Outlet record 64/100
“While both articles discuss the upcoming referendum in Alberta, they are reporting on different aspects and timeframes of the event.”
Global News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 6 of 42 claims Outlet record 63/100
“While both articles discuss an upcoming referendum in Alberta, they cover different aspects: Article A focuses on voter turnout and polling results, while Article B discusses how other premiers are responding to the proposed constitutional changes. They do not describe the same specific incident.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 30 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A discusses Albertans voting on various questions related to immigration and Confederation, while Article B focuses on other premiers' reactions to Premier Smith's proposals being put to a vote in Alberta.”
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 5 of 30 claims Outlet record 52/100
“Article A discusses Premier Smith's proposal for health premiums for temporary residents, while Article B focuses on other premiers' reactions to constitutional changes proposed in Alberta's upcoming referendum.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
44
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
5 of 44 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
64/100
Toronto Star's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
2
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-27 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Star · 11445 article(s) · 28 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 28 correction(s)
2026-10-26
Correction
2026-10-24
Correction
2026-10-07
Correction
2026-09-24
Correction

Who wrote this

Jack Farrell
11 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The proposal, made public in a report on Monday, would split the southern city of Lethbridge into four ridings from its current two.
🔮 The other nine questions saw voters, by slim margins, sign off on the province pursuing changes to immigration policies and reject proposals from Premier Danielle Smith on changes to Canada’s Constitution that would transfer more power from Ottawa to the provinces.
🔮 A government bill tabled Tuesday, if passed, would prohibit a number of public bodies from using DEI policies to make hiring decisions.
🔮 “Empty words and platitudes do not make it otherwise.” Stephan’s public stance forced Smith into some pretzel-style arguments over how her caucus could be pro-Canada while harbouring separatists.
🔮 Smith’s four proposals, three of which would likely require the support of seven legislatures representing over half of Canada’s population (known as the 7/50 rule) and Parliament to implement, are among 10 questions she’s putting to Albertans on Oct. 19.
🔮 The agency said those who have previously registered for a special ballot will soon start receiving their packages in the mail or they can pick them up in person.
🔮 For Thursday’s call, Albertans could either submit questions online or, if they registered in advance, over the phone.
🔮 The event, hosted by the City of Edmonton and Mayor Andrew Knack, saw Indigenous leaders and elders participate in ceremonies, drumming, dancing and the raising of the Treaty 6 flag.
Also by Jack Farrell
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 11 articles by Jack Farrell →

Topics

Alberta Albertans Canada Confederation Senate

Subjects

Alberta GPE · 7× Smith PERSON · 7× Canada GPE · 6× Albertans NORP · 5× Ottawa ORG · 4× Confederation ORG · 3× Senate ORG · 3× Nunavut NORP · 2× Parliament ORG · 2× Yukon GPE · 2×

Narrative

“She’s not really talking about the Constitutional questions,” Bratt said in an interview, pointing to recent speeches the premier has made. “It’s immigrants who are the scapegoats and the villains here.” Bratt, a professor at Mount Royal University, said the lack of attention Smith has given the constitutional proposals, combined with the amount of work needed to actually move the issues forward, means he doesn’t think she will act after Oct. 19.
framing: assertive · carried by 2 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-27
🔮 Smith’s four proposals, three of which would likely require the support of seven legislatures representing over half of Canada’s population (known as the 7/50 rule) and Parliament to implement, are among 10 questions she’s putting to Albertans on Oct. 19.

Claims (44 extracted, 5 hedged)

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s counterparts across the country are keeping their cards close to their chest on where they stand on the major constitutional reforms Smith is sending to a provincewide vote next month. asserted
Smith → keep → vote
Smith’s four proposals, three of which would likely require the support of seven legislatures representing over half of Canada’s population (known as the 7/50 rule) and Parliament to implement, are among 10 questions she’s putting to Albertans on Oct. 19. asserted
she → require → Oct.
Her ideas, in brief, are: to abolish the Senate; let Alberta, not Ottawa, pick provincial King’s Bench and Court of Appeal judges; allow Alberta to opt out of federal programs without losing the associated funding; and to give provincial laws standing over Ottawa’s when jurisdictional disputes occur. asserted
disputes → abolish → Ottawa
Smith’s government concedes on its referendum website that abolishing the Senate, which would require unanimous cross-country support and the support of the Senate itself, is going to be a non-starter for other political leaders. asserted
which → concede → leaders
But the premier’s office says there’s support for the other proposals and that “targeted” amendments to Canada’s legal and administrative spine are more likely to become reality, which is why it wants a mandate from Albertans to proceed. asserted
mandate → say → Albertans
“Provinces across the country are tired of federal overreach and want more authority within Confederation, not less,” said Ryan Fournier, a communications adviser to Smith. asserted
Fournier → want → Smith
“We believe this conversation is a vital step towards a fairer Confederation.” asserted
conversation → believe → Confederation
The Canadian Press reached out to premiers across the country to ask whether they supported Smith’s proposals, but many did not respond to repeated requests. asserted
many → reach → requests
Some, such as Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe’s office, said they wouldn’t be commenting, and those who did respond didn’t answer directly. asserted
who → say → office
“This is a matter for Albertans to consider through their referendum process,” said a spokesperson for Northwest Territories Premier R.J. Simpson. asserted
spokesperson → consider → Simpson
Nunavut Premier John Main said the territory is be closely monitoring the results of the referendum. asserted
territory → say → referendum
“Like Alberta, Nunavut is rich in resources that benefit the rest of Canada and the world, and we need external supports to bring those resources to market,” Main said. asserted
Main → benefit → market
“We intend to make our mark in partnership with other governments and private industry, and support measures that build a stronger Canada.” asserted
that → intend → Canada
Yukon Premier Currie Dixon said he looked forward to “hearing what Albertans have to say” when it comes to the Constitution, but didn’t offer an opinion. asserted
it → say → opinion
He did, however, voice his support for Alberta remaining in Canada, referring to the headlining question on succession. asserted
Alberta → voice → succession
“While I know Albertans have a number of grievances with the federal government, it’s my hope that Alberta will continue to stay in Confederation,” Dixon said. asserted
Dixon → know → Confederation
“Canada, including the Yukon, would be negatively affected if Alberta were to leave.” While they may not be saying so now, one constitutional law expert said Smith’s office is correct in saying there could be enough support from other provincial governments to take two of the proposals beyond the ballot — having provinces pick provincial judges and opting out of federal programs without financial punishment. uncertain
provinces → include → punishment
“It’s extra provincial power. asserted
It → ’ → ?
Why wouldn’t they want it?” said Gerard Kennedy, a constitutional law professor at the University of Alberta. asserted
Kennedy → want → Alberta
“To me, the big problem is going to be getting the federal Parliament to agree, because the federal government would have to be agreeing to reduce its own power for nothing in return.” asserted
government → go → return
Smith, Moe, Ontario Premier Doug Ford and former Quebec premier François Legault penned a letter to Ottawa in March asking that all provincial Appeal Court and Superior Court judges be appointed from a pre-approved list submitted by the provinces. asserted
judges → pen → provinces
Federal Justice Minister Sean Fraser quickly shut the issue down, saying Ottawa wasn’t considering changes to the judicial appointment process. asserted
Ottawa → shut → process
He pointed to the advisory committees set up across the country that review and advise on judicial applications to say that provinces already have input, since each government appoints some of the committee’s members. asserted
government → point → members
Kennedy said the proposal about giving provincial laws paramountcy over federal laws probably won’t go anywhere, adding that there was no federation in the world with that setup. asserted
proposal → say → setup
He said regardless of the support that may exist, Alberta could be opening a can of worms if it makes serious efforts at working with other provinces. uncertain
it → say → provinces
“The problem if you open up constitutional negotiations is that some other provinces are going to have their pet projects and they’ll say, ‘well, we won’t agree to amend the Constitution on terms favorable to Alberta unless they’re also amended on terms that are favorable to New Brunswick or Quebec,’” he said. asserted
he → open → Brunswick
“And then you end up having a package and too many provinces won’t like some part of the package and then it doesn’t get through.” asserted
it → end → package
He said there’s a third way Alberta could try to amend the Constitution. uncertain
Alberta → say → Constitution
Some changes can be made with only the support of Parliament and the province that is being affected by the amendment. asserted
that → make → amendment
An example was in 2001, when the Constitution was amended to change the name of Newfoundland to Newfoundland and Labrador. asserted
Constitution → amend → Newfoundland
Alberta could try to go that route, Kennedy said, but the effort would likely end up in court, as granting the province special privileges others don’t have would go against the presumption that all provinces are treated equally. uncertain
provinces → try → presumption
Despite the premier and her office hinting that they’re committed to lobbying other provinces should the four proposals get majority approval on Oct. 19, some doubt Smith is willing to put in the effort. asserted
Smith → hint → effort
Smith framed her referendum questions as presenting Albertans with a plan to better the province’s standing within Confederation so that voters don’t resort to separatism. asserted
voters → frame → separatism
She’s also blamed federal immigration policy for Alberta’s overburdened health and education systems. asserted
She → blame → systems
Calgary-based political scientist Duane Bratt said the constitutional questions feel like an afterthought for the referendum. asserted
questions → base → referendum
Bratt said he’d feel differently if the questions were a bigger part of the premier’s messaging or the government’s $4-million ad campaign, which he said are far more focused on Smith’s five immigration proposals that are also on the ballot. asserted
that → say → ballot
“She’s not really talking about the Constitutional questions,” Bratt said in an interview, pointing to recent speeches the premier has made. “It’s immigrants who are the scapegoats and the villains here.” Bratt, a professor at Mount Royal University, said the lack of attention Smith has given the constitutional proposals, combined with the amount of work needed to actually move the issues forward, means he doesn’t think she will act after Oct. 19. asserted
she → talk → Oct.
Is their energy (on) building pipelines, restructuring the health-care system, or constitutional change? asserted
energy → build → system
Because I don’t think they could do all of that.” uncertain
they → think → that
Opposition NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi said this week that he thinks Smith is only trying to find new enemies to blame for Alberta getting a raw deal. asserted
Alberta → say → deal
…and 4 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support