- Published
The government must "take seriously the possibility of an unprecedented impact on the jobs market" caused by artificial intelligence (AI), a UK minister has said.
asserted
minister → publish → intelligence
AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said there was no evidence so far of an overall reduction in jobs as a result of AI, but one of his priorities was to have a contingency plan in place for worst case scenarios.
asserted
one → say → scenarios
"If it's going to hit us in a big way, you are going to want to be as ahead of the curve as possible," he told a fringe meeting at the Labour Party conference.
asserted
he → go → conference
Carsten Jung, of the IPPR think tank, said: "In a worst case scenario you could have about 8 million jobs being negatively affected by this."
uncertain
jobs → say → this
Jung said the think tank was working on a "pandemic preparedness" report on AI labour market disruption.
asserted
tank → say → disruption
The level of AI adoption by industry was not that high so far and it might not ultimately lead to massive job losses, he said, but he claimed it was still going to have a bigger impact on the labour market than the industrial revolution.
uncertain
it → lead → revolution
He also admitted that "stark scenarios" the IPPR had produced in 2024 were "to some extent" wrong but, he argued, AI had evolved rapidly since then from doing "boring" tasks to "more high-level reasoning and creative tasks".
"We are not preparing enough for something quite big that's coming," he told the meeting.
asserted
he → admit → meeting
According to Jung, about 11% of UK jobs are "highly exposed" to being replaced by AI chatbots, "led by secretarial and administrative occupations".
uncertain
% → accord → occupations
But with the rise of more sophisticated agentic AI, he argued that the proportion "could rise to about 60% of tasks across the UK economy".
uncertain
proportion → argue → economy
The government needed to be ready to help retrain service sector workers, he argued, but also to bring in measures to "slow down the transition slightly" to keep people in their jobs.
asserted
he → need → jobs
That could involve redesigning tax structures to "make it a bit more attractive to hold on to workers than automating them," he said.
uncertain
he → involve → them
But he warned that "a lot of the policies we might want to do in a really severe disruption scenario will cost a lot of money," particularly as the UK is more of a service-based economy than other G7 nations.
uncertain
UK → warn → nations
He also said that women were "40% more exposed than men" to the threat of AI because a higher proportion worked in service jobs.
asserted
proportion → say → jobs
'Better transparency'
Narayan told the meeting that the impact of AI might have been under-estimated because of the "silent adoption" of the technology by workers, which did not show up in industry surveys.
uncertain
which → tell → surveys
UK firms had said there was "no aggregate impact in the overall labour market today," the AI minister added, but one tech firm had told him they had hired fewer people because tasks had been automated "so the actual net impact might not be fully captured".
uncertain
impact → say → people
The minister said he was determined that workers would have a voice in the transition to AI, and promised "much better transparency when AI and technology is adopted" so that any productivity gains could be measured.
And he said one of his top priorities was "thinking through what you would do in contingency" if the job losses were as bad as some were predicting.
uncertain
some → say → contingency
This could involve changes to "labour market policy" and "even where we might go on some aspects of regulation," he added.
uncertain
he → involve → regulation
Mike Clancy, general secretary of the Prospect trade union, welcomed the government's commitment to giving workers more of a say, but warned against "creating the conditions in which working people become victims" of AI.
asserted
people → welcome → AI
Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband has, meanwhile, used his conference speech to fire a warning shot at "tech titans" he said could not be relied on to manage the safety risks posed by AI alone.
uncertain
he → use → AI
He said that while some tech companies were "calling for us to act", others "are saying we should leave it all to them".
asserted
we → say → them
But he argued that the "lesson of history is that we cannot leave it to corporations to put in place the guardrails to serve the public interest".
asserted
we → argue → interest
"It is neither their purpose nor their motive, theirs is to maximise profits.
asserted
theirs → maximise → profits
We cannot and will not allow that to come at the expense of our children or indeed humanity," he continued.
asserted
he → allow → children
He said that while the "technological progress" from AI was "inspiring", the "threat it poses according to its own inventors is daunting".
uncertain
it → say → inventors
He said the UK would confront those "urgent risks", including by using its G20 presidency next year to "lead the efforts to manage AI so we keep our country and our world safe".
asserted
we → say → country
The Aporia
