Photo via ABC News (US)

Former special counsel Jack Smith to testify before Senate on Trump investigations

Read the original at ABC News (US) ↗
Cite

Mallin, A. (2026, September 29). Former special counsel Jack Smith to testify before Senate on Trump investigations. ABC News (US). https://abcnews.com/Politics/former-special-counsel-jack-smith-testify-senate-trump/story?id=136828779

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

ABC News (US) · collected 2026-09-29 · by Alexander Mallin

Quick Summary

Former special counsel Jack Smith will testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday regarding his investigations into former President Donald Trump. Smith is expected to defend his decision to charge Trump for attempting to overturn the 2020 election and retaining classified documents, emphasizing that political considerations did not influence his actions. Republicans have called for Smith himself to face prosecution, accusing him of politicizing the Justice Department, while Democrats argue these attacks are politically motivated and misleading.
Written by AI on 2026-09-29, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On Tuesday, former special counsel Jack Smith testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee chaired by Senator Chuck Grassley to defend his two criminal investigations into President Donald Trump. Republicans accuse Smith of abusing authority and politically targeting Republicans, while Democrats support him for standing up against Trump's alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and mishandling classified documents. The hearing, titled "Oversight of Jack Smith’s Abuse of Authority and the Targeting of Republicans," also involves scrutiny over subpoenas issued by Smith's office, which were aimed at disrupting certification of Joe Biden's victory in 2020, ultimately leading to the Jan. 6 Capitol attack. Smith has insisted his decisions were made without political bias and said he would not be silenced despite threats from Trump's Justice Department.

Written for “Jack Smith Testifies Before Senate” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 34 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Jack Smith Testifies Before Senate
Politics · 35 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Al Jazeera
Hedges 1 of 35 claims Outlet record 60/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 2 of 35 claims Outlet record 70/100
NBC News
Hedges 1 of 23 claims Outlet record 60/100
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 22 claims Outlet record 64/100
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 70/100
New York Post
Hedges 1 of 15 claims Outlet record 66/100
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Bulwark
Hedges 0 of 5 claims
Washington Examiner
Hedges 1 of 16 claims Outlet record 70/100
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 39 claims Outlet record 59/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
28
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
3 of 28 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
70/100
ABC News (US)'s corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
35
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-29 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

ABC News (US) · 1268 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Alexander Mallin
20 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Attorneys for former FBI Director James Comey are set to appear in court in Washington, D.C., Friday in their emergency push to have a federal judge dismiss the criminal allegations lodged against him by the Justice Department that accuse him of allegedly mishandling classified information more than a decade ago.
🔮 A House Democrat is asking congressional appropriators for guardrails that would prevent President Donald Trump from exploiting a loophole in federal law to buy the East Potomac Golf Course that he's been pushing to renovate with taxpyer funds.
🔮 "Never before in American history has the federal government, on the eve of an election, sought to coerce a state and local government to abandon their own Constitutional elections procedures and bend to the will of the Executive Branch," U.S .District Judge David Carter wrote in his Wednesday order.
🔮 Bill Essayli, a controversial Trump-installed leader of the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Central District of California, argued in the hearing that the administration was simply pushing for the state to be in compliance with federal law barring non-citizens from casting votes. But state officials and other legal advocates opposing the DOJ lawsuit countered that the litigation violated longstanding Constitutional principles mandating that states have control over their elections -- and could have chaotic consequences for the state in tabulating final vote counts in the weeks ahead.
🔮 I'm frustrated that I got it in the middle of the night, but I'm much more concerned that it's filed on the public record." The assistant U.S. attorney in the hearing, John Borchert, struggled repeatedly as Faruqui asked him to explain the government's conduct, which the judge said was unlike any case he had ever seen in the history of D.C.'s district court. Faruqui ultimately granted the request from Flores' and Benavides' attorneys to strike the amended complaint from the docket and said he would continue Tuesday's hearing to determine whether prosecutors established probable cause in their initial complaint filed last week. "Why today on this one case have you changed the entire history of how you charge cases?" Faruqui asked of Borchert.
🔮 She could not immediately be reached for comment on Tuesday.
🔮 "The United States seeks a court order to prevent Defendants from certifying the result of the November 2026 United States Senate election if '(1) [Dan S.] Sullivan does not win the election; and (2) had all votes cast for Daniel J. Sullivan been cast instead for [Dan S.] Sullivan and Alaska's rank-choice process played out accordingly, [Dan S.] Sullivan would have won the election.'"
🔮 Appeals court rejects Trump admin's voting lawsuit against California The court sent the suit back to a district court, which will hear it on Tuesday.
🔮 During a press conference on Monday, Deputy Attorney General Trent McCotter attracted some scrutiny when he acknowledged that the administration's list likely included errors, and that "there may be some names on there who it turns out ultimately are citizens.
🔮 In a follow-up post resharing the letter, Trump wrote "They will all go to jail for a long period of time!!!"
Also by Alexander Mallin
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 20 articles by Alexander Mallin →

Topics

Democrat House Republican Republicans Senate

Subjects

Smith PERSON · 19× Trump PERSON · 11× Republicans NORP · 5× House ORG · 3× Republican NORP · 3× Senate ORG · 3× the Justice Department ORG · 3× Democrat NORP · 2× Jack Smith PERSON · 2× the Senate Judiciary Committee ORG · 1×

Narrative

Smith has repeatedly defended his office's actions with respect to the subpoenaed records, and has said the records were only targeted because they were made in the period where Trump and other White House officials were seeking to disrupt certification of Joe Biden's 2020 election win -- which ultimately led to the violent Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-29
🔮 Former special counsel Jack Smith is set to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday to defend his two criminal investigations of President Donald Trump amid growing calls from Republicans that Smith himself face prosecution by Trump's Justice Department.

Claims (28 extracted, 3 hedged)

Former special counsel Jack Smith to testify before Senate on Trump investigations asserted
Smith → testify → investigations
Smith has rejected assertions he or his prosecutors were motivated by politics. asserted
he → reject → politics
Former special counsel Jack Smith is set to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday to defend his two criminal investigations of President Donald Trump amid growing calls from Republicans that Smith himself face prosecution by Trump's Justice Department. asserted
Smith → set → Department
Smith, who secured indictments against Trump over his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss and his alleged unlawful retention of classified documents after leaving the White House, has repeatedly said he believes he could prove Trump's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and defended the actions of his investigative team. uncertain
he → secure → team
Trump has long denied wrongdoing and neither case ultimately made it before a jury following his 2024 election victory, after which Smith moved to dismiss both indictments based on DOJ policy barring prosecution of a sitting president. asserted
Smith → deny → president
In an opening statement to the committee obtained by ABC News, Smith is expected to say, "I stand by my decisions as Special Counsel, including my decision to bring charges against President Trump. asserted
I → open → Trump
I made these decisions without regard to President Trump’s political association, activities, beliefs, or candidacy in the 2024 presidential election." asserted
I → make → election
"If asked whether to prosecute a former President based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that President was a Republican or a Democrat," his statement says. asserted
statement → ask → facts
Trump has repeatedly said Smith should face prosecution and he has become a central target of House and Senate Republicans, who have argued his investigations were fueled by political animus and represented a "weaponization" of the Justice Department. asserted
investigations → say → Department
Smith, in a January appearance before the House Judiciary Committee, vigorously rejected the notion that he or any of his prosecutors were motivated by politics. asserted
he → reject → politics
"If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican," Smith said. asserted
Smith → ask → facts
"No one, no one should be above the law in this country, and the law required that he be held to account. asserted
he → require → account
So that is what I did." asserted
I → do → what
Senate Democrats have cast Republicans' attacks on Smith as misleading and hypocritical in light of what they argue is Trump's blatant weaponization of the department to pursue his political enemies. asserted
they → cast → enemies
Attorney General Todd Blanche said in July testimony that the department was investigating a criminal referral from House Republicans who accused Smith of lying in his January House testimony. asserted
who → say → testimony
In a lengthy rebuttal to Blanche, Smith's attorneys argued the referral was based on "spurious" claims that took his testimony out of context in order to create a pretext for the Justice Department to investigate him. uncertain
Department → argue → him
"During his testimony, Mr. Smith provided truthful, responsive answers and candidly discussed his work," Smith's attorneys said. asserted
attorneys → provide → work
"This referral reflects a chilling eagerness to weaponize the justice system by attacking a career, nonpartisan public servant who faithfully and fearlessly performed his duties by following the facts and the law. asserted
who → reflect → facts
In the nearly two years since Smith's office was shuttered following Trump's 2024 election win, nearly every prosecutor and line agent associated with Smith's investigation have either resigned or been fired. asserted
prosecutor → shutter → investigation
The Justice Department and FBI have also handed over scores of records from Smith's probes to Republican lawmakers who have released them in piecemeal disclosures alleging, without evidence, that they expose corruption or otherwise unethical behavior by Smith's investigative team. asserted
they → hand → team
In Tuesday's hearing, specifically, Republicans are expected to accuse Smith of unlawfully targeting their phone records during the course of his investigation into Trump's efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss. asserted
Republicans → expect → loss
Smith has repeatedly defended his office's actions with respect to the subpoenaed records, and has said the records were only targeted because they were made in the period where Trump and other White House officials were seeking to disrupt certification of Joe Biden's 2020 election win -- which ultimately led to the violent Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol. asserted
which → defend → Capitol
"I didn't choose those members, President Trump did," Smith said in prior testimony regarding lawmakers whose records his office obtained. asserted
office → choose → records
"I didn't choose those members," Smith said in prior testimony. asserted
Smith → choose → testimony
"President Trump did." asserted
Trump → do → ?
Another factor looming over Smith's Tuesday testimony is that he is technically barred from discussing details from his other criminal investigation of Trump's alleged unlawful retention of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago resort. asserted
he → loom → resort
The Trump-appointed federal judge who previously dismissed the classified documents case, Aileen Cannon, has a standing order that prohibits Smith or any other government official from revealing information that could be part of his final report detailing the probe. uncertain
that → appoint → probe
An appeals court is currently weighing a lawsuit filed by First Amendment advocacy groups seeking to lift Cannon's order and make the report public. asserted
report → weigh → order
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support