Photo via New York Post

Ex-special counsel Jack Smith accused of ‘corrupt’ probe of Trump and Republican lawmakers

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

King, R. (2026, September 29). Ex-special counsel Jack Smith accused of ‘corrupt’ probe of Trump and Republican lawmakers. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/09/29/us-news/jack-smith-accused-of-corrupt-probe-of-trump-republican-lawmakers/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-09-29 · by Ryan King

Quick Summary

Former special counsel Jack Smith faced accusations from Senate Republicans during a hearing where they claimed his investigation into President Trump was illegal and politically motivated. Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley accused Smith of running a “corrupt operation” that broke the law, while Smith defended his actions, stating he made decisions without regard to political affiliations. Democrats supported Smith, arguing that his team had the necessary experience to handle sensitive cases like the Jan. 6 Capitol riot investigation.
Written by AI on 2026-09-29, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On Tuesday, former special counsel Jack Smith testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee chaired by Senator Chuck Grassley to defend his two criminal investigations into President Donald Trump. Republicans accuse Smith of abusing authority and politically targeting Republicans, while Democrats support him for standing up against Trump's alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and mishandling classified documents. The hearing, titled "Oversight of Jack Smith’s Abuse of Authority and the Targeting of Republicans," also involves scrutiny over subpoenas issued by Smith's office, which were aimed at disrupting certification of Joe Biden's victory in 2020, ultimately leading to the Jan. 6 Capitol attack. Smith has insisted his decisions were made without political bias and said he would not be silenced despite threats from Trump's Justice Department.

Written for “Jack Smith Testifies Before Senate” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 34 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Jack Smith Testifies Before Senate
Politics · 35 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
ABC News (US)
Hedges 3 of 28 claims Outlet record 70/100
Al Jazeera
Hedges 1 of 35 claims Outlet record 60/100
NBC News
Hedges 1 of 23 claims Outlet record 60/100
Washington Examiner
Hedges 6 of 54 claims Outlet record 70/100
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 14 claims Outlet record 68/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 2 of 35 claims Outlet record 70/100
Euronews
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 4 of 18 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A reports on a prosecutor's resignation from Trump's election conspiracy investigation, while Article B discusses accusations against former special counsel Jack Smith by Republicans during Senate Judiciary Committee hearings.”
CBS News
Hedges 4 of 43 claims Outlet record 66/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
15
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
1 of 15 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
35
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-29 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 15765 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ryan King
107 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 On Election Day, many voters across the country will be forced to decide whether to elect ethically and criminally challenged candidates as they juggle their political and moral priorities.
🔮 The Justice Department has already filed a lawsuit aimed at blocking certification of the election if Sen. Sullivan loses, complaining that his defeat may be unfair in light of “Decoy Dan” being in the race.
🔮 “Federal agents have raided her home, confiscated personal records, and seized her phone — all to try and uncover a nonexistent smoking gun from 20 years ago that will somehow make their case,” the 44th president posted on X. “Think about that.
🔮 “We will hold the judge, Ana C. Reyes, fully responsible for anybody who is hurt, or killed, on this very dangerous, dilapidated, and unsightly Golf Course,” the president continued.
🔮 “The establishment did not want him to be out there mobilizing people who had never voted before, just for change,” former Waterville Mayor Karen Heck lamented to The Post about Platner at a Jackson town hall event on Monday “It’s another example of innuendo taking somebody down who was popular,” she added.
🔮 Top campaign aides for Alaska Senate hopeful Mary Peltola were instructed to search for people named Dan Sullivan they could recruit for the contest, and she was “definitely aware,” a bombshell report revealed.
🔮 “It’s innumerate and morally obtuse and if anything remotely like it was aimed at Muslims [Uygur] and his ilk would (defensibly) be outraged.
🔮 The judge added that allowing Comey’s dismissal to stand “would be to unsettle the very equilibrium established by this Nation’s constitutional system.”
🔮 Critically, the trend from September to October indicates that swing voters who will be deciding key races are increasingly turning on the far left.
🔮 To that end, the GOPer has called for an end to the war in Iran while touting his relationship with Trump as an asset that could help him convince the president to wind down the tariffs on Canada that have rocked Michigan.
Also by Ryan King
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 107 articles by Ryan King →

Topics

Committee GOP Republicans WASHINGTON the Senate Judiciary Committee

Subjects

Smith PERSON · 12× Trump PERSON · 8× Grassley PERSON · 2× Chuck Grassley PERSON · 1× Committee ORG · 1× GOP ORG · 1× Jack Smith PERSON · 1× Republicans NORP · 1× WASHINGTON GPE · 1× the Senate Judiciary Committee ORG · 1×

Narrative

Smith had been tapped as special counsel in November 2022 by then-Attorney General Merrick Garland, who tasked Smith with handling two cases against Trump — one for hoarding national security papers at Mar-a-Lago and another related to his attempt to overturn the 2020 election result.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-29
🔮 “If asked whether to prosecute a former President based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that President was a Republican or a Democrat.

Claims (15 extracted, 1 hedged)

WASHINGTON — Former special counsel Jack Smith squared off with Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee who accused him Tuesday of illegally targeting President Trump and GOP lawmakers. asserted
who → square → Trump
Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) accused Smith of running a “corrupt operation” that “undermined the rule of law and threatened our very political institutions.” asserted
that → accuse → institutions
“Mr. Smith’s operation was a partisan weapon that broke the rules, lied to the court, and engaged in bad faith throughout his operation,” Grassley added, contending that the outcome of the special counsel’s probe “has no credibility.” asserted
outcome → break → credibility
Smith had been tapped as special counsel in November 2022 by then-Attorney General Merrick Garland, who tasked Smith with handling two cases against Trump — one for hoarding national security papers at Mar-a-Lago and another related to his attempt to overturn the 2020 election result. asserted
who → tap → result
“Mr. Smith prosecuted Trump for allegedly mishandling classified information,” Grassley noted. uncertain
Grassley → prosecute → information
“[But] his team left a classified facility open, causing a security violation while prosecuting Trump for effectively the same offense.” asserted
team → leave → offense
Smith remained defiant in his opening statement, telling the committee: “I stand by my decisions as Special Counsel, including my decision to bring charges against President Trump,” Smith said during his opening remarks. asserted
Smith → remain → remarks
“I made these decisions without regard to President Trump’s political association, activities, beliefs, or candidacy in the 2024 presidential election.” asserted
I → make → election
“Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in serious crimes against our nation,” Smith added. asserted
Smith → develop → nation
“If asked whether to prosecute a former President based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that President was a Republican or a Democrat. asserted
President → ask → facts
The special counsel’s team brought a total of 41 felony counts against Trump across the two cases. asserted
team → bring → cases
The Mar-a-Lago case was thrown out by a Florida federal judge who ruled Smith had been illegally appointed, while the 2020 election case ended after Trump was returned to office in 2024. asserted
Trump → throw → 2024
Democrats on the panel stood by Smith, with ranking member Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) recalling the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot, “when this cathedral of democracy was overrun by violent insurrectionists at the direction of the president.” asserted
cathedral → stand → president
“Thankfully, Mr. Smith, who is here today and will be under oath, and his team of nonpartisan career prosecutors had the necessary experience to tackle this assignment,” Durbin later added. asserted
Durbin → have → assignment
“…The aspersions cast on Mr. Smith nonstop are petty, personal and political. asserted
aspersions → cast → Smith
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support