Photo via Toronto Star

Supreme Court lets quick deportations to third countries resume for now while it weighs Trump policy

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Cite

Whitehurst, L. (2026, September 29). Supreme Court lets quick deportations to third countries resume for now while it weighs Trump policy. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/news/world/united-states/supreme-court-lets-trump-continue-deporting-people-to-third-countries-while-justices-weigh-policy/article_033c700e-c1b0-5b10-b4cd-27c640692710.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Toronto Star · collected 2026-09-29 · by Lindsay Whitehurst

Quick Summary

The Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration's policy of expelling migrants to third countries without giving them an opportunity to contest their deportation to proceed, pending a decision on its legality. The ruling came in response to lower court injunctions that required such objections to be heard first. Six justices supported this temporary measure, while three dissented.
Written by AI on 2026-09-29, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The Trump administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court to allow it to continue swiftly deporting immigrants to third countries, different from their country of origin, after a federal appeals court blocked such deportations due to insufficient process protections for migrants. Attorney General Todd Blanche announced on X that the government would seek immediate relief from the high court, which previously allowed similar removals. Over 25,000 people have been deported under this policy since March 2025, with most sent to Mexico and others to more than two dozen countries. The administration argues these deportations are crucial for public safety, targeting individuals who pose a criminal threat or whose home countries refuse them entry. However, critics claim the policy lacks due process protections and targets those granted legal protection from deportation back to their home countries. On September 24th, the Supreme Court temporarily allowed the policy to continue while it considers full oral arguments in December, despite objections from Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Written for “Third Country Deportations Policy” on 2026-10-30, grounded in this article and the 17 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Third Country Deportations Policy
Politics · 18 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 64/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 4 of 22 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 5 claims Outlet record 66/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 3 of 12 claims Outlet record 70/100
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 70/100
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 19 claims Outlet record 66/100
NPR
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 3 of 16 claims Outlet record 60/100
Fox News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 6 of 20 claims Outlet record 70/100
Toronto Star
Hedges 5 of 31 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles describe different judicial proceedings related to migrant deportations but refer to distinct court decisions and timelines.”
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 2 of 10 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different judicial actions regarding immigration policy and deportations under the Trump administration, not the same specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
2
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 2 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
64/100
Toronto Star's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
18
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-29 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Star · 10538 article(s) · 27 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 27 correction(s)
2026-10-26
Correction
2026-10-24
Correction
2026-10-07
Correction
2026-09-24
Correction

Who wrote this

Lindsay Whitehurst
18 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 But in the Big Bend region, the administration has run into opposition from ranchers, residents, business owners and environmentalists who argue the projects are a waste of money in an area of historically low illegal immigration and that construction could harm the region’s scenic landscapes.
🔮 The justices will hear an appeal from energy companies trying to block dozens of lawsuits seeking to hold them liable in court for damage related to climate change.
🔮 And it does feel like maybe the oil and gas industry should have a part in this.”
🔮 Since then, an appeals court has upheld a Boston-based judge’s final ruling that migrants must have a meaningful chance to argue a third-country deportation would put them in danger of persecution or torture.
🔮 Lawyers for the couple had urged the court to reject the request, questioning what an intervention would do for medical decision-making at an already chaotic time.
🔮 None of the three justices wrote about their rationale for joining the majority opinion, though Justice Brett Kavanaugh indicated he might see things differently if the election wasn’t coming up so quickly.
🔮 The Supreme Court majority indicated that the effort to enact these restrictions this year would probably prove unsuccessful legally, though its brief emergency order provided no extensive rationale.
🔮 In the filing, Solicitor General John Sauer said: “Ballots have already begun to be mailed in North Carolina, and more States will begin the mailing process as the injunction remains in place — including Alabama on September 9 and at least five States the week of September 13.”
🔮 The legal wrangling comes even as states start sending out mail ballots, leaving the administration little time to make big changes in mail ballot rules. “Ballots have already begun to be mailed in North Carolina, and more States will begin the mailing process as the injunction remains in place — including Alabama on September 9 and at least five States the week of September 13,” Solicitor General John Sauer said in the filing.
🔮 Backers of the referendum have said a statewide vote would give the state’s residents a voice in the process.
Also by Lindsay Whitehurst
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 18 articles by Lindsay Whitehurst →

Topics

The Supreme Court WASHINGTON

Subjects

Donald Trump PERSON · 1× The Supreme Court ORG · 1× WASHINGTON GPE · 1×

Narrative

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday let President Donald Trump’s administration continue swiftly deporting people to countries other than their own for now, while the justices consider whether the policy is legal.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-29

Claims (2 extracted, 0 hedged)

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday let President Donald Trump’s administration continue swiftly deporting people to countries other than their own for now, while the justices consider whether the policy is legal. asserted
policy → let → own
The apparent 6-3 order temporarily lifts lower court requirements for migrants to get a chance to object before being sent to countries to which they have no ties. asserted
they → lift → ties
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support