Photo via Toronto Star

Appeals court appears divided in case over Venezuelan migrants deported to El Salvador prison

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Cite

Kunzelman, M. (2026, September 25). Appeals court appears divided in case over Venezuelan migrants deported to El Salvador prison. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/news/world/united-states/appeals-court-appears-divided-in-case-over-venezuelan-migrants-deported-to-el-salvador-prison/article_84e434c5-6011-5461-a906-05bc71b67c3a.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Toronto Star · collected 2026-09-25 · by Michael Kunzelman

Quick Summary

On Friday, a three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit debated whether to uphold an order requiring the Trump administration to facilitate the return of Venezuelan migrants who were deported to El Salvador without due process last year. The judges seemed divided over whether the court has jurisdiction in this case and whether the U.S. government maintained control over the migrants even after their deportation, with Judge Harry Edwards supporting the lower court’s decision and Judges A. Raymond Randolph and Neomi Rao appearing skeptical.
Written by AI on 2026-09-25, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On Friday, a three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit heard arguments regarding an order by Chief Judge James Boasberg to allow some Venezuelan migrants deported to El Salvador to return to the U.S. The migrants were flown out without any notice or opportunity to challenge their removals, which took place under the Trump administration in March 2025. The Justice Department had appealed this decision after Boasberg ruled that the government must facilitate the migrants' return at its expense. Judges A. Raymond Randolph and Neomi Rao seemed skeptical about granting the migrants a right to return to challenge their deportations, indicating potential disagreement among the judges on how to proceed with the case.

Written for “Venezuelan Migrants Deportation Case” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Venezuelan Migrants Deportation Case
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 16% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
NPR
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 3 of 16 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different stages of legal proceedings related to deportation policies, not the same specific incident.”
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A discusses an appeals court hearing about deporting Venezuelan migrants, while Article B reports on the Supreme Court ruling that temporarily permits continued deportation to third countries. These are different judicial proceedings.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 3 of 12 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different judicial proceedings related to deportations but refer to distinct rulings and hearings at different levels of the court system.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 5 of 34 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles describe different aspects of ongoing legal proceedings related to Venezuelan migrants, but they do not appear to be reporting on the exact same hearing or incident.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles describe different judicial proceedings related to migrant deportations but refer to distinct court decisions and timelines.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 4 of 22 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different judicial proceedings related to deportation policies but do not describe the same specific incident.”
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 62/100
“The articles describe different judicial actions: one is about a panel of appeals court judges discussing whether to block or uphold an order, while the other is about the Supreme Court's decision to allow Trump's administration to resume deportations based on an emergency request.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 4 of 23 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different legal actions related to deportations, with Article A focusing on an emergency filing to the Supreme Court regarding a broader policy, while Article B discusses an appeals court hearing about specific Venezuelan migrants deported to El Salvador.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 19 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different judicial actions: an appeals court hearing versus a Supreme Court decision.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 6 of 20 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles describe different legal proceedings related to immigration policies; one is about an appeals court considering a case involving Venezuelan migrants, while the other is about the Supreme Court's decision on a broader policy of deporting illegal aliens to third countries.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
31
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
16%
5 of 31 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
64/100
Toronto Star's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-25 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Star · 11255 article(s) · 28 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 28 correction(s)
2026-10-26
Correction
2026-10-24
Correction
2026-10-07
Correction
2026-09-24
Correction

Who wrote this

Michael Kunzelman
17 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Lawyers for former FBI Director James Comey will ask a federal judge on Friday to block the Justice Department from pursuing its third criminal case against the outspoken critic of President Donald Trump and frequent target of Republican outrage.
🔮 But the judge noted that the administration can “moot this process at any time” by filing a notice indicating that it will not engage in the election-related conduct the Democratic plaintiffs sued to challenge.
🔮 Cole Tomas Allen’s trial is scheduled to start with jury selection on Sept. 7 in Washington, D.C., and is expected to last approximately three to four weeks.
🔮 Cole Tomas Allen's trial is scheduled to start with jury selection on Sept. 7 in Washington, D.C., and is expected to last approximately three to four weeks.
🔮 The high court, granting a request by President Donald Trump’s administration, will hear arguments on whether Izuchukwu Ozurumba’s cooking job for leaders of the Unknown Gunmen qualifies as providing “material support” for a terrorist group.
🔮 Issuing a preliminary injunction at ABC’s request would mean “allowing them to sidestep” the path that Congress has set up for regulatory action appeals, Georgiev-Remmel said.
🔮 The nation's highest court will listen to oral arguments in the coming months in its latest religious rights legal dispute.
🔮 But the questions posed at Tuesday’s hearing suggest that the full court could give Boasberg a green light to proceed with his inquiry.
🔮 “It may have been carried out in a bizarre manner, but the threat of violence was a serious one.”
🔮 A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit didn’t indicate how soon they would rule after hearing arguments from attorneys for the government and the migrants who were flown to El Salvador without any notice or opportunity to challenge their removals from the U.S.
Also by Michael Kunzelman
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 17 articles by Michael Kunzelman →

Topics

El Salvador U.S. Venezuelan WASHINGTON the Trump administration

Subjects

U.S. GPE · 7× Boasberg PERSON · 6× El Salvador GPE · 4× Randolph PERSON · 3× Edwards PERSON · 2× Rao PERSON · 2× Republican NORP · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× Venezuelan NORP · 2× the Trump administration ORG · 2×

Narrative

A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit didn’t indicate how soon they would rule after hearing arguments from attorneys for the government and the migrants who were flown to El Salvador without any notice or opportunity to challenge their removals from the U.S.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-25
🔮 A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit didn’t indicate how soon they would rule after hearing arguments from attorneys for the government and the migrants who were flown to El Salvador without any notice or opportunity to challenge their removals from the U.S.

Claims (31 extracted, 5 hedged)

A panel of appeals court judges appeared to be divided Friday on whether to block or uphold an order for the Trump administration to facilitate the return of dozens of Venezuelan migrants who were deported from the U.S. to a notorious prison in El Salvador last year. asserted
who → appear → Salvador
A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit didn’t indicate how soon they would rule after hearing arguments from attorneys for the government and the migrants who were flown to El Salvador without any notice or opportunity to challenge their removals from the U.S. asserted
who → indicate → U.S.
The Justice Department appealed after District Court Chief Judge James Boasberg in February ordered the Trump administration to make arrangements for some of the deported Venezuelan migrants to return to the U.S. at the government’s expense. asserted
some → appeal → expense
Boasberg said the administration responded by essentially telling him to “pound sand.” asserted
administration → say → sand
Two panel members — Judges A. Raymond Randolph and Neomi Rao — appeared to be skeptical that the migrants have a right to return to the U.S. to challenge their March 2025 deportations. asserted
migrants → appear → deportations
A key question for the panel is whether the U.S. courts have jurisdiction over the migrants’ claims because the U.S. government maintained “constructive custody” of them even after they arrived in El Salvador. uncertain
they → have → Salvador
Rao questioned whether the migrants can meet that legal burden through their “habeas corpus” petitions. asserted
migrants → question → petitions
“There needs to be some showing that the U.S. had that type of control — the control that they could produce a detainee on command — and I don’t see that evidence from petitioners,” said Rao, who was nominated by Republican President Donald Trump. uncertain
who → need → Trump
Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, who was nominated by Democratic President Jimmy Carter, said Boasberg cited plenty of evidence that the Trump administration “retained co-control” over the deported migrants and was “fully engaged and kept itself in a position of control throughout.” asserted
administration → nominate → control
Edwards also said that Supreme Court precedent holds that the plaintiffs have a right to pursue their due process claims. uncertain
plaintiffs → say → claims
“Judge Boasberg was merely attempting to facilitate the exercise of their rights. asserted
Boasberg → attempt → rights
That’s all,” Edwards said. asserted
Edwards → ’ → ?
Justice Department attorney Tiberius Davis argued that Boasberg didn’t have the jurisdiction to issue the order under appeal. asserted
Boasberg → argue → appeal
Boasberg’s “freewheeling” decision would “open the floodgates to claims that the United States has constructive custody over prisons across the globe,” Davis said. uncertain
Davis → open → globe
“This court is not supposed to second-guess sensitive matters of foreign affairs or undermine the United States’ ability to speak with one voice on the international stage. asserted
court → suppose → stage
That is exactly what the district court is doing here,” Davis added. asserted
Davis → do → what
American Civil Liberties Union attorney Lee Gelernt, who represents the deported migrants, said the Trump administration has conceded that it violated the plaintiffs’ constitutional rights, denying them due process, but isn’t trying to rectify the problem. asserted
it → represent → problem
“They concede we rushed them out, gave them no due process,” Gelernt said. asserted
Gelernt → concede → process
That would be such an untenable rule for this court to adopt.” asserted
court → adopt → ?
Randolph noted that the plaintiffs already have been released from custody in El Salvador and taken to Venezuela. asserted
plaintiffs → note → Venezuela
He suggested that they already have received the only legal remedy to which they are entitled. uncertain
they → suggest → which
“We’re talking about habeas corpus. asserted
We → talk → corpus
They’re already released,” said Randolph, who was nominated by Republican President George H. W. Bush. asserted
who → release → Bush
“The remedy for this is not release in a country from which they fled. asserted
they → flee → which
It’s to come back,” Gelernt said. asserted
Gelernt → ’ → ?
Randolph also questioned whether the plaintiffs’ underlying case is moot since the migrants are no longer in custody. asserted
migrants → question → custody
ACLU attorneys have been in contact with roughly two-thirds of 137 migrants since their release from the El Salvador mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT. asserted
attorneys → know → Center
Boasberg, who was nominated by Democratic President Barack Obama, has repeatedly clashed with the administration since Trump invoked the 18th-century Alien Enemies Act to deport planeloads of Venezuelan migrants accused of being gang members. asserted
Trump → nominate → migrants
Boasberg gave a verbal order for the aircraft to turn around. asserted
aircraft → give → order
The administration denied violating it. asserted
administration → deny → it
Boasberg subsequently started a contempt investigation, leading to a separate appeal for which the full D.C. Circuit will hear arguments next Tuesday. asserted
Circuit → start → arguments
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support