Photo via CBS News

Attorney says there's "no evidence" Lindsay Clancy admitted killing her kids

Read the original at CBS News ↗
Cite

Rex, K. (2026, September 30). Attorney says there's "no evidence" Lindsay Clancy admitted killing her kids. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/lindsay-clancy-kevin-reddington-murder-trial-hearing/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

CBS News · collected 2026-09-30 · by Kristina Rex

Quick Summary

During Lindsay Clancy's first hearing since a renewed motion for a required finding of not guilty was filed, her lawyer Kevin Reddington argued that there is no evidence she admitted to killing her children and questioned the validity of other pieces of evidence presented at trial. This contradicts previous statements where Reddington acknowledged Clancy's responsibility. Prosecutors countered by stating that ample evidence supports Clancy's guilt.
Written by AI on 2026-09-30, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Judge William Sullivan denied Lindsay Clancy's defense motion to find her not guilty of murdering her three children, ruling that prosecutors presented sufficient evidence for a jury to determine she was criminally responsible despite suffering from mental illness. The judge noted that it is up to the jury to decide whether expert witnesses' testimony about her lack of criminal responsibility should be accepted or rejected. This decision leaves open the possibility of a retrial following the earlier mistrial due to a deadlocked jury. Clancy's lawyer argued there was insufficient evidence proving she committed the killings, but Sullivan disagreed, stating that any rational trier of fact could find her guilty based on the presented evidence. The case now remains unresolved with ongoing debate about criminal responsibility and mental health considerations in legal proceedings.

Written for “Lindsay Clancy Murder Case Hearing” on 2026-10-30, grounded in this article and the 29 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Lindsay Clancy Murder Case Hearing
Crime & Law · 30 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 26 claims Outlet record 66/100
Washington Examiner
Hedges 2 of 19 claims Outlet record 70/100
The Sydney Morning Herald
Hedges 3 of 29 claims Outlet record 61/100
CBC News
Hedges 1 of 17 claims Outlet record 74/100
NPR
Hedges 4 of 32 claims Outlet record 60/100
New York Post
Hedges 0 of 12 claims Outlet record 66/100
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
New York Post
Hedges 0 of 6 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses Patrick Clancy's recollections of his relationship with Lindsay Clancy before the incident, while Article B covers a legal hearing and defense arguments regarding Lindsay Clancy's case. These describe different specific events.”
Fox News
Hedges 1 of 13 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Lindsay Clancy's case and legal proceedings. Article A focuses on the holdout juror in her mistrial, while Article B covers a lawyer arguing there is no evidence she killed her children.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
26
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 26 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
66/100
CBS News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
30
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
2
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-30 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

CBS News · 4207 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Kristina Rex
8 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Judge William Sullivan denied a request from Lindsay Clancy's attorney to find her not guilty of murder in the 2023 deaths of her three children following her mistrial last month.
🔮 "I would suggest to you that the entire record is voluminous as to information supporting the fact that she did this."
🔮 "I would suggest to you that the entire record is voluminous as to information supporting the fact that she did this."
🔮 There was not a single moment throughout the presentation of that case where you could say 'Yup, 100% I'm certain she did it' or that she didn't do it.
🔮 A judge indicated the Lindsay Clancy murder trial would end in a mistrial Friday, then granted the defense a one-hour delay in order to make a plea to the state's highest court.
🔮 The hung jury could not reach a verdict in Plymouth Superior Court in Plymouth, Massachusetts.
🔮 After testimony ended, the prosecutors and defense met with the judge to discuss final instructions for the jury and exactly what will appear on their verdict slips.
🔮 She also wrote down "Is my body broken?" and "Are my legs straight?" and asked Dr. Biswas if she could have visitors, and where her family was.
Also by Kristina Rex
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 8 articles by Kristina Rex →

Topics

WBZ WBZ-TV's

Subjects

Reddington PERSON · 11× Clancy PERSON · 8× Kevin Reddington PERSON · 1× Kristina Rex PERSON · 1× Lindsay Clancy PERSON · 1× Lindsay Clancy's PERSON · 1× Patrick PERSON · 1× Shanan Buckingham PERSON · 1× WBZ ORG · 1× WBZ-TV's ORG · 1×

Narrative

In a surprising turn in Lindsay Clancy's first hearing since , her lawyer, Kevin Reddington, argued that there was no evidence she killed her kids.a renewed motion for a required finding of not guilty, asking the judge to find that the evidence presented at trial was legally insufficient for a rational jury to find Clancy guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
framing: assertive · carried by 2 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-30
🔮 "I would suggest to you that the entire record is voluminous as to information supporting the fact that she did this."

Claims (26 extracted, 0 hedged)

In a surprising turn in Lindsay Clancy's first hearing since , her lawyer, Kevin Reddington, argued that there was no evidence she killed her kids.a renewed motion for a required finding of not guilty, asking the judge to find that the evidence presented at trial was legally insufficient for a rational jury to find Clancy guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. asserted
Clancy → argue → doubt
Legal experts have told WBZ that the motion itself is a long-shot attempt to avoid a second trial. asserted
motion → tell → trial
Prosecutors have not explicitly stated plans to retry Clancy. asserted
Prosecutors → state → Clancy
On Tuesday, Reddington argued that prosecutors hadn't met their burden – that Clancy killed her children beyond a reasonable doubt – at trial. asserted
Clancy → argue → trial
Where is the evidence that she did this?" Reddington said. asserted
Reddington → say → this
"This entire case is based on speculation. asserted
case → base → speculation
Where does she say that she did this?" asserted
she → say → this
Reddington launched into a list of evidence he said didn't pass muster, including Clancy's body temperature and testimony from her ex-husband, Patrick. asserted
he → launch → husband
"There's no evidence that she admitted she did this," Reddington said. asserted
Reddington → be → this
Reddington's argument Tuesday appeared to conflict with arguments he made repeatedly before and during the trial. asserted
he → appear → trial
In his opening statement in July, Reddington said Clancy "knows what happened to those kids." asserted
what → say → kids
, Reddington said, "She takes responsibility. asserted
She → say → responsibility
She, as the kids say, she owns it. asserted
she → say → it
She's not running away from anything here. asserted
She → run → anything
Reddington also offered to stipulate – in writing – that Clancy admits to killing her kids, in an April 2026 motion. asserted
Clancy → offer → motion
In that motion, he had asked the judge to bifurcate the trial or split it in two: one trial for Clancy's guilt and another for her mental state. asserted
he → ask → state
That request was denied. asserted
request → deny → ?
Reddington told the judge Tuesday that he was making his required-finding argument in two parts, consistent with his earlier request to bifurcate the trial. asserted
he → tell → trial
First, he argued prosecutors failed to prove that Clancy committed the killings beyond a reasonable doubt. asserted
Clancy → argue → doubt
He then argued they also failed to prove that she was criminally responsible for them. asserted
she → argue → them
"You're put in a conundrum when you have to admit culpability in order to raise a lack of criminal responsibility," he explained to the judge. asserted
he → put → judge
Still, Reddington's comments surprised prosecutors, too. asserted
comments → surprise → prosecutors
"Now for the first time the defendant is arguing that there's no evidence that she did this," prosecutor Shanan Buckingham said in response. asserted
Buckingham → argue → response
"I would suggest to you that the entire record is voluminous as to information supporting the fact that she did this." asserted
she → suggest → this
When asked outside of court to clarify whether he's claiming Lindsay Clancy did not kill her kids, Reddington told WBZ-TV's Kristina Rex, "Look, I argued that in the trial, I argued it on a motion for a required finding, it's not new rocket science by any means. asserted
it → ask → means
It's the fact that [prosecutors] cannot prove a probable cause." asserted
prosecutors → prove → cause
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support