Photo via BBC News

£1.2bn on transfers with £830m inflated in accounts - Man City's 'asterisk era'

Read the original at BBC News ↗
Cite

Austin, D. (2026, September 30). £1.2bn on transfers with £830m inflated in accounts - Man City's 'asterisk era'. BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c9lyk46gekkeo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

BBC News · collected 2026-09-30 · by Daniel Austin

Quick Summary

Manchester City spent approximately £1.2 billion on transfers between 2009 and early 2018, during which they won seven major trophies. However, a recent ruling found that the club had inflated its accounts by £830 million through fictitious sponsorship deals to circumvent financial regulations. This revelation casts doubt on City's achievements from this period, with some fans referring to it as an "asterisk era." The article explores how these exaggerated finances enabled City’s transfer spending and subsequent success, questioning the legitimacy of their titles and accomplishments during that time.
Written by AI on 2026-09-30, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In 2014, the Premier League found that Manchester City had violated financial regulations between 2009 and 2018 by using a "disguised funding scheme." This revelation has led to debates about the legitimacy of City's achievements during this period, which included winning multiple league titles. Fans have coined it the "asterisk era," questioning the validity of trophies won under potentially illegal financial practices. The club spent over £1.2 billion on player transfers and inflated more than £830 million in accounts to circumvent rules. There is a possibility that City could lose their honors from this period, with other clubs considering legal action for potential compensation.

Written for “Manchester City Financial Practices” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Manchester City Financial Practices
Economy/Business · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Al Jazeera
Hedges 3 of 46 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects and timeframes related to Manchester City's financial misconduct case rather than a single specific incident.”
BBC News
Hedges 2 of 7 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A discusses Manchester City CEO's response to Premier League charges during a board meeting, while Article B reflects on hypothetical scenarios and past events related to financial misconduct but does not describe the same specific incident.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 0 of 13 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss related topics but describe different events: one about financial wrongdoing and its implications, the other a statue commemorating a famous goal.”
Toronto Star
Hedges 3 of 11 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Both articles discuss the financial scandal involving Manchester City, but they focus on different aspects and do not describe the exact same incident or timeframe.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 3 of 26 claims Outlet record 61/100
“Article A reports on Manchester City being found guilty of 'sham contracts' in a scandal, while Article B discusses hypothetical scenarios and mentions financial breaches but does not describe the same specific event or ruling.”
Al Jazeera
Hedges 1 of 9 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss related topics about Manchester City's financial issues but describe different aspects: one focuses on a hypothetical scenario regarding Aguero's goal, while the other reports on the club's planned appeal against financial breach findings.”
BBC News
Hedges 9 of 66 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss related issues regarding Manchester City's breaches of financial rules but describe different aspects and do not seem to focus on a single specific incident or ruling.”
Al Jazeera
Hedges 10 of 52 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A discusses hypothetical scenarios and historical context regarding Manchester City's financial practices, while Article B reports on a specific verdict from the Premier League against Manchester City for breaching financial rules.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
39
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
2 of 39 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
68/100
BBC News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Economy/Business
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-30 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

BBC News · 4855 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Daniel Austin
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 And general admission to the 2027 Ryder Cup at Adare Manor, in the Republic of Ireland, will cost €499 (£434), compared with up to €260 (£220) in Italy in 2023.
🔮 That outlay was vital in making them England's most successful club, and would surely have been heavily reduced had they not knowingly broken the rules, as the independent commission concluded.
🔮 Some fans are referring to it as the asterisk era, and there is a possibility City could be retroactively stripped of the honours they earned during the period, with some clubs seeking legal advice over potential financial compensation.
🔮 That a transfer saga involving a footballer so young could generate so much interest highlights a truth that to many is uncomfortable - money is changing how the football transfer market works, and children are increasingly deemed to be among its most valuable commodities.
Also by Daniel Austin
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

City English Manchester City's Manchester United Premier League

Subjects

City ORG · 10× Aguero PERSON · 2× English NORP · 2× the Premier League ORG · 2× Man City's ORG · 1× Manchester City ORG · 1× Manchester City's ORG · 1× Manchester United ORG · 1× Premier League ORG · 1× Sergio Aguero PERSON · 1×

Narrative

The revelation that the club has been found guilty of the charges brought against it by the Premier League three and a half years ago has left football fans around the world questioning the legitimacy of City's achievements between 2009 and 2018, when they were the most successful club in English football and cemented themselves among the global game's elite.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-30
🔮 Some fans are referring to it as the asterisk era, and there is a possibility City could be retroactively stripped of the honours they earned during the period, with some clubs seeking legal advice over potential financial compensation.

Claims (39 extracted, 2 hedged)

- Published Outside Manchester City's Etihad Stadium is a lustrous silver statue of Sergio Aguero - mouth agape in ecstasy, kit swirling over his head - depicting his goal celebration after securing the club's first Premier League title. asserted
kit → publish → title
It is the immortilisation of the most famous goal in English league football history, when City snatched the trophy away from Manchester United in the dying seconds of the 2011-12 season. asserted
City → snatch → season
But what if the goal never happened? asserted
goal → happen → ?
What if Aguero had never played for the club? asserted
Aguero → play → club
What if City had opted to abide by football's financial rules instead of purposefully breaking them through a "disguised funding scheme"? asserted
City → opt → scheme
The revelation that the club has been found guilty of the charges brought against it by the Premier League three and a half years ago has left football fans around the world questioning the legitimacy of City's achievements between 2009 and 2018, when they were the most successful club in English football and cemented themselves among the global game's elite. asserted
they → find → elite
Some fans are referring to it as the asterisk era, and there is a possibility City could be retroactively stripped of the honours they earned during the period, with some clubs seeking legal advice over potential financial compensation. uncertain
clubs → refer → compensation
So how exactly did City's "hugely overstated" income impact their actions in the transfer market, how key were the players who were brought in, and what does it all mean for both the past and the future? asserted
it → impact → past
Manchester City spent about £1.2bn on new players in the transfer windows between summer 2009 and January 2018. asserted
City → spend → summer
In that time, the club won seven major trophies - three Premier Leagues, one FA Cup, and three EFL Cups - having previously gone without a significant honour since 1970. asserted
club → win → 1970
The players they purchased during that time included some of the world's best, in all areas of the pitch. asserted
they → purchase → pitch
Multiple were signed for figures in the tens of millions every summer and made a huge contribution to the club's consistent success. asserted
Multiple → sign → success
The graphic below demonstrates how much City spent in each summer and across the whole time period, and contrasts it with the amount of money that the commission which has found the club guilty determined had been falsely pumped into the club by its owners, under the guise of sponsorship income. asserted
club → demonstrate → income
City did not only generate revenue from sponsorship funds in that time. asserted
City → generate → time
And income is also spent on many things other than transfers, including player wages, utilities, insurance, infrastructure, marketing, foundations and more. asserted
income → spend → wages
But the figures underline the fact that City would simply not have been able to purchase the quantity and quality of players they signed during their era of domination had they not been conducting what the commission described as a "concerted campaign to falsify" their financial accounts. asserted
commission → underline → accounts
If City's financial power had been slashed by the extra £830m the commission says they falsely added to their books, their transfer spend would surely have been massively reduced. asserted
spend → slash → books
Chop the amount in half, say, and maybe they would only have brought in half the amount of players. asserted
they → chop → players
Which potentially means no Aguero, no David Silva, no Yaya Toure, no Kevin de Bruyne, or at least a significant reduction in the number or ability of the less glamorous players who were key cogs in the trophy-winning machine. asserted
who → mean → machine
Would those successes have been achieved had the rule breaking not been going on in tandem? asserted
breaking → achieve → tandem
And what would the impact have been on all the other clubs who have played in the Premier League during that time? Nobody will ever know. asserted
Nobody → play → time
The seasons cannot be replayed. asserted
seasons → replay → ?
And so the outcomes exist in a kind of mixed reality where the world watched them happen, but isn't sure if they're really 'real'. asserted
they → exist → reality
The era provided the foundation for City's ongoing success, too, meaning more trophies and TV income, and the chaos of the situation has also unleashed doubt about the present and future. asserted
chaos → provide → present
What does it all mean for football fans and the future? asserted
it → mean → fans
If you figured out that the plots of all three never really happened - because in their endings it was revealed that they existed only in the dreams of one of the lead characters - then very well done indeed. asserted
they → figure → characters
So do the guilty verdicts mean the Premier League seasons between 2009-10 and 2017-18 should now be considered a figment of our collective imaginations too? asserted
seasons → mean → imaginations
City have until Friday to mount an appeal. asserted
City → have → appeal
If that appeal is unsuccessful, then, at some point, the club will be given some sort of punishment. asserted
club → give → punishment
Whether sanctions will retcon the past in any way is unknown. asserted
retcon → retcon → way
Right now football fans, both of City and other clubs across the country, do not know whether the football they are watching is 'real' or not. asserted
they → know → country
Are City actually top of the league and in a title challenge, or will they be docked points later in the season? asserted
they → dock → season
If they are linked with another team's star player, could that transfer happen or will they be unable to make deals at some point? uncertain
they → link → point
Will they be in the Premier League next season or will they be expelled and will there need to be a quite significant rejigging of the pyramid to accommodate them somewhere else? asserted
they → expel → them
And then there are questions about what comes later down the line. asserted
what → be → line
Is anybody else breaking rules right now, which fans will only find out about in the future? asserted
fans → break → future
Does the potential for years of results to be retroactively kiboshed undermine the Premier League's popularity with fans, players and sponsors? asserted
years → kibosh → fans
And can the action fans are watching week in, week out ever fully be trusted again? asserted
fans → watch → ?
The answers to those questions will determine the future of the biggest league in the world's most popular game. asserted
answers → determine → game
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support