Photo via BBC News

Which clubs did Man City's 'inflated' money flow to in transfer market?

Read the original at BBC News ↗
Cite

Austin, D. (2026, October 2). Which clubs did Man City's 'inflated' money flow to in transfer market? BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cmew9w451vx8o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

BBC News · collected 2026-10-02 · by Daniel Austin

Quick Summary

This article discusses how Manchester City's significant expenditures on player transfers between 2009-2018, totaling approximately £1.2 billion, impacted other football clubs financially. It highlights that while some argue this spending benefited the game overall by spreading wealth among various clubs, others contend it inflated transfer prices and wages for all teams. The article provides a list of 46 different clubs from 19 national league systems to which Manchester City paid transfer fees during this period, illustrating how broadly their financial influence spread across European football.
Written by AI on 2026-10-02, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In 2021, the BBC reported on Manchester City's spending during a period when they were found guilty of breaking financial rules. The club was fined for inflating their accounts by over £900 million, though only part of this sum went towards transfer fees. Between 2009 and 2018, Manchester City spent approximately £1.2 billion on transfers, more than any other team during that time frame. This spending was crucial in establishing the club as one of England's most successful teams. Critics argue that if they had adhered to financial regulations, their transfer outlay would have been significantly lower. The article explores how this money flowed through the football economy, benefiting other clubs and influencing the broader landscape of the Premier League.

Written for “Manchester City Transfer Spending” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Manchester City Transfer Spending
Economy/Business · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Dawn
Hedges 6 of 33 claims Outlet record 72/100
“While both articles discuss Manchester City's financial misconduct case and its implications, Article A focuses on the potential sanctions and legal battles following the verdict, while Article B discusses the flow of money to other clubs from Man City's inflated finances. These are related but distinct aspects of the larger event.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 26 claims Outlet record 61/100
“While both articles discuss Manchester City's financial irregularities, Article A reports the verdict finding the club guilty of arranging 'sham' contracts, while Article B discusses the broader impact and flow of money as a result of those irregularities.”
Al Jazeera
Hedges 10 of 52 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A reports on Manchester City's guilty verdict for breaching financial rules, while Article B discusses the impact of Man City's inflated money flow in the transfer market, which is a related but separate event.”
BBC News
Hedges 1 of 4 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss related consequences of Manchester City's verdict but describe different aspects: Article A focuses on the FA's response to the verdict, while Article B discusses how money from Manchester City affected other clubs in the transfer market.”
Toronto Star
Hedges 4 of 28 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A covers the verdict and punishment for Manchester City's financial irregularities, while Article B discusses the broader impact of the money allegedly 'inflated' by Manchester City on other clubs in the transfer market.”
BBC News
Hedges 4 of 18 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss related consequences of Manchester City's financial misconduct but describe different aspects and implications, not the same specific incident.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 37 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A discusses the initial report of Manchester City being found guilty of most charges related to financial rule-breaking, while Article B focuses on the aftermath and implications of those findings for other clubs in the transfer market.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
43
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
3 of 43 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
68/100
BBC News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Economy/Business
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-02 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

BBC News · 4978 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Daniel Austin
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 And general admission to the 2027 Ryder Cup at Adare Manor, in the Republic of Ireland, will cost €499 (£434), compared with up to €260 (£220) in Italy in 2023.
🔮 That outlay was vital in making them England's most successful club, and would surely have been heavily reduced had they not knowingly broken the rules, as the independent commission concluded.
🔮 Some fans are referring to it as the asterisk era, and there is a possibility City could be retroactively stripped of the honours they earned during the period, with some clubs seeking legal advice over potential financial compensation.
🔮 That a transfer saga involving a footballer so young could generate so much interest highlights a truth that to many is uncomfortable - money is changing how the football transfer market works, and children are increasingly deemed to be among its most valuable commodities.
Also by Daniel Austin
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

City England Manchester City Manchester City's the Premier League

Subjects

City ORG · 6× Manchester City ORG · 5× Manchester City's ORG · 2× the Premier League ORG · 2× Championship ORG · 1× England GPE · 1× English NORP · 1× La Liga ORG · 1× Man City ORG · 1× Premier League ORG · 1×

Narrative

Manchester City's spending during the time in which they were breaking the rules certainly had an enormous impact, on their own upward trajectory, the futures of other clubs around the world and the wider football economy. But the reality is that it is impossible to unweave the tapestry of football history during that time and since - too much has happened and there are too many indirect consequences.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-02
🔮 That outlay was vital in making them England's most successful club, and would surely have been heavily reduced had they not knowingly broken the rules, as the independent commission concluded.

Claims (43 extracted, 3 hedged)

The money flowed around football. asserted
money → flow → football
It made a lot of other clubs richer. asserted
lot → make → clubs
It helped teams everywhere and especially in the Premier League. asserted
It → help → League
These have been some of the arguments used by those backing Manchester City in the media and online since the verdicts declaring the club guilty came in and an appeal was announced. asserted
appeal → use → media
The suggestion is that there was a net benefit to the game as a whole, and in particular the clubs to whom Manchester City paid big transfer fees. asserted
City → be → fees
The more than £900m by which the independent commission found the club had "inflated" its accounts was not all spent on transfer fees. asserted
club → find → fees
Clubs have many bills, including wages for players and other staff, utilities, insurance, infrastructure costs, commercial fees and much more. asserted
Clubs → have → players
But the roughly £1.2bn Man City spent on players between 2009-2018 (about £900m net spend) was more than anybody else in that period. asserted
spent → spend → period
That outlay was vital in making them England's most successful club, and would surely have been heavily reduced had they not knowingly broken the rules, as the independent commission concluded. asserted
commission → make → rules
So where did City's money flow to in the transfer market, and what impact did it have? asserted
it → flow → impact
Who did Man City pay most money to between 2009 and 2018? asserted
City → pay → 2009
Football transfers include many costs. asserted
transfers → include → costs
The amount required to sign the player is the most obvious, but there are also agents fees, legal expenses, administration money and potentially signing-on bonuses. asserted
amount → require → player
That means the money dished out by Manchester City during the 'asterisk era' will have reached people and bodies who work in the background of football deal-making and is difficult to track. asserted
who → mean → making
But what can be done is analysis of the fundamental interactions between City and other clubs. asserted
done → do → City
Below is a list of every club to whom Manchester City paid transfer fees between summer 2009 and winter 2018, in descending order from the most money to the least. asserted
City → pay → least
The list is for senior players and does not include free transfers, loans or academy graduates. asserted
list → include → transfers
For some of them, the fees paid by City were the highest the clubs had ever received at the time. asserted
clubs → pay → time
Looking at the spread of money among clubs demonstrates just how far and wide Manchester City's money was spent. asserted
money → look → clubs
The split in money spent on transfer fees by City during the timeframe is relatively even across some of the highest-ranked leagues in Europe, though the Premier League is higher than any other. asserted
League → spend → other
Just over a quarter of their total transfer outlay was paid to clubs in the English top flight. asserted
quarter → pay → flight
They signed players from eight Premier League clubs, and the same amount in La Liga. asserted
They → sign → Liga
A combined £13m was spent on two players in the Championship. asserted
m → combine → Championship
Did the money really help football? asserted
money → help → football
Manchester City's spending power unquestionably changed the world football transfer market - their willingness to pay higher fees and wages meant prices rose for everybody else too. And once the world knows that a club has a wedge of cash burning a hole in its pocket courtesy of City, it can be difficult to spend it. asserted
it → change → it
Asking prices may rise, and having an influx of money is no guarantee of it being well spent. uncertain
it → ask → money
For many of the teams to whom City paid the most during this time, the money did not work out particularly beneficially. Let's take a look at some of the more interesting cases. asserted
's → pay → cases
They immediately signed winger Julian Draxler for about half the fee received for Kevin de Bruyne in 2016, as well as others including veteran defender Dante. asserted
They → sign → Dante
Having lost De Bruyne, they dropped from second to eighth in the Bundesliga before narrowly avoiding relegation in the subsequent two seasons. asserted
they → lose → seasons
And things did not go particularly well for second highest-ranked club Monaco either. asserted
things → go → club
The most direct players they signed following the sales of Benjamin Mendy and Bernardo Silva in the same summer to Manchester City - Terence Kongolo and Keita Balde - did not work out in the long run, and the team went from winning Ligue 1 and reaching the Champions League semi-finals to almost being relegated within two years. asserted
team → sign → years
The club City purchased most players from in the 2009-18 period - Arsenal (four) - did not mount a serious Premier League title challenge during that time. asserted
City → purchase → time
Some clubs who did not receive payments from City could also argue that the spending of money from their "inflated" accounts compromised their chances. uncertain
spending → receive → chances
For example, Manchester City paid very similar totals to Benfica and Porto during the era, but nothing to Sporting, the club which makes up the big three in Portugal. asserted
which → pay → Portugal
Sporting did not win a title between 2009 and 2018. asserted
Sporting → win → 2009
There are many reasons for that, but could one of them be the fact that their direct rivals received money from City that would perhaps not have been on offer had they followed football's financial rules? uncertain
they → be → rules
There are also some ancillary fees which reached clubs whom Manchester City did not deal with directly. asserted
City → be → whom
Some players were subject to sell-on clauses, where the club City where buying the player from owed money to the previous team who owned the player. For example, Queens Park Rangers earned roughly £9m from Raheem Sterling's move to City from Liverpool in 2015. asserted
Rangers → sell → 2015
Barnsley took about £7m of the transfer fee paid to Everton for John Stones in 2016, and the Toffees also had to pass on about £2.5m to Wolves when Joleon Lescott moved to Manchester in 2009. asserted
Lescott → take → 2009
The Sterling and Stones clauses were worth more than most players operating in the English Football League at that time, significantly strengthening the financial positions of QPR and Barnsley. To this day Barnsley have not sold a player for a higher amount than the fee they are believed to have received for Stones. asserted
they → operate → Stones
…and 3 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support