Photo via CBC News

Why pro-Trump ads — paid for with public money — are airing on U.S. TV

Read the original at CBC News ↗
Cite

Crawley, M. (2026, September 30). Why pro-Trump ads — paid for with public money — are airing on U.S. TV. CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-tv-ads-election-midterms-9.7362513?cmp=rss

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

CBC News · collected 2026-09-30 · by Mike Crawley

Quick Summary

The White House is using taxpayer funds to air pro-Trump TV ads during the lead-up to midterm elections, spending at least $1.4 million so far according to AdImpact. These campaign-style advertisements, which include a song called "Love Me," have drawn criticism from Republicans and Democrats alike who argue they are illegal government propaganda. Despite claims by the White House that these are legal public service announcements since Trump is not on the ballot, critics such as former White House ethics lawyer Richard Painter contend the ads could be an impeachable offense due to their misuse of taxpayer money for political gain.
Written by AI on 2026-09-30, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In mid-October 2018, the Trump administration began airing a series of ads on major networks like Fox News and CBS that praised President Trump's achievements. These ads were funded by taxpayer money and included phrases such as "Paid for by the U.S. Government." The first ad aired on Fox News, denouncing communism while highlighting domestic manufacturing, tax cuts, and law enforcement support.

The ad featured images of Trump at various events with patriotic music in the background and text stating, “America will never be a communist country.” It drew criticism from Democrats like Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), who accused it of violating federal rules against using government funds for political campaigns. Raskin said such use could constitute "felony criminal theft" and violate the Hatch Act.

By October 19, AdImpact reported that spending on these ads had increased from $14,000 to $430,000 over three days, running in markets across the country. The White House defended the ad as a "public service announcement," arguing it was educational and patriotic rather than political.

Critics argue that with midterm elections approaching, these ads blur the line between government messaging and campaign propaganda, raising concerns about ethical violations and misuse of taxpayer dollars.

Written for “Taxpayer Funded Pro-Trump Ads” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 43 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Taxpayer Funded Pro-Trump Ads
Politics · 44 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Because He Can Same event
The Dispatch
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 61/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 3 of 19 claims Outlet record 70/100
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 17 claims Outlet record 66/100
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 3 claims Outlet record 64/100
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 2 of 15 claims Outlet record 96/100
The Guardian
Hedges 4 of 30 claims Outlet record 66/100
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 12 claims
“The articles describe different stages of a campaign, with Article A discussing the initial push for and legality concerns over pro-Trump ads, while Article B covers the actual airing and cost of these ads.”
Times of India
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 18 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A discusses Republican groups reserving $888 million for ads in multiple House races, while Article B talks about the White House using taxpayer funds to air pro-Trump TV ads featuring President Trump.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 21 claims Outlet record 59/100
NBC News
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 1 of 26 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A describes a specific ad released as part of a campaign, while Article B discusses the broader advertising campaign featuring Trump, including multiple ads and their total cost.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
36
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
4 of 36 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
74/100
CBC News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
44
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-30 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

CBC News · 1758 article(s) · 5 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 5 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Mike Crawley
9 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Why the Hispanic vote could sway the outcome of the U.S. midterm elections Hispanic voters have soured on Republicans over ICE and economy — but many don't vote along party lines While millions of U.S. voters have become only more entrenched in their party loyalties in the era of Donald Trump, the large and growing Hispanic community has instead bucked that partisan trend.
🔮 These midterm races will decide who controls U.S. Congress for the rest of Trump's presidency Democrats need net gains of 4 seats in Senate, 3 seats in House to flip power from Republicans The most important elections in next Tuesday's U.S. midterms are in the handful of states and districts where polling suggests the Republicans and Democrats are locked in tight races.
🔮 Trump has brushed off concerns about affordability as a "con job by Democrats," insisted consumer prices had fallen during his term when they'd actually risen, and repeatedly claimed the costs of gas and diesel — up sharply after he launched the war against Iran — would start falling soon.
🔮 The ads are running as Trump's approval rating hits an all-time low and his Republican Party faces what could be a disastrous midterm result on Nov. 3, potentially ceding control of the U.S. Congress to the Democrats for the remainder of his presidency. Although U.S. law forbids use of government funds for "publicity and propaganda," Trump's officials insist there's nothing illegal about the advertising campaign.
🔮 Public and bipartisan pressure are mounting amid dire warnings from experts Fresh warnings that artificial intelligence models could go rogue and wipe out the human race appear to have jolted some U.S. politicians into action, but not President Donald Trump.
🔮 Republican control of House, Senate at stake in nationwide elections on Nov. 3 The upcoming U.S. midterm elections will determine whether Republican President Donald Trump will be free to pursue his agenda during his final two years in office or whether he'll face constraints from a Congress where the Democrats hold new power.
🔮 The president is pledging what he calls the "Trump dividend," but says the money will come only if the Republican Party wins control of both the House of Representatives and the Senate in the midterm elections on Nov. 3.
🔮 Will he help or hurt Republicans?
🔮 While some Republicans are quietly concerned that an escalation of costly tariffs could worsen their re-election prospects in the midterms in November, those who spoke with CBC News after meeting Greer generally expressed support for the president's trade strategy.
2026-09-03 · assertive framing · Republicans back Trump in his trade war with Canada
Also by Mike Crawley
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 9 articles by Mike Crawley →

Topics

Democrats Senate U.S. White House the White House

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 17× U.S. GPE · 4× America GPE · 2× Democrats NORP · 2× Senate ORG · 2× White House ORG · 2× the White House ORG · 2× AdImpact ORG · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× NFL ORG · 1×

Narrative

- CBC Explains Your guide to the U.S. midterms, and why they're crucial for Donald Trump Past administrations have used taxpayer funds on public service advertising, such as a $10 million US campaign under Joe Biden urging people to get vaccinated against COVID-19 and national TV ads promoting government subsidies for health insurance during Barack Obama's time in the White House.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-30
🔮 The ads are running as Trump's approval rating hits an all-time low and his Republican Party faces what could be a disastrous midterm result on Nov. 3, potentially ceding control of the U.S. Congress to the Democrats for the remainder of his presidency. Although U.S. law forbids use of government funds for "publicity and propaganda," Trump's officials insist there's nothing illegal about the advertising campaign.

Claims (36 extracted, 4 hedged)

Why pro-Trump ads — paid for with public money — are airing on U.S. TV White House says advertising campaign is not illegal because Trump isn't on midterm election ballot With crucial midterm elections just weeks away, the White House is using taxpayer funds to air campaign-style TV ads featuring U.S. President Donald Trump. asserted
House → pay → Trump
The ads have aired in top timeslots on national and local television, including during last weekend's NFL games, costing at least $1.4 million US so far, according to analysis by advertising tracking firm AdImpact. uncertain
ads → air → AdImpact
The White House's decision to spend public money on the campaign is drawing widespread criticism, including from Republicans. " asserted
decision → spend → Republicans
I like the message, but it shouldn't be paid for by taxpayer dollars," Senate majority leader John Thune told reporters on Capitol Hill on Monday. asserted
Thune → like → Monday
The ads are running as Trump's approval rating hits an all-time low and his Republican Party faces what could be a disastrous midterm result on Nov. 3, potentially ceding control of the U.S. Congress to the Democrats for the remainder of his presidency. Although U.S. law forbids use of government funds for "publicity and propaganda," Trump's officials insist there's nothing illegal about the advertising campaign. uncertain
officials → run → campaign
"These public service announcements are unapologetically American," the White House said in a statement. asserted
House → say → statement
President Trump is not on the ballot and there is no call to action. asserted
Trump → be → action
" While it's true that Trump is not up for re-election in the midterms, he did urge the audience watching this month's Republican convention to "pretend that I'm on the ballot," an attempt to boost turnout for GOP candidates in tight House and Senate races. asserted
I → urge → races
'Love Me' Richard Painter, who served as White House ethics lawyer during then-president George W. Bush's second term, says the ads could be an impeachable offence because Trump cannot use taxpayer money to campaign. uncertain
Trump → love → money
"All three ads, they're sheer propaganda," Painter told the Associated Press. asserted
Painter → tell → ?
"This is increasingly looking like what authoritarian governments do to promote their leaders." asserted
governments → look → leaders
The first ad features rapid-fire montages of photos of Trump, as a choir repeatedly sings the title lyrics of Love Me, a song by musician JMSN. asserted
choir → feature → JMSN
"If President Trump wants people to love him, he can pay for it himself," a group of Democratic lawmakers wrote to Trump's chief of staff in a letter calling for the ad to be pulled. asserted
ad → want → letter
"This is the sort of government propaganda one might expect in North Korea, not the United States of America, and it is an egregious and utterly illegal misuse of Americans' hard-earned tax dollars," the Democrats wrote. uncertain
Democrats → expect → dollars
The 'Love Me' ad begins with grainy black-and-white video of Trump as his voice is heard saying "Together we will defeat communism, socialism and Marxism in America. asserted
we → love → America
The 30-second ad then shows slides declaring in all-caps "Largest Tax Cuts in History" and "Reigniting American Manufacturing." asserted
ad → show → Manufacturing
UFC boss praises Trump in ad asserted
boss → praise → ad
It concludes with video of Trump with Dana White, CEO of the Ultimate Fighting Championship mixed-martial arts empire, as the words "Paid for by the U.S. Government" appear at the bottom of the screen. asserted
words → conclude → screen
"He's the toughest, most resilient person that I've ever met, and nothing was going to stop him for fighting so hard for the country he loves," White said in the voice-over, audio from his introduction of Trump at the 2024 Republican National Convention. asserted
White → meet → Convention
Another of the government-funded ads is nearly identical to a Trump campaign ad from 2024. asserted
Another → fund → 2024
"This is the final battle," Trump said in the ad. asserted
Trump → say → ad
"With you at my side, we will demolish the deep state, we will expel the warmongers from our government." asserted
we → demolish → government
Another ad uses clips and video from Trump's speech at Mount Rushmore on July 3, the night before the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Declaration of Independence. asserted
ad → use → Independence
"We are the freest people on earth," Trump said in the minute-long TV commercial. asserted
Trump → say → commercial
The taxpayer money for the ads comes from U.S. Customs and Border Protection, an agency of the Department of Homeland Security, the Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday. asserted
Journal → come → Security
Scott Talan, a professor of communication at American University in Washington, D.C., describes the message of the ads as "love Trump, love his policies" but he's doubtful they will have much impact on the president's sagging polls. asserted
they → describe → polls
"I can't imagine much movement," Talan told CBC News. asserted
Talan → imagine → News
"People pretty much have their opinions formed." asserted
opinions → have → ?
He noted that the ads ran heavily during pro and college football games. asserted
ads → note → games
"I don't know how many people watching those games haven't made up their mind already," he said. asserted
he → know → mind
Trump looms over U.S. midterms. asserted
Trump → loom → midterms
Will he help or hurt Republicans? asserted
he → help → Republicans
- CBC Explains Your guide to the U.S. midterms, and why they're crucial for Donald Trump Past administrations have used taxpayer funds on public service advertising, such as a $10 million US campaign under Joe Biden urging people to get vaccinated against COVID-19 and national TV ads promoting government subsidies for health insurance during Barack Obama's time in the White House. asserted
administrations → explain → House
The top Democrat in the U.S. Senate, Chuck Schumer, said the Trump administration's ads are "anything but" public service announcements. asserted
ads → say → announcements
"They were pure propaganda," Schumer said Tuesday on the Senate floor. asserted
Schumer → say → floor
"Trump is getting you, American taxpayer, to use your dollars to pay for his political ads." asserted
you → get → ads
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support