A federal judge on Wednesday dismissed a Department of Justice lawsuit seeking Georgia’s complete voter rolls, marking the department’s 26th court defeat in its nationwide campaign to obtain sensitive voter information.
asserted
judge → dismiss → information
U.S. District Judge Victoria Marie Calvert, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, ruled that federal law did not override Georgia’s voter privacy protections.
asserted
law → rule → protections
The lawsuit against Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, sought voters’ full birthdates, driver’s license numbers, and partial Social Security numbers.
asserted
lawsuit → seek → birthdates
The department argued that Title III of the Civil Rights Act of 1960 entitled it to the unredacted records.
asserted
Title → argue → records
Calvert concluded that Georgia could meet its federal obligations while withholding information protected under state law.
uncertain
Georgia → conclude → law
“Based on the text of the CRA … there is no explicit manifestation of Congress’s intent to preempt states’ voter privacy laws,” Calvert wrote in her 23-page ruling.
asserted
Calvert → base → ruling
Raffensperger, a Republican who had provided the public version of the voter list with less information requested by the DOJ, welcomed the decision.
asserted
who → provide → decision
“I will always protect the sensitive personal information of Georgians, in accordance with the law and the Constitution,” he said in a statement.
asserted
he → protect → statement
“I will not give in and break the law for anyone.
asserted
I → give → anyone
The campaign to obtain states’ voter records began last year.
asserted
campaign → obtain → records
The DOJ has argued it needs the information to enforce federal voter roll maintenance requirements.
asserted
it → argue → requirements
Despite repeated district court losses, a divided federal appeals court has offered some glimmers of optimism for the department amid the sea of defeats.
asserted
court → repeat → defeats
In United States v. Benson, a U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit panel ruled 2-1 on June 24 against the DOJ’s demand for Michigan’s statewide voter file.
asserted
Court → rule → file
The majority distinguished the state-created database from individual records officials received and found that DOJ’s demand letters failed to state both the basis and purpose required by law.
asserted
letters → distinguish → law
U.S. Circuit Judge John Nalbandian dissented, arguing that the underlying records satisfied the statute and the DOJ’s letters adequately explained its request.
asserted
letters → dissent → request
The full 6th Circuit ultimately declined the DOJ’s request to rehear the case on Aug. 14.
asserted
Circuit → decline → Aug.
However, an appointee from President Donald Trump’s first term, U.S. Circuit Judge Amul Thapar, dissented from the pack and drew support from four colleagues: Richard Griffin, John Bush, Nalbandian, and Whitney Hermandorfer.
asserted
appointee → dissent → colleagues
Griffin separately argued that the law covered records created by election officials.
asserted
law → argue → officials
U.S. Circuit Judge Eric Murphy, who supported denying rehearing, also identified a possible path forward, suggesting the DOJ could expressly request the individual voter records used to create the statewide list.
uncertain
DOJ → support → list
His concurrence read the panel’s decision as narrower than a categorical rejection of federal access.
asserted
concurrence → read → access
Those opinions suggest the DOJ’s arguments remain viable on appeal.
asserted
arguments → suggest → appeal
But disagreement within one court does not establish a split between appeals courts.
asserted
disagreement → establish → courts
Without conflicting appellate decisions, the DOJ would lack a traditional ground for Supreme Court review, though the justices can also hear sufficiently important unresolved federal questions.
asserted
justices → conflict → questions
While the DOJ has had little success in its voter roll lawsuits, the administration secured a procedural victory in May in its election accountability efforts involving Fulton County’s 2020 election records, which FBI agents seized during a Jan. 28 search.
uncertain
agents → have → search
On May 6, U.S. District Judge J.P. Boulee, a Trump appointee, rejected county officials’ request to force the materials’ return.
uncertain
Boulee → reject → return
Although he criticized aspects of the warrant affidavit, he found that the county had not established the callous disregard for its rights needed to justify judicial intervention.
asserted
county → criticize → intervention
In its search warrant affidavit, the FBI said it sought the records to determine whether alleged irregularities — including missing ballot images, repeated scanning of ballots, and discrepancies in vote tallies — resulted from intentional acts violating federal law.
asserted
irregularities → say → law
The bureau has not offered any updates about whether its seizure of those materials has aided any effort to expose possible election interference or irregularities from the 2020 election, which Trump lost in Georgia to former President Joe Biden by around 11,000 votes.
asserted
Trump → offer → votes
The Aporia
