Photo via The Guardian

Group encouraging people to join Green party to back ‘Zionism is racism’ agenda

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

correspondent, P. W. S. p. (2026, October 1). Group encouraging people to join Green party to back ‘Zionism is racism’ agenda. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/oct/01/group-encouraging-people-join-green-party-back-zionism-is-racism

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-10-01 · by Peter Walker Senior political correspondent

Quick Summary

An organization called Greens for Palestine is encouraging people to join the Green party to support a motion equating Zionism with racism at its annual conference in Brighton. This motion, which advocates for a single Palestinian state and could lead to disciplinary action against members supporting Zionism, has sparked concerns among some Jewish members about their ability to stay within the party if it passes. Party leader Zack Polanski faces pressure to address the controversy ahead of next week’s Holborn and St Pancras byelection, while activists linked to more militant groups argue that pro-Israel individuals must be expelled from the UK.
Written by AI on 2026-10-01, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

An organization pushing the Green party in England and Wales to equate Zionism with racism has encouraged people to join the party specifically to advocate for this stance. This comes amid concerns that some activists view pro-Israel members as "infiltrators" needing removal from the UK political scene. The Green party's leadership, including Zack Polanski, who leads in England and Wales, faces pressure over a motion at their annual conference stating "Zionism is racism." Some Jewish members fear they may have to leave if this policy passes, as it would label support for Zionism as racism and could lead to disciplinary actions. The motion has gained prominence through a member ballot and will be debated during the party's upcoming conference in Brighton. This controversy threatens the Green party’s prospects in an important by-election next week in Holborn and St Pancras, where Polanski is running for Keir Starmer’s former seat, potentially harming their electoral chances.

Written for “Green Party Zionism Debate” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Green Party Zionism Debate
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 6 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A describes an agenda and concerns leading up to a vote at the annual conference, while Article B reports on the actual outcome of the vote.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 1 of 22 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A discusses an organization pushing the Green Party to support a 'Zionism is racism' agenda, while Article B covers Labour candidate concerns about this divisive motion in relation to an upcoming election.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 5 of 24 claims Outlet record 64/100
“While both articles discuss a similar issue within the Green party regarding a motion on Zionism being racist, they describe different aspects of the debate and are dated one day apart.”
ABC News (AU)
Hedges 4 of 33 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss related issues but describe different events: one is about an accusation by a Labor MP against the Greens leader, and the other concerns an organization encouraging people to join the Green party to support an anti-Zionism stance.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 1 of 18 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses an agenda push and concerns before a vote, while Article B reports on the actual outcome of the vote.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 0 of 36 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A describes efforts to encourage people to join the Green party for an upcoming vote on a motion equating Zionism with racism, while Article B reports that the motion has already been passed at the annual conference.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 0 of 31 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A discusses an organization encouraging people to join the Green party to support a controversial motion about Zionism, while Article B reports on the actual conference where a 'safe room' was provided for Jewish delegates amid tensions over the vote.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 2 of 30 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles describe related events but different occurrences: Article A covers the encouragement of people to join the Green party in support of an agenda, while Article B reports on Israel banning Zack Polanski from entering the country after a vote at the Green Party conference.”
The Guardian
Hedges 4 of 31 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss related topics but describe different specific events - Article A discusses an organization encouraging support for a particular agenda within the Green party, while Article B reports on Israel banning Zack Polanski after the Green party voted to equate Zionism with racism.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 40 claims Outlet record 60/100
“While both articles discuss a motion to equate Zionism with racism in the UK Green Party, Article A focuses on an organization encouraging people to join the party for that agenda and concerns among some members, whereas Article B reports on the actual vote at the party conference.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
29
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
1 of 29 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-01 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2862 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Peter Walker Senior political correspondent
24 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Andy Burnham will ask countries affected by Britain’s role in slavery to help shape an expected formal apology, Downing Street has indicated, arguing that their input is indispensable in crafting a enduring message.
🔮 A statement from Labour said coalitions or other deals with Greens would stop in all local authorities where they had refused to condemn the policy motion passed at their party conference last month, which also called for a single Palestinian state in place of Israel.
🔮 The decision, which will have been more financially and environmentally costly than if the prime minister had travelled to London, leaves him open to accusations of hypocrisy after Labour repeatedly criticised Rishi Sunak for his use of private planes and helicopters for domestic travel when he was the prime minister.
🔮 It merited the briefest of mentions in John Healey’s speech and just one paragraph in the 166-page budget document, but some believe it could revolutionise not just public spending but the very process of government itself: a new focus on long-term outcomes.
🔮 The health and social care select committee said in a report that there are no signs the so-called “moonshot ambition on obesity”, set out in the 10-year health plan for England, will achieve anything significant.
🔮 “The prime minister opened by setting out how he would shortly write to cabinet on the UK’s relationship with the EU,” it said, adding: “He said the Brexit deal left by the last government had been bad for the UK and had led to a harder Brexit than had been promised at the referendum.”
🔮 Adrian Ramsay, the former co-leader of the Greens, has urged his party’s councillors to reject the newly adopted “Zionism is racism” motion if it will help them stay in power in local government, in a fresh sign of internal dissent over the policy.
🔮 In post-byelection interviews, Polanski said he would have voted against the motion had he attended.
🔮 A low turnout of 38.7% and Abdi-Wali’s numerically modest 3,364 majority that resulted might not appear the greatest endorsement of the government, but it is also likely to have been in part due to the widespread assumption that Labour would win.
🔮 Justifying the Conservatives’ decision to scrap the target of the UK reaching net zero emissions by 2050, introduced under Theresa May, the document says that estimates of how much this would cost the economy “have varied enormously”.
Also by Peter Walker Senior political correspondent
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 24 articles by Peter Walker Senior political correspondent →

Topics

GfP Green Jewish Zionism the Green party

Subjects

AZM ORG · 5× GfP ORG · 5× Speitan PERSON · 4× Zionism NORP · 4× Zionist NORP · 4× Jewish NORP · 3× anti-Zionist NORP · 3× the Green party ORG · 3× Green ORG · 2× Polanski PERSON · 2×

Narrative

Zack Polanski, who leads the Green party in England and Wales, has come under pressure to take a definitive stance on the motion amid worries the controversy will harm the party in next week’s key Holborn and St Pancras byelection, where Polanski is seeking to win Keir Starmer’s former seat.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-01
🔮 Some Jewish members have said privately they fear it will be difficult for them to remain in the party if the policy passes.

Claims (29 extracted, 1 hedged)

An organisation pushing the Green party to equate Zionism with racism has encouraged people to join the party specifically to support that agenda, and has links to activists who say that pro-Israel “infiltrators” must be rooted out of the UK, the Guardian has learned. asserted
Guardian → push → UK
Some Green members are increasingly concerned that the party risks being manipulated by extremist outsiders over a motion to be voted on at the party’s annual conference this weekend, which states that “Zionism is racism”. asserted
Zionism → risk → conference
Some Jewish members have said privately they fear it will be difficult for them to remain in the party if the policy passes. asserted
policy → say → party
Zack Polanski, who leads the Green party in England and Wales, has come under pressure to take a definitive stance on the motion amid worries the controversy will harm the party in next week’s key Holborn and St Pancras byelection, where Polanski is seeking to win Keir Starmer’s former seat. asserted
Polanski → lead → seat
The motion came top of a members’ ballot of policy issues to be debated at the event in Brighton. asserted
motion → come → Brighton
It calls for a single Palestinian state and, if passed, it would mean members who support Zionism – the movement for a Jewish state – could be disciplined for racism. uncertain
who → call → racism
The controversy reflects a longstanding debate about the definition of Zionism, the political movement whose supporters see it as the necessary struggle for a Jewish homeland, and whose critics see it as a colonial project that has inevitably led to the dispossession of Palestinians. asserted
that → reflect → Palestinians
The term Zionist is, meanwhile, sometimes used as a synonym for Jew by antisemites. asserted
term → use → antisemites
Efforts to push the policy have been led by Greens for Palestine (GfP), a group not formally affiliated with the party. asserted
Efforts → push → party
In repeated social media posts over recent months, GfP has urged backers of the idea to sign up as Green members specifically to get the motion debated at the conference and then adopted. asserted
motion → repeat → conference
Polanski last week declared he was anti-Zionist, adding that Zionism was a form of racism because it involved the displacement and genocide of Palestinians. asserted
it → declare → Palestinians
But he has supported amendments to tone down the motion. asserted
he → support → motion
Lubna Speitan, a leading member of GfP who co-authored the motion asserted
who → lead → motion
“It doesn’t matter what the leadership thinks,” Speitan said in a recent video, adding: “We are certainly not here to negotiate the terms of our liberation or oppression with any of our oppressors.” asserted
We → matter → oppressors
GfP and Speitan have links to a group called the Anti-Zionist Movement (AZM), a more militant campaign group that argues that the “so-called Jewish state” should be dismantled, along with “Zionist organisations” in the UK and elsewhere. asserted
state → have → UK
A key member of AZM is David Miller, a former academic who was sacked by Bristol University over his criticisms of Israel, and subsequently won a tribunal case after it ruled he had been discriminated against because of his anti-Zionist views. asserted
he → sack → views
He now presents a show for Press TV, the Iranian state channel. asserted
He → present → TV
In social media posts, Miller has argued that Zionists have, as “infiltrators and subversives”, gained access to not just all UK political parties but also “the media, entertainment industries, the law, financial institutions, sports and all sorts of apparently obscure parts of the UK”. asserted
Zionists → argue → UK
GfP and AZM have collaborated on a series of social media posts, and Speitan attended an AZM meeting in London this year. asserted
Speitan → collaborate → London
, Speitan said it was important for anti-Zionist groups to collaborate. asserted
groups → say → ?
Speaking in the same video, Miller said his aim was to “dismantle Zionist organisations wherever they are in the world, including the 3,000 or 4,000 Zionist organisations in this country”. asserted
they → speak → country
Some senior Greens say they are deeply worried about the links. asserted
they → say → links
One said: “I just don’t understand why Zack hasn’t provided any leadership on this, especially when we have such a crucial byelection just days later.” asserted
we → say → byelection
A spokesperson for the Greens said: “The Green party is a democratic party and membership has grown as more people join to support our full policy platform. asserted
people → say → platform
The vast majority of members joined prior to a specific attempt at mobilisation.” asserted
majority → join → mobilisation
They added: “The Green party does not support the views of the AZM.” asserted
party → add → AZM
A spokesperson for GfP cited Miller’s employment tribunal, saying it “concluded that anti-Zionist beliefs constitute a protected belief”, adding: “We reject all conflations of anti-Zionism with antisemitism, just as we reject the settler colonial project in occupied Palestine.” asserted
we → cite → Palestine
Asked about the links to AZM, they added: “We welcome the adoption of our motion by all anti-racist organisations, political parties and unions.” asserted
We → ask → organisations
GfP, the statement added, “affirms the Palestinian people’s inalienable right to self-determination, including the right of the Palestinian people to resistance and liberation from Israeli occupation, domination and subjugation” via any means under international law. asserted
statement → add → law
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support