Photo via Evening Standard

Greens make ‘Zionism is racism’ party policy as Polanski skips vote

Read the original at Evening Standard ↗
Cite

Corbett, H. (2026, October 4). Greens make ‘Zionism is racism’ party policy as Polanski skips vote. Evening Standard. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/green-party-zionism-brighton-greens-jewish-b1299473.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Evening Standard · collected 2026-10-04 · by Helen Corbett

Quick Summary

At the recent Green Party conference, members voted in favor of a motion declaring Zionism as racism, positioning the party as anti-Zionist. The decision, proposed by Greens for Palestine, calls for the recognition of a single democratic Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital and supports ending arms sales to Israel while maintaining opposition to illegal occupation. Roman Polanski did not participate in this vote, having left earlier to campaign elsewhere. Jewish leaders criticized the move, viewing it as legitimizing terrorism against Israel. The Green Party clarified that the motion would not affect governance or disciplinary procedures within the party but remains committed to anti-racism and human rights for all.
Written by AI on 2026-10-04, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The Green Party of England and Wales adopted a policy at its annual conference on October 1, 2026, equating Zionism with racism. The motion also calls for the establishment of a single democratic Palestinian state encompassing all of historic Palestine, including Jerusalem as its capital. This move has sparked significant backlash from various quarters:

In response to this controversy, Zack Polanski, leader of the Green Party, issued a statement asserting that the party will protect both Palestinian rights and Jewish communities. He emphasized distinguishing between criticism of Israel and antisemitism while reiterating his commitment to ensuring everyone feels safe and welcome within the party.

The decision has also drawn international attention, with the United States reportedly set to make representations regarding the policy's implications for anti-Semitism in Britain. This move reflects the global concern over the potential ramifications of such policies on Jewish communities internationally.

Written for “Green Party Zionism Vote Controversy” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 35 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Green Party Zionism Vote Controversy
Politics · 36 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Evening Standard
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 0 of 17 claims Outlet record 65/100
BBC News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 6 of 26 claims Outlet record 68/100
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
Dawn
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 17 claims Outlet record 72/100
The Hindu
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 17 claims Outlet record 60/100
New York Post
Hedges 2 of 17 claims Outlet record 66/100
Evening Standard
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 16 claims Outlet record 65/100
BBC News
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 2 of 22 claims Outlet record 68/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 1 of 19 claims Outlet record 60/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
36
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 36 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
65/100
Evening Standard's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
36
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
3
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-04 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Evening Standard · 7865 article(s) · 64 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 64 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Helen Corbett
45 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 He said he would instead seek to launch a drive on debt-servicing to help countries repay over a longer time period with better rates.
🔮 He said he would instead seek to launch a drive on debt-servicing to help countries repay over a longer time period with better rates.
🔮 Mr Farage brought up the incident at a post-Budget press conference, saying he wanted to “avoid conflict” in the chamber, claiming he had been involved in an altercation with another MP at the state opening of Parliament on May 13.
🔮 This is down from the £22 billion Rachel Reeves set out last year through raising taxes, but he said it would rise to match that figure in 2030-31.
2026-10-28 · assertive framing · Budget at a glance: What has John Healey announced?
🔮 A Downing Street spokeswoman said we are “not at that stage yet” when asked whether the public would decide on proposals to get closer to the EU through a referendum or by voting on an updated Labour manifesto.
🔮 Streamlined reporting requirements are expected to save £290 million; easing “duplicative reporting burdens” for asset managers £105 million; and cutting red tape for buying and selling homes £116 million for businesses in the transaction chain.
🔮 He also said that cyber incidents such as the critical security flaw in the PHP programming language used by the majority of websites that has left organisations around the world scrambling for a fix will happen “more and more”.
🔮 Mr Streeting, speaking at the opening of a new gun hall in Telford on Thursday, warned of the need to be ready for the possibility that businesses could be hit by cyber attacks that knock out supply chains.
🔮 The Reform UK leader will announce a plan on Monday to suspend the asylum system for a full parliamentary term and declare void any applications in progress.
🔮 Zack Polanski has signalled he could usher in changes to the Greens’ style of grassroots democracy and give more power to leaders to set the party’s direction after a vote to define Zionism as a form of racism.
Also by Helen Corbett
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 45 articles by Helen Corbett →

Topics

Green Party Greens Israel Jewish Zionism

Subjects

Greens ORG · 4× Green Party ORG · 3× Jewish NORP · 3× The Green Party ORG · 3× Israel GPE · 2× Palestinian NORP · 2× Polanski PERSON · 2× Zionism NORP · 2× Zionists NORP · 2× Holborn GPE · 1×

Narrative

The chief executives of the Board of Deputies, Community Security Trust and Jewish Leadership Council wrote a letter to Green Party leaders ahead of the conference airing their concerns and referring back to a warning they issued over the motion earlier this year. “We also emphasised the implications for the safety and welfare of all British Jews, and our belief that this motion would make the Green Party the first electorally significant UK political party in living memory to adopt what appears to be an overtly antisemitic political platform,” they said.
framing: assertive · carried by 3 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-04
🔮 It declares the Greens to be an “anti-Zionist party” and sets into its policy that Zionism, the movement to develop and protect a Jewish state in Israel, will be “treated as any other form of racism”.
2026-10-04 · Evening Standard
Greens make ‘Zionism is racism’ party policy as Polanski skips vote · assertive framing
2026-10-04 · Evening Standard
Greens make ‘Zionism is racism’ party policy as Polanski skips vote · assertive framing
2026-10-04 · Evening Standard
Zack Polanski barred from Israel after ‘Zionism is racism’ made party policy · assertive framing

Claims (36 extracted, 0 hedged)

Mr Polanski did not take part in the vote on the “Zionism is racism” motion, having left the party conference after his speech on Friday to campaign in the Holborn and St Pancras by-election. asserted
Zionism → take → election
It declares the Greens to be an “anti-Zionist party” and sets into its policy that Zionism, the movement to develop and protect a Jewish state in Israel, will be “treated as any other form of racism”. asserted
Zionism → declare → racism
It also supports the establishment of a “single democratic Palestinian State in all of historic Palestine with Jerusalem as its capital”. asserted
Jerusalem → support → capital
Supporters chanted “say it loud, say it clear, Zionists are not welcome here” as the campaigners behind the motion, Greens for Palestine, gathered to speak to the media. asserted
campaigners → chant → media
Asked if the new stance meant Zionists would be kicked out of the party, former councillor Salma Yaqoob said “absolutely not”. asserted
Yaqoob → ask → party
“We’re saying that if you want to champion Zionism, it will be called out as racism. asserted
it → say → racism
Nobody will be removed, challenged, disciplined, suspended because they put forward or articulate their belief in Zionism.” asserted
they → remove → Zionism
This type of motion does not have a “material impact on governance or disciplinary procedures”, a Green Party spokesperson said. asserted
spokesperson → have → governance
“This has been a serious and deeply felt debate within our membership. asserted
This → feel → membership
Our members value the ability to bring forward and decide party policy, and conference has now made its decision. asserted
conference → value → decision
“The Green Party is an anti-racist party and has consistently opposed the illegal occupation of both Palestinian and Syrian land, called for an end to arms sales to the Israeli government and spoken out fearlessly about the devastating situation in Gaza and the West Bank. asserted
Party → oppose → Gaza
Read More “Those positions remain central to our approach. asserted
positions → read → approach
So too does our deeply-held commitment to equality, justice and human rights for all, and opposition to racism in all its forms.” asserted
commitment → do → forms
The members voted against adding a clause to make clear the motion should not be used to “pressure, proscribe or discipline” party members for their affiliation to synagogues or other Jewish groups that describe themselves as Zionist. asserted
that → vote → Zionist
Israel’s foreign ministry said the Greens were giving “legitimacy to terrorism”. asserted
Greens → say → terrorism
“The Greens have adopted not only the green of Hamas, but also its ideology: the elimination of the State of Israel through armed struggle.” asserted
Greens → adopt → struggle
They added: “This goes far beyond the boundaries of legitimate political debate. asserted
This → add → debate
As long as this resolution remains in place, it will stand as a stain on the history of the United Kingdom.” asserted
it → remain → Kingdom
Jewish leaders said the failure of the Green Party leadership to oppose the move “shows a staggering indifference to the welfare of British Jews”. asserted
failure → say → Jews
The chief executives of the Board of Deputies, Community Security Trust and Jewish Leadership Council wrote a letter to Green Party leaders ahead of the conference airing their concerns and referring back to a warning they issued over the motion earlier this year. “We also emphasised the implications for the safety and welfare of all British Jews, and our belief that this motion would make the Green Party the first electorally significant UK political party in living memory to adopt what appears to be an overtly antisemitic political platform,” they said. asserted
they → write → memory
Two senior Rabbis said the motion was “antisemitic in its formulation and intention”. asserted
motion → say → formulation
Rabbi Charley Baginsky and Rabbi Josh Levy said: “By adopting it, the Green Party has made antisemitism party policy and become a racist party.” asserted
Party → say → policy
The vote has exposed divisions within the party as four of its five MPs – Ellie Chowns, Sian Berry and ex-leaders Adrian Ramsay and Carla Denyer – came out to publicly reject the motion. asserted
four → expose → motion
Ms Chowns said in a social media post that she was concerned the motion “risks fuelling division and risks undermining the party’s ability to advocate effectively for justice and peace”. asserted
motion → say → justice
Afterwards, party leader Mr Polanski and the five MPs released a joint statement saying they would “always uphold universal human rights”. asserted
they → release → rights
“We will never tolerate any form of discrimination or harassment. asserted
We → tolerate → discrimination
“We will continue to stand in opposition to genocide, ethnic cleansing, apartheid and the illegal occupation. asserted
We → continue → genocide
“We will continue to call out the heinous crimes of the Netanyahu government. asserted
We → continue → government
“And we will continue to work to ensure that the Green Party is an anti-racist party in every way. asserted
Party → continue → way
“We know there is no conflict between supporting the rights of Palestinians and the rights of Jewish people.” asserted
We → know → people
The position will become party policy but the Greens do not require all their politicians to back it. asserted
Greens → become → it
Party leader Mr Polanski is running to become an MP in Sir Keir Starmer’s former seat and the Greens had encouraged members to leave Brighton to support his campaign in London. asserted
Greens → run → London
Mr Polanski said he believes that the “displacement and genocide of the Palestinian people” is “clearly racism” in an interview with the BBC earlier this week. asserted
displacement → say → BBC
But he said he wanted an amendment to call for one Palestinian state in the motion, “because what I want to see is equal rights for Israelis and Palestinians”. asserted
want → say → Israelis
The Conservatives said it showed the Green Party is “toxic to its core”. asserted
Party → say → core
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: “British Jews should not have to disclaim a belief in Jewish self-determination and the existence of Israel in order to be accepted by a British political party.” asserted
Jews → say → party
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support