The U.S. Supreme Court's 2026–2027 term officially kicks off on Monday.
asserted
term → kick → Monday
But you may be forgiven if you didn't realize the justices had actually gone away on a summer break.
uncertain
justices → forgive → break
After all, the Court has certainly stayed busy enough over the past two months, issuing a number of high-profile orders and opinions on issues ranging from President Donald Trump's efforts to restrict the use of mail-in ballots to the president's ongoing construction of a new White House ballroom.
asserted
Court → stay → ballroom
Those cases, however, were all from the Supreme Court's emergency docket, sometimes also known among its critics as the shadow docket.
asserted
cases → know → docket
The Court's regular docket, in which the justices only decide cases after reading several rounds of briefs and hearing lengthy oral arguments, was in fact on pause over the summer.
asserted
justices → decide → summer
That pause will be lifted on Monday when oral arguments start again.
asserted
arguments → lift → Monday
So what's coming on the regular docket?
asserted
what → come → docket
Here are two notable cases that I'll be watching this month.
asserted
I → watch → that
You’re reading Injustice System from Damon Root and Reason.
asserted
You → read → Root
County officials in Colorado sued Suncor Energy for damages under Colorado law over injuries allegedly caused by the effects of greenhouse gas emissions and climate change.
uncertain
officials → sue → emissions
The energy company countered by arguing that this kind of state lawsuit is preempted by federal law because the alleged conduct at issue did not originate in Colorado.
asserted
conduct → counter → Colorado
In other words, if a state seeks to sue an energy company under state law over damages allegedly caused by interstate or even international pollution or greenhouse gas emissions, may the state lawsuit proceed, or must it be dropped because federal law, not state law, controls?
uncertain
law → seek → pollution
Needless to say, the importance of this case for future climate change-related litigation is significant.
asserted
importance → say → litigation
Oral arguments are scheduled for October 5.
2.
asserted
arguments → schedule → October
The Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988 (VPPA), which was passed after a video store clerk leaked to a journalist a list of films that then-Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork had rented, prohibits a "video tape service provider" from "knowingly disclos[ing], to any person, personally identifiable information concerning any consumer of such provider."
asserted
Bork → pass → provider
At issue in this case is whether Paramount Global, doing business as the website 247Sports, violated this federal law when it shared user Michael Salazar's private information, including what videos he watched, with Facebook.
asserted
he → do → Facebook
Here is how that legal question is presented in the case: "whether the phrase 'goods or services from a video tape service provider,' as used in the VPPA's definition of 'consumer,' refers to all of a video tape service provider's goods or services or only to its audiovisual goods or services.
asserted
refers → present → goods
Oral arguments are scheduled for October 14.
asserted
arguments → schedule → October
On September 30, 1857—169 years ago yesterday—Justice Benjamin Curtis resigned from the Supreme Court in protest over its decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), the notorious case that held that African Americans "had no rights which the white man was bound to respect."
asserted
man → resign → which
Curtis was one of two dissenters in Dred Scott, and his judicial objections still make for illuminating reading today.
asserted
objections → make → reading
The Dred Scott opinion was written by Chief Justice Roger Taney.
asserted
opinion → write → Taney
He held that neither Scott nor any other black person could ever count as a U.S. citizen because they were, in Taney's words, "beings of an inferior order" who could never qualify as any part of that "We the People" for whom the U.S. Constitution was written.
uncertain
Constitution → hold → whom
Black Americans "are not included, and were not intended to be included," Taney asserted, "under the word 'citizens' in the Constitution."
asserted
Taney → include → Constitution
Writing in dissent, Curtis laid bare the historical illiteracy of Taney's argument.
asserted
Curtis → write → argument
"At the time of the ratification of the Articles of Confederation," Curtis noted, "all free native-born inhabitants of the States of New Hampshire, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, and North Carolina, though descended from African slaves, were not only citizens of those States, but such of them as had the other necessary qualifications possessed the franchise of electors, on equal terms with other citizens."
asserted
qualifications → note → citizens
In other words, when the Constitution was up for ratification, a number of black Americans were literally among the "We the People" who brought the document into existence because they were among the ratifying populations of those five ratifying states.
asserted
they → bring → states
Taney's opinion is now widely remembered as among the Supreme Court's very worst.
asserted
opinion → remember → Court
It's also worth remembering Curtis' wise dissent, which opposed Taney's crimes against the Constitution in real time.
asserted
which → remember → time
The Aporia
