Photo via CBS News

Supreme Court gears up for new term with major cases on climate change, guns

Read the original at CBS News ↗
Cite

Quinn, M. (2026, October 4). Supreme Court gears up for new term with major cases on climate change, guns. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-new-term-2026-climate-change-immigration-guns/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

CBS News · collected 2026-10-04 · by Melissa Quinn

Quick Summary

The Supreme Court's new term begins on October 5th and will include significant cases related to climate change and gun laws. One major case involves Suncor Energy v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, where the court will determine if federal law prevents local governments from suing fossil fuel companies over climate impacts in state courts. This decision could affect similar lawsuits across the country and has implications for how responsibility for climate change is assigned to specific industries versus broader national policies.
Written by AI on 2026-10-04, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The Supreme Court opened its new term on Monday by hearing arguments in Suncor Energy v. Boulder County, a landmark case that could determine whether states and local governments can sue oil and gas companies for climate change damages. The case, which began in 2018 when Boulder County sued Exxon Mobil and Suncor Energy, accuses these companies of contributing to climate-related harms through their fossil fuel operations. The lawsuit aims to hold the companies financially responsible for local climate impacts using state tort laws.

If the Supreme Court allows such lawsuits, it could set a precedent for similar cases across the nation, potentially affecting industries that emit carbon and leading to increased costs for consumers due to higher legal liabilities. Conversely, if the court rules against Boulder County, it would limit states' ability to use their courts for addressing national policy issues like climate change through tort law, thereby protecting manufacturers from an expanding patchwork of lawsuits based on complex environmental problems.

Written for “Supreme Court Climate Case” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 35 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Supreme Court Climate Case
Environment · 36 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Reason
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 28 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Both articles discuss the upcoming Supreme Court term but mention different cases and issues, indicating they are describing related topics rather than the exact same event.”
Reason
Hedges 18 of 87 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Article A discusses Prof. Adler's amicus brief in Suncor Energy v. Boulder County, while Article B is about the broader start of the Supreme Court's new term and mentions a lawsuit on Monday but does not specify it as being related to Suncor.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 21 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes states and cities suing over EPA's repeal of emissions rules, while Article B discusses the Supreme Court's upcoming term with various high-profile cases including climate change disputes.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 2 of 37 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects and timelines related to the start of the Supreme Court's new term, covering various cases but not focusing on the exact same incident or occurrence.”
NBC News
Hedges 4 of 42 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles refer to different aspects of the Supreme Court's upcoming new term: Article A focuses on President Trump's criticisms and previous rulings, while Article B discusses major cases involving climate change, guns, and immigration policies.”
Fox News
Hedges 3 of 56 claims Outlet record 69/100
NPR
Hedges 8 of 51 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A discusses the upcoming Supreme Court term, while Article B mentions SCOTUS hearing a major climate change case but also includes unrelated international news about Brazil's presidential race and an incident involving a flydubai flight.”
Reason
Hedges 2 of 10 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Article A discusses general cases for the new Supreme Court term, while Article B focuses specifically on the upcoming Suncor Energy v. Boulder County case involving climate change tort suits.”
CBS News
Hedges 6 of 88 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Supreme Court without describing the same specific incident.”
NBC News
Outlet record 60/100
“Article A discusses the Supreme Court gearing up for its new term, while Article B reports on arguments being heard in a climate change lawsuit during the new term.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
102
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
9 of 102 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
CBS News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
36
Environment
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-04 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

CBS News · 4349 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Melissa Quinn
26 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 A federal judge on Friday said she is opening an inquiry into whether government officials and lawyers made misrepresentations to the court and violated ethics rules during proceedings over President Trump's plans to renovate a historic in Washington, D.C.U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes said during a hearing she will conduct the examination herself, but will be assisted by a special master, a neutral arbiter, to determine whether officials and lawyers at the Departments of Justice and Interior engaged in misconduct. The judge said she will examine several issues, including whether a notice filed to her court about impending at East Potomac Golf Links was done in bad faith.
🔮 Steve Hobbs, the Washington secretary of state, was responding to a letter from two federal prosecutors in the state to be set aside and not counted until their citizenship status could be verified.
🔮 The decision from U.S. District Judge David Carter is the latest setback for the Trump administration in its efforts to exert more federal control over election administration just ahead of the Nov. 3 midterm elections, when voters will decide which party controls the House and Senate.
🔮 The Department of the Interior is working on a plan to close East Potomac Golf Links in Washington, D.C., by Nov. 15 after President Trump twice said the historic course will temporarily shutter for a redesign next month, senior Justice Department officials said Wednesday.
🔮 A federal appeals court on Monday dismissed the Justice Department's effort to force California election officials to set aside thousands of ballots that the Trump administration claims may have been cast by alleged noncitizens.
🔮 The agency has said that the proposed border wall will not cut through Big Bend National Park, but other infrastructure would, including patrol roads, detection technology and roughly 17 miles of vehicle barriers.
🔮 Vance with "CBS Evening News" anchor Tony Dokoupil for a one-hour town hall in Michigan, which will air Saturday.
🔮 Hoyt argued that because the president appoints members of the Kennedy Center's board and a related Advisory Committee on the Arts, he must "familiarize himself" with the institution's management, operations, fundraising efforts and planned activities. "I believe that, without the protection of the presidential communications privilege over the communications described above, presidential advisors and their staff members would be chilled from gathering relevant information, exploring alternatives, and providing fully informed recommendations regarding the performance of the President's duties," the White House lawyer wrote in a declaration.
🔮 President Trump said Thursday that the execution of Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan will not be streamed, a decision that comes after his administration faced significant backlash over the Pentagon's initial plan to allow the American people to watch Hasan's death by firing squad.
🔮 The Justice Department and lawyers for CNN, MS NOW and Politico will be back in court Thursday as the legal battle continues over President Trump's decision to ban reporters from the three news outlets from the White House over what he said is their negative coverage of his administration.
Also by Melissa Quinn
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 26 articles by Melissa Quinn →

Topics

Boulder Boulder County Exxon Suncor Energy the Supreme Court

Subjects

the Supreme Court ORG · 9× Boulder GPE · 4× Boulder County GPE · 3× Exxon ORG · 3× Suncor ORG · 3× Colorado ORG · 2× Suncor Energy ORG · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× Washington GPE · 1× the Supreme Court's ORG · 1×

Narrative

In its decision, the 2nd Circuit panel of judges said accepting the administration's interpretation of immigration law would "send a seismic shock through our immigration detention system and society, straining our already overcrowded detention infrastructure, incarcerating millions, separating families, and disrupting communities."
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-04
🔮 The start of the Supreme Court's new term is quickly approaching, with cases involving climate change, President Trump's immigration policies and the Second Amendment among the most high-profile disputes the justices will hear in the coming months.

Claims (102 extracted, 9 hedged)

The start of the Supreme Court's new term is quickly approaching, with cases involving climate change, President Trump's immigration policies and the Second Amendment among the most high-profile disputes the justices will hear in the coming months. asserted
justices → approach → months
But waiting in the wings at the Supreme Court are several legal battles involving Mr. Trump's second-term agenda, which will be discussed by the justices in forthcoming closed-door conferences and, if taken up by the court, decided by the summer of 2027. asserted
which → wait → 2027
The Supreme Court kicks off its term Monday with arguments involving a lawsuit filed in state court by the city and county of Boulder, Colorado, that seeks to hold energy companies accountable for the effects of global climate change. asserted
companies → kick → change
Here are the big cases that the Supreme Court is poised to decide so far in its upcoming term, which begins Oct. 5: asserted
which → poise → term
Climate change: Suncor Energy v. County Commissioners of Boulder County On the first day of the new term, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in a dispute between Boulder and two energy companies, Suncor Energy and Exxon Mobil. asserted
Court → hear → Boulder
The question before the Supreme Court is a technical one: Whether federal law prevents Boulder County from suing energy companies in state court and claiming that the sale and allegedly deceptive marketing of fossil fuels violates state law. uncertain
sale → prevent → law
The outcome of the case could have significant ramifications for dozens of similar lawsuits brought by states and localities that seek to hold fossil-fuel producers accountable for the effects of climate change. uncertain
producers → have → change
A decision in favor of the energy companies would block Boulder's lawsuit, which is still in its early stages and seeks money damages. asserted
which → block → damages
Lawyers for Exxon and Suncor warn that if the Supreme Court allows these suits to move forward and they are ultimately successful, they would effectively impose a carbon tax on fossil-fuel producers and "bankrupt" the industry. asserted
they → warn → industry
In filings with the Supreme Court, they called climate change "one of the most complex public-policy challenges of our time," resulting from the buildup of greenhouse gases that are emitted by every state and every country. asserted
that → call → state
Those emissions, Suncor and Exxon lawyers said, "cannot be unmixed and traced to their individual sources." asserted
lawyers → say → sources
The case landed at the Supreme Court on appeal from the Colorado Supreme Court, which allowed Boulder's lawsuit to proceed. asserted
lawsuit → land → Court
The high court will also consider whether it has jurisdiction to review that decision. asserted
it → consider → decision
The energy companies warned that if that ruling is upheld and adopted on a nationwide scale, it would give the green light to all 50 states and their municipalities "to ask local courts to establish countless, conflicting climate policies for the Nation." asserted
it → warn → Nation
Lawyers for Boulder County argued that the Constitution allows states to address the harms that arise within their own borders. asserted
that → argue → borders
Whether those harms should be better addressed at the federal level is a decision that rests with Congress, they said. asserted
they → address → Congress
The county officials said the energy companies rushed to the Supreme Court and instead should wait until the state court has issued its final decision in the case before seeking review. asserted
court → say → review
"That climate change is a global problem does not disempower states from redressing its local harms either," they wrote. asserted
they → disempower → harms
"This litigation is not an attempt to solve climate change; it merely asks that petitioners bear their fair share of local costs incurred in part because of their tortious conduct." asserted
petitioners → solve → conduct
Justice Samuel Alito in the case, according to a letter sent to lawyers for the parties Monday. uncertain
Alito → accord → parties
The letter did not include a reason for his recusal. asserted
letter → include → recusal
In his financial disclosure for 2025, Alito reported owning stocks in two energy companies, ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66, but did not list individual holdings in Exxon or Suncor. asserted
Alito → report → Exxon
On Nov. 3, the justices will convene for arguments in a case involving a Catholic preschool in Colorado that from the state's universal preschool program. asserted
justices → convene → program
The dispute is the latest in which the Supreme Court will consider participation by religious entities in state-funded programs. asserted
Court → consider → programs
Colorado's program provides state funding for families to send their 4-year-olds to the preschool of their choosing. asserted
families → provide → choosing
The program allows all children in the state to receive up to 15 hours of free preschool each week before they enter kindergarten. asserted
they → allow → kindergarten
Families can send their children to public or private preschools, or to faith-based or in-home providers. asserted
Families → send → providers
The law creating the program includes a nondiscrimination provision, which requires all schools to ensure children have the equal opportunity to attend regardless of their or their parents' religious affiliation, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, lack of housing or income level. asserted
children → create → housing
In 2023, the Archdiocese of Denver, which oversees more than 30 Catholic preschools, requested an exemption from the universal preschool program's nondiscrimination rule so it could admit only participating families who adhere to the Catholic Church's teachings, including on gender identity and sexual orientation. uncertain
who → oversee → identity
But the Colorado Department of Early Childhood declined to provide the accommodation. asserted
Department → decline → accommodation
In response, the Archdiocese, two parishes and a family with children who attend parish schools sued and argued they were entitled to an exemption under the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause. asserted
they → attend → Clause
The plaintiffs said because the universal preschool program created exemptions to the nondiscrimination requirement, it was not neutral and generally applicable. asserted
it → say → requirement
The Supreme Court said in a 1990 decision called Employment Division v. Smith that laws burdening the free exercise of religion generally do not violate the First Amendment as long as they're neutral and generally applicable. asserted
they → say → Amendment
A federal district court sided with the state in June 2024, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit upheld that decision, finding that the program's nondiscrimination rule "exists in harmony with the First Amendment" and doesn't violate the plaintiffs' free exercise rights. asserted
rule → side → rights
Gun rights: Viramontes v. Cook County and Grant v. Higgins This latest Second Amendment dispute to arise following the Supreme Court's landmark 2022 decision expanding gun rights involves and similar semiautomatic weapons. asserted
dispute → arise → weapons
The two cases, which will be argued Dec. 2, involve a Connecticut law and an ordinance in Cook County, Illinois. asserted
which → argue → County
Cook County's prohibition was put in place nearly 20 years ago, while Connecticut tightened its rules for semiautomatic firearms after the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School. asserted
Connecticut → put → School
More than 10 states and the District of Columbia prohibit AR-15-style semiautomatic weapons. asserted
states → prohibit → weapons
In both of the cases from Illinois and Connecticut, lower courts upheld the bans. asserted
courts → uphold → bans
The appeals courts each applied the new standard for determining the constitutionality of gun restrictions that the Supreme Court laid out in 2022, which requires the government to show that a law is consistent with the nation's historical tradition of firearms regulation. asserted
law → apply → regulation
…and 62 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support