Photo via Washington Examiner

Last call in America: You don’t have to go home, but you can’t stay here

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Rogers, J. (2026, October 1). Last call in America: You don’t have to go home, but you can’t stay here. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op-eds/4748845/third-country-deportations-supreme-court-ruling/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-10-01 · by Jay Rogers

Quick Summary

The Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to resume deporting people who have final removal orders but no clear country of return. This decision came after three liberal justices dissented, while the article's author supports the policy, arguing that those who entered illegally and were ordered out should be sent to countries willing to accept them. About 25,000 individuals have already been removed under this policy since its inception in 2025, with destinations including El Salvador, Libya, and South Sudan. The article emphasizes the need for procedural safeguards to prevent sending people to places where they might face torture or harm, advocating that Congress should codify these protections rather than leaving it to judicial interpretation.
Written by AI on 2026-10-01, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The Trump administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court to allow it to continue swiftly deporting immigrants to third countries, different from their country of origin, after a federal appeals court blocked such deportations due to insufficient process protections for migrants. Attorney General Todd Blanche announced on X that the government would seek immediate relief from the high court, which previously allowed similar removals. Over 25,000 people have been deported under this policy since March 2025, with most sent to Mexico and others to more than two dozen countries. The administration argues these deportations are crucial for public safety, targeting individuals who pose a criminal threat or whose home countries refuse them entry. However, critics claim the policy lacks due process protections and targets those granted legal protection from deportation back to their home countries. On September 24th, the Supreme Court temporarily allowed the policy to continue while it considers full oral arguments in December, despite objections from Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Written for “Third Country Deportations Policy” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 17 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Third Country Deportations Policy
Politics · 18 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
NPR
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 3 of 16 claims Outlet record 60/100
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 70/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 3 of 12 claims Outlet record 70/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 4 of 22 claims Outlet record 60/100
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 64/100
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 19 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 1 of 5 claims Outlet record 66/100
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 64/100
Fox News
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 6 of 20 claims Outlet record 69/100
Reason
Hedges 5 of 29 claims Outlet record 67/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
45
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
3 of 45 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
18
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-01 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3820 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jay Rogers
20 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 This week, the justices lifted a court-ordered deadline that would have forced the agency to rule on a Democratic challenge to its political advertising policy before Nov. 3.
2026-10-18 · assertive framing · One ad, one price. Congress should say so
🔮 The 6-3 order is temporary, and the justices will hear arguments on Dec. 9.
🔮 If you entered illegally, a judge ordered you out, and your homeland won’t take you, America can send you somewhere that will.
🔮 Whatever you do, never submit to the extended, adversarial questioning that might reveal what millions of Americans were forced to confront after the June 2024 debate: that the 46th president’s cognitive capacity had been degrading in the most powerful office on Earth.
🔮 That timing placed the release squarely inside the window the DOJ’s own election-sensitivity guidance identifies as the highest-risk period for any government action that could appear to influence a vote.
🔮 Texas redistricting cost him his primary in May, so this was his last lap.
🔮 In Montgomery County, Maryland, school officials swapped a test-based magnet admissions process for one weighing an applicant’s home and neighborhood, after being briefed in advance on exactly how the switch would change the racial makeup of the incoming class.
🔮 A federal judge in Miami will hear oral arguments this week on a legal theory that five people around the country are betting will spring them from noncitizen voting charges.
🔮 New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani stood at City Hall on Monday and announced that his city is suing the federal government to preserve immigrants’ access to Medicaid and food stamps.
🔮 I’ve spent three decades in regulated finance, and I know what an uncapped $1,000-per-item liability schedule does to an organization’s willingness to speak.
Also by Jay Rogers
The executive branch needs an executive
2026-10-23 · Washington Examiner
The penalty for doing your homework
2026-10-22 · Washington Examiner
Clean California’s voter rolls, and show the work
2026-10-21 · Washington Examiner
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 20 articles by Jay Rogers →

Topics

America Congress Massachusetts U.S. the Supreme Court

Subjects

Congress ORG · 2× America GPE · 1× Boston ORG · 1× Brian Murphy PERSON · 1× D. John Sauer PERSON · 1× Massachusetts GPE · 1× The 1st Circuit ORG · 1× Trump PERSON · 1× U.S. GPE · 1× the Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

Last year the Department of Homeland Security offered a free flight home, a $1,000 stipend, and forgiveness of accrued civil fines to anyone who used the CBP Home app, then tripled the stipend for the holidays.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-01
🔮 If you entered illegally, a judge ordered you out, and your homeland won’t take you, America can send you somewhere that will.
2026-10-01 · Washington Examiner
Last call in America: You don’t have to go home, but you can’t stay here · assertive framing

Claims (45 extracted, 3 hedged)

Closing time comes to every bar, and nobody acts surprised when the lights come up. asserted
lights → come → bar
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court let the Trump administration resume deporting people with final removal orders to countries other than their own while the justices hear the case in December. asserted
justices → let → December
Predictably, the three left-leaning justices dissented. asserted
justices → lean → ?
If you entered illegally, a judge ordered you out, and your homeland won’t take you, America can send you somewhere that will. asserted
that → enter → you
The only destination off the table is staying here. asserted
destination → stay → table
Critics treat this as exotic. asserted
Critics → treat → this
Federal law disagrees. asserted
law → disagree → ?
It lists where the government may send a person ordered removed, and the list ends with a catchall: “another country whose government will accept the alien.” uncertain
government → list → alien
Congress wrote that line. asserted
Congress → write → line
I’ve testified in courts, and I always read the statute before I read the headline. asserted
I → testify → headline
This one doesn’t require a law degree. asserted
one → require → degree
The case began in 2025 when four immigrants with removal orders sued in Massachusetts. asserted
immigrants → begin → Massachusetts
U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy of Boston ruled in February that the policy violates due process and ordered notice and a chance to contest removal over fear of torture. asserted
policy → rule → torture
The 1st Circuit upheld that ruling last week. asserted
Circuit → uphold → ruling
Solicitor General D. John Sauer told the justices the order took away “an essential tool to remove certain aliens.” asserted
order → tell → aliens
By Axios’s count, roughly 25,000 people have already been removed to third countries. asserted
people → remove → countries
No one was ambushed, either. asserted
one → ambush → ?
Last year the Department of Homeland Security offered a free flight home, a $1,000 stipend, and forgiveness of accrued civil fines to anyone who used the CBP Home app, then tripled the stipend for the holidays. asserted
who → offer → holidays
Those who declined chose to roll the dice, and the dice came up snake eyes. asserted
dice → decline → dice
Critics have one fair point. asserted
Critics → have → point
As Justice Sonia Sotomayor warned in her June 2025 dissent, “In matters of life and death, it is best to proceed with caution.” asserted
it → warn → caution
Nobody should ship a person to a place where they face torture, and federal law agrees. asserted
law → ship → torture
It generally bars removal to a country where a person’s life or freedom would be threatened because of race, religion, nationality, social group, or political opinion. asserted
life → bar → race
The stay leaves that ban in place. asserted
stay → leave → place
The December argument will settle what process the government owes to those who broke our laws on the way in. asserted
who → settle → way
And the administration insists it is targeting “the worst of the worst.” asserted
it → insist → worst
Destinations have included El Salvador, Libya, and South Sudan. asserted
Destinations → include → Salvador
Those aren’t resort towns, which is why a fast screening matters. asserted
screening → matter → ?
The fix is short, and Congress should codify it rather than waiting on nine justices. asserted
Congress → codify → justices
Let an asylum officer hear one fear claim, decide it fast and record the reasons. uncertain
officer → let → reasons
Justice Louis Brandeis had it right: sunlight is the best disinfectant. asserted
sunlight → have → ?
In my own field we call this due diligence. asserted
we → call → this
You verify before you wire the money, and you do it once, quickly, with a paper trail. asserted
you → verify → trail
That answers the humane objection without handing a veto to every appeal, and it stops professional delay artists from turning every removal order into a decade of litigation. asserted
it → answer → litigation
I’m the father of three sons, and I can’t imagine a policy that puts a parent on one plane and a child on another. asserted
that → ’m → another
Sorting that out at the airport is cruelty and bad management. asserted
Sorting → sort → airport
The DHS inspector general reported that as of May 2024, Immigration and Customs Enforcement had not served court notices on more than 291,000 unaccompanied migrant children, and that more than 32,000 missed their immigration court hearings between fiscal 2019 and 2023 under the Biden administration. uncertain
32,000 → report → administration
A government that can’t keep track of a child has no business splitting one from a parent. asserted
that → keep → parent
The court will decide the process question. asserted
court → decide → question
The principle already has a statute behind it. asserted
principle → have → it
…and 5 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support