Photo via Reason

Justin Wolfers Recognizes His "Libertarian Friends Were Right" About Government Power

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Somin, I. (2026, October 1). Justin Wolfers Recognizes His "Libertarian Friends Were Right" About Government Power. Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/10/01/justin-wolfers-recognizes-his-libertarian-friends-were-right-about-government-power/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-10-01 · by Ilya Somin

Quick Summary

Economist Justin Wolfers admits on the Volokh Conspiracy blog that his libertarian friends were correct about the dangers of concentrated government power. Reflecting on his past skepticism towards libertarians' views, he now acknowledges the risks of abuse and calls for tighter constraints on federal authority. Wolfers’ admission follows similar recognitions by other left-leaning intellectuals like Cass Sunstein and Noah Smith.
Written by AI on 2026-10-01, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In a recent post on his blog, Justin Wolfers, an economist at the University of Michigan, admitted that his libertarian friends were correct in their concerns about the risks associated with a powerful federal government. Initially skeptical, Wolfers now acknowledges the potential for abuse when power is concentrated within governmental structures. He highlights this realization as particularly relevant amid current political dynamics, noting common adversaries on both the right and left who advocate for expansive government authority without sufficient constraints. This admission follows similar acknowledgments from other notable figures like legal scholar Cass Sunstein and economic commentator Noah Smith, indicating a growing awareness among some prominent intellectuals about the need to limit governmental power. Wolfers' willingness to reassess his earlier views is seen as commendable, especially in an intellectual climate where many resist admitting error or changing perspectives.

Written for “Government Power Debate” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Government Power Debate
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
33
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
1 of 33 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-01 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1116 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ilya Somin
30 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 I address a variety of counterarguments, including claims that voting for a lesser evil makes you morally complicit in that candidate's wrongdoing, arguments that it's better to cast a "protest vote" for a candidate that has no chance of winning, arguments based on the very low probability that your vote will be decisive, and more.
🔮 If Section 338 is still valid and does grant the kind of nearly unlimited authority Trump claims, that would violate the constitutional "nondelegation" doctrine, which restricts delegation of legislative power to the executive…
🔮 Today, in United States v. Alaska, federal district Judge Sharon Gleason ruled against the Trump administration's lawsuit seeking to block certification of Alaska Senate election results on the grounds that doing so might be necessary to prevent "voter confusion" caused by the presence of two candidates with very similar names on the ballot.
🔮 In the original series, the Klingons and Romulans are mostly depicted as evil and irreconcilable enemies of the Federation, in TNG the Klingons have become allies and there is hope that there will be peace with the Romulans, as well.
2026-10-31 · assertive framing · Sir Patrick Stewart, RIP
🔮 But I have a few additions and caveats that I will append after quoting a few key passages from Dan's post.
2026-10-30 · assertive framing · A Libertarian Perspective on the 2026 Election
🔮 I would add, as I did in this article, that invocations of emergency powers should be subject to nondeferential judicial review, to ensure that they are used only in the event of genuine emergencies, not bogus ones.
2026-10-30 · assertive framing · New Brennan Center Report on Curbing Executive Power
🔮 Some of those who vote for the "wrong" Dan Sullivan might rank the "right" one second.
🔮 It also adopts a properly restrictive definition of "rebellion" (which is one of the conditions that might justify federalization of the National Guard).
🔮 Today, the Trump Justice Department filed a federal lawsuit seeking to block Alaska Senate election results on the grounds they might be influenced by voter "confusion" between incumbent Republican Senator Dan S. Sullivan and a separate Republican candidate with a very similar name (Dan L. Sullivan).
🔮 And I think he actually agrees with me more than the framing of his post might suggest.
2026-10-17 · assertive framing · Who Should Defend Democracy?
Also by Ilya Somin
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 30 articles by Ilya Somin →

Topics

University of Michigan

Subjects

Wolfers PERSON · 5× Trump PERSON · 4× Cass Sunstein PERSON · 1× James Madison PERSON · 1× Justin Wolfers PERSON · 1× Matt Yglesias PERSON · 1× Noah Smith PERSON · 1× University of Michigan ORG · 1× the Trump Administration ORG · 1×

Narrative

At the very least, we have common enemies in the form of two prominent political movements that very much don't appreciate the need for significant constraints on government power: MAGA nationalists on the right, and "democratic socialists" on the left.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-01
🔮 I commend Wolfers and the others for being willing to admit error and learn from it.

Claims (33 extracted, 1 hedged)

In a recent post, prominent left-liberal economist Justin Wolfers (University of Michigan) concedes that his "libertarian friends" were right about the dangers of government power: asserted
friends → concede → power
My libertarian-leaning friends have consistently argued against a powerful federal government in favor of individual freedoms. asserted
friends → lean → freedoms
I had — somewhat naively — never taken their views seriously enough. asserted
I → take → views
My friends who worked in government were good people, I reasoned, and surely that's true more broadly. asserted
that → work → government
But I've had to admit to my libertarian friends that they were right. asserted
they → have → friends
Concentration of power can be abused. asserted
Concentration → abuse → power
We're seeing it happen right now. asserted
it → see → ?
Last year, I wrote about similar admissions by two other prominent left-of-center figures: famed legal scholar Cass Sunstein and economic policy commentator Noah Smith. asserted
I → write → figures
I commend Wolfers and the others for being willing to admit error and learn from it. asserted
I → commend → it
All too many intellectuals and political commentators never do. asserted
intellectuals → do → ?
It is often the case that people become more aware of the dangers of government power when that authority is wielded by their political opponents. asserted
authority → become → opponents
Even some libertarians tend to ignore or overlook abuses of power when perpetrated by the side of the political spectrum they identify with. asserted
they → tend → spectrum
The Trump era has been a particularly significant wake-up call in that respect for some on the left, because he has engaged in so many abuses, especially in his second term. asserted
he → wake → term
But it is important to recognize that the problems here are systematic, not confined to the misdeeds of any one politician, even one so egregious as Trump. asserted
problems → recognize → Trump
As James Madison famously warned, "[e]nlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm." asserted
statesmen → warn → helm
Distinctly unenlightened demagogues like Trump all too often reach high political office. asserted
demagogues → reach → office
That's in large part because voters often do a poor job of choosing leaders, thanks to widespread political ignorance and bias. asserted
voters → do → ignorance
Trump's return to power in 2024 showed that these problems are even more severe than I had previously thought. asserted
I → show → 2024
Wolfers adds that his newfound appreciation for libertarian concerns have made him "more small-c conservative": The old conservative idea was that we have rules of the game that have served us well for generations. asserted
that → add → generations
We should be slow to change them. asserted
We → change → them
Our children should be handed the same set of opportunities we had, if not better ones. asserted
we → hand → opportunities
I only partially agree. asserted
I → agree → ?
Where established institutions constrain government power and protect liberty, we should indeed conserve them. asserted
we → establish → them
But, in too many ways, those safeguards have been eroded over the last 100 years or more, thereby creating the very dangers of abusive government power that Wolfers rightly decries. asserted
Wolfers → erode → that
To fix that, we in some instances need to restructure the current "rules of the game," and impose much tighter constraints. asserted
we → fix → constraints
For example, we should roll back federal power to impose immigration restrictions (which was not part of the original Constitution), and have much stronger enforcement of constitutional constraints on delegation of legislative power to the executive. asserted
which → roll → executive
The growth of delegation and federal immigration powers is at the heart of the many of the worst abuses of the Trump Administration, and creates severe problems even under more conventional administrations. asserted
growth → create → administrations
Similarly, the growth and institutionalization of government control over land use is at the heart of the housing crisis that besets many parts of the US. asserted
that → beset → US
We should roll that back too, by enforcing federal and state constitutional protections for property rights. asserted
We → roll → rights
Elsewhere, I have explained how these issues and others like them can be the basis of a useful alliance between libertarians and "abundance liberals" (see also my exchange with Matt Yglesias on that subject). asserted
issues → explain → subject
I suspect Wolfers may be sympathetic to the abundance liberal movement. uncertain
Wolfers → suspect → movement
We're not likely to agree on issue. asserted
We → agree → issue
At the very least, we have common enemies in the form of two prominent political movements that very much don't appreciate the need for significant constraints on government power: MAGA nationalists on the right, and "democratic socialists" on the left. asserted
that → have → left
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support