In a recent "fireside chat" before the Tenth Circuit conference, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch decried the trend towards abusive use of emergency powers (see also this slightly more detailed account):
"Everything is an emergency," he said….
asserted
he → decry → account
"We've moved so much up to the federal level that needs to be done by states.
asserted
that → move → states
And now through delegations of authority, through emergency legislation of all stripes, we've moved it over to the executive branch.
asserted
we → move → branch
And I just don't think that's a recipe for a healthy democracy over the long term."
asserted
that → think → term
We should not allow emergency powers intended to be used only in extreme situations to become a blank check that the executive can wield at will.
asserted
executive → allow → will
Sadly, we have increasingly moved in that dangerous direction.
asserted
we → move → direction
Presidents of both parties have abused emergency powers, though Trump - in his second term - has been a particularly egregious offender.
asserted
Trump → abuse → term
While much of the blame for this state of affairs rests with Congress and the executive branch, Gorsuch and other judges can help by rigorously enforcing constitutional and statutory constraints on emergency powers.
asserted
Gorsuch → rest → powers
As I outlined in more detail in a Dispatch article published last year, courts should engage in strong judicial review of both the meaning of terms like "emergency," "invasion," and "unusual and extraordinary threat," and whether the facts on the ground proves that these dangers are actually present (thereby justifying invocation of extraordinary emergency powers to deal with them).
asserted
dangers → outline → them
I also rebut the argument that courts should defer to the executive on these kinds of issues, because of the supposedly superior expertise of the latter.
asserted
courts → rebut → latter
The Supreme Court has in fact constrained executive abuse of emergency powers in several important cases, under both Biden and Trump.
asserted
Court → constrain → Biden
Notable examples include the IEEPA tariff case (which I helped litigate) and the Illinois National Guard case (both under Trump), and Biden v. Nebraska (2023) (in which the Court rightly struck down Biden's attempt to use Covid emergency powers as a pretext to forgive over $400 billion in student loan debt).
asserted
Court → include → debt
Last year, the Supreme Court also blocked Trump's efforts to swiftly deport Venezuelans under the Alien Enemies Act, a statute that can only be used in the event of an "invasion" or a "predatory incursion" on US territory by a foreign government.
asserted
that → block → government
But in each of these cases, the Court never ruled on whether an emergency, "invasion," or other extraordinary circumstance justifying the use of emergency powers was actually present.
asserted
emergency → rule → powers
It instead ruled against the executive on other grounds.
asserted
It → rule → grounds
In one of the "shadow docket" cases involving the Alien Enemies Act, the Court did rule that the meaning of "invasion" and other terms in the Act is subject to judicial review.
asserted
meaning → involve → review
But it did not address the question of deference on factual issues.
asserted
it → address → issues
Thus, the extent to which the Court is willing to constrain abuses of emergency powers remains at least somewhat unclear.
uncertain
Court → constrain → powers
To his credit, back in 2022, Justice Gorsuch broke with the other conservative justices, and (along with the three liberals) dissented from a procedural decision that, in effect, required Biden to continue the abusive use of Covid emergency powers as a tool for immigration restrictions.
asserted
that → break → restrictions
As Gorsuch put it in his dissent, "courts should not be in the business of perpetuating administrative edicts designed for one emergency only because elected officials have failed to address a different emergency."
asserted
officials → put → emergency
Judicial review cannot fully solve the problem of abusive use of emergency powers on its own.
asserted
review → solve → own
As noted in my Dispatch article, Congress needs to step in and take measures such as setting strict time limits on executive-declared invocations of emergencies.
asserted
Congress → note → emergencies
But the judiciary can, nonetheless, play a valuable role in preventing extraordinary emergency powers from becoming a blank check the president can use whenever he wants.
asserted
he → play → powers
And, while we cannot rely on the judiciary alone to police abuses of emergency powers, we should also avoid the opposite error of relying solely on Congress.
asserted
we → rely → Congress
As Gorsuch points out in his compelling concurring opinion in the tariff case, it is very difficult for Congress to pull back delegations of power, if courts interpret them overbroadly:
When a private agent oversteps, a principal may fix that problem prospectively by withdrawing the agent's authority.
uncertain
principal → point → authority
Once this Court reads a doubtful statute as granting the executive branch a given power, that power may prove almost impossible for Congress to retrieve.
uncertain
Congress → read → power
Perhaps Congress can use other tools, including its appropriation authority, to influence how the President exercises his new power.
asserted
President → use → power
Maybe Congress can sometimes even leverage those tools to induce the President to withhold a veto.
asserted
Congress → leverage → veto
But retrieving a lost power is no easy business in our constitutional order.
asserted
retrieving → retrieve → order
And without doctrines like major questions, our system of separated powers and checks-and-balances threatens to give way to the continual and permanent accretion of power in the hands of one man.
asserted
system → threaten → man
That is all the more reason for the judiciary to rigorously enforce statutory and constitutional constraints on the scope of delegated powers - especially when we are talking about sweeping emergency powers that endanger civil liberties, threaten the stability of the economy, and have other potentially massive effects.
asserted
that → enforce → effects
If anyone has access to the full text of Gorsuch's talk at the Tenth Circuit conference, please send it to me, if you can.
asserted
you → have → me
For those keeping score, I also called for rigorous judicial review of invocations of emergency powers under Biden.
asserted
I → keep → Biden
The Aporia
