Photo via The Guardian

Green party votes to adopt policy that equates Zionism with racism

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Walker, P. (2026, October 4). Green party votes to adopt policy that equates Zionism with racism. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/oct/04/green-party-votes-adopt-policy-zionism-racism

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-10-04 · by Peter Walker

Quick Summary

At the Green party's annual conference in Brighton, members voted to adopt a policy equating Zionism with racism. The motion passed by a margin of 1,022 to 813 and calls for treating Zionism as any other form of racism while advocating for a single Palestinian state with equal rights. Some Jewish party members are concerned this could make it difficult for them to remain in the party, while senior figures like former leader Caroline Lucas have condemned the motion.
Written by AI on 2026-10-04, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The Green Party of England and Wales adopted a policy at its annual conference on October 1, 2026, equating Zionism with racism. The motion also calls for the establishment of a single democratic Palestinian state encompassing all of historic Palestine, including Jerusalem as its capital. This move has sparked significant backlash from various quarters:

In response to this controversy, Zack Polanski, leader of the Green Party, issued a statement asserting that the party will protect both Palestinian rights and Jewish communities. He emphasized distinguishing between criticism of Israel and antisemitism while reiterating his commitment to ensuring everyone feels safe and welcome within the party.

The decision has also drawn international attention, with the United States reportedly set to make representations regarding the policy's implications for anti-Semitism in Britain. This move reflects the global concern over the potential ramifications of such policies on Jewish communities internationally.

Written for “Green Party Zionism Vote Controversy” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 35 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Green Party Zionism Vote Controversy
Politics · 36 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Dawn
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 17 claims Outlet record 72/100
National Post
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 13 claims Outlet record 60/100
Evening Standard
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 16 claims Outlet record 65/100
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 9 of 85 claims Outlet record 66/100
New York Post
Hedges 2 of 17 claims Outlet record 66/100
Evening Standard
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 0 of 17 claims Outlet record 65/100
BBC News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 6 of 26 claims Outlet record 68/100
Evening Standard
Hedges 0 of 36 claims Outlet record 65/100
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 1 of 18 claims Outlet record 66/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
24
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
3 of 24 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
36
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-04 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2758 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Peter Walker
12 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The prime minister said he hoped to have all four UK nations moving at the same pace on devolution, particularly on efforts outlined in Wednesday’s budget to give mayors in England more powers over tax revenues.
🔮 Healey’s opening remarks John Healey starts by saying that his budget is “delivered at a time when global uncertainties and pressures are swirling worldwide and hitting people here at home”. He says the administration will have a new approach to steer us through global economic storms and give people fresh hope for Britain’s future.
2026-10-28 · assertive framing · Budget 2026: key points at a glance
🔮 The UK government has approved the controversial Jackdaw gasfield in the North Sea, a widely expected move that will nonetheless dismay environmental campaigners and a number of Labour MPs.
2026-10-21 · assertive framing · UK approves Jackdaw gasfield in North Sea
🔮 While the result was broadly as predicted, Labour strategists were buoyed up by the party’s relatively straightforward route to victory in a diverse inner-city area of the sort the Greens have been targeting with recent success.
🔮 “Your viewers will know that sometimes you have a football team that’s disappointing,” the Tory leader told GB News.
🔮 Senior Labour party figures said it is very unlikely their party would cooperate with the Greens in the future after they adopted a policy treating Zionism as a form of racism.
🔮 The English and Welsh Greens are facing international ostracism after adopting a policy declaring Zionism as a form of racism, which has drawn dismay from the group representing European Greens.
🔮 The Greens have formally adopted a policy which equates Zionism with racism, a move that will dismay the bulk of the party’s MPs and has alarmed some Jewish members.
🔮 After Trump savaged the three-way plan as “a terrible deal” during a meeting with Andy Burnham at the UN general assembly, the prime minister said he was “confident” the UK would be able to find a solution to revive the idea.
🔮 When he addresses the faithful on the final day of the gathering in Brighton, the party leader will call for a global pause on super-intelligent AI, comparing it to a nuclear arms race that could result in technology that could “destroy us all”. Davey is expected to lay out plans in his speech on Tuesday for a new international AI safety agency – modelled on the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and headquartered in the UK, after numerous warnings from AI researchers that artificial intelligence could wipe out humanity within the decade.
Also by Peter Walker
Budget 2026: key points at a glance
2026-10-28 · The Guardian
UK approves Jackdaw gasfield in North Sea
2026-10-21 · The Guardian
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 12 articles by Peter Walker →

Topics

Greens Jewish Palestinian Zionism Zionists

Subjects

Greens ORG · 6× Jewish NORP · 6× Zionism NORP · 5× Palestinian NORP · 3× Zionists NORP · 3× Green PERSON · 2× Israel GPE · 2× Jews NORP · 2× Polanski PERSON · 2× Brighton ORG · 1×

Narrative

The party leader, who missed the vote to campaign in Holborn and St Pancras, where he is standing in a parliamentary byelection next week, has justified the motion’s argument by noting the extent of the death toll in Gaza during Israel’s assault on the territory.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-04
🔮 The Greens have formally adopted a policy which equates Zionism with racism, a move that will dismay the bulk of the party’s MPs and has alarmed some Jewish members.
2026-10-04 · The Guardian
Green party votes to adopt policy that equates Zionism with racism · assertive framing

Claims (24 extracted, 3 hedged)

The Greens have formally adopted a policy which equates Zionism with racism, a move that will dismay the bulk of the party’s MPs and has alarmed some Jewish members. asserted
that → adopt → members
In a vote on Sunday at the party’s annual conference in Brighton about whether to back a motion which calls for Zionism, the movement for a Jewish state, to be “treated as any other form of racism”, it passed by 1,022 votes to 813. asserted
it → back → 813
The motion, which is now formal policy for the Greens in England and Wales, also calls for a single Palestinian state in place of Israel “with equal rights for all”. asserted
which → call → all
In earlier voting, an amendment ensuring other parts of Green policy were updated to take account of the motion was backed. asserted
parts → ensure → motion
Three other amendments, including one that said the motion should not be used to “pressure, proscribe or discipline members based on affiliation with Jewish community institutions”, were voted down. asserted
motion → include → institutions
The primary motion, titled “Zionism is racism”, had been pushed by a group called Greens for Palestine, which encouraged non-party members to sign up to the party to make sure the policy was debated and adopted. asserted
policy → title → party
The motion argues that Zionism is necessarily racist as it “privileges one ethnic group on the basis of the subjugation of others”. asserted
it → argue → others
It adds: “This motion is aimed at the political ideology and practice of Zionism, as defined, and not at the religious or ethnic background of those who may identify as Zionists. uncertain
who → add → Zionists
“Zionism, as defined above, will be treated as any other form of racism, and this motion will be implemented by the anti-racism policy working group as appropriate and in accordance with its ordinary practice.” asserted
motion → define → practice
Some Jewish Greens have said privately they are worried the policy could make it difficult for them to remain in the party. uncertain
them → say → party
A poll by the group Jewish Greens found its membership was split over whether to oppose the motion, while 81% said they did not identify as Zionist. asserted
they → find → Zionist
The group is expected to comment publicly on the vote only after consulting members. asserted
group → expect → members
There is considerable disquiet among some senior Greens who feel that Zack Polanski, who is Jewish, could have taken a stronger stance on the issue. uncertain
who → be → issue
The party leader, who missed the vote to campaign in Holborn and St Pancras, where he is standing in a parliamentary byelection next week, has justified the motion’s argument by noting the extent of the death toll in Gaza during Israel’s assault on the territory. asserted
he → miss → territory
Asked on Saturday if he believed Zionism was racist, Polanski told the BBC: “Well, in the motion, it is defined as the displacement and genocide of the Palestinian people. asserted
it → ask → people
I think that is clearly racism.” asserted
that → think → ?
Four of the party’s five MPs have condemned the motion, as did Caroline Lucas, the former leader who was the Greens’ first MP. asserted
who → condemn → motion
Adrian Ramsay, who co-led the Greens before Polanski, said in a statement he would vote against it, as it set out what sort of Palestinian state should exist without taking into account the self-determination of Israelis and Palestinians. asserted
sort → co → Israelis
Siân Berry, another of the MPs, made the same point. asserted
Berry → make → point
Carla Denyer, the Bristol Central MP who was co-leader with Ramsay, said the wording “risks alienating a significant proportion of Jewish people, including those who vehemently disagree with the Israeli government”. asserted
who → say → government
Another Green MP, Ellie Chowns, said the motion “risks fuelling division, and risks undermining the party’s ability to advocate effectively for justice and peace”. asserted
motion → say → justice
She said in a statement: “Zionism is a contested concept with no single definition. asserted
Zionism → say → definition
If this motion passes, the party risks alienating many people, including in Jewish communities. asserted
party → pass → communities
Defining a highly personal and variable identity simply as racism risks reinforcing exactly the zero-sum politics we desperately need to get beyond.” asserted
we → define → politics
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support