Photo via The Globe and Mail

Ex-defendant apologizes to Steven Galloway as defamation trial set to begin

Read the original at The Globe and Mail ↗
Cite

Hannay, C. (2026, October 5). Ex-defendant apologizes to Steven Galloway as defamation trial set to begin. The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-ex-defendant-apologizes-to-steven-galloway-as-defamation-trial-set-to/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Globe and Mail · collected 2026-10-05 · by Chris Hannay
Content note This article describes sexual violence.

Quick Summary

A defamation trial involving novelist Steven Galloway and four former defendants is set to begin on Monday in Vancouver. One of the former defendants, Chelsea Rooney, has apologized for her role in spreading accusations against Galloway, who claims these false allegations destroyed his life and career. The case originally included two dozen defendants but now focuses on Mandi Gray, Dana Kagis, Glynnis Kirchmeier, and A.B., the woman who first accused Galloway of sexual assault. This trial follows years of legal battles stemming from accusations that began in 2015 at the University of British Columbia.
Written by AI on 2026-10-05, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In 2015, Steven Galloway, a prominent creative writing professor at UBC (University of British Columbia), faced serious sexual assault allegations from a student referred to as A.B.. One accuser, Chelsea Rooney, circulated these unproven accusations and worked to gather more evidence against him, contributing to the damage to his reputation and career. A retired judge later found that Galloway's alleged actions were unsubstantiated. Ahead of an upcoming defamation trial in Vancouver at the B.C. Supreme Court, Rooney issued a public apology on her conduct, acknowledging the harm caused by spreading unproven allegations and failing to give Galloway a fair chance to defend himself. The trial involves four defendants, including Rooney, who have been accused of perpetuating false claims against Galloway.

Written for “Defamation Trial Apologies” on 2026-10-30, grounded in this article and the 3 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Defamation Trial Apologies
Crime & Law · 4 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 17% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Toronto Star
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 64/100
The Globe and Mail
Hedges 2 of 20 claims Outlet record 52/100
National Post
Hedges 2 of 42 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe related events but different moments: one is about Chelsea Rooney's initial role in spreading allegations against Steven Galloway, and the other is about her apology years later ahead of a defamation trial.”
CBC News
Hedges 3 of 27 claims Outlet record 74/100
“The articles describe different stages of the defamation trial; Article A reports an apology ahead of the trial starting, while Article B covers testimony on Day 1.”
CBC News
Hedges 1 of 26 claims Outlet record 74/100
“The articles describe different parts of the same broader legal proceedings: one is about an apology from a former defendant, while the other covers testimony given by Steven Galloway in the trial.”
CBC News
Hedges 5 of 35 claims Outlet record 74/100
“Article A discusses an apology from a former defendant ahead of the trial, while Article B describes Galloway's testimony during the trial about how the allegations affected his career.”
The Globe and Mail
Hedges 0 of 10 claims Outlet record 52/100
“While both articles discuss the defamation trial involving Steven Galloway, Article A focuses on a former defendant's apology ahead of the trial, whereas Article B reports that one accuser will not testify and does not rely on certain defenses. These appear to be different aspects of the broader event.”
National Post
Hedges 4 of 60 claims Outlet record 60/100
“While both articles are related to Steven Galloway's defamation trial, they describe different aspects of the proceedings: one focuses on a former defendant's apology before the trial starts, while the other covers Galloway's testimony during the trial.”
The Globe and Mail
Hedges 2 of 24 claims Outlet record 52/100
“Article A describes a public apology by one former defendant ahead of the defamation trial, while Article B details Steven Galloway's testimony during the ongoing trial about his book sales. The articles describe different parts of the same broader legal process but are not describing the exact same event.”
The Globe and Mail
Hedges 2 of 27 claims Outlet record 52/100
“The articles describe different parts of the defamation trial process: one focuses on a former defendant's apology before the trial, while the other covers Steven Galloway's testimony during the trial.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
30
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
17%
5 of 30 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
52/100
The Globe and Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
4
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-05 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Globe and Mail · 1010 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Chris Hannay
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The charity, which runs the blood system everywhere in Canada but Quebec, would not provide any details about the donor, where the incident happened or precisely when it occurred, preferring to say it happened “earlier in the fall.”
🔮 A high-profile defamation trial of several people novelist Steven Galloway says perpetuated false sexual-assault allegations against him is set to begin Monday.
🔮 Mr. Gill often went twice a week as one of the ways he gives back to his community, he said – and getting paid up to $70 each time, which he would not be at a Canadian Blood Services centre, was a perk, too.
🔮 The company voluntarily stopped collecting plasma in Canada on Aug. 14, saying the pause would be temporary as it worked through improvements to address Health Canada’s concerns. Rodiyat Alabede, a 22-year-old university student, began experiencing cardiac problems during a donation at a Grifols site on Taylor Avenue last October and was pronounced dead at hospital about an hour later. Health Canada told media there was “no linkage” between Ms. Alabede’s death and the donation activity.
🔮 Grifols said it would use the temporary closure to retrain staff and work with Health Canada and CBS to improve its operations.
Also by Chris Hannay
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

A.B. UBC Vancouver the B.C. Court of Appeal the University of British Columbia

Subjects

Galloway PERSON · 11× A.B. PERSON · 3× Rooney PERSON · 3× UBC ORG · 3× Twitter ORG · 2× Chelsea Rooney PERSON · 1× Daniel Burnett PERSON · 1× Steven Galloway PERSON · 1× Vancouver GPE · 1× the University of British Columbia ORG · 1×

Narrative

Ahead of the trial, one former defendant, Chelsea Rooney, who was a student of Mr. Galloway’s when he taught at the University of British Columbia, released a public apology for what she characterized as her “harmful” conduct in spreading accusations against Mr. Galloway.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-05
🔮 A high-profile defamation trial of several people novelist Steven Galloway says perpetuated false sexual-assault allegations against him is set to begin Monday.
2026-10-05 · The Globe and Mail
Ex-defendant apologizes to Steven Galloway as defamation trial set to begin · assertive framing

Claims (30 extracted, 5 hedged)

A high-profile defamation trial of several people novelist Steven Galloway says perpetuated false sexual-assault allegations against him is set to begin Monday. asserted
Galloway → say → him
The case will be heard against four defendants, down from the original two dozen listed when the case was first filed eight years ago. asserted
case → hear → dozen
Ahead of the trial, one former defendant, Chelsea Rooney, who was a student of Mr. Galloway’s when he taught at the University of British Columbia, released a public apology for what she characterized as her “harmful” conduct in spreading accusations against Mr. Galloway. asserted
she → teach → Galloway
“Everyone deserves fairness, including Mr. Galloway, who was the subject of very serious allegations,” Ms. Rooney said in a statement, posted online alongside the apologies of eight others. asserted
Rooney → deserve → others
She said she regrets playing a role in collecting and soliciting complaints about Mr. Galloway, and building a case against him. asserted
she → say → him
The trial is set to begin Monday in Vancouver against four defendants, according to Mr. Galloway’s long-time lawyer, Daniel Burnett: Mandi Gray, Dana Kagis, Glynnis Kirchmeier and the woman who originally accused him of sexual assault, A.B., whose identity is covered by a publication ban. uncertain
identity → set → ban
Mr. Burnett said Ms. Rooney is one of six defendants who recently settled. asserted
who → say → defendants
Two of the others settled in the summer and three settled previously. asserted
three → settle → summer
Of the other originally named defendants, some could not be identified or pursued, and one had the claim against them dismissed. uncertain
claim → name → them
The case concerns allegations that rocked the literary community and that have tested courts on questions of whether an accused person’s attempts to defend themself contribute to the stigma of reporting sexual assaults. asserted
attempts → concern → assaults
The years-long legal battle traces back to an accusation made against Mr. Galloway in 2015 by a former student when he was a UBC professor. asserted
he → trace → student
The two had sexual relations between 2011 and 2013 that Mr. Galloway has described as consensual and his student has characterized as abusive. asserted
student → have → that
The student is referred to as A.B. in legal filings. asserted
student → refer → filings
UBC fired Mr. Galloway but a retired judge hired by the university to investigate A.B.’s complaint found that, on a balance of probabilities, it could not be established he committed sexual assault or assault. uncertain
he → fire → assault
He was not charged by police. asserted
He → charge → police
In 2018, Mr. Galloway sued A.B. and nearly two dozen other people for making comments that he sexually and physically assaulted A.B. asserted
he → sue → A.B.
He says the allegations are false and have destroyed his life and career. asserted
allegations → say → life
The case has wound through various courts over the years as judges have had to weigh whether those accused of sexual assault have a right to sue their accusers for defamation. asserted
those → wind → defamation
In 2024, the B.C. Court of Appeal upheld a lower-court decision that said someone accused of being a rapist must be allowed to defend their reputations in court. asserted
someone → uphold → court
When the accusations against Mr. Galloway first surfaced, sexual misconduct by powerful men was rising in the public consciousness. asserted
misconduct → surface → consciousness
Once-admired celebrities were facing allegations that would eventually lead to the #MeToo movement. asserted
that → admire → movement
Margaret Atwood, the popular Canadian author who has written publicly about what she says was a lack of due process afforded to Mr. Galloway, told The Globe and Mail she hopes the trial finally reveals the truth of what happened a decade ago. asserted
what → write → truth
“It was a time of mobbing on Twitter, and this was a Twitter mob, but it was also a time of moral panic,” Ms. Atwood said. Ms. Kirchmeier, one of the defendants, is a U.S. citizen who attended UBC from 2011 to 2013 to study and earn a master’s degree in history. asserted
who → say → history
She said she is being sued for comments she made on Twitter (now called X) in 2018. asserted
she → say → 2018
She said in a legal response to the suit that the tweet at issue was taken out of context and argues her remarks represent fair comment on a matter of public interest. asserted
remarks → say → interest
She said she is representing herself because she does not currently have money for a lawyer. asserted
she → say → lawyer
“I’m prepared,” she said by phone on Sunday evening. asserted
she → ’m → evening
Lawyers for Ms. Rooney, A.B. and Ms. Gray did not respond to a request for comment Sunday. asserted
Lawyers → respond → comment
Ms. Kagis could not be reached. uncertain
Kagis → reach → ?
A.B. is not expected to testify at trial because of mental-health challenges, according to a decision released in June by Justice Neena Sharma. uncertain
A.B. → expect → Sharma
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support