Photo via National Post

Jamie Sarkonak: ‘It got insane,’ Galloway recounts years living in Kafkaesque nightmare

Read the original at National Post ↗
Cite

Sarkonak, J. (2026, October 8). Jamie Sarkonak: ‘It got insane,’ Galloway recounts years living in Kafkaesque nightmare. National Post. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/jamie-sarkonak-it-got-insane-galloway-recounts-years-living-in-kafkaesque-nightmare

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

National Post · collected 2026-10-08 · by Jamie Sarkonak analysis

Quick Summary

Steven Galloway, a former UBC professor and author, is currently testifying in his defamation trial, denying sexual assault allegations made by his former paramour, identified only as A.B., due to a publication ban. In court on Wednesday, Galloway stated that the alleged incident where he choked A.B. on his boat never occurred, arguing it was physically impossible and contradicted their history of consensual affairs from 2011 to 2013. The retired judge who investigated these allegations in 2016 found them unsubstantiated based on a balance of probabilities. Galloway’s lawyer is permitted to present his version of events despite A.B.’s decision not to argue the truthfulness of her claims during this defamation trial.
Written by AI on 2026-10-08, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Steven Galloway, a bestselling Canadian author and former University of British Columbia (UBC) professor, is suing four individuals for defamation related to false sexual assault allegations. In 2015, Galloway was accused by a former student, identified only as A.B., leading UBC to fire him shortly after launching an investigation. Testifying at the B.C. Supreme Court trial in Vancouver, Galloway claimed he was "shocked" upon learning of the accusations and denied all allegations of sexual assault. His wife testified on day one that Galloway had been hospitalized on a 72-hour suicide watch when she arrived to support him after the accusation surfaced while he was in Ohio.

Galloway’s testimony detailed how their affair, which ended amicably in 2013, was followed by A.B. filing a sexual harassment complaint with UBC three years later. He stated that none of the specific incidents alleged occurred and maintained his innocence. The defamation lawsuit, launched after A.B.'s claims went public, has had a significant impact on Galloway’s career; book sales "cratered" to about $5,000 to $10,000 annually from previous higher royalties. He also testified that he can no longer write due to the stress and trauma caused by these unproven allegations.

Written for “Galloway Defamation Trial” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 6 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Galloway Defamation Trial
Politics · 7 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Globe and Mail
Hedges 1 of 33 claims Outlet record 52/100
CBC News
Hedges 5 of 35 claims Outlet record 74/100
“The articles describe different days and aspects of Steven Galloway's testimony in a defamation trial.”
The Globe and Mail
Hedges 2 of 24 claims Outlet record 52/100
“The articles describe different parts of Steven Galloway's defamation trial, with Article A focusing on his testimony about alleged sexual assaults and Article B discussing the impact of the allegations on his career.”
Toronto Star
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A discusses a court decision granting anonymity to a defendant in Steven Galloway's defamation case, while Article B focuses on Galloway's testimony during his trial regarding the alleged sexual assaults.”
The Globe and Mail
Hedges 5 of 30 claims Outlet record 52/100
“While both articles are related to Steven Galloway's defamation trial, they describe different aspects of the proceedings: one focuses on a former defendant's apology before the trial starts, while the other covers Galloway's testimony during the trial.”
CBC News
Hedges 1 of 26 claims Outlet record 74/100
“While both articles discuss Steven Galloway's testimony in a defamation trial related to sexual assault allegations, they describe different aspects of his testimony and do not appear to cover the exact same specific incident.”
CBC News
Hedges 3 of 27 claims Outlet record 74/100
“Article A describes testimony from Day 1 of Steven Galloway's defamation trial by his wife, while Article B reports on Galloway's own testimony on a different day recounting the alleged events.”
Toronto Star
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A discusses an apology from one of Galloway's accusers before a defamation trial starts, while Article B covers testimony during the defamation trial itself.”
The Globe and Mail
Hedges 0 of 10 claims Outlet record 52/100
“The articles refer to different parts of the defamation trial; Article A is about the accuser's decision not to testify at the start of the trial, while Article B reports on Galloway's testimony later in the same trial.”
The Globe and Mail
Hedges 2 of 27 claims Outlet record 52/100
“The articles describe different days of testimony in the same trial but cover distinct statements and events.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
60
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
4 of 60 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
60/100
National Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
7
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-08 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

National Post · 1241 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jamie Sarkonak
23 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Later, BioWare proved it could bring its formula for rich characters, story and combat to its own original worlds.
2026-10-26 · assertive framing · Jamie Sarkonak: BioWare abandoned what made it great
🔮 It seems like only yesterday that the Toronto mayoral election appeared to be a foregone conclusion.
🔮 Barely two weeks before America’s crucial midterm elections, Black voters could very well emerge as the unanticipated kingmakers in key state races nationwide.
🔮 They also show that two weeks prior to the calling of B.C.’s snap election, the government committed to changing the province’s Forest Act to limit how much forestry companies could be compensated for tenure loss.
🔮 His lagging poll numbers may as well have been written on his face.
2026-10-15 · assertive framing · Amy Hamm: David Eby’s failure of an election debate
🔮 You’d think a municipal ward with the name “Toronto Centre” would be the last electoral district to turn its back on a left-wing incumbent.
🔮 He said he couldn’t comprehend a situation where you would choke a woman and ask her if it was that bad.
🔮 “I should have understood that supporting people who come forward about sexual violence does not require, and cannot justify, acting in ways that may lead others to conclude that unproven allegations are true or failing to give the person accused a fair opportunity to be heard and considered.”
🔮 No one is questioning historical inquiry, but using public money to draw a line from “colonial land policies” to today’s private landowners and business operators amounts to a political campaign that will have consequences.
🔮 Which, if you think about it, might as well strike out the entire Criminal Code.
Also by Jamie Sarkonak
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 23 articles by Jamie Sarkonak →

Topics

A.B. Canada UBC the B.C. Supreme Court

Subjects

Galloway PERSON · 15× A.B. PERSON · 8× Canada GPE · 1× Neela Sharma PERSON · 1× Steven Galloway PERSON · 1× UBC ORG · 1× the B.C. Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

In 2016, when a “tsunami of vitriol and hatred” engulfed the signatories of an open letter urging that Galloway be treated fairly, he released an apology through counsel for his conduct despite the retired judge’s finding that he had not committed sexual assault.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-08
🔮 He said he couldn’t comprehend a situation where you would choke a woman and ask her if it was that bad.

Claims (60 extracted, 4 hedged)

On Wednesday, author and former UBC professor Steven Galloway testified in court at his defamation trial that none of the sexual assaults alleged against him by his former paramour ever happened. asserted
none → testify → paramour
That woman, who can only be identified as A.B. due to a publication ban, told the retired judge tasked with investigating Galloway back in 2016 that the first sexual assault happened on his boat. asserted
assault → identify → boat
A.B. claimed that they were chatting and playing cards when Galloway suddenly tried to kiss her, and when she leaned away, he grabbed her neck tightly to the point where it was difficult to breathe, kissed her, and said, “That wasn’t so bad, was it?” asserted
it → claim → her
Recommended Videos Then, went the allegation, he grabbed her and threw her in the bunk space above; she somehow got down, disembarked, and, though she had no memory of it, ended up at her home. asserted
she → go → home
“That never happened,” Galloway told the B.C. Supreme Court. asserted
Galloway → happen → Court
“It’s hard to know how to dismantle (the allegation) because the entire story is fictional.” asserted
story → ’ → allegation
He said he couldn’t comprehend a situation where you would choke a woman and ask her if it was that bad. asserted
it → say → her
The story also didn’t make sense given the size and configuration of the boat’s bunk. asserted
story → make → bunk
“The idea that I could physically lift her up and throw her into such a space without causing major injury to a person is … just not possible,” he testified. uncertain
he → lift → person
Galloway and A.B. had a consensual affair from 2011 to 2013. asserted
Galloway → have → 2013
A.B. first accused him of sexual assault to the university in July 2013, but it wasn’t until 2015 that he — and the rest of Canada — became aware that such allegations existed. asserted
allegations → accuse → Canada
In a matter of days, Galloway’s career was destroyed. asserted
career → destroy → days
In 2018, Galloway filed a lawsuit against numerous defendants who repeated A.B.’s claims, as well as A.B. herself. uncertain
who → file → claims
Most defendants settled before the trial, which began Monday. asserted
which → settle → trial
In court, Galloway said that he hadn’t taken the boat out at all in March 2011, but there were instances where he and A.B. would use it, sometimes at her initiation. asserted
he → say → initiation
She would remark to him that it was a beautiful day to go sailing. asserted
it → remark → sailing
Galloway recalled that she had even asked to go sailing with him because, she told him, her husband’s violent brother was in town and she wanted a safe space. asserted
she → recall → space
The retired judge who investigated A.B.’s allegations in 2016 found that they were unsubstantiated, and that the sexual assault did not occur, based on a balance of probabilities. asserted
assault → investigate → probabilities
Now, A.B. will not be testifying to their truth at the ongoing defamation trial, nor will her lawyers be arguing the defence of truth. asserted
lawyers → testify → truth
It was on this basis that A.B.’s lawyer objected to Galloway’s testimony about his boat. asserted
lawyer → object → boat
The lawyer argued that because A.B. wasn’t going to argue that her allegations were true, and because the allegations made during the independent investigation weren’t the specific subject of the lawsuit, Galloway’s version of events was irrelevant to the court. asserted
version → argue → court
Justice Neela Sharma ruled against the objection and gave several reasons why A.B.’s lawyer was wrong in law. asserted
lawyer → rule → law
Galloway was thus free to speak to the second allegation against him, which arose from an end-of-semester party for the department that also occurred in March 2011. asserted
that → speak → March
A.B. claimed that Galloway had offered to drive her home, but they ended up at his office where she purportedly woke up, naked, to him attempting to force himself upon her. asserted
him → claim → her
“None of that happened,” Galloway testified in response. asserted
Galloway → happen → response
While he did recall having intercourse with her that night, there was no scene where she woke up on her back naked to an attempted sexual assault. asserted
she → recall → assault
On Tuesday, he testified that their relationship was entirely consensual and that she routinely sought him out for contact. asserted
she → testify → contact
Regarding the third sexual assault allegation, which was said to have occurred on May 5, 2011, Galloway testified that it was “entirely false.” uncertain
it → regard → May
Once again, A.B. claimed that she woke up naked in Galloway’s office — but this time, there was semen coming out of her vagina and her assailant was at his computer watching hockey. asserted
assailant → claim → hockey
Galloway told the court that “This is not a situation where there were two people in a room, and there was a disagreement about what happened” — rather, he was not in the room to begin with. asserted
he → tell → room
He was at Koerner’s Pub watching the Canucks game with a friend, and afterward attended a reading by another author who was visiting campus. asserted
who → watch → campus
As proof, Galloway’s lawyer presented the court with a text message chain starting at 6:41 p.m. (11 minutes after the game’s start time), in which Galloway’s friend wrote, “We are watching game at koerners if you’re early.” asserted
you → present → koerners
Galloway asked the friend to order him a burger and said he’d be there in 20 minutes. asserted
he → ask → minutes
Galloway added that he couldn’t stream games in his office in 2011. asserted
he → add → 2011
The rest of Galloway’s Wednesday testimony painted a picture of a Kafkaesque maze through university procedure and beyond. asserted
rest → paint → procedure
When it came to his initial suspension, it was “verdict first, trial second.” asserted
it → come → suspension
When the retired judge began her investigation into the allegations, in 2015 Galloway had to sign a confidentiality agreement: asserted
Galloway → retire → agreement
“I could agree to these terms of this investigation, or I could be terminated,” he said. uncertain
he → agree → investigation
He would be terminated anyway. asserted
He → terminate → ?
Throughout the investigation, his accuser’s name was omitted. asserted
name → omit → investigation
…and 20 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support