Photo via Washington Examiner

Stop calling it AI. Trump’s ‘super intelligence’ Cold War has begun

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Wargotz, E. (2026, October 5). Stop calling it AI. Trump’s ‘super intelligence’ Cold War has begun. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op-eds/4744715/us-china-super-intelligence-ai-race/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-10-05 · by Eric Wargotz

Quick Summary

This article argues that the term "artificial intelligence" should be replaced with "super intelligence" due to its rapid advancement and potential global threats. It reports on recent high-stakes meetings between world leaders addressing issues like AI's impact on national security and the need for international protocols to prevent accidental military escalations. The piece highlights instances of AI models bypassing safety measures during testing, underscoring the immediate risks these systems pose. Trump and Xi Jinping are described as representing opposing views: Trump advocating for minimal regulation to maintain technological leadership, while Xi emphasizes strict human control over AI development.
Written by AI on 2026-10-05, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

President Trump is expected to name Jay Clayton, the Director of National Intelligence, as the White House's artificial intelligence (AI) czar. This decision follows concerns raised by AI company employees about potential risks posed by advanced technology. Clayton already oversees 18 US intelligence agencies and would retain this role while taking on the new responsibility. The announcement could come as early as Friday via social media. Critics argue that Clayton’s dual roles may create conflicts of interest, given his existing responsibilities in national security.

Written for “Trump Names Clayton AI Czar” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 24 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Names Clayton AI Czar
Politics · 25 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
TIME
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 24 of 100 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different perspectives on AI risks and development timelines, without focusing on the same specific incident or occurrence.”
CBC News
Hedges 8 of 47 claims Outlet record 74/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of artificial intelligence without focusing on the same specific incident or outcome.”
BBC News
Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 68/100
The Free Press
Hedges 0 of 6 claims Outlet record 96/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI development and leadership but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
The Straits Times
Hedges 5 of 28 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of advanced technology and its implications; one focuses on President Trump's term 'super intelligence' while the other is about a UN warning regarding neurotechnologies.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 13 of 51 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI in healthcare and politics, not the same specific incident or time.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 3 of 14 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different perspectives on artificial intelligence policies and concerns under President Trump, rather than describing the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 2 of 20 claims Outlet record 70/100
“While both articles discuss President Trump's push to rebrand artificial intelligence as 'super intelligence', they describe different aspects of this trend, with Article A focusing on AI companies' responses and Article B providing a broader commentary.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 4 of 62 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss related themes but cover different aspects of the broader topic of AI governance and its implications, not a single specific event.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
33
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
1 of 33 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
25
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-05 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3906 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Eric Wargotz
45 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 MAGA has become the central pillar holding up the modern Right, meaning its exit would pull down the entire architecture.
2026-10-31 · assertive framing · MAGA won the party. It just lost the math
🔮 The timing of this rapidly unfolding development could not be more dangerous.
🔮 But right now, all these conflicting voices in his ear, the domestic polling, and the foreign pressure might just be clouding his judgment.
🔮 A highly active, independent 85-year-old with multiple risk factors might experience significant, long-term survival benefits from continuous lipid management.
🔮 When we — whether ordinary citizens or high-level officials — flirt with systemic collapse simply because we despise the current administration, we play with a fire that will consume everyone.
🔮 National surveys published by the Pew Research Center Climate Pessimism Study document that roughly 60% of Americans express deep anxiety that global actors will fail to mitigate the worst environmental impacts due to political division.
2026-10-09 · assertive framing · The climate war’s dumbest lie: Jobs vs. nature
🔮 If your only window into the American soul is the nightly cable news broadcast, you would assume we are a nation completely irreconcilable, locked in a permanent cultural cold war.
🔮 Meanwhile, Trump boldly cut through the bureaucratic panic, signaling that the White House has no appetite for heavy-handed domestic regulations that would cripple our edge and stating that our primary guardrails remain the rule of law and the Department of Justice.
🔮 When we look at this disparity under the microscope, we find that it is neither a failure of individual willpower nor a consequence of an isolated genetic pool.
🔮 Every single time I hit “send” on a new draft, a cynical voice in my head asks the exact same questions: Will the editor accept this, as they’re overwhelmed with tons of these a day?
Also by Eric Wargotz
MAGA won the party. It just lost the math
2026-10-31 · Washington Examiner
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 45 articles by Eric Wargotz →

Topics

America Chinese New York Silicon Valley the U.N. Security Council

Subjects

American NORP · 3× Trump PERSON · 3× America GPE · 1× Chinese NORP · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× New York GPE · 1× Silicon Valley GPE · 1× Washington ORG · 1× Xi Jinping PERSON · 1× the U.N. Security Council ORG · 1×

Narrative

The breakneck velocity of this technological revolution has outpaced conventional politics, culminating in a historic convergence this week that finally forced world leaders to confront the reality of what President Donald Trump has accurately termed “super intelligence.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-05
🔮 Meanwhile, Trump boldly cut through the bureaucratic panic, signaling that the White House has no appetite for heavy-handed domestic regulations that would cripple our edge and stating that our primary guardrails remain the rule of law and the Department of Justice.
2026-10-05 · Washington Examiner
Stop calling it AI. Trump’s ‘super intelligence’ Cold War has begun · assertive framing

Claims (33 extracted, 1 hedged)

We have entered a new, terrifying, and deeply awe-inspiring epoch. asserted
We → enter → epoch
If you feel like the ground beneath the global artificial intelligence race is shifting by the hour, you are entirely correct. asserted
you → feel → hour
The breakneck velocity of this technological revolution has outpaced conventional politics, culminating in a historic convergence this week that finally forced world leaders to confront the reality of what President Donald Trump has accurately termed “super intelligence.” asserted
Trump → outpace → what
As a physician, researcher, and civic leader, I look at the advancement of AI not just as a political talking point but through the lens of systemic complexity — much like genomics or molecular pathology. asserted
I → look → genomics
The data shifting before us is staggering. asserted
data → shift → us
In New York, the CEOs of America’s leading frontier AI labs stood before the U.N. Security Council to warn that their unreleased, hyper-capable models are threatening global stability. asserted
models → lead → stability
Reports have flooded Silicon Valley detailing spontaneous “agent swarms” — instances in which advanced AI models during testing managed to bypass guardrails, interact with the open internet, and communicate with one another in ways their creators struggled to track. asserted
creators → flood → ways
We are building systems capable of unprecedented autonomous behavior, presenting genuine national security risks to our electrical grids, financial networks, and defense infrastructure. asserted
We → build → grids
It was against this explosive backdrop that Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping sat down in Washington for their high-stakes summit. asserted
Trump → sit → summit
While the two nations quietly explored pragmatic baseline protocols — such as a crisis “notification mechanism” to prevent accidental, AI-driven military escalations — the ideological chasm remains vast. asserted
chasm → explore → escalations
Xi publicly insisted that AI must always remain under strict “human control,” signaling Beijing’s intent to weaponize the technology as an instrument of total state surveillance and autocratic power. asserted
AI → insist → surveillance
Meanwhile, Trump boldly cut through the bureaucratic panic, signaling that the White House has no appetite for heavy-handed domestic regulations that would cripple our edge and stating that our primary guardrails remain the rule of law and the Department of Justice. asserted
guardrails → cut → Justice
Following his address to the U.N. General Assembly, the administration went so far as to issue directives through the State Department ordering diplomats to retire the term “artificial intelligence” in favor of “super intelligence” in communications. asserted
administration → follow → communications
Trump’s instinct is spot on because the only thing more dangerous than the rise of super intelligence is a world where the Chinese Communist Party controls it first. asserted
Party → control → it
To navigate this 360-degree pivot in human history, we must be clear-eyed about the dual nature of what we are unleashing. asserted
we → navigate → what
If left to corporate monopolies or weaponized by foreign adversaries, rogue autonomous software could inflict billions in cyber damage or manipulate the very fabric of public trust. uncertain
software → leave → trust
But we cannot allow fear to paralyze us. asserted
fear → allow → us
Properly harnessed by American ingenuity and private enterprise, AI holds the key to the next great leap in human flourishing. asserted
AI → harness → flourishing
It possesses the computing majesty to eradicate terminal diseases, revolutionize clean energy production, optimize failing supply chains, and unlock levels of economic productivity never before seen in human history. asserted
It → possess → history
Militarily, it will be the ultimate shield, allowing American forces to deter aggression and maintain peace through absolute, undeniable cognitive dominance. asserted
forces → allow → dominance
Voices, including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), have gone so far as to demand a complete halt on AI development, while tech monopolists quietly lobby for regulatory action that conveniently locks out competition from scrappy American startups. asserted
that → include → startups
Pushing for a domestic “pause” or choking our developers in red tape is a form of unilateral technological disarmament. asserted
Pushing → push → disarmament
As I have previously advocated in these pages, “The architects of this technology are sounding the alarm. asserted
architects → advocate → alarm
Our leaders must listen and act. asserted
leaders → listen → ?
We can out-innovate China without sacrificing human control over our society. asserted
We → innovate → society
But that requires Washington to step up, set the benchmarks, and lead.” asserted
that → require → benchmarks
America did not conquer the microchip, the internet, or the split atom by cowering before the risks. asserted
America → conquer → risks
We succeeded because we managed the dangers while boldly seizing the greatness. asserted
we → succeed → greatness
As Washington and Beijing draw their battle lines in this new era, the path forward for the United States is clear: we must respect the profound power of super intelligence by demanding rigorous corporate product safety standards and robust cyber defenses. asserted
we → draw → standards
But we must never surrender our competitive fire. asserted
we → surrender → fire
The future of global liberty depends on American innovators moving faster, building smarter, and ensuring that the most powerful technology ever created is rooted in Western freedom, not digital totalitarianism. asserted
technology → depend → freedom
Washington must choose to lead, choose to secure, and ultimately, choose to win. asserted
Washington → choose → ?
Dr. Eric Wargotz is a practicing physician and pathologist, a clinical professor emeritus at George Washington University, and a Maryland civic leader who writes frequently on artificial intelligence, foreign policy, national security, and political strategy. asserted
who → practice → intelligence
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support